Next Article in Journal
Analysis and Correction of Antenna Pattern Errors for In-Orbit Fully Polarimetric Aperture Synthesis Radiometer
Next Article in Special Issue
Assessing the Combined Impact of Land Surface Temperature and Droughts to Heatwaves over Europe Between 2003 and 2023
Previous Article in Journal
Data Integration Based on UAV Multispectra and Proximal Hyperspectra Sensing for Maize Canopy Nitrogen Estimation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessment of MODIS and VIIRS Ice Surface Temperature Products over the Antarctic Ice Sheet
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Geographically Constrained Machine Learning-Based Kernel-Driven Method for Downscaling of All-Weather Land Surface Temperature

1
Institute of Remote Sensing and Earth Sciences, School of Information Science and Technology, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China
2
Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Urban Wetlands and Regional Change, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(8), 1413; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17081413
Submission received: 22 January 2025 / Revised: 26 March 2025 / Accepted: 11 April 2025 / Published: 16 April 2025

Abstract

The reconstruction of all-weather land surface temperature (LST) has gained increasing attention in recent years, and many reconstructed LST products have been published. However, the spatial resolution of most LST products is still lower than 1 km, which limits the application of all-weather LSTs. This study proposed the geographically constrained machine learning-based kernel-driven method (Geo-MLKM), which is incorporated with the light gradient-boosting machine (LightGBM) model to explore its feasibility in the downscaling of all-weather LST (DALST). Using data from the northeastern Tibetan Plateau (NETP) region and Zhejiang Province, the relationship between all-weather LST and various kernels (i.e., land surface-related kernels, LST-derived kernels, and meteorologically related kernels) was trained to compare the kernel importance; then, advisable kernels were selected for the implementation of DALST. Compared with the 1 km resolution all-weather LST product, the downscaled LST at 250 m obviously adds more spatial details. Evaluated with the in situ measurement, the average root mean square error (RMSE) and r value of the downscaled LST are 2.465 K and 0.981 for clear skies and 4.361 K and 0.925 for cloudy skies, respectively. Compared with the all-weather LST product, the downscaled LST can reduce RMSE by 0.391 K. These results indicate that the Geo-MLKM method is promising for effectively implementing the DALST at a large scale and for generating a large number of high-resolution all-weather LSTs for environmental studies.
Keywords: land surface temperature; spatial downscaling; machine learning; light gradient-boosting machine; regression kernels land surface temperature; spatial downscaling; machine learning; light gradient-boosting machine; regression kernels

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xia, H. Geographically Constrained Machine Learning-Based Kernel-Driven Method for Downscaling of All-Weather Land Surface Temperature. Remote Sens. 2025, 17, 1413. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17081413

AMA Style

Xia H. Geographically Constrained Machine Learning-Based Kernel-Driven Method for Downscaling of All-Weather Land Surface Temperature. Remote Sensing. 2025; 17(8):1413. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17081413

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xia, Haiping. 2025. "Geographically Constrained Machine Learning-Based Kernel-Driven Method for Downscaling of All-Weather Land Surface Temperature" Remote Sensing 17, no. 8: 1413. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17081413

APA Style

Xia, H. (2025). Geographically Constrained Machine Learning-Based Kernel-Driven Method for Downscaling of All-Weather Land Surface Temperature. Remote Sensing, 17(8), 1413. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17081413

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop