Next Article in Journal
Dermatitis Herpetiformis: A Common Extraintestinal Manifestation of Coeliac Disease
Next Article in Special Issue
The Association of Vitamin D Levels with Common Pregnancy Complications
Previous Article in Journal
Supporting Mothers of Very Preterm Infants and Breast Milk Production: A Review of the Role of Galactogogues
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impact of Dietary Macronutrient Intake during Early and Late Gestation on Offspring Body Composition at Birth, 1, 3, and 5 Years of Age

Nutrients 2018, 10(5), 601; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10050601

Review
Maternal Anemia and Low Birth Weight: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
1
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Brasilia, Brasília 70910-900, Distrito Federal, Brazil
2
Department of Health, Feira de Santana State University, Feira de Santana 44036-900, Bahia, Brazil
3
Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Brasilia; Brasília 70910-900, Distrito Federal, Brazil
4
Department of Epidemiology, Federal University of Recôncavo da Bahia, Santo Antônio de Jesus 44.570-000, Bahia, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 22 January 2018 / Accepted: 1 May 2018 / Published: 12 May 2018

Abstract

:
Objective: To systematically analyze the relationship between maternal anemia and low birth weight. Methods: A search of studies was conducted in the main databases (Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, SciELO, and Lilacs), the gray literature, and the reference lists of selected articles. Cohort and case-control studies that met the eligibility criteria were included in the review. There was no limitation on the language or date of publication. Article selection and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. Meta-analyses with random effects, subgroup analyses and meta-regressions were performed. Publication bias was measured using Egger regression and visual funnel plot inspection. Results: A total of 7243 articles were found, of which 71 comprised the systematic review and 68 were included in the meta-analyses. Maternal anemia was associated with low birth weight with an adjusted OR: 1.23 (95% CI: 1.06–1.43) and I2: 58%. The meta-regressions confirmed that the sample size and the methodological quality may partially explain the statistical heterogeneity. Conclusions: Maternal anemia was considered a risk factor for low birth weight.
Keywords:
anemia; pregnancy; low birth weight; cohort study; systematic review

1. Introduction

Worldwide, approximately 7–15% of all live births each year are of low birth weight, a gestational outcome that is considered a major public health problem and is more prevalent in countries with fewer financial resources [1].
Children born weighing less than 2500 g are more prone to infant morbidity and mortality [2,3]. Inadequate biological, social, economic, environmental, and lifestyle factors, either prior to or during pregnancy, may favor low birth weight [2,4,5]. Some nutritional aspects, such as a low nutritional diet and inadequate weight gain during pregnancy, contribute to a lower intake of the nutrients considered important for fetal growth, such as B vitamins and iron [6].
Ionic iron is the mineral that promotes the formation of new hemoglobin and is the main source of energy and oxygen transportation to the organs of the body [6]. Maternal anemia can develop due to both the unavailability of this element in the extracellular environment for erythropoiesis and the presence of infectious processes, which may influence the metabolism of new hemoglobin [7]. In general, the diagnosis of maternal anemia is defined by hemoglobin levels below 11 g/dL [8,9,10].
Reduced levels of hemoglobin favor changes in placental angiogenesis, limiting the availability of oxygen to the fetus and, consequently causing potential restriction of intrauterine growth and low birth weight [11]. Pregnant women with hemoglobin levels below 11 g/dL are at higher risk of having low birth weight children compared with women who do not have anemia during pregnancy [12].
The most recent data for overall prevalence of maternal anemia, estimated in 2011, was 38.2%. The event occurs throughout the world, and only in North America is its prevalence less than 20%. The prevalence of maternal anemia is distributed among the continents as follows: Europe (24.5%), Latin America and the Caribbean (28.3%), Oceania (29%), Asia (39.3%), and Africa (44.6%) [8]. Due to the worldwide occurrence of this disease, maternal anemia demands attention, not only because it affects the health condition of the mother, but also because it is related to undesirable gestational outcomes [8].
Despite the need to investigate maternal anemia and low birth weight, two relevant public health problems, there are few robust reviews which include women from diverse countries and socioeconomic conditions. Only one systematic review was found and it was limited to cohort studies developed up to 2014 and evaluated various gestational outcomes in women residing in low- and middle-income countries [12]. Another systematic review on maternal anemia and gestational outcomes published in 2013 was identified; it used both cohort and case-control investigations conducted up to 2010 [13]. In addition, other systematic reviews, published in 2012 and 2015, proposed to evaluate the impact of iron sulfate supplementation on low birth weight [14,15,16].
In view of the scarcity of recent review studies regarding the association between maternal anemia and low birth weight that include information from different continents and diverse socioeconomic conditions, this article aimed to systematically assess the relationship between maternal anemia and low birth weight through cohort and case-control studies carried out in several countries around the world.

2. Methods

2.1. Registration and Protocol

A search for systematic reviews on the subject was conducted in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database and no records were found. The systematic review was registered in PROSPERO under protocol number CRD42017069451.

2.2. Eligibility Criteria for the Studies

The eligibility criteria consisted of cohort and case-control studies assessing the relationship between maternal anemia (hemoglobin levels <11 g/dL) and low birth weight (<2500 g). Investigations involving women diagnosed with anemia of a genetic origin or with self-reported exposure or outcomes were excluded. There was no restriction on the date of publication or the language used.

2.3. Information Sources

The search for information was performed up to 5 January 2018. The electronic databases used were Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, SciELO, and Lilacs. The reference lists of the articles selected for the systematic review were examined to locate citations of references. Additionally, abstracts from congresses and specific databases containing gray literature texts that met the eligibility criteria established in this review were examined.

2.4. Search Strategies

The descriptors used and their synonyms were identified in the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and Embase Subject Headings (Emtree). The uniterms and Boolean operators in English used in the search strategies were (anemia OR anaemia OR haemoglobin OR hemoglobin OR haematocrit OR hematocrit) AND (Pregnancy OR Pregnant women OR Gravidity OR Maternal exposure OR Mother OR Pregnant OR Gravid OR Obstetric OR Antenatal OR Antepartum OR Gestation) AND (Infant, Low birth weight) AND (Case-control studies OR Retrospective studies OR Case-control study OR Study, Case-control OR Studies, case-control OR Case-comparison studies OR Cohort studies OR Longitudinal studies OR Follow-up studies OR Prospective studies OR Cohort OR longitudinal OR Prospective OR Retrospective OR Incidence study OR Follow-up OR Case control OR Meta-analysis). The search strategy was adapted for the other electronic databases used (Supplementary File 1).

2.5. Studies Selection

Two reviewers (ACMGF and PPSP) selected articles by reading titles and abstracts. During the article selection process, the researchers were not aware of the decisions one another made. After this phase, two researchers (ACMGF and RBS) independently read the full text of the previously selected articles. Articles that met the eligibility criteria were included in the systematic review. In cases where there was divergence between the researchers, the inclusion or exclusion of the articles was decided by consensus (ACMGF, PPSP, and RBS).

2.6. Extraction of Data

Data were extracted from the included articles by two independent researchers (ACMGF and RBS) and subsequently confronted. The data were entered into an electronic form in Excel containing the following fields: author’s name, year of publication, place and year of study, objective, study design, sample size, data collection location, data source, criteria for anemia diagnosis, frequency of maternal anemia, percentage of low birth weight infants, association measurements and confidence intervals, and confounding covariables. When the data were not available in the articles, the authors of the studies were contacted.

2.7. Evaluation of Study Quality

The quality of the selected studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa instrument [17] recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration for cohort and case-control observational studies. It consists of eight questions composed of three axes: study selection, comparability and verification of exposure, and outcome investigated. This instrument has a classification system in which an article receives stars for each criterion met. The categories of quality classification for studies are (1) low quality—when the article receives up to 3 stars, (2) moderate quality—from 4 to 6 stars, and (3) high quality—from 7 to 9 stars.

2.8. Data Analysis

A statistical description of the studies and the results related to maternal anemia and low birth weight was performed. Statistical heterogeneity was measured using the chi-square test (p < 0.10) and the Higgins and Thompson I-square (I2), and the magnitude of the inconsistency was evaluated [18]. I2 values above 50% were considered high, values of 25% to 50% were considered moderate, and values less than 25% were considered low [18].
The summary of exposure and outcome frequency was calculated with 95% confidence intervals using the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation technique [19]. The DerSimonian-Laird method was used for the random-effects meta-analysis to obtain the global association measurement, odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals [18]. When the cohort study findings were shown to have relative risk, this association measurement was converted to an odds ratio according to criteria defined by Zhang [20]. To evaluate the mean difference in birth weight, the nonstandard technique was used in the meta-analysis of random effects.
Publication bias was analyzed using Begg’s funnel plot and Egger regression with a significance level of 5% [18]. The trim-and-fill test was performed to identify the possible effects of the absence of studies related to the summary association measurement in the meta-analysis.
Sensitivity analysis, subgroup analyses and meta-regressions were also performed to verify the source of heterogeneity in the studies used in the systematic review. In the subgroup analyses and meta-regressions, the following covariables were used: study design (prospective cohort, retrospective cohort, case-control), data collection location (hospital, primary health units, community), differential diagnosis of maternal anemia (maternal anemia, iron deficiency anemia), hemoglobin levels (<11 g/dL; <10.6 g/dL; <10 g/dL; <8 g/dL), severity levels of maternal anemia as classified in the study (mild, moderate, severe), gestational trimester when maternal anemia was diagnosed (first, second, third), magnitude of the association measurement (<2; ≥2), Human Development Index (very high, high, medium, low), geographic region (America, Africa, Asia, Europe, Oceania), sample size (<1000; ≥1000), and the year the research was initiated (<1990, 1990–2000, 2001–2010, 2011–2017). Data analysis was performed using the statistical package STATA® version 15. (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX, USA), Serial number: 301506206729.

3. Results

3.1. Selected Studies

From the database searches, 7243 records were identified. After duplicates were removed and titles and abstracts were read, 534 articles were selected for full reading. Only 71 texts met the eligibility criteria of this systematic review (Figure 1). The publication period for the evaluated investigations was from 1986 to 2017.

3.2. General Characteristics and Quality of Studies

The population included in this review consisted of 916,990 pregnant women with a mean age of 26 years. Of the total number of selected studies, 54 cohort studies and 17 case-control studies (Table 1) were identified. Much of the research was conducted between 2000 and 2010 in Asian countries with a high Human Development Index, and in a hospital environment.
The definition of maternal anemia used in most studies was hemoglobin levels below 11 g/dL, and more than half of the studies collected this information from medical records. Only 20 studies included information regarding the severity of maternal anemia, and of the six studies that diagnosed pregnant women with iron deficiency anemia, only three reported the ferritin level to confirm the differential diagnosis. The methodological quality of the studies was considered moderate (mean: 6.6), and no selected articles were of low quality.
For the meta-analysis of maternal anemia proportion, 50 studies were included. To estimate the overall frequency of low birth weight, 51 studies were selected as they contained all the information necessary to generate the summary measurement. Three of the studies included in this review [21,22,23] did not include the association measurement and mean birth weight in their findings. However, the authors stated that maternal anemia was considered a risk factor for low birth weight.
To generate the summary association measurement, 56 studies were included in the meta-analysis as they presented association measurements or information that made the calculation of the odds ratio possible. Of these, 36 presented only crude measurements, 19 presented crude and adjusted measurements, and one investigation included only the adjusted measurement. Among these investigations, the covariables most frequently considered in adjustment of the association measurements were maternal age, maternal level of education, hypertensive gestational disease, and gestational age.
For the summary measurement of the mean difference in birth weight, only 12 studies were selected for the meta-analysis. Although 14 studies measured mean birth weight according to the presence of maternal anemia, two of these were not considered eligible because they did not present sufficient data to calculate the overall measurement [24,25].

3.3. Maternal Anemia and Low Birth Weight

The summary frequencies of exposure and outcome, calculated using proportional meta-analysis, were 34% (95% CI: 29%, 40%) and 14% (95% CI: 12%, 15%), respectively.
In this systematic review, the meta-analysis summarized the crude odds ratio as 1.49 (95% CI: 1.36, 1.63) and I2 as 86% (Figure 2), which represents a statistically significant association between maternal anemia and low birth weight, although with high heterogeneity. The Egger test (p < 0.01) and the funnel plot showed publication bias for the crude association measurement (Figure 3). If there had been no publication bias, the expected association measurement would be 1.18 (95% CI: 1.07, 1.29) according to the trim-and-fill test.
The overall association estimate for the adjusted odds ratio was 1.23 (95% CI: 1.06, 1.43), with 58% heterogeneity (Figure 4) and no publication bias (Egger’s test: p = 0.72). This finding was confirmed by the trim-and-fill test, which showed that the number of publications and the association measurement expected consistent with the estimate measured in the present systematic review.
The meta-analysis of global mean difference showed that the children of pregnant women with maternal anemia presented a mean reduction of 60.55 g (95% CI: −111.38, −9.71, I2: 96%) in birth weight compared with the children of women with normal hemoglobin levels, and there was no publication bias (Egger: p = 0.611). The trim-and-fill test confirmed that the findings presented are similar to the expected mean difference.
The sensitivity analysis identified 9 studies that were considered outliers and that produced distortion in the crude [83,84,85] and adjusted [24,40,42,48,72,83,86] summary measurements, although they were included in the qualitative evaluation of the investigations. The subgroup analysis for the crude and adjusted odds ratio indicated that for most of the variables evaluated, the association measurement continued to be associated with low birth weight, even after stratification (Table 2). Multiple meta-regressions for the crude association measurement confirmed that the strength of the association measurement (p < 0.01), geographic location (p = 0.02), and sample size (p < 0.01) may have been the possible causes of heterogeneity. For the adjusted association measurement, the sample size (p = 0.01) and the methodological quality of the studies (p = 0.01) were the possible explanation.

4. Discussion

The main findings of this systematic review show that maternal anemia is a risk factor for low birth weight. These results were confirmed through a meta-analysis of the mean difference in birth weight, which showed that the children of women with maternal anemia had a reduction in birth weight compared with those whose mothers did not develop anemia. The methodological quality of the longitudinal studies used in this systematic review, which included case-control and cohort designs, was considered moderate to high, and the studies were performed in different countries across all continents.
Of the previous systematic reviews on the subject, four corroborated the present findings. They also showed moderate and high heterogeneity in their meta-analyses; however, they only used longitudinal studies to evaluate the relationship between maternal anemia and neonatal events and did not focus specifically on low birth weight [12,13,87,88]. Rahman et al. [12] evaluated exposure and outcomes in 17 cohort studies with high methodological quality, but only included data from low- and middle-income countries. Sukrat et al. [13] used only two databases to track their studies on this topic, and to perform the meta-analysis, they included association measurements from only 10 longitudinal studies according to a cutoff point based on hemoglobin levels.
The other two reviews [87,88] included cross-sectional investigations in addition to cohort and case-control studies. This fact may have contributed negatively to the results of their meta-analyses since the temporality of the events was not considered in the estimation of the summary association measurement. Only Anand and Leonardi-Bee [87] corroborated the present review’s findings from the meta-analysis of the mean difference in birth weight; however, they used a small sample size of only five studies.
This systematic review also provided an estimation of the global frequency of maternal anemia originating from the proportional meta-analysis, which corroborates the most recent official data [8]. Although there is significant regional variation in the occurrence of maternal anemia, the summary measurement presented in this systematic review was able to reproduce this proportion more reliably at the global level because it included studies from countries on all continents, regardless of their socioeconomic conditions.
The proportion of studies conducted in Asian countries was much higher than in other countries on other continents and it could have influenced association measurements in the subgroup analysis according to geographic region. On the other hand, if the findings were evaluated through the Human Development Index (HDI), the measurement indicates more clearly the presence of an association between maternal anemia and low birth weight, in the different countries according to the socioeconomic stratum of the referred populations. Similarly, the overall percentage of low birth weight children is similar to that reported by the World Health Organization for various countries [89].
Most of the studies in this systematic review presented findings based on a diagnosis of maternal anemia that used a lower severity cutoff. This fact shows how a narrow diagnosis of maternal anemia predominates in the studies. In the present systematic review, the positive association between maternal anemia and low birth weight was verified using subgroup analyses that included both the presence of anemia and its severity level due to the need for more accurate anemia diagnosis.
Another important issue is the high heterogeneity found among the studies, which could be attributed to regional differences in research; to specific characteristics of populations, such as health, socioeconomic and nutritional status; or to the different diagnostic definitions of maternal anemia [6,90]. Countries with a low Human Development Index show an increase in the magnitude of the association between maternal anemia and low birth weight; this association is supported by the findings of this review and justifies the high heterogeneity encountered in the present study.
Of the variables mentioned above, only the Human Development Index was identified as a source of heterogeneity in the subgroup analysis of the present systematic review. Multiple meta-regression showed that the high I2 in the crude association measurement could be partially explained by geographic region, sample size. and the strength of the association measurement of the studies used in the meta-analysis. For the adjusted measurement, the sample size and methodological quality of the studies were possible explanations for the high heterogeneity observed.
Regarding the limitations of this review, the publication bias of the crude association measurement stands out, despite a wide search in several databases that had not been previously investigated in other systematic reviews. In an attempt to minimize bias, texts from the gray literature were inserted, and the authors of the published articles that did not provide some data considered relevant for this review were contacted.
Furthermore, in relation to prematurity, although this is strongly associated with low birth weight, it was not included in this meta-analysis due to the scarcity of information about gestational age related to birth weight and maternal anemia. Consequently, the global association measurements between the exposure and the outcome, by gestational age subgroups, could not be obtained in this investigation.
To identify the possible effects of the absence of studies from the meta-analysis of the summary association measurement, the trim-and-fill test for the crude association measurement was used. As a result, a 19% reduction in the odds ratio was observed, together with the need for an additional 14 articles to be added to the meta-analysis to correct this measurement. In the present review, 71 studies were included, but only 58 presented sufficient information to calculate the crude summary measurement of the meta-analysis, demonstrating that 13 studies may have shown reporting bias. Of these, three were excluded because they were considered outliers and may have led to an overestimation of the meta-analytic odds ratio. However, when the publication bias was evaluated with and without the inclusion of these outliers, no change in the results was observed.
The difference between the crude and adjusted summary association measurement was lower than 17%, showing that although there one of the measurements showed publication bias, the studies’ findings point in the same direction: namely, they indicate that maternal anemia may be an important risk factor for low birth weight. However, this result should be interpreted with caution due to the high heterogeneity among the studies, which can be considered an indicator of inconsistency [91,92,93,94,95,96].
Another limitation was the use of different risk measurements (relative risk and odds ratios) in the meta-analysis. To correct the possible effects of this combination of measurements, all relative risks were converted into odds ratios. To verify the effect of this conversion on the meta-analysis, a sensitivity analysis was performed, and the articles that presented a relative risk and an outcome occurrence higher than 10% were excluded [20]. However, the difference was insignificant. Another aspect that reinforces this finding is that the two types of association measurements have a tendency to present similar results since the outcome investigated is considered rare, which minimizes the possible impact of this measurement difference [20].
The strengths of this review include the high number of databases employed, the use of research techniques and validated instruments, such as the Newcastle Quality Survey Scale-Ottawa [17] and the Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE), to evaluate the studies and draft the systematic reviews [97]. In addition, the subgroup analyses to measure possible associations between exposure and outcome used covariables that are considered epidemiologically important.
In terms of minimizing the information bias, another positive aspect was the use of original surveys that obtained information from reliable exposure and outcome measures, such as laboratory tests and medical records, rather than self-reported data.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic review to include research on the subject conducted in all continents using a large number of longitudinal studies. Although the present findings indicate that maternal anemia is associated with low birth weight, they also signal the need for further longitudinal research on this topic, with an evaluation of the various types of anemia in pregnant women. The relationship between anemia and low birth weight could be better understood through more robust methods, which would improve the quality of scientific evidence on the topic and provide more effective preventive and health-promotion measures for mothers and children.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/10/5/601/s1, Supplementary 1: Search strategy.

Author Contributions

A.C.M.G.F., I.S.G.F., P.P.S.P., F.A.F.M., R.B.S., A.O.L., E.S.S., S.S.C., M.G.P.: Study concept, manuscript writing, critical revision, and approval of final manuscript. All authors are accountable for all aspects of this work and for ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Acknowledgments

Financial support from the Research Support Foundation of the State of Bahia (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia-FAPESB)–PPSUS 0025/2014, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil, and the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico-CNPq)–Universal 457809/2014-0, Brasília, Brazil.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. UNICEF. Low Birthweight: Country, Regional and Global Estimates; UNICEF: New York, NY, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lawani, L.O.; Iyoke, C.A.; Onoh, R.C.; Nkwo, P.O.; Ibrahim, I.A.; Ekwedigwe, K.C.; Ekine, A.A. Obstetric benefits of health insurance: A comparative analysis of obstetric indices and outcome of enrollees and non-enrollees in southeast Nigeria. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2016, 36, 946–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Petrou, S. Economic consequences of preterm birth and low birthweight. Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2003, 110 (Suppl. 20), 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bird, A.L.; Grant, C.C.; Bandara, D.K.; Mohal, J.; Atatoa-Carr, P.E.; Wise, M.R.; Inskip, H.; Miyahara, M.; Morton, S.M. Maternal health in pregnancy and associations with adverse birth outcomes: Evidence from growing up in New Zealand. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2017, 57, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Harvey, E.M.; Strobino, D.; Sherrod, L.; Webb, M.C.; Anderson, C.; White, J.A.; Atlas, R. Community-Academic Partnership to Investigate Low Birth Weight Deliveries and Improve Maternal and Infant Outcomes at a Baltimore City Hospital. Matern. Child Health J. 2017, 21, 260–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Brannon, P.M.; Taylor, C.L. Iron Supplementation during Pregnancy and Infancy: Uncertainties and Implications for Research and Policy. Nutrients 2017, 9, 1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Grotto, H.Z.W. Metabolismo do ferro: Uma revisão sobre os principais mecanismos envolvidos em sua homeostase. Rev. Bras. Hematol. Hemoter. 2008, 30, 390–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. World Health Organization (WHO). The Global Prevalence of Anaemia in 2011; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Recommendations to prevent and control iron deficiency in the United States. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. MMWR Recomm. Rep. 1998, 47, 1–29. [Google Scholar]
  10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). CDC criteria for anemia in children and childbearing-aged women. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 1989, 38, 400–404. [Google Scholar]
  11. Stangret, A.; Wnuk, A.; Szewczyk, G.; Pyzlak, M.; Szukiewicz, D. Maternal hemoglobin concentration and hematocrit values may affect fetus development by influencing placental angiogenesis. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017, 30, 199–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Rahman, M.M.; Abe, S.K.; Rahman, M.S.; Kanda, M.; Narita, S.; Bilano, V.; Ota, E.; Gilmour, S.; Shibuya, K. Maternal anemia and risk of adverse birth and health outcomes in low-and middle-income countries: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016, 103, 495–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sukrat, B.; Wilasrusmee, C.; Siribumrungwong, B.; McEvoy, M.; Okascharoen, C.; Attia, J.; Thakkinstian, A. Hemoglobin concentration and pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Biomed. Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 769057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Peña-Rosas, J.P.; De-Regil, L.M.; Garcia-Casal, M.N.; Dowswell, T. Daily oral iron supplementation during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015, CD004736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Peña-Rosas, J.P.; De-Regil, L.M.; Gomez Malave, H.; Flores-Urrutia, M.C.; Dowswell, T. Intermittent oral iron supplementation during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015, CD009997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Peña-Rosas, J.P.; De-Regil, L.M.; Dowswell, T.; Viteri, F.E. Daily oral iron supplementation during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2012, 12, CD004736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wells, G.; Shea, B.; O’Connell, D.; Peterson, J.; Welch, V.; Losos, M.; Tugwell, P. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses; The Ottawa Hospital: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  18. Higgins, J.P.; Thompson, S.G. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat. Med. 2002, 21, 1539–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Freeman, M.F.; Tukey, J.W. Transformations related to the angular and the square root. Ann. Math. Stat. 1950, 21, 607–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, J.; Yu, K.F. What’s the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1998, 280, 1690–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Buzyan, L.O. Mild anemia as a protective factor against pregnancy loss. Int. J. Risk Saf. Med. 2015, 27 (Suppl. 1), S7–S8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Rizvi, S.A.; Hatcher, J.; Jehan, I.; Qureshi, R. Maternal risk factors associated with low birth weight in Karachi: A case-control study. East. Mediterr. Health J. 2007, 13, 1343–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Rodriguez, O.T.S.; Szarfarc, S.C.; d’Aquino Benicio, M.H. Anemia e desnutrição maternas e sua relação com o peso ao nascer. Rev. Saúde Pública 1991, 25, 193–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Malhotra, M.; Sharma, J.B.; Batra, S.; Sharma, S.; Murthy, N.S.; Arora, R. Maternal and perinatal outcome in varying degrees of anemia. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2002, 79, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Duthie, S.J.; King, P.A.; To, W.K.; Lopes, A.; Ma, H.K. A case controlled study of pregnancy complicated by severe maternal anaemia. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1991, 31, 125–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Abeysena, C.; Jayawardana, P.; de A Seneviratne, R. Maternal haemoglobin level at booking visit and its effect on adverse pregnancy outcome. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2010, 50, 423–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ahankari, A.S.; Myles, P.R.; Dixit, J.V.; Tata, L.J.; Fogarty, A.W. Risk factors for maternal anaemia and low birth weight in pregnant women living in rural India: A prospective cohort study. Public Health. 2017, 151, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ahmad, Z.; Jaafar, R.; Hassan, M.M.; Othman, M.S.; Hashim, A. Anaemia during pregnancy in rural Kelantan. Malays. J. Nutr. 1997, 3, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  29. Al-Sibai, M.H.; Khwaja, S.S.; al-Suleiman, S.A.; Magbool, G. The low birth-weight infants of Saudi adolescents: Maternal implications. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1987, 27, 320–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ali, A.A.; Rayis, D.A.; Abdallah, T.M.; Elbashir, M.I.; Adam, I. Severe anaemia is associated with a higher risk for preeclampsia and poor perinatal outcomes in Kassala hospital, eastern Sudan. BMC Res. Notes 2011, 4, 311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Bakacak, M.; Avci, F.; Ercan, O.; Köstü, B.; Serin, S.; Kiran, G.; Bostanci, M.S.; Bakacak, Z. The effect of maternal hemoglobin concentration on fetal birth weight according to trimesters. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015, 28, 2106–2110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Bakhtiar, U.J.; Khan, Y.; Nasar, R. Relationship between maternal hemoglobin and Perinatal outcome. Rawal Med. J. 2007, 32, 102–104. [Google Scholar]
  33. Bhalerao, A.; Kawthalkar, A.; Ghike, S.; Joshi, S. Anemia during Pregnancy: Most Preventableyet most Prevalent. J. South Asian Fed. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2011, 3, 75–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bian, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, Q.; Wu, D.; Wang, S. Maternal risk factors for low birth weight for term births in a developed region in China: A hospital-based study of 55,633 pregnancies. J. Biomed. Res. 2013, 27, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Bodeau-Livinec, F.; Briand, V.; Berger, J.; Xiong, X.; Massougbodji, A.; Day, K.P.; Cot, M. Maternal anemia in Benin: Prevalence, risk factors, and association with low birth weight. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2011, 85, 414–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Bondevik, G.T.; Lie, R.T.; Ulstein, M.; Kvåle, G. Maternal hematological status and risk of low birth weight and preterm delivery in Nepal. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2001, 80, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Chang, S.C.; O’Brien, K.O.; Nathanson, M.S.; Mancini, J.; Witter, F.R. Hemoglobin concentrations influence birth outcomes in pregnant African-American adolescents. J. Nutr. 2003, 133, 2348–2355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Cosme, J.A.G.; Hechavarría, E.M.; Miralles, R.M.F.; Isaac, R.C.; Blanco, Y.V. Factores de riesgo del bajo peso al nacer en el hospital materno de Palma Soriano durante un trienio Risk factors of low birth weight in Palma Soriano Maternal Hospital during a triennium. Medisan 2009, 13, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  39. El Guindi, W.; Pronost, J.; Carles, G.; Largeaud, M.; El Gareh, N.; Montoya, Y.; Arbeille, P. Anémies maternelles sévèreset issues de grossesse. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. 2004, 33, 506–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Elhassan, E.M.; Abbaker, A.O.; Haggaz, A.D.; Abubaker, M.S.; Adam, I. Anaemia and low birth weight in Medani, Hospital Sudan. BMC Res. Notes 2010, 3, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Gaillard, R.; Eilers, P.H.; Yassine, S.; Hofman, A.; Steegers, E.A.; Jaddoe, V.W. Risk factors and consequences of maternal anaemia and elevated haemoglobin levels during pregnancy: A population-based prospective cohort study. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 2014, 28, 213–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ganesh Kumar, S.; Harsha Kumar, H.N.; Jayaram, S.; Kotian, M.S. Determinants of low birth weight: A case control study in a district hospital in Karnataka. Indian J. Pediatr. 2010, 77, 87–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Geelhoed, D.; Agadzi, F.; Visser, L.; Ablordeppey, E.; Asare, K.; O’Rourke, P.; van Leeuwen, J.S.; van Roosmalen, J. Maternal and fetal outcome after severe anemia in pregnancy in rural Ghana. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2006, 85, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Hämäläinen, H.; Hakkarainen, K.; Heinonen, S. Anaemia in the first but not in the second or third trimester is a risk factor for low birth weight. Clin. Nutr. 2003, 22, 271–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Heredia-Olivera, K.; Munares-García, O. Factores maternos asociados al bajo peso al nacer. Rev. Med. Inst. Mex. Seguro Soc. 2016, 54, 562–567. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Hirve, S.S.; Ganatra, B.R. Determinants of low birth weight: A community based prospective cohort study. Indian Pediatr. 1994, 31, 1221–1225. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  47. Hosain, G.M.; Chatterjee, N.; Begum, A.; Saha, S.C. Factors associated with low birthweight in rural Bangladesh. J. Trop. Pediatr. 2006, 52, 87–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Ilunga, P.M.; Mukuku, O.; Mawaw, P.M.; Mutombo, A.M.; Lubala, T.K.; Shongo Ya Pongombo, M.; Kakudji Luhete, P.; Wembonyama, S.O.; Mutombo Kabamba, A.; Luboya Numbi, O. Risk factors for low birth weight in Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of the Congo. Med. Sante Trop. 2016, 26, 386–390. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  49. Knottnerus, J.A.; Delgado, L.R.; Knipschild, P.G.; Essed, G.G.; Smits, F. Haematologic parameters and pregnancy outcome. A prospective cohort study in the third trimester. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1990, 43, 461–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Koura, G.K.; Ouedraogo, S.; Le Port, A.; Watier, L.; Cottrell, G.; Guerra, J.; Massougbodji, A.; Garcia, A. Anaemia during pregnancy: Impact on birth outcome and infant haemoglobin level during the first 18 months of life. Trop. Med. Int. Health 2012, 17, 283–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Kumar, A.; Chaudhary, K.; Prasad, S. Maternal indicators and obstetric outcome in the north Indian population: A hospital-based study. J. Postgrad. Med. 2010, 56, 192–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Lee, H.S.; Kim, M.S.; Kim, M.H.; Kim, Y.J.; Kim, W.Y. Iron status and its association with pregnancy outcome in Korean pregnant women. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2006, 60, 1130–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Levy, A.; Fraser, D.; Katz, M.; Mazor, M.; Sheiner, E. Maternal anemia during pregnancy is an independent risk factor for low birthweight and preterm delivery. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2005, 122, 182–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Lone, F.W.; Qureshi, R.N.; Emanuel, F. Maternal anaemia and its impact on perinatal outcome. Trop. Med. Int. Health 2004, 9, 486–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Masukume, G.; Khashan, A.S.; Kenny, L.C.; Baker, P.N.; Nelson, G.; Consortium, S. Risk factors and birth outcomes of anaemia in early pregnancy in a nulliparous cohort. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0122729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Mir, M.K.; Yousaf, S.; Ilyas, A.; Tahir, S. Maternal anemia is a risk factor for low birth weight babies at Term. Pak. J. Med. Health Sci. 2016, 10, 741–743. [Google Scholar]
  57. Misra, A.; Ray, S.; Patrikar, S. A longitudinal study to determine association of various maternal factors with neonatal birth weight at a tertiary care hospital. Med. J. Armed Forces India 2015, 71, 270–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Msuya, S.E.; Hussein, T.H.; Uriyo, J.; Sam, N.E.; Stray-Pedersen, B. Anaemia among pregnant women in northern Tanzania: Prevalence, risk factors and effect on perinatal outcomes. Tanzan. J. Health Res. 2011, 13, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Nasiri-Amiri, F.; Hajiahmadi, M.; Basirat, Z. Maternal hematocrit status affecting pregnancy outcome. Iran. Red Crescent Med. J. 2007, 9, 104–108. [Google Scholar]
  60. Negandhi, P.H.; Negandhi, H.N.; Zodpey, S.P.; Ughade, S.N.; Biranjan, J.R. Risk factors for low birth weight in an Indian urban setting: A nested case control study. Asia Pac. J. Public Health 2014, 26, 461–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Padhi, B.K.; Baker, K.K.; Dutta, A.; Cumming, O.; Freeman, M.C.; Satpathy, R.; Das, B.S.; Panigrahi, P. Risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes among women practicing poor sanitation in rural India: A population-based prospective cohort study. PLoS Med. 2015, 12, e1001851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Patabendige, M.; Dias, T.; Gunasena, J.; Motha, C.M.B.; Palihawadana, T.; Herath, R.P.; Wijesinghe, P.S. Retrospective study on anaemia in pregnancy: Effect on fetal and labour outcomes. In Proceedings of the RCOG World Congress 2017, Cape Town, South Africa, 20–22 March 2017. [Google Scholar]
  63. Perveen, S.; Soomro, T.K. Sideropaenic anaemia: Impact on perinatal outcome at tertiary care hospital. J. Pak. Med. Assoc. 2016, 66, 952–956. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  64. Ren, A.; Wang, J.; Ye, R.W.; Li, S.; Liu, J.M.; Li, Z. Low first-trimester hemoglobin and low birth weight, preterm birth and small for gestational age newborns. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2007, 98, 124–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Sananpanichkul, P.; Rujirabanjerd, S. Association between maternal body mass index and weight gain with low birth weight in eastern Thailand. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 2015, 46, 1085–1091. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  66. Scholl, T.O.; Hediger, M.L.; Fischer, R.L.; Shearer, J.W. Anemia vs iron deficiency: Increased risk of preterm delivery in a prospective study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1992, 55, 985–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Sekhavat, L.; Davar, R.; Hosseinidezoki, S. Relationship between maternal hemoglobin concentration and neonatal birth weight. Hematology 2011, 16, 373–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Sharma, S.R.; Giri, S.; Timalsina, U.; Bhandari, S.S.; Basyal, B.; Wagle, K.; Shrestha, L. Low birth weight at term and its determinants in a tertiary hospital of Nepal: A case-control study. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0123962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Shobeiri, F.; Begumb, K.; Nazari, M. A prospective study of maternal hemoglobin status of Indian women during pregnancy and pregnancy outcome. Nutr. Res. 2006, 26, 209–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Singh, A.; Arya, S.; Chellani, H.; Aggarwal, K.C.; Pandey, R.M. Prediction model for low birth weight and its validation. Indian J. Pediatr. 2014, 81, 24–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Smithers, L.G.; Gialamas, A.; Scheil, W.; Brinkman, S.; Lynch, J.W. Anaemia of pregnancy, perinatal outcomes and children’s developmental vulnerability: A whole-of-population study. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 2014, 28, 381–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Stanisic, D.I.; Moore, K.A.; Baiwog, F.; Ura, A.; Clapham, C.; King, C.L.; Siba, P.M.; Beeson, J.G.; Mueller, I.; Fowkes, F.J.; et al. Risk factors for malaria and adverse birth outcomes in a prospective cohort of pregnant women resident in a high malaria transmission area of Papua New Guinea. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2015, 109, 313–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Tzur, T.; Weintraub, A.Y.; Sergienko, R.; Sheiner, E. Can anemia in the first trimester predict obstetrical complications later in pregnancy? J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012, 25, 2454–2457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Vural, T.; Toz, E.; Ozcan, A.; Biler, A.; Ileri, A.; Inan, A.H. Can anemia predict perinatal outcomes in different stages of pregnancy? Pak. J. Med. Sci. 2016, 32, 1354–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Xiong, X.; Buekens, P.; Fraser, W.D.; Guo, Z. Anemia during pregnancy in a Chinese population. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2003, 83, 159–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Yazdani, M.; Tadbiri, M.; Shakeri, S. Maternal hemoglobin level, prematurity, and low birth weight. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2004, 85, 163–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Yildiz, Y.; Özgü, E.; Unlu, S.B.; Salman, B.; Eyi, E.G. The relationship between third trimester maternal hemoglobin and birth weight/length; results from the tertiary center in Turkey. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014, 27, 729–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Yousaf, F.; Haider, G.; Shaikh, R.B.; Haider, A.; Muhammad, N. Impact of maternal anemia on perinatal outcome. Pak. Armed Forces Med. J. 2011, 60, 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  79. Zhou, L.M.; Yang, W.W.; Hua, J.Z.; Deng, C.Q.; Tao, X.; Stoltzfus, R.J. Relation of hemoglobin measured at different times in pregnancy to preterm birth and low birth weight in Shanghai, China. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1998, 148, 998–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Dal Pizzol, T.S.; Giugliani, E.R.J.; Mengue, S.S. Associação entre o uso de sais de ferro durante a gestação e nascimento pré-termo, baixo peso ao nascer e muito baixo peso ao nascer. Cad. Saúde Pública 2009, 25, 106–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Lone, F.W.; Qureshi, R.N.; Emmanuel, F. Maternal anaemia and its impact on perinatal outcome in a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan. East. Mediterr. Health J. 2004, 10, 801–807. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  82. Human Development Report, 2016. Available online: http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/2016_human_development_report.pdf (accessed on 11 May 2018).
  83. Rukuni, R.; Bhattacharya, S.; Murphy, M.F.; Roberts, D.; Stanworth, S.J.; Knight, M. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of antenatal anemia in a Scottish population: A retrospective cohort study. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2016, 95, 555–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Steer, P.; Alam, M.A.; Wadsworth, J.; Welch, A. Relation between maternal haemoglobin concentration and birth weight in different ethnic groups. Br. Med. J. 1995, 310, 489–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. López, J.I.; Botell, M.L.; Echevarría, S.M.M.; Pérez, C.G.; Valdés-Dapena, D.P. Algunos factores de riesgo relacionados con el bajo peso al nacer. Rev. Cubana Ginecol. Obstet. 2012, 38, 45–55. [Google Scholar]
  86. Bánhidy, F.; Acs, N.; Puhó, E.H.; Czeizel, A.E. Iron deficiency anemia: Pregnancy outcomes with or without iron supplementation. Nutrition 2011, 27, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Anand, A.; Jo, L.-B. Maternal hemoglobin and birth weight: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Med. Sci. Public Health 2015, 4, 435–445. [Google Scholar]
  88. Rahmati, S.; Delpishe, A.; Azami, M.; Hafezi Ahmadi, M.R.; Sayehmiri, K. Maternal Anemia during pregnancy and infant low birth weight: A systematic review and Meta-analysis. Int. J. Reprod. Biomed. 2017, 15, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. WHO. WHA Global Nutrition Targets 2025: Low Birth Weight Policy Brief; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014; p. 7. [Google Scholar]
  90. Friedrisch, J.R.; Friedrisch, B.K. Prophylactic Iron Supplementation in Pregnancy: A Controversial Issue. Biochem. Insights 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Balshem, H.; Helfand, M.; Schünemann, H.J.; Oxman, A.D.; Kunz, R.; Brozek, J.; Vist, G.E.; Falck-Ytter, Y.; Meerpohl, J.; Norris, S.; et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2011, 64, 401–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Guyatt, G.H.; Oxman, A.D.; Kunz, R.; Woodcock, J.; Brozek, J.; Helfand, M.; Alonso-Coello, P.; Falck-Ytter, Y.; Jaeschke, R.; Vist, G.; et al. GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—Indirectness. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2011, 64, 1303–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Guyatt, G.H.; Oxman, A.D.; Montori, V.; Vist, G.; Kunz, R.; Brozek, J.; Alonso-Coello, P.; Djulbegovic, B.; Atkins, D.; Falck-Ytter, Y.; et al. GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—Publication bias. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2011, 64, 1277–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Guyatt, G.H.; Oxman, A.D.; Schünemann, H.J.; Tugwell, P.; Knottnerus, A. GRADE guidelines: A new series of articles. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2011, 64, 380–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Guyatt, G.H.; Oxman, A.D.; Vist, G.; Kunz, R.; Brozek, J.; Alonso-Coello, P.; Montori, V.; Akl, E.A.; Djulbegovic, B.; Falck-Ytter, Y.; et al. GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—Study limitations (risk of bias). J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2011, 64, 407–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Guyatt, G.; Oxman, A.D.; Akl, E.A.; Kunz, R.; Vist, G.; Brozek, J.; Norris, S.; Falck-Ytter, Y.; Glasziou, P.; DeBeer, H.; et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2011, 64, 383–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Stroup, D.F.; Berlin, J.A.; Morton, S.C.; Olkin, I.; Williamson, G.D.; Rennie, D.; Moher, D.; Becker, B.J.; Sipe, T.A.; Thacker, S.B. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: A proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2000, 283, 2008–2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flowchart of the search, selection, and inclusion of the studies.
Figure 1. Flowchart of the search, selection, and inclusion of the studies.
Nutrients 10 00601 g001
Figure 2. Meta-analysis with crude effect measurement for the evaluated studies and 95% confidence intervals [24,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79].
Figure 2. Meta-analysis with crude effect measurement for the evaluated studies and 95% confidence intervals [24,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79].
Nutrients 10 00601 g002
Figure 3. (a) Publication bias of the crude odds ratio and (b) Publication bias of the adjusted odds ratio.
Figure 3. (a) Publication bias of the crude odds ratio and (b) Publication bias of the adjusted odds ratio.
Nutrients 10 00601 g003
Figure 4. Meta-analysis with adjusted effect measurements for the evaluated studies and 95% confidence intervals [26,34,36,43,55,59,64,65,68,73,75,80,81].
Figure 4. Meta-analysis with adjusted effect measurements for the evaluated studies and 95% confidence intervals [26,34,36,43,55,59,64,65,68,73,75,80,81].
Nutrients 10 00601 g004
Table 1. Study characteristics.
Table 1. Study characteristics.
CharacteristicN%
Study design
Prospective cohort3853.6
Retrospective cohort1622.5
Case-control1723.9
Location of data collection
Hospital5881.7
Primary health units79.9
Community38.4
Differential diagnosis of exposure
Maternal anemia6591.6
Iron deficiency anemia68.4
Hemoglobin levels *
<11 g/dL5477.1
<10 g/dL1014.3
<8 g/dL68.6
Geographic region
America912.7
Africa68.4
Asia4462.0
Europe811.3
Oceania45.6
Sample size
≤10004360.6
>10002839.4
Methodological quality of the studies
Moderate4056.3
High3143.7
Year the research was initiated **
Before 1990814.0
1990–20091221.0
2000–20092544.0
2010–20171221.0
Control for confounding
Yes2028.2
No5171.8
* One study did not present the definition but affirmed that there was a reduction in birth weight. ** Some studies did not report the start date of the survey.
Table 2. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression of the crude and adjusted effect measurement.
Table 2. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression of the crude and adjusted effect measurement.
VariableNCrude OR (95% CI)Heterogeneity (I2)Meta-Regression p Value *NAdjusted OR (95% CI)Heterogeneity (I2)Meta-Regression p Value *
Study design
Prospective cohort301.51 (1.29–1.76)83.8% 61.38 (0.96–2.01)46.7%
Retrospective cohort131.18 (1.08–1.28)72.7%0.0351.24 (1.04–1.49)70.8%0.56
Case-control122.29 (1.51–3.47)82.8% 20.85 (0.37–2.00)79.4%
Data collection location
Hospital441.54 (1.39–1.71)85.4% 101.30 (1.06–1.59)63.4%
Primary health units61.28 (1.02–1.61)68.9%0.2821.05 (0.77–1.42)55.2%0.50
Community51.40 (1.09–1.78)60.4% 1--
Differential diagnosis of exposure
Maternal anemia511.47 (1.34–1.61)86.8%0.54121.21 (1.04–1.42)60.0%0.53
Iron deficiency anemia41.89 (1.10–3.27)60.9% 1--
Hemoglobin levels (g/dL)
<11331.48 (1.32–1.66)86.7% 101.25 (1.04–1.49)50.3%
<10.652.58 (1.69–3.94)72.4%0.871--0.84
<1071.25 (1.02–1.52)86.2% 21.04 (0.79–1.37)64.0%
<831.72 (1.10–2.69)33.6% 0--
Severity levels of maternal anemia
Mild71.14 (0.99–1.31)66.3% 0--
Moderate91.39 (1.11–1.74)49.0%0.6121.16 (1.04–1.29)0.0%-
Severe92.31 (1.47–3.63)82.7% 42.24 (1.35–3.71)0.0%
Odds ratio
<2341.15 (1.06–1.25)80.1%<0.01101.14 (0.99–1.30)47.8%0.02
≥2212.85 (2.48–3.27)16.0% 31.87 (1.42–2.45)0.0%
Maternal anemia by gestational trimester
First31.51 (0.94–2.42)55.7% 0--
Second30.98 (0.56–1.68)61.5%-0---
Third30.88 (0.53–1.48)72.2% 0--
Human Development Index **
Very high121.24 (1.03–1.49)88.4% 31.25 (1.03–1.51)0.0%
High151.30 (1.14–1.49)82.0%0.0261.15 (0.92–1.44)64.8%0.92
Medium211.82 (1.46–2.27)77.3% 41.30 (0.87–1.94)72.4%
Low72.28 (1.23–4.21)89.5% 1--
Geographic region
America41.38 (1.00–1.91)0.0% 1--
Africa63.07 (1.60–5.89)83.9% 1--0.76
Asia381.44 (1.31–1.58)83.7%0.3091.20 (1.02–1.40)58.2%
Europe40.94 (0.47–1.89)87.4% 1--
Oceania31.51 (1.23–1.85)16.0% 1--
Sample size
≤1000341.84 (1.46–2.33)79.0%0.0261.46 (1.00–2.16)57.2%0.15
>1000211.24 (1.13–1.35)86.8% 71.15 (1.02–1.31)44.1%
Year the research was initiated
Before 199040.96 (0.58–1.60)91.5% 1--
1990–199991.34 (1.10–1.64)81.1%0.3641.22 (1.00–1.50)64.6%0.08
2000–2009221.75 (1.44–2.13)82.3% 61.40 (1.16–1.69)16.0%
2010–2017111.32 (1.09–1.60)87.2% 0--
Methodological quality of the studies
Moderate301.65 (1.42–1.91)83.2%0.2520.52 (0.26–1.04)0.0%0.05
High251.49 (1.36–1.63)87.0% 131.27 (1.10–1.46)56.6%
* p value < 0.05. The p value represents the difference between the characteristics; ** Human Development Report, 2016 [82].

© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Back to TopTop