Next Article in Journal
CRECA-Net: Class Representation-Enhanced Class-Aware Network for Semantic Segmentation of High-Resolution Remote Sensing Images
Next Article in Special Issue
Long-Tail Learning for Three-Dimensional Pavement Distress Segmentation Using Point Clouds Reconstructed from a Consumer Camera
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of Generalization Performance of Tornado Detection Models: A Cross-Domain Evaluation from U.S. to Chinese Weather Radar Observations
Previous Article in Special Issue
CFFCNet: Center-Guided Feature Fusion Completion for Accurate Vehicle Localization and Dimension Estimation from Lidar Point Clouds
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

High-Performance Parallel Direct Georeferencing for Massive ULS LiDAR Measurements

School of Surveying and Geoinformation Engineering, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2026, 18(6), 949; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18060949
Submission received: 26 January 2026 / Revised: 18 March 2026 / Accepted: 19 March 2026 / Published: 20 March 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Point Cloud Data Analysis and Applications)

Abstract

The rapid increase in point density and acquisition rate of UAV laser scanning (ULS) systems has shifted the primary bottleneck of LiDAR workflows from data acquisition to post-processing, particularly during direct georeferencing of massive LiDAR measurements. This study presents a systematic evaluation of parallel computing strategies for accelerating ULS direct georeferencing while preserving geodetic accuracy. Two georeferencing models are investigated: (1) a rigorous model that strictly follows the full geodetic transformation chain from sensor owned coordinates system (SOCS) to projected map coordinates, and (2) an approximate model that incorporates meridian convergence angle compensation and preprocessing of platform trajectories to reduce per-point computational complexity. For each model, a shared-memory multicore CPU implementation based on OpenMP and a heterogeneous GPU implementation based on CUDA are designed. Experiments were conducted on seven real-world ULS datasets, ranging from 2.9 × 107 to 7.0 × 108 points and covering diverse terrain types. Accuracy analysis shows that, in typical urban, plain, and industrial scenarios, the approximate model achieves millimeter-level mean errors and centimeter-level RMSEs relative to the rigorous model, satisfying the requirements of most engineering surveying applications. Performance evaluation demonstrates that parallelization yields substantial speedups: OpenMP-based method achieves 7–9 times acceleration, while GPU computing attains up to 24.6 times acceleration for the rigorous model and up to 16.7 times for the approximate model. The results highlight the complementary strengths of the two models and provide practical guidance for selecting accuracy-efficiency trade-offs in large-scale ULS production workflows.
Keywords: ULS; direct georeferencing; parallel computing; OpenMP; CUDA; GPU ULS; direct georeferencing; parallel computing; OpenMP; CUDA; GPU

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yu, M.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, H.; Liu, B. High-Performance Parallel Direct Georeferencing for Massive ULS LiDAR Measurements. Remote Sens. 2026, 18, 949. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18060949

AMA Style

Yu M, Zhou Y, Liu H, Liu B. High-Performance Parallel Direct Georeferencing for Massive ULS LiDAR Measurements. Remote Sensing. 2026; 18(6):949. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18060949

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yu, Mei, Yuhao Zhou, Hua Liu, and Bo Liu. 2026. "High-Performance Parallel Direct Georeferencing for Massive ULS LiDAR Measurements" Remote Sensing 18, no. 6: 949. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18060949

APA Style

Yu, M., Zhou, Y., Liu, H., & Liu, B. (2026). High-Performance Parallel Direct Georeferencing for Massive ULS LiDAR Measurements. Remote Sensing, 18(6), 949. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18060949

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop