This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Forest Soil Moisture Monitoring Using L-Band Passive Microwave and Machine Learning
1
Centre d’Applications et de Recherches en Télédétection (CARTEL), Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC J1K 2R1, Canada
2
Department of Geography, Environment and Geomatics, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
3
Finnish Meteorological Institute, 00560 Helsinki, Finland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2026, 18(12), 1970; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18121970 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 25 April 2026
/
Revised: 31 May 2026
/
Accepted: 11 June 2026
/
Published: 13 June 2026
Abstract
This study evaluates the potential of L-band passive microwave data for monitoring soil moisture (SM) in boreal and temperate forests using SMAP and SMOS AM and PM overpasses. SMAP and SMOS Level 3 SM products were first assessed for spring and summer seasons. SMOS showed lower accuracy (r2 = 0.04–0.24, ubRMSE = 0.09–0.13 m3/m3), while SMAP performed better (r2 = 0.18–0.62, ubRMSE = 0.05–0.07 m3/m3) across sites and overpasses. Given the larger number of SMAP TB observations at a fixed incidence angle and greater temporal coverage over the study area, SMAP was selected for SM estimation using ML models. Feature importance analysis identified brightness temperature (TB) as the most influential variable, followed by vegetation water content (VWC), air and soil temperatures, and the microwave polarization difference index (MPDI). Soil and air temperatures were interchangeable during AM overpasses, whereas PM overpasses showed distinct differences, likely due to thermal absorption by dense vegetation. Using optimal features, SM was estimated with CatBoost, Gradient Boosting (GB), Random Forest (RF), and Principal Component Regression (PCR), using stratified shuffle split (SSS) and leave-one-year-out cross-validation (LOYOCV). In SSS, CatBoost achieved slightly higher accuracy than the other ensemble models (AM: r2 = 0.73; PM: R2 = 0.74), while PCR yielded substantially lower accuracy across both overpasses. LOYOCV showed closer rankings among models, with CatBoost ranking highest overall (r2 = 0.58 for AM and 0.54 for PM). Results highlight the feasibility of improved SM estimation in forests using L-band TB, VWC, temperature variables, and MPDI.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Esmaeilisarteshnizi, R.; Magagi, R.; Foucher, S.; Berg, A.; Colliander, A.
Forest Soil Moisture Monitoring Using L-Band Passive Microwave and Machine Learning. Remote Sens. 2026, 18, 1970.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18121970
AMA Style
Esmaeilisarteshnizi R, Magagi R, Foucher S, Berg A, Colliander A.
Forest Soil Moisture Monitoring Using L-Band Passive Microwave and Machine Learning. Remote Sensing. 2026; 18(12):1970.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18121970
Chicago/Turabian Style
Esmaeilisarteshnizi, Rouhollah, Ramata Magagi, Samuel Foucher, Aaron Berg, and Andreas Colliander.
2026. "Forest Soil Moisture Monitoring Using L-Band Passive Microwave and Machine Learning" Remote Sensing 18, no. 12: 1970.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18121970
APA Style
Esmaeilisarteshnizi, R., Magagi, R., Foucher, S., Berg, A., & Colliander, A.
(2026). Forest Soil Moisture Monitoring Using L-Band Passive Microwave and Machine Learning. Remote Sensing, 18(12), 1970.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18121970
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.