Next Article in Journal
Remote-Sensing-Based Prioritization of Post-Fire Restoration Actions in Mediterranean Ecosystems: A Case Study in Cyprus
Previous Article in Journal
Bayesian FDOA Positioning with Correlated Measurement Noise
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Landslide Segmentation in High-Resolution Remote Sensing Images: The Van–UPerAttnSeg Framework with Multi-Scale Feature Enhancement

1
College of Computer and Information Science College of Software, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
2
Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(7), 1265; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17071265
Submission received: 21 February 2025 / Revised: 18 March 2025 / Accepted: 31 March 2025 / Published: 2 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Topic Remote Sensing and Geological Disasters)

Abstract

Among geological disasters, landslides are a common and extremely destructive disaster. Their rapid identification is crucial for disaster analysis and response. However, traditional methods of landslide recognition mainly rely on visual interpretation and manual recognition of remote sensing images, which are time-consuming and susceptible to subjective factors, thereby limiting the accuracy and efficiency of recognition. To overcome these limitations, for high-resolution remote sensing images, this method first uses online equalization sampling and enhancement strategy to sample high-resolution remote sensing images to ensure data balance and diversity. Then, it adopts an encoder–decoder structure, where the encoder is a visual attention network (Van) that focuses on extracting discriminative features of different scales from landslide images. The decoder consists of a pyramid pooling module (PPM) and feature pyramid network (FPN), combined with a convolutional block attention module (CBAM) module. Through this structure, the model can effectively integrate features of different scales, achieving precise positioning and recognition of landslide areas. In addition, this study introduces a sliding window algorithm based on Gaussian fusion as a post-processing method, which optimizes the prediction of landslide edge in high-resolution remote sensing images and ensures the context reasoning ability of the model. In the validation set, this method achieved a significant landslide recognition effect with a Dice score of 84.75%, demonstrating high accuracy and efficiency. This result demonstrates the importance and effectiveness of the research method in improving the accuracy and efficiency of landslide recognition, providing strong technical support for analysis and response to geological disasters.
Keywords: geological disaster; landslide recognition; deep learning; multi-scale feature fusion geological disaster; landslide recognition; deep learning; multi-scale feature fusion

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, C.; Zou, Q.; Li, G.; Yu, W. Landslide Segmentation in High-Resolution Remote Sensing Images: The Van–UPerAttnSeg Framework with Multi-Scale Feature Enhancement. Remote Sens. 2025, 17, 1265. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17071265

AMA Style

Li C, Zou Q, Li G, Yu W. Landslide Segmentation in High-Resolution Remote Sensing Images: The Van–UPerAttnSeg Framework with Multi-Scale Feature Enhancement. Remote Sensing. 2025; 17(7):1265. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17071265

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Chang, Quan Zou, Guoqing Li, and Wenyang Yu. 2025. "Landslide Segmentation in High-Resolution Remote Sensing Images: The Van–UPerAttnSeg Framework with Multi-Scale Feature Enhancement" Remote Sensing 17, no. 7: 1265. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17071265

APA Style

Li, C., Zou, Q., Li, G., & Yu, W. (2025). Landslide Segmentation in High-Resolution Remote Sensing Images: The Van–UPerAttnSeg Framework with Multi-Scale Feature Enhancement. Remote Sensing, 17(7), 1265. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17071265

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop