Next Article in Journal
Integrated Rainfall Estimation Using Rain Gauges and Weather Radar: Implications for Rainfall-Induced Landslides
Previous Article in Journal
Machine Learning-Based Sea Surface Wind Speed Retrieval from Dual-Polarized Sentinel-1 SAR During Tropical Cyclones
Previous Article in Special Issue
CSESpy: A Unified Framework for Data Analysis of the Payloads on Board the CSES Satellite
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Phase Shift Analysis of Cryosat-2 SARin Waveforms: Inland Water Off-Pointing Corrections

by
Philip Moore
* and
Christopher Pearson
School of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE1 7RU, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(21), 3627; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17213627
Submission received: 16 August 2025 / Revised: 26 October 2025 / Accepted: 28 October 2025 / Published: 2 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing in Geomatics (Second Edition))

Abstract

Cryosat-2 SARin altimetric FBR data facilitates an opportunity to investigate phase differences between inland water radar reflections at the two antennae. With the antennae positioned cross-track, SARin was designed for the recovery of slope over ice margins, but here, it was used to recover off-pointing over inland waters. The ability to measure non-nadir off-pointing is verified using ocean data near the Amazon estuary to determine the satellite roll angle. Over inland waters, off-pointing requires correction to the nadir range and the geographic location of the reflectance. By using an SRTM-based water mask, the number of inland water reflectance increases significantly when off-pointing is considered. Comparisons between altimetric and river heights utilise gauge data at Tabatinga on the Solimões–Amazon. A least-squares adjustment yielded a river slope of −0.03506 ± 0.00003 m/km and a mean velocity of 1.803 ± 0.014 m/s over a river stretch of nearly 290 km. RMSE differences between the gauge and altimetry improve from 0.423 m to 0.404 m when off-pointing is taken into account for nadir inland water returns, showing the asymmetric effect of off-pointing. If all potential off-pointings are considered, the number of measurements increases by 66%, but the RMSE of 0.524 m is higher due to additional errors in the off-pointing corrections.
Keywords: altimetry; Cryosat-2; SARin; waveforms; off-nadir pointing; phase shift; Amazon hydrology altimetry; Cryosat-2; SARin; waveforms; off-nadir pointing; phase shift; Amazon hydrology

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Moore, P.; Pearson, C. Phase Shift Analysis of Cryosat-2 SARin Waveforms: Inland Water Off-Pointing Corrections. Remote Sens. 2025, 17, 3627. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17213627

AMA Style

Moore P, Pearson C. Phase Shift Analysis of Cryosat-2 SARin Waveforms: Inland Water Off-Pointing Corrections. Remote Sensing. 2025; 17(21):3627. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17213627

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moore, Philip, and Christopher Pearson. 2025. "Phase Shift Analysis of Cryosat-2 SARin Waveforms: Inland Water Off-Pointing Corrections" Remote Sensing 17, no. 21: 3627. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17213627

APA Style

Moore, P., & Pearson, C. (2025). Phase Shift Analysis of Cryosat-2 SARin Waveforms: Inland Water Off-Pointing Corrections. Remote Sensing, 17(21), 3627. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17213627

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop