Next Article in Journal
MSF-PhyDRNN: A Physics-Driven Multi-Source Fusion Recurrent Neural Network for Short-Term Thunderstorm Gale Nowcasting
Next Article in Special Issue
LiDAR-Guided 3D Gaussian Splatting with Differentiable UDF-Based Regularization for Mine Tunnel Reconstruction
Previous Article in Journal
A Variational Random Finite-Set Approach to Highly Robust Active-Sonar Multi-Target Tracking Under Strong Reverberation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Study of a Fusion Method Combining InSAR and UAV Photo-Grammetry for Monitoring Surface Subsidence Induced by Coal Mining
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Research Status, Challenges and Future Perspectives of Geological Hazard Monitoring Methods in Mining Areas

1
College of Vehicle and Transportation Engineering, Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China
2
College of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2026, 18(9), 1333; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18091333
Submission received: 22 March 2026 / Revised: 14 April 2026 / Accepted: 22 April 2026 / Published: 27 April 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applications of Photogrammetry and Lidar Techniques in Mining Areas)

Abstract

Geological hazards induced by large-scale and high-intensity mining activities worldwide are primary drivers of regional ecological degradation and pose significant threats to human safety and property. To construct efficient monitoring systems and enhance early warning capabilities, it is essential to clarify the formation mechanisms of various hazards and the suitability of corresponding technologies. Focusing on five typical geological hazards prevalent in mining areas (surface subsidence, ground fissures, landslides, collapses, and sinkholes), this paper characterizes their specific features and monitoring requirements. It systematically analyzes the physical principles, accuracy levels, and technical advantages and limitations of ground-based, aerial, and spaceborne monitoring, as well as multi-source remote sensing data fusion and emerging technologies (e.g., distributed optical fiber, light detection and range, microseismical monitoring, and deep learning). Utilizing case studies from an open-pit coal mine in Turkey and a loess gully mining area in China, the paper evaluates the effectiveness of methods like multi-temporal InSAR and UAV photogrammetry in identifying the evolution of these hazards. The findings indicate that the technological framework for mining area monitoring is transitioning from single-method approaches to integrated systems. However, given the complex mining environment, several bottleneck challenges remain, including single data dimensions, the limited environmental adaptability of aerospace remote sensing, insufficient stability of deep monitoring equipment, and weak anti-interference capabilities under extreme operating conditions. Consequently, this paper proposes that future innovations in geological hazard monitoring in mining areas will focus on multi-platform hierarchical collaboration, the development of multi-parameter fusion early warning criteria, and the construction of digital and visual platforms. Constructing a comprehensive monitoring system characterized by multi-scale collaboration and dynamic prediction capabilities is vital for improving safety standards in mining areas and achieving coordinated development between resource exploitation and environmental protection. The findings provide a theoretical foundation for the precise prevention and control of mining hazards, as well as for land ecological restoration.
Keywords: geological disasters; monitoring methods; data fusion; mining engineering; evolution law geological disasters; monitoring methods; data fusion; mining engineering; evolution law

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Y.; Sun, Y.; Yan, Y.; Wang, S.; Ge, L. Research Status, Challenges and Future Perspectives of Geological Hazard Monitoring Methods in Mining Areas. Remote Sens. 2026, 18, 1333. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18091333

AMA Style

Zhang Y, Sun Y, Yan Y, Wang S, Ge L. Research Status, Challenges and Future Perspectives of Geological Hazard Monitoring Methods in Mining Areas. Remote Sensing. 2026; 18(9):1333. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18091333

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Yanjun, Yue Sun, Yueguan Yan, Shengliang Wang, and Lina Ge. 2026. "Research Status, Challenges and Future Perspectives of Geological Hazard Monitoring Methods in Mining Areas" Remote Sensing 18, no. 9: 1333. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18091333

APA Style

Zhang, Y., Sun, Y., Yan, Y., Wang, S., & Ge, L. (2026). Research Status, Challenges and Future Perspectives of Geological Hazard Monitoring Methods in Mining Areas. Remote Sensing, 18(9), 1333. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18091333

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop