Next Article in Journal
Clustered Rainfall-Induced Landslides in Jiangwan Town, Guangdong, China During April 2024: Characteristics and Controlling Factors
Previous Article in Journal
Delineation of Dynamic Coastal Boundaries in South Africa from Hyper-Temporal Sentinel-2 Imagery
Previous Article in Special Issue
Toward an Operational System for Automatically Detecting Xylella fastidiosa in Olive Groves Based on Hyperspectral and Thermal Remote Sensing Data
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Anthropogenic Activities Dominate Vegetation Improvement in Arid Areas of China

1
Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
2
College of Chemical Engineering and Environment, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China
3
Institute of Farmland Water Conservancy and Soil-Fertilizer, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Sciences, Shihezi 832000, China
4
Key Laboratory of Northwest Oasis Water-Saving Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Shihezi 832000, China
5
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
6
Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(15), 2634; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17152634
Submission received: 16 June 2025 / Revised: 12 July 2025 / Accepted: 23 July 2025 / Published: 29 July 2025

Abstract

Arid regions, while providing essential ecosystem services, are among the most ecologically vulnerable worldwide. Understanding and monitoring their long-term vegetation dynamics is essential for accurate environmental assessment and climate adaptation strategies. This study examined the spatiotemporal variations and driving forces of the vegetation dynamics in arid Northwestern China during 2000 to 2020, using the annual peak fractional vegetation cover (FVC) as the primary indicator. The Sen’s slope estimator with the Mann–Kendall test and the coefficient of variation were employed to assess the spatiotemporal variations in FVC, while the Pearson correlation, geographic detector model and random forest model were applied to identify the dominant driving factors for FVC. The results indicated that (1) overall vegetation cover was low (averaged peak FVC = 0.191), showing a spatial pattern of higher values in the northwest and lower values in the southeast; high FVC values were primarily observed in mountainous areas and river corridors; (2) the annual peak FVC increased significantly at a rate of 0.0508 yr−1, with 33.72% of the region showing significant improvements and 5.49% degradation; (3) the spatial pattern of FVC was shaped by the distribution of land use types (59.46%), while the temporal dynamics of FVC were driven by land use changes (16.37%) and the land use intensity (37.56%); (4) both the spatial pattern and the temporal dynamics were limited by the environmental conditions. These findings highlight the critical role of anthropogenic activities in shaping the spatiotemporal variations in FVC, particularly emphasizing the distinct contributions of changes in land use types and land use intensity. This study could provide a scientific basis for sustainable land management and restoration strategies in arid regions facing global changes.

1. Introduction

Vegetation, as a primary component of terrestrial ecosystems, plays a critical role in carbon, water, and energy cycles [1,2]. Quantifying the spatiotemporal variation in vegetation changes and identifying their driving factors is fundamental in understanding ecosystem responses to environmental change and in supporting ecological restoration and sustainable land management. Such assessments have been greatly facilitated by the advent of satellite remote sensing technologies, which offer high-resolution and large-scale observations of vegetation cover across regional and global scales. In recent years, numerous studies have explored vegetation changes across multiple spatial and temporal scales by utilizing long-term satellite-derived indicators, such as the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), fractional vegetation cover (FVC), enhanced vegetation index (EVI) and soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI). Their findings have revealed significant transformations in global vegetation coverage over the past several decades. Increased trends were observed in Europe [3]; the Eastern United States [4]; East, South and Southeast Asia [5,6,7]; and Western and Southern Australia [8], while decreased trends were observed in Southern Africa [9,10] and Southern South America [11,12].
Arid regions and semi-arid regions, which cover approximately 41% of the global land area, provide essential ecosystem services that support the livelihoods of more than two billion people [13,14]. However, vegetation in dryland is typically sparse and highly vulnerable to desertification driven by climate change and anthropogenic disturbances. Once degraded, these ecosystems are difficult to restore due to limited water availability and poor soil quality [15,16,17]. Recent studies on vegetation coverage have identified hotspots with spatially heterogeneous trends in arid regions. Land cover changes were widely confirmed as the primary driving factors [18,19,20]. However, anthropogenic activities other than land use change have rarely been discussed.
Northwest China represents a typical arid region, characterized by the mean annual precipitation being lower than the mean annual potential evapotranspiration. Particularly in the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, rugged terrain environments lead to diverse types of vegetation, with bare areas, cropland, grassland and urban land being the dominant land cover types [21,22]. Recent studies have highlighted the roles of precipitation, temperature and glacier melt in promoting vegetation recovery [23,24,25,26,27]. Furthermore, government-led revegetation initiatives and land reclamation have also significantly contributed to vegetation greening in recent decades [26,28,29]. However, critical livelihood activities such as grazing and cultivation place strong but spatially heterogeneous pressures on vegetation patterns [30,31,32,33]. Despite their importance, these human factors have not been comprehensively assessed at the regional scale using remote sensing techniques. This limitation leaves a critical gap in our understanding of human–environment interactions in these fragile ecosystems.
To address this gap, this study proposes an integrated framework to disentangle the contributions of natural and anthropogenic factors to the vegetation dynamics in arid environments. Specifically, we derived high-resolution FVC (250 m) from MODIS NDVI time series (2000 to 2020) to characterize vegetation changes in Xinjiang. FVC was selected as the primary vegetation indicator due to its intuitive quantification of vegetation coverage and its higher accuracy in sparsely vegetated areas [34,35,36]. Ten potential drivers, including terrain conditions (elevation, slope and aspect), climate (air temperature, precipitation), soil water content and changes in land use types and land use intensity (population density, fertilization and grazing) were assessed by Pearson correlation analysis, the geographical detector model and a random forest model. Compared to traditional studies focusing on climate or land cover alone, this multifactor attribution framework offers a more nuanced and spatially explicit understanding of vegetation dynamics, especially in regions experiencing rapid environmental and socioeconomic transitions. Moreover, comparing the quantified importance of each driver across three complementary methods allowed for a more robust and comprehensive evaluation of their influence. Based on the spatiotemporal patterns of FVC and the quantified potential driving factors, this study offers high-resolution insights into vegetation dynamics, thereby providing scientific support for ecological conservation and region-specific sustainable development in arid Northwest China under future climate and human pressures.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (34°22′N to 49°33′N, 73°22′E to 96°21′E) is situated in the Northwest of China, at the heart of Asia, with elevation ranging from −155 to 8611 m (Figure 1). The region is dominated by a temperate continental climate with a mean annual temperature of 6.2 to 9.0 °C and annual precipitation of approximately 150 mm. Meanwhile, the topography has shaped a unique mountain basin system in arid and semi-arid regions, resulting in diverse local climatic conditions. The spatial variability in the hydrothermal conditions has led to the typical and complete vertical zonation of mountain natural belts in arid regions [37]. In recent years, with the establishment and development of the Central Asia Economic Corridor, Xinjiang has experienced population growth and economic expansion, leading to increasing ecological and environmental pressures [38]. Despite the Chinese government’s efforts in implementing projects such as the Three-North Shelterbelt Program and inter-basin water transfer, which have achieved notable accomplishments in ecological restoration, the vegetation dynamics in Xinjiang remain uncertain. Specifically, there is a limited understanding of the spatiotemporal variations in vegetation changes and their driving factors in the region.

2.2. Data Sources and Data Processing

FVC was utilized to investigate the spatiotemporal dynamics of vegetation cover. To identify the potential driving factors underlying these changes, ten associated factors (Table 1) were incorporated into the analysis. Environmental conditions included the terrain (elevation, slope and aspect), climate conditions (annual mean temperature and cumulative precipitation) and soil water content, whereas anthropogenic activities were represented by land cover changes and the land use intensity (population density, fertilizer application rates and grazing pressure). All datasets were projected to the GCS_WGS_1984 coordinate system, resampled to a spatial resolution of 250 m and clipped to the study area using the official boundary provided by the standard map of China (https://www.tianditu.gov.cn/; accessed on 22 July 2025).

2.2.1. FVC Data

The FVC data were calculated based on the NDVI datasets derived from the Moderate-Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) aboard NASA’s Terra satellite. The MODIS NDVI datasets, sourced from the MOD13Q1 product, were obtained through the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform. The datasets offer global coverage at 16-day intervals with a spatial resolution of 250 m from February 2000 to present [39]. FVC was estimated using the dimidiate pixel model as follows:
F V C =   N D V I N D V I s o i l N D V I v e g N D V I
where NDVI represent the pixel value, and NDVIveg and NDVIsoil represent the NDVI values of pure vegetation and bare soil in the study area, respectively. Pixels with NDVI values outside the range of [0, 1] were assigned 0 before calculation. Moreover, NDVIveg and NDVIsoil were defined as the 98th and 2nd percentiles of the NDVI distribution within the study area to reduce the influence of outliers [27,35].

2.2.2. Environmental Conditions

1.
Terrain data
Terrain features were characterized based on a digital elevation model (DEM) derived from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission [40] and the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer [41]. The datasets provide near-global coverage at a spatial resolution of 1 arc-second. The slope and aspect were calculated using the Spatial Analyst tool in ArcGIS 10.7.
2.
Climate data
The 1 km monthly temperature and precipitation datasets for China developed by Peng et al. were used to calculate the annual mean temperature and cumulative precipitation in this study [42]. The datasets were spatially downscaled from CRU TS v4.02 with WorldClim datasets based on the Delta downscaling method and evaluated via 496 national weather stations across China. The datasets provide monthly mean temperature and cumulative precipitation data with 0.0083333 arc-degrees for China from January 1901 to December 2023, obtained from the National Tibetan Plateau Data Center—Third Pole Environment Data Center.
3.
Soil water content data
In this study, the annual maximum value of each pixel was selected according to the global daily surface soil moisture dataset at a 1 km resolution (2000–2020) developed by Zheng et al. to represent the annual soil water content [43]. The datasets were generated using a machine learning-based approach based on the ESA Climate Change Initiative (ESA-CCI) dataset and verified by 2346 ground observation stations around the world. The datasets were obtained from the National Tibetan Plateau Data Center—Third Pole Environment Data Center.

2.2.3. Land Use Type Data

Land cover data were obtained from the European Space Agency Climate Change Initiative Land Cover (ESA CCI-LC) dataset, which provides annual global land cover maps at a spatial resolution of 300 m from 1992 onwards [44]. The dataset is generated using a consistent classification scheme aligned with the United Nations Land Cover Classification System (LCCS). The land cover types were reclassified into 15 categories based on the Level 1 classification system of ESA CCI-LC. These categories include cropland, cropland–natural vegetation mosaics, deciduous broadleaved forests, evergreen needle-leaved forests, deciduous needle-leaved forests, mixed forests, tree–shrub–herbaceous cover, shrubland, grassland, lichens and mosses, sparse vegetation, wetlands, urban areas, bare areas and non-vegetation areas.

2.2.4. Land Use Intensity Data

Annual population data were obtained from the LandScan Global Population Database published by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The dataset provides ambient population distributions at a 30-arc-second spatial resolution, representing the average population presence over a 24 h period [45].
Fertilizer application rates were represented by nitrogen fertilization data in this study. The historical nitrogen fertilizer application rate datasets developed by Yu et al. [46] were accessed from the National Science and Technology Infrastructure of China (https://www.geodata.cn; accessed on 22 July 2025), a national platform supporting long-term data sharing in environmental and resource sciences. The dataset provided annual nitrogen application rates at a spatial resolution of 5 km, expressed in units of g N m−2 yr−1, covering the period from 1952 to 2018. It was developed by integrating historical cropland distribution maps with multisource statistical and survey data, enabling the reconstruction of historical nitrogen inputs across agricultural lands in China.
Annual grazing intensity datasets were developed by [47]. The dataset provides the grazing intensity in seven pastoral provinces in Western China with a spatial resolution of 250 m, in units of SU ha−1, from 1980 to 2022. It was developed by integrating livestock census statistics with satellite-derived vegetation indices to estimate the spatially explicit grazing intensity.

2.3. Methods

The methods and technical framework employed in this study are illustrated in Figure 2, comprising the following steps: (1) calculating annual maximum FVC data from 2000 to 2020 and preprocessing the auxiliary datasets to ensure consistency in spatial resolution and geographic extent; (2) analyzing the spatiotemporal variations in FVC and associated factors; and (3) quantifying the driving factors contributing to FVC changes. All computations and statistical analyses were conducted using Python 3.12.

2.3.1. Data Preprocessing and Standardization

As the datasets used in this study originated from multiple sources with varying spatial resolutions, a harmonization process was implemented to ensure spatial consistency and data compatibility prior to analysis. All auxiliary data were resampled to match the spatial resolution of the FVC (250 m). During the resampling process, bilinear interpolation was used for continuous variables, and nearest-neighbor interpolation was applied for categorical data. To control the data quality and reduce the propagation of resampling errors, (1) all input datasets were projected to a consistent coordinate system (WGS84); (2) post-resampling comparisons were made between the original and processed data using correlation and RMSE metrics; and (3) zonal statistics were cross-checked against officially reported administrative statistical data. All statistical outliers were identified and removed. Although resampling inevitably introduces uncertainty, particularly when upscaling low-resolution socioeconomic data, aligning all layers to the FVC resolution allows for the better preservation of vegetation signals and more robust driver attribution at the landscape scale.

2.3.2. Spatiotemporal Analysis

1.
Trend analysis of FVC and associated driving factors
The trend analysis of the FVC data was conducted using Sen’s slope estimator, which is a widely recognized and robust method for the analysis of long-term time series data [48,49,50]. The statistical significance of the identified trends was assessed using the Mann–Kendall (MK) test, a non-parametric method that does not require the data to follow a normal distribution and is robust to missing values and outliers. The formula was as follows:
S e n s   s l o p e   ( S ) = m e d i a n F V C j F V C i j i         j > i
Z = S S 1 V a r S S , S > 0 0 , S S = 0 S S + 1 V a r S S , S < 0
S S = i n 1 i + 1 n s g n F V C j F V C i
s g n F V C j F V C i = 1 ,   F V C j F V C i > 0 0 , F V C j F V C i = 0 1 , F V C j F V C i < 0
V a r S S = n n 1 2 n + 5 18
where i and j denote the years under investigation in this study (2000–2020), and n represents the total number of years. Sen’s slope (S) represents the estimator trend in temporal FVC, where a positive slope indicates an increasing trend in FVC, whereas a negative slope indicates a decreasing trend. Z represents the test statistics of the MK statistical test. A two-tailed MK test was employed with a significance level of 0.05 (Z = 1.96), and the pixel-scale FVC trends were classified based on the results of Sen’s slope (S) and Z, as presented in Table 2.
2.
Stability analysis of FVC
The coefficient of variation (CV) was applied to assess the pixel stability and relative dispersion of the temporal variability in FVC over the long-term time series. The formula was as follows:
C V = F V C i F V C ¯ 2 n 1 F V C ¯
where CV is the coefficient of variation of FVC. n represents the duration of the study. F V C ¯ denotes the average of FVC, and i represents the year. The CV values were stratified into five categories based on threshold values of 0.10, 0.15, 0.20 and 0.30, based on previous studies of vegetation dynamics in arid regions [23,51].

2.3.3. Driving Factor Detection

1.
Pearson correlation coefficients among FVC and associated driving factors
The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to analyze the linear relationships among the annual peak FVC and associated annual driving factors. The significance of the correlations was analyzed based on the t-test.
r = x x ¯ × y y ¯ x x ¯ 2 × y y ¯ 2
t = r n 2 1 r 2
d f = n 2
where r is the correlation coefficient between two variables. n is the sample size. df is the degree of freedom.
2.
Geographical detector
The geographical detector (GeoDetector) was applied to assess the initial conditions and interannual changes in these drivers for FVC temporal dynamics. GeoDetector, developed by [52,53,54], is a widely used spatial statistical method for the investigation of spatial variation and the quantification of the driving factors vegetation changes [24,55,56]. In this study, the factor detector module was used to quantify the explanatory power of each driving factor through the q-statistic (Equation (11)). Meanwhile, the interaction detection module was used to assess the interactions between pairs of factors (Table 3). Since GeoDetector is designed to work with categorical data, all selected continuous factors were discretized using the Jenks natural breaks classification method. This method minimizes within-class variance and reduces subjective bias in classification [57], making it widely applicable in GeoDetector-based studies [55,58,59,60]. For each factor, the classification scheme yielding the highest q-value was selected, ensuring that the spatial stratification best reflected the explanatory power of the variable.
q = 1 h = 1 L N h σ h 2 N σ 2 = 1 S S W S S T
where h denotes the stratification of the study area based on FVC and the driving factors. Nh and N represent the number of units in stratum h and in the entire study area, respectively. σ h 2 and σ 2 represent the variance in FVC within stratum h and the entire study area, respectively. SSW refers to the sum of within-group variances, while SST refers to the total variance of the entire study area. A higher q-value, ranging from 0 to 1, indicates a greater influence for the driving factor.
The interaction between two explanatory variables was assessed using the interaction detector module of the geographical detector. This allowed for the identification of whether the combined influence of the two factors enhanced, weakened or was independent of their individual effects on the spatial distribution of the dependent variable.
3.
Random forest model
A random forest model (RFM) was applied to quantify the annual drivers of FVC spatial variation, as well as to assess the initial conditions and interannual changes in these drivers for FVC temporal dynamics. RF is an ensemble learning algorithm that combines multiple regression trees using a bagging approach to improve the predictive performance and reduce overfitting [61]. The relative importance of the input individual variables was assessed following the development of the optimal evaluation model. The cumulative contribution of each categorized factor was quantified by summing the relative importance of all individual variables within the category.
I i = 1 K 1 K M S E k i M S E k  
where I i is the importance of variable i; K is the number of trees in the forest; M S E k i is the estimation error, with predictor x being eliminated for the k decision tree; and M S E k is the forecasting error, with all predictors included in the k-th decision tree. The score I i indicated the relevant importance of the variable. The importance scores of all input variables were summed to be 1.

3. Results

3.1. Temporal and Spatial Variation in FVC

FVC exhibited pronounced seasonal dynamics and spatial heterogeneity. The intra-annual mean FVC ranged from 0.054 in February to 0.191 in July (Figure 3A). Over half of the total region was dominated by sparse vegetation (FVC < 0.2), which showed negligible seasonal dynamics. In contrast, the vegetation exhibiting strong seasonal variability was predominantly concentrated in ephemeral and perennial river systems, notably in the Tianshan and Altai Mountains of Northern Xinjiang, as well as the Tarim River Basin in the south (Figure 3B,C).
Over the past two decades, the annual peak FVC has exhibited a stepwise and consistent increase, characterized by the expansion of high-FVC areas and the contraction of low-FVC areas (Figure 3D). An increase in FVC was observed across approximately 355,700 km2, while a decline was observed in about 100,400 km2 of the region (Figure 3E). The overall conversion led to a significant increase in the annual peak FVC for the total region at a rate of 0.0508 yr−1 (p < 0.01; Figure 3A).

3.2. Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity and Stability of FVC

The results of Sen’s slope estimator and the Mann–Kendall statistical test revealed pronounced spatiotemporal heterogeneity in FVC changes (Figure 4A,B). Notably, areas exhibiting significant improvements encompassed approximately 561,400 km2, accounting for 33.72% of the total region. These improvements primarily spanned along the basins of rivers, including the Irtysh River, Ili River and Tarim River, where vegetation has benefited from abundant water resources. In contrast, significant degradation was observed across about 91,400 km2, representing only 5.49% of the total region. These degradations were largely concentrated around rapidly urbanizing areas and the foothills (1000–2000 m) within the Ili River Basin.
The CV served as an indicator of interannual variability in FVC. An average CV of 0.163 was observed across the region, reflecting mild variability within basin regions and heightened fluctuations in mountainous zones. (Figure 4C). The regions with extremely high and low stability accounted for 37.39% and 9.4%, respectively (Figure 4D). Overall, the spatial pattern demonstrated a strong correlation with the FVC values and trends. Higher-FVC regions, including the Altai and Central Tianshan ranges, are typically associated with lower rates of increase and more stable conditions. However, in regions with low FVC values, the CV was dependent on the altitude. In the basins (<3500 m), the FVC values, CV and slope were all notably low. Meanwhile, in high-altitude regions (>3500 m), vegetation exhibited pronounced high CVs but insignificant long-term trends.

3.3. Changes in the Influencing Factors

The annual mean temperature during 2000 to 2020 ranged from −29.2 to 15.9 °C, which was associated with the latitude and altitude (Figure 5A). Meanwhile, the precipitation during 2000 to 2020 ranged from 3.9 to 753.2 mm and was predominantly concentrated in the mountainous areas (Figure 5B). There was a trend of warming and increased humidity in the eastern part of Xinjiang (Figure 5C,D), although the overall average temperature and cumulative precipitation in Xinjiang did not exhibit significant linear changes from 2000 to 2020 (Figure 5E,F). The soil water content depended on both the climate and terrain conditions, which was positive for precipitation and negative for the temperature at elevations below 5000 m (Figure 6). No significant changes in soil water content were observed between 2000 and 2020.
The land use types in Xinjiang were dominated by bare area, grassland, cropland and forests (Figure 7A). The FVC values for each land use type from highest to lowest were in the order of forests, cropland, urban areas, grassland and bare areas (Figure 7C). Between 2000 and 2020, the FVC of cropland, evergreen needle-leaved trees, shrubland, grassland, wetlands, lichens and mosses and urban areas increased significantly (p < 0.05). In addition, transitions in land cover types were mainly observed around natural and artificial water bodies, characterized by the expansion of cropland, forests and urban areas and a reduction in bare land (Figure 7A,B).
The population in Xinjiang was concentrated in urban areas along the Tarim River, the Ili River and the northern slopes of the Tianshan Mountains (Figure 8A), experiencing significant growth during 2000 to 2020 (Figure 8B). The managed areas, represented by grazing and fertilization, were distributed around the urban areas (Figure 8C,E). The total amount of livestock generally increased, accompanied by changes in the proportions of pigs, cattle and sheep (Figure 8D), and the fertilization rates increased significantly before 2015 and then remained stable afterwards.

3.4. Driving Mechanism of FVC

Vegetation growth was influenced by the topographical conditions, with a positive correlation observed with the slope and contributing a total of 4.7% importance in the RFM. The FVC of vegetation exhibited a positive correlation with precipitation and the soil water content and a negative correlation with the temperature. The climate conditions and soil water content contributed 8.23% and 10.29% to the overall importance, respectively. Besides the topographical and environmental conditions, anthropogenic activities play a major role in the FVC of vegetation in Xinjiang. Specifically, the land use type emerged as a predominant determinant of FVC, with vegetation cover showing a positive association with the land use intensity (Figure 9).
In contrast to the drivers of spatial heterogeneity in FVC values, the spatial heterogeneity of FVC trends was shaped by a combination of environmental conditions and anthropogenic activities, as well as their changes over time (Figure 10A,B). The fertilization rate yielded the highest q-value according to GeoDetector, whereas changes in the grazing index exhibited the highest importance in the RFM. These findings jointly suggest that the land use intensity serves as the predominant driver of desertification processes. The terrain conditions were the least important driving factors for FVC trends in both GeoDetector and the RFM. A comparative analysis of both individual and interactive effects revealed a synergistic enhancement between factors (Figure 10C). Notably, these enhancement effects were primarily non-linear. Among these factors, the combination of the fertilization rate and changes in soil water content had the greatest influence (q-value = 0.217), followed by the fertilization rate and land use type (q-value = 0.210).

4. Discussion

4.1. Spatiotemporal Variation in FVC

The observed spatial variation in vegetation coverage is consistent with previous studies, showing a pattern of higher values in the northwest and lower values in the southeast [19,23,26,29]. The Tianshan Mountains intercept moisture from the Atlantic under the influence of the westerly circulation. This results in a relatively humid environment in the northwestern mountainous areas and long-term drought in southeastern basins [62,63]. Additionally, the water has been spatiotemporally redistributed through the migration of meltwater and groundwater, as well as artificial irrigation [64,65,66]. Given that water availability is widely confirmed as the primary constraint on vegetation development [67,68], the vegetation distribution closely mirrored the precipitation patterns and exhibited significant spatial clustering near major natural watercourses and areas sustained by artificial irrigation.
The annual peak FVC for the total region has increased at a rate of 0.0508 yr−1 over the past two decades, showing pronounced spatial clustering. The spatial analysis revealed that the spatial distribution of the FVC values, their CVs and the long-term trends shared similar spatial patterns. Due to prolonged drought and limited precipitation, desert regions in the basins were characterized by the absence of substantial vegetation cover, resulting in persistently low FVC values, low CVs and minimal long-term trends, as reported previously [15,69]. In contrast, high-altitude mountainous regions (>3500 m) with similarly low FVC values exhibited high interannual variability (CV > 0.5) but weak long-term trends, confirming that alpine ecosystems are particularly sensitive to environmental disturbances. In low-altitude regions (<3500 m) where vegetation was present, higher CVs were generally associated with significant FVC trends. Notably, these regions showing significant trends often overlapped with zones targeted by ecological restoration programs and land reclamation activities [27,70]. These pronounced and directional changes induced by anthropogenic environmental interventions would mask the intrinsic variability and time-lagged responses of vegetation to natural environmental drivers.

4.2. Driving Mechanism of Spatiotemporal Variation in FVC

The observed spatiotemporal variations in vegetation coverage in Xinjiang were the result of the interplay between the climatic conditions and human activities [5,20,71]. Notably, variations in land cover types are closely associated with differences in vegetation coverage (59.46%, Figure 9B), and land cover change has been widely recognized as an important factor driving the temporal dynamics of FVC (16.37%, Figure 10A), which was also demonstrated in previous studies [72,73]. Government-led ecological restoration programs, such as the ‘Grain-for-Green’ initiative, the water diversion projects in the Tarim River Basin and large-scale afforestation, have been widely acknowledged as among the most influential drivers of global greening during the early 21st century [74,75]. In these areas, land conversion from barren land to cropland or shrubland has significantly elevated FVC. However, changes in land use types driven by human activities exert multifaceted impacts on vegetation dynamics. In some cases, the conversion of cropland to grassland would result in decreased FVC, considering the differences in the vegetation structure and management intensity [1,74]. Meanwhile, population growth and associated urban expansion have driven the encroachment of built-up areas into ecologically valuable cropland and grassland. Although the FVC within urban areas increased significantly, such land conversion resulted in abrupt and spatially localized declines in the regional FVC. This encroachment of high-economic-output urban areas on limited land resources in arid regions underscores the intensifying conflict between rapid economic development and ecological conservation.
In addition to land cover changes, the land use intensity have been increasingly recognized as a critical driver of temporal changes in vegetation dynamics (37.6%, Figure 10A). Spatial variation in cropland vegetation cover was closely linked to nitrogen application rates, with a clear positive linear correlation observed between FVC increases and the total fertilizer input [35,76]. These findings highlight the critical role of improved water and fertilizer management in the planting density and in enhancing productivity, which is further corroborated by the steadily increasing agricultural output values reported in Xinjiang over the past two decades. Meanwhile, the increase in FVC in urban areas can also be attributed to the expansion of urban green spaces and enhanced water supply for urban vegetation maintenance. In addition, grazing plays a crucial role in land management practices, especially in grassland ecosystems. Intensified grazing pressure has markedly elevated the risk of vegetation degradation, manifested in recurrent transitions between grassland and barren land, which reflect the ecological instability induced by unsustainable land use [71,77,78].
The impacts of anthropogenic activities and the environmental conditions on FVC were not isolated (Figure 10C). The joint impact of the topographic and climatic conditions determined spatial variations in the temperature and hydrothermal resources across Xinjiang, characterized by an enhanced non-linear relationship, as revealed by the GeoDetector results and Pearson correlation analyses. As the elevation increases, there is a decrease in air pressure and an increase in radiation; combined with the varying distribution of precipitation and groundwater resources, this has resulted in the development of a diverse mountain vegetation ecosystem, ranging from forests to alpine tundra or lowland deserts [79,80,81]. The vegetation types with high FVC were primarily concentrated in the northwestern mountainous regions, where precipitation exceeds approximately 150 mm yr−1, and along riverbanks, which allow sustainable water availability. Additionally, favorable temperature and hydrothermal conditions provided the necessary environmental foundations for anthropogenic-driven transformations in FVC, as evidenced by enhanced correlations in the GeoDetector results (Figure 10C). The expansion of both cropland and urban areas, leading to rapidly increasing and decreasing FVC, respectively, was observed in low-altitude (<3500 m) and flat regions (<30°) with habitable temperatures and abundant water resources, while relatively high precipitation and sustainable irrigation could support sustained vegetation growth [36]. Some studies have suggested that improvements in vegetation will enhance surface evapotranspiration, which could exceed the regional precipitation, potentially leading to water deficits [23,82,83]. Fortunately, the warming and wetter climate, along with the cross-regional water resource redistribution, can partially offset the losses from evapotranspiration [27,84,85].

4.3. Limitations and Future Perspectives

Multisource remote sensing data were utilized in this study to analyze the impacts of the environmental conditions and anthropogenic activities on vegetation coverage. The spatial resolutions of these datasets varied considerably, ranging from 30 m to 5 km. To ensure the reliability of the core results regarding vegetation cover changes, all datasets were resampled to match the spatial resolution of the FVC data. Meanwhile, efforts such as RMSE comparison, zonal statistics cross-checking and outlier removal were used to ensure data quality. However, the loss of fine-scale spatial information for the driving factors during the process of spatial resolution was inevitable. The annual mean temperature and cumulative precipitation were used as the climate indicators in this study. Besides annual data, the seasonal (May–October) climate conditions and annual extremes were also tested in the preliminary analysis. Among the indicators examined, the annual average temperature and cumulative precipitation exhibited the strongest correlations with vegetation cover across Xinjiang. The superior performance of annual-scale indicators could be attributed to their ability to capture integrated measures of thermal and hydrological availability throughout the year [86,87,88]. The temperature and precipitation during the non-growing season may indirectly influence vegetation growth by affecting soil moisture retention, snowmelt timing and the accumulation of thermal energy, especially in arid regions such as Xinjiang. However, these indirect effects require further investigation. In addition, this study conducted statistical analyses based on the annual peak FVC values, which may have overlooked the lagged responses of vegetation to variations in hydrothermal conditions, as well as the impacts of extreme climatic events [89,90,91]. Recognizing these constraints, future investigations will be undertaken to refine the current approach and provide more comprehensive insights.

5. Conclusions

The Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, located in Northwestern China, is one of the typical arid regions, where vegetation is highly sensitive to global environmental changes. This study investigated the spatial and temporal features and driving factors of FVC in Xinjiang from 2000 to 2020. The main conclusions are as follows:
(1)
The vegetation coverage in Xinjiang was high in the northwest and low in the southeast, primarily distributed in mountainous regions and along river systems, where favorable hydrothermal conditions support vegetation growth;
(2)
The annual peak FVC increased significantly at a rate of 0.0508 yr−1 over the study period, with 33.72% of the region showing significant improvements and 5.49% experiencing significant degradation;
(3)
Anthropogenic activities were the primary driving factors for the spatiotemporal variation in FVC, where the land use type divided the FVC values, and management was the most important factor for FVC trends.
In summary, due to the harsh natural conditions, characterized by prolonged droughts, intense evaporation, limited precipitation and frequent extreme weather events, the overall FVC in Xinjiang remained at a relatively low level. Nevertheless, despite the growing tension between humans and land use caused by economic development and population growth, vegetation cover has increased in the arid regions of Xinjiang. This improvement can be attributed to the combined effects of ecological restoration programs, improved land management practices and climate warming and humidification. Moreover, the ecological consequences induced by changes in vegetation cover call for further investigation, encompassing the ecosystem’s structure, function and service provision.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.G., X.W., Q.P. and H.C.; methodology, Y.G.; validation, Y.D. and Y.Q.; formal analysis, Y.G.; resources, N.L. and F.Y.; data curation, Y.G.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.G.; writing—review and editing, Y.G., X.W. and N.L.; visualization, Y.G., X.Y. and M.Z.; project administration, Q.P. and X.W.; funding acquisition, Y.Q., J.L. and F.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Third Comprehensive Scientific Investigation Project of Xinjiang, grant number 2022xjkk1002; the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant numbers 42277241, 42177224 and 41203054; the Strategic Research and Consulting Project, Chinese Academy of Engineering, grant number 2023-XY-64; and the XPCC Science and Technology Innovation Talent Program, grant number 2022CB028.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Wang, Z.; Fu, B.; Wu, X.; Li, Y.; Feng, Y.; Wang, S.; Wei, F.; Zhang, L. Vegetation Resilience Does Not Increase Consistently with Greening in China’s Loess Plateau. Commun. Earth Environ. 2023, 4, 336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhao, L.; Dai, A.; Dong, B. Changes in Global Vegetation Activity and Its Driving Factors during 1982–2013. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2018, 249, 198–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kempf, M. Enhanced Trends in Spectral Greening and Climate Anomalies across Europe. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2023, 195, 260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Parra, A.; Greenberg, J. Climate-limited Vegetation Change in the Conterminous United States of America. Glob. Change Biol. 2024, 30, e17204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hu, Y.; Cui, C.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, Y. Vegetation Dynamics in Mainland Southeast Asia: Climate and Anthropogenic Influences. Land Use Policy 2025, 153, 107546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hassanpour, R.; Majnooni-Heris, A.; Fakheri Fard, A.; Verrelst, J.; Gao, W.; Yang, J.; Ren, S.; Hailong, L.; Kuttippurath, J.; Kashyap, R. Greening of India: Forests or Croplands? Appl. Geogr. 2023, 161, 103115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Piao, S.; Wang, X.; Park, T.; Chen, C.; Lian, X.; He, Y.; Bjerke, J.W.; Chen, A.; Ciais, P.; Tømmervik, H.; et al. Characteristics, Drivers and Feedbacks of Global Greening. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2020, 1, 14–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bai, J.; Xu, T. Investigating the Zonal Response of Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Australian Grasslands to Ongoing Climate Change. Land 2025, 14, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Muthoni, F.K.; Manda, J.; Dubovyk, O. Disentangling Climate and Human Drivers of Land Degradation in East and Southern Africa. Land Degrad. Dev. 2023, 36, 3801–3816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shi, S.; Yang, P.; van der Tol, C. Spatial-Temporal Dynamics of Land Surface Phenology over Africa for the Period of 1982–2015. Heliyon 2023, 9, e16413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Long, Q.; Wang, F.; Ge, W.; Jiao, F.; Han, J.; Chen, H.; Roig, F.A.; Abraham, E.M.; Xie, M.; Cai, L. Temporal and Spatial Change in Vegetation and Its Interaction with Climate Change in Argentina from 1982 to 2015. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 1926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hassanpour, R.; Majnooni-Heris, A.; Fakheri Fard, A.; Verrelst, J.; Gao, W.; Yang, J.; Ren, S.; Hailong, L.; Kuttippurath, J.; Kashyap, R.; et al. A Near Four-Decade Time Series Shows the Hawaiian Islands Have Been Browning Since the 1980s. Environ. Manag. 2023, 71, 965–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, L.; Jiao, W.; MacBean, N.; Rulli, M.C.; Manzoni, S.; Vico, G.; D’Odorico, P. Dryland Productivity under a Changing Climate. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2022, 12, 981–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. IPCC. Climate Change and Land: IPCC Special Report on Climate Change, Desertification, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Food Security, and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems, 1st ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2022; ISBN 978-1-009-15798-8. [Google Scholar]
  15. DOdorico, P.; Bhattachan, A.; Davis, K.F.; Ravi, S.; Runyan, C.W. Global Desertification: Drivers and Feedbacks. Adv. Water Resour. 2013, 51, 326–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, C.; Fu, B.; Wang, S.; Stringer, L.C.; Wang, Y.; Li, Z.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, W. Drivers and Impacts of Changes in China’s Drylands. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2021, 2, 858–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, Z.; Pan, J. Spatiotemporal Changes in Vegetation Net Primary Productivity in the Arid Region of Northwest China, 2001 to 2012. Front. Earth Sci. 2018, 12, 108–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gui, Y.; Wang, K.; Huntingford, C.; Wei, S.; Li, X.; Myneni, R.B.; Piao, S. Vegetation Greenness in 2024. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2025, 6, 255–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xu, L.; Gao, G.; Wang, X.; Fu, B. Distinguishing the Effects of Climate Change and Vegetation Greening on Soil Moisture Variability along Aridity Gradient in the Drylands of Northern China. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2023, 343, 109786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhu, Z.; Piao, S.; Myneni, R.B.; Huang, M.; Zeng, Z.; Canadell, J.G.; Ciais, P.; Sitch, S.; Friedlingstein, P.; Arneth, A.; et al. Greening of the Earth and Its Drivers. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2016, 6, 791–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dickoré, W.B. Zonation of Flora and Vegetation of the Northern Declivity of the Karakoram/Kunlun Mountains (SW Xinjiang China). GeoJournal 1991, 25, 265–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xu, X.; Yang, Z.; Saiken, A.; Rui, S.; Liu, X. Natural Heritage Value of Xinjiang Tianshan and Global Comparative Analysis. J. Mt. Sci. 2012, 9, 262–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhou, Q.; Chen, W.; Wang, H.; Wang, D. Spatiotemporal Evolution and Driving Factors Analysis of Fractional Vegetation Coverage in the Arid Region of Northwest China. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 954, 176271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xu, S.; Wang, J.; Altansukh, O.; Chuluun, T. Spatiotemporal Evolution and Driving Mechanisms of Desertification on the Mongolian Plateau. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 941, 173566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhang, X.; Pei, Q.; Chen, Y.; Guo, Y.; Hou, Y.; Sun, R. Temporal and Spatial Changes Monitoring of Vegetation Coverage in Qilian County Based on GF-1 Image. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2019, 162, 662–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhou, W.; Li, C.; Fu, B.; Wang, S.; Ren, Z.; Stringer, L.C. Changes and Drivers of Vegetation Productivity in China’s Drylands under Climate Change. Environ. Res. Lett. 2024, 19, 114001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cai, Y.; Zhang, F.; Duan, P.; Yung Jim, C.; Weng Chan, N.; Shi, J.; Liu, C.; Wang, J.; Bahtebay, J.; Ma, X. Vegetation Cover Changes in China Induced by Ecological Restoration-Protection Projects and Land-Use Changes from 2000 to 2020. CATENA 2022, 217, 106530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Peng, S.; Chen, A.; Xu, L.; Cao, C.; Fang, J.; Myneni, R.B.; Pinzon, J.E.; Tucker, C.J.; Piao, S. Recent Change of Vegetation Growth Trend in China. Environ. Res. Lett. 2011, 6, 044027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Song, D.; Hu, Z.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, F.; Sun, H. Assessing Ecological Impacts and Recovery in Coal Mining Areas: A Remote Sensing and Field Data Analysis in Northwest China. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 2236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Belgacem, A.O.; Alharbi, M.; Alhajoj, A.; Alruwaili, F.; Njeru, J. Effects of Community Camel and Sheep Grazing on Vegetation Cover in Al-Mayla Rangeland in Northern Saudi Arabia. Range Manag. Agrofor. 2023, 44, 226–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hu, X.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Gong, D.; Liu, L.; Li, K. Effectiveness of Conservation Measures Based on Assessment of Grazing Intensity in the Yellow River Source Region. Land 2025, 14, 813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Polley, H.W.; Kolodziejczyk, C.A.; Jones, K.A.; Smith, D.R. Grazing Treatment Influences Recovery of Mesic Grassland from Seasonal Drought: An Assessment Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle−Enabled Remote Sensing. Clim. Chang. 2022, 82, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Robertson, R.D.; De Pinto, A.; Cenacchi, N. Assessing the Future Global Distribution of Land Ecosystems as Determined by Climate Change and Cropland Incursion. Clim. Chang. 2023, 176, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ding, Y.; Peng, S.; Du, W. Ecological Disturbance Effects of Surface Vegetation during Coal Mining in Arid Regions of Western China. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2024, 196, 498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Hassanpour, R.; Majnooni-Heris, A.; Fakheri Fard, A.; Verrelst, J. Monitoring Biophysical Variables (FVC, LAI, LCab, and CWC) and Cropland Dynamics at Field Scale Using Sentinel-2 Time Series. Remote Sens. 2025, 16, 2284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, W.; Mo, X.; Liu, S.; Lu, C. Impacts of Climate Change on Grassland Fractional Vegetation Cover Variation on the Tibetan Plateau. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 939, 173320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Batool, M.; Sarrazin, F.J.; Attinger, S.; Basu, N.B.; Van Meter, K.; Kumar, R. Long-Term Annual Soil Nitrogen Surplus across Europe (1850–2019). Sci. Data 2022, 9, 612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Shangguan, Y.; Min, X.; Wang, N.; Tong, C.; Shi, Z. A Long-Term, High-Accuracy and Seamless 1km Soil Moisture Dataset over the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau during 2001–2020 Based on a Two-Step Downscaling Method. GIScience Remote Sens. 2024, 61, 2290337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Didan, K.; Munoz, A.B. MODIS Vegetation Index User’s Guide (MOD13 Series); Version 3.10; (Collection 6.1); September 2019; Vegetation Index and Phenology Lab, The University of Arizona: Tucson, AZ, USA, 2019; Available online: https://vip.arizona.edu/documents/MODIS/MODIS_VI_UsersGuide_MOD13_C6.pdf (accessed on 22 July 2025).
  40. Farr, T.G.; Rosen, P.A.; Caro, E.; Crippen, R.; Duren, R.; Hensley, S.; Kobrick, M.; Paller, M.; Rodriguez, E.; Roth, L.; et al. The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission. Rev. Geophys. 2007, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tachikawa, T.; Kaku, M.; Iwasaki, A.; Gesch, D.B.; Oimoen, M.J.; Zhang, Z.; Danielson, J.J.; Krieger, T.; Curtis, B.; Haase, J.; et al. ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model Version 2—Summary of Validation Results; Report to the ASTER GDEM Version 2 Validation Team, USA. 2011. Available online: https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/documents/220/Summary_GDEM2_validation_report_final.pdf (accessed on 22 July 2025).
  42. Peng, S.; Ding, Y.; Liu, W.; Li, Z. 1 Km Monthly Temperature and Precipitation Dataset for China from 1901 to 2017. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2019, 11, 1931–1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zheng, C.; Jia, L.; Zhao, T. A 21-Year Dataset (2000–2020) of Gap-Free Global Daily Surface Soil Moisture at 1-Km Grid Resolution. Sci. Data 2023, 10, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Plummer, S.; Lecomte, P.; Doherty, M. The ESA Climate Change Initiative (CCI): A European Contribution to the Generation of the Global Climate Observing System. Remote Sens. Environ. 2017, 203, 2–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lebakula, V.; Sims, K.; Reith, A.; Rose, A.; McKee, J.; Coleman, P.; Kaufman, J.; Urban, M.; Jochem, C.; Whitlock, C.; et al. LandScan Global 30 Arcsecond Annual Global Gridded Population Datasets from 2000 to 2022. Sci. Data 2025, 12, 495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Yu, Z.; Liu, J.; Kattel, G. Historical Nitrogen Fertilizer Use in China from 1952 to 2018. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2022, 14, 5179–5194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, D.; Peng, Q.; Li, X.; Zhang, W.; Xia, X.; Qin, Z.; Ren, P.; Liang, S.; Yuan, W. A Long-Term High-Resolution Dataset of Grasslands Grazing Intensity in China. Sci. Data 2024, 11, 1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Najafi, Z.; Fatehi, P.; Darvishsefat, A.A. Vegetation dynamics trend using satellite time series imagery. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2019, XLII-4/W18, 783–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ohlson, J.A.; Kim, S. Linear Valuation without OLS: The Theil-Sen Estimation Approach. Rev. Account. Stud. 2015, 20, 395–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Peng, H.; Wang, S.; Wang, X. Consistency and Asymptotic Distribution of the Theil–Sen Estimator. J. Stat. Plan. Inference 2008, 138, 1836–1850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jiang, W.; Yuan, L.; Wang, W.; Cao, R.; Zhang, Y.; Shen, W. Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Vegetation Variation in the Yellow River Basin. Ecol. Indic. 2015, 51, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wang, J.; Haining, R.; Zhang, T.; Xu, C.; Hu, M.; Yin, Q.; Li, L.; Zhou, C.; Li, G.; Chen, H. Statistical Modeling of Spatially Stratified Heterogeneous Data. Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr. 2024, 114, 499–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, J.-F.; Zhang, T.-L.; Fu, B.-J. A Measure of Spatial Stratified Heterogeneity. Ecol. Indic. 2016, 67, 250–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wang, J.-F.; Li, X.-H.; Christakos, G.; Liao, Y.-L.; Zhang, T.; Gu, X.; Zheng, X.-Y. Geographical Detectors-Based Health Risk Assessment and Its Application in the Neural Tube Defects Study of the Heshun Region, China. Ecol. Indic. 2016, 67, 250–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Guo, Y.; Cheng, L.; Ding, A.; Yuan, Y.; Li, Z.; Hou, Y.; Ren, L.; Zhang, S. Geodetector Model-Based Quantitative Analysis of Vegetation Change Characteristics and Driving Forces: A Case Study in the Yongding River Basin in China. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2024, 132, 104027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Li, Y.; Ma, J.; Li, Y.; Jia, Q.; Shen, X.; Xia, X. Spatiotemporal Variations in the Soil Quality of Agricultural Land and Its Drivers in China from 1980 to 2018. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 892, 164649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chen, J.; Yang, S.T.; Li, H.W.; Zhang, B.; Lv, J.R. Research on Geographical Environment Unit Division Based on the Method of Natural Breaks (Jenks). Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2013, XL-4/W3, 47–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Duan, Q.; Tan, M. Using a Geographical Detector to Identify the Key Factors That Influence Urban Forest Spatial Differences within China. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2020, 49, 126623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Liu, C.; Li, W.; Wang, W.; Zhou, H.; Liang, T.; Hou, F.; Xu, J.; Xue, P. Quantitative Spatial Analysis of Vegetation Dynamics and Potential Driving Factors in a Typical Alpine Region on the Northeastern Tibetan Plateau Using the Google Earth Engine. CATENA 2021, 206, 105500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Nie, T.; Dong, G.; Jiang, X.; Lei, Y. Spatio-Temporal Changes and Driving Forces of Vegetation Coverage on the Loess Plateau of Northern Shaanxi. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2020, 13, 613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Breiman, L. Random Forests. Mach. Learn. 2001, 45, 5–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Tian, L.; Yao, T.; MacClune, K.; White, J.W.C.; Schilla, A.; Vaughn, B.; Vachon, R.; Ichiyanagi, K. Stable Isotopic Variations in West China: A Consideration of Moisture Sources. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2007, 112, D10112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Chen, L.; Zhu, G.; Wang, Q.Q.; Ye, L.; Lin, X.; Lu, S.; Jiao, Y.; Li, R.; Meng, G.; Wang, Y.; et al. Influence of Mountain Orientation on Precipitation Isotopes in the Westerly Belt of Eurasia. Glob. Planet. Chang. 2024, 240, 104543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Jin, C.; Wang, B.; Cheng, T.F.; Dai, L.; Wang, T. How Much We Know about Precipitation Climatology over Tianshan Mountains––the Central Asian Water Tower. Npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. 2024, 7, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ren, C.; Zhang, P.; Deng, X.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Y.; Wang, S.; Yu, J.; Lai, X.; Long, A. Unveiling the Dynamics and Influence of Water Footprints in Arid Areas: A Case Study of Xinjiang, China. Water 2024, 16, 1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhang, J.; Zhang, P.; Deng, X.; Ren, C.; Deng, M.; Wang, S.; Lai, X.; Long, A. Study on the Spatial and Temporal Trends of Ecological Environment Quality and Influencing Factors in Xinjiang Oasis. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Li, X.; Zulkar, H.; Wang, D.; Zhao, T.; Xu, W. Changes in Vegetation Coverage and Migration Characteristics of Center of Gravity in the Arid Desert Region of Northwest China in 30 Recent Years. Land 2022, 11, 1688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wang, S.; Liu, Q.; Huang, C. Vegetation Change and Its Response to Climate Extremes in the Arid Region of Northwest China. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wang, Y.; Liu, B.; Xing, Y.; Peng, H.; Wu, H.; Zhong, J. Ecological Construction Status of Photovoltaic Power Plants in China’s Deserts. Front. Environ. Sci. 2024, 12, 1406546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Yuan, W.; Wu, S.; Hou, S.; Xu, Z.; Lu, H. Normalized Difference Vegetation Index-based Assessment of Climate Change Impact on Vegetation Growth in the Humid-arid Transition Zone in Northern China during 1982–2013. Int. J. Climatol. 2019, 39, 5583–5598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Li, Y.; Gong, J.; Zhang, Y.; Gao, B. NDVI-Based Greening of Alpine Steppe and Its Relationships with Climatic Change and Grazing Intensity in the Southwestern Tibetan Plateau. Land 2022, 11, 975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Chen, M.; Tang, C.; Li, M.; Xiong, J.; Luo, Y.; Shi, Q.; Zhang, X.; Tie, Y.; Feng, Q. Changes of Surface Recovery at Coseismic Landslides and Their Driving Factors in the Wenchuan Earthquake-Affected Area. CATENA 2022, 210, 105871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Yao, J.; Li, J.; Cao, Y.; Chen, M.; Zhang, C.; Mo, F.; Jia, G.; Chang, H.; Wu, J. Analysing the Influence of Surface Greening on Soil Conservation in China Using Satellite Remote Sensing. J. Hydrol. 2024, 636, 131253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Chen, X.; Luo, Z.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, W.; Wang, T.; Su, X.; Zeng, C.; Li, Z. Trade-Offs between Grain Supply and Soil Conservation in the Grain for Green Program under Changing Climate: A Case Study in the Three Gorges Reservoir Region. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 945, 173786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Shidong, L.; Moucheng, L. The Development Process, Current Situation and Prospects of the Conversion of Farmland to Forests and Grasses Project in China. J. Resour. Ecol. 2022, 13, 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Gao, W.; Yang, J.; Ren, S.; Hailong, L. The Trend of Soil Organic Carbon, Total Nitrogen, and Wheat and Maize Productivity under Different Long-Term Fertilizations in the Upland Fluvo-Aquic Soil of North China. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosystems 2015, 103, 61–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Lian, J.; Zhao, X.; Li, X.; Zhang, T.; Wang, S.; Luo, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Feng, J. Detecting Sustainability of Desertification Reversion: Vegetation Trend Analysis in Part of the Agro-Pastoral Transitional Zone in Inner Mongolia, China. Sustainability 2017, 9, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Liu, Q.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Li, L. Vegetation Degradation and Its Driving Factors in the Farming–Pastoral Ecotone over the Countries along Belt and Road Initiative. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Cao, Q.; Wei, Y.; Li, W.; Feng, Y.; Abduraimov, O.S. The Distribution Characteristics of Vegetation in the Subrange of the Altai Mountains, Xinjiang. Plants 2023, 12, 3915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Sang, W. Plant Diversity Patterns and Their Relationships with Soil and Climatic Factors along an Altitudinal Gradient in the Middle Tianshan Mountain Area, Xinjiang, China. Ecol. Res. 2009, 24, 303–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Pauli, H.; Halloy, S.R.P. High Mountain Ecosystems Under Climate Change. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Green, J.K.; Konings, A.G.; Alemohammad, S.H.; Berry, J.; Entekhabi, D.; Kolassa, J.; Lee, J.-E.; Gentine, P. Regionally Strong Feedbacks between the Atmosphere and Terrestrial Biosphere. Nat. Geosci. 2017, 10, 410–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Joiner, J.; Yoshida, Y.; Anderson, M.; Holmes, T.; Hain, C.; Reichle, R.; Koster, R.; Middleton, E.; Zeng, F.-W. Global Relationships among Traditional Reflectance Vegetation Indices (NDVI and NDII), Evapotranspiration (ET), and Soil Moisture Variability on Weekly Timescales. Remote Sens. Environ. 2018, 219, 339–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Bao, A.; Huang, Y.; Ma, Y.; Guo, H.; Wang, Y. Assessing the Effect of EWDP on Vegetation Restoration by Remote Sensing in the Lower Reaches of Tarim River. Land 2017, 12, 693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Hou, Y.; Chen, Y.; Li, Z.; Wang, Y. Changes in Land Use Pattern and Structure under the Rapid Urbanization of the Tarim River Basin. Land 2023, 12, 693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. von Oppen, J.; Jakob, J.A.; Anne, D.B.; Urs, A.T.; Bo, E.; Jacob, N.; Signe, N. Cross-scale Regulation of Seasonal Microclimate by Vegetation and Snow in the Arctic Tundra. Glob. Change Biol. 2022, 28, 7296–7312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Kelsey, K.C.; Pedersen, S.H.; Leffler, A.J.; Sexton, J.O.; Feng, M.; Welker, J.M. Winter Snow and Spring Temperature Have Differential Effects on Vegetation Phenology and Productivity across Arctic Plant Communities. Glob. Change Biol. 2021, 27, 1572–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Li, J.; Bevacqua, E.; Chen, C.; Wang, Z.; Chen, X.; Myneni, R.B.; Wu, X.; Xu, C.-Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zscheischler, J. Regional Asymmetry in the Response of Global Vegetation Growth to Springtime Compound Climate Events. Commun. Earth Environ. 2022, 3, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. An, H.; Zhang, X.; Ye, J. Analysis of Vegetation Environmental Stress and the Lag Effect in Countries along the “Six Economic Corridors”. Sustainability 2024, 16, 3303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Deng, Y.; Wang, X.; Wang, K.; Ciais, P.; Tang, S.; Jin, L.; Li, L.; Piao, S. Responses of Vegetation Greenness and Carbon Cycle to Extreme Droughts in China. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2021, 298–299, 108307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Li, W.; Wang, Y.; Yang, J.; Deng, Y. Time-Lag Effect of Vegetation Response to Volumetric Soil Water Content: A Case Study of Guangdong Province, Southern China. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The situation, elevation and water system of the study area.
Figure 1. The situation, elevation and water system of the study area.
Remotesensing 17 02634 g001
Figure 2. Framework of this study. The background color represents the stage of data acquisition and processing, while the elements enclosed within each colored box represent the data products generated from the corresponding processing.
Figure 2. Framework of this study. The background color represents the stage of data acquisition and processing, while the elements enclosed within each colored box represent the data products generated from the corresponding processing.
Remotesensing 17 02634 g002
Figure 3. The spatiotemporal variation in FVC in Xinjiang. (A) The temporal variation in the average FVC in total region; (B) the seasonal trough FVC values; (C) the seasonal peak FVC values; (D) the statistical summary of the leveled FVC values for each year; and (E) the transition of FVC between 2000 and 2020.
Figure 3. The spatiotemporal variation in FVC in Xinjiang. (A) The temporal variation in the average FVC in total region; (B) the seasonal trough FVC values; (C) the seasonal peak FVC values; (D) the statistical summary of the leveled FVC values for each year; and (E) the transition of FVC between 2000 and 2020.
Remotesensing 17 02634 g003
Figure 4. The spatial variations in FVC trends and coefficients of variation (CVs). (A) Spatial heterogeneity of FVC trends; (B) statistical summary of classified FVC trends; (C) spatial distribution of CV values at the pixel level; and (D) statistical summary of classified CVs.
Figure 4. The spatial variations in FVC trends and coefficients of variation (CVs). (A) Spatial heterogeneity of FVC trends; (B) statistical summary of classified FVC trends; (C) spatial distribution of CV values at the pixel level; and (D) statistical summary of classified CVs.
Remotesensing 17 02634 g004
Figure 5. The spatiotemporal variation in the annual mean temperature (A,C) and annual cumulative precipitation (B,D) and the regression of the overall changes in temperature (E) and precipitation (F) over time.
Figure 5. The spatiotemporal variation in the annual mean temperature (A,C) and annual cumulative precipitation (B,D) and the regression of the overall changes in temperature (E) and precipitation (F) over time.
Remotesensing 17 02634 g005
Figure 6. The spatial variation in the soil water content in Xinjiang (A) and its relationship with the climatic conditions (B).
Figure 6. The spatial variation in the soil water content in Xinjiang (A) and its relationship with the climatic conditions (B).
Remotesensing 17 02634 g006
Figure 7. The spatial distribution, transitions and FVC values of land cover types in Xinjiang. (A) The spatial distribution of land cover types; (B) the land cover transition patterns at five-year intervals; and (C) the annual mean FVC values of each land cover type. The * in (C) indicates that the annual mean FVC changed significantly at the 0.05 level over time during 2000 to 2020.
Figure 7. The spatial distribution, transitions and FVC values of land cover types in Xinjiang. (A) The spatial distribution of land cover types; (B) the land cover transition patterns at five-year intervals; and (C) the annual mean FVC values of each land cover type. The * in (C) indicates that the annual mean FVC changed significantly at the 0.05 level over time during 2000 to 2020.
Remotesensing 17 02634 g007
Figure 8. The spatial distribution of the population (A), the grazing index measured in standard sheep (C), the nitrogen application rates (E), the temporal changes in the total population (B), the number of livestock (D) and the net fertilizer application rate (F). In (B,D,F), the colors correspond to population gender, livestock categories, and fertilizer categories, respectively. The red line in (B) represents the linear regression trend of population over the years, while the blue line in (B) indicates the nonlinear LOESS regression trend of total fertilizer application across years.
Figure 8. The spatial distribution of the population (A), the grazing index measured in standard sheep (C), the nitrogen application rates (E), the temporal changes in the total population (B), the number of livestock (D) and the net fertilizer application rate (F). In (B,D,F), the colors correspond to population gender, livestock categories, and fertilizer categories, respectively. The red line in (B) represents the linear regression trend of population over the years, while the blue line in (B) indicates the nonlinear LOESS regression trend of total fertilizer application across years.
Remotesensing 17 02634 g008
Figure 9. The correlations between FVC and the driving factors (A) and the importance of the driving factors for FVC (B). Elevation, Slope, Aspect, Pre, Tmp, SWC, Pop, LHGI, NFer and LULC represent elevation, slope, aspect, annual cumulative precipitation, annual mean temperature, soil water content, population density, grazing index, nitrogen application rate and land use type, respectively.
Figure 9. The correlations between FVC and the driving factors (A) and the importance of the driving factors for FVC (B). Elevation, Slope, Aspect, Pre, Tmp, SWC, Pop, LHGI, NFer and LULC represent elevation, slope, aspect, annual cumulative precipitation, annual mean temperature, soil water content, population density, grazing index, nitrogen application rate and land use type, respectively.
Remotesensing 17 02634 g009
Figure 10. The relative importance of the conditions and trends of driving factors according to the random forest model (A) and the q-values (B) and their interactions (C) for the conditions and trends of the driving factors according to the geographic detector model. Elevation, Slope, Aspect, Pre, Tmp, SWC, Pop, LHGI, NFer and LULC represent elevation, slope, aspect, annual cumulative precipitation, annual mean temperature, soil water content, population density, grazing index, nitrogen application rate and land use type, respectively.
Figure 10. The relative importance of the conditions and trends of driving factors according to the random forest model (A) and the q-values (B) and their interactions (C) for the conditions and trends of the driving factors according to the geographic detector model. Elevation, Slope, Aspect, Pre, Tmp, SWC, Pop, LHGI, NFer and LULC represent elevation, slope, aspect, annual cumulative precipitation, annual mean temperature, soil water content, population density, grazing index, nitrogen application rate and land use type, respectively.
Remotesensing 17 02634 g010
Table 1. Descriptions and origins of the map variables used in this study.
Table 1. Descriptions and origins of the map variables used in this study.
CategoryVariableSpatial ResolutionResource
VegetationFVC250 mMOD13Q1 NDVI
Environmental conditions
TerrainElevation1 arc-secondDEM (https://www.usgs.gov/; accessed on 22 July 2025)
Slope
Aspect
ClimateTemperature1 kmhttps://cstr.cn/18406.11.Meteoro.tpdc.270961 (accessed on 22 July 2025)
Precipitation1 km
SoilSoil water content1 kmhttps://cstr.cn/18406.11.RemoteSen.tpdc.272760 (accessed on 22 July 2025)
Anthropogenic activities
Land cover changesLand cover300 mhttps://www.esa-landcover-cci.org/(accessed on 22 July 2025)
Land use intensityPopulation1 kmhttps://landscan.ornl.gov/(accessed on 22 July 2025)
Nitrogen fertilization5 kmhttps://cstr.cn/15732.11.nesdc.ecodb.pa.2022.13 (accessed on 22 July 2025)
Grazing index250 mhttps://cstr.cn/15732.11.nesdc.ecodb.rs.2024.024 (accessed on 22 July 2025)
Table 2. Classification criteria for FVC trends.
Table 2. Classification criteria for FVC trends.
Sen’s Slope (S)ZClassification
S > 0.005Z > 1.96Significant increase
S > 0.005Z < 1.96Slight increase
−0.005 < S < 0.005-Stable
S < −0.005Z < 1.96Slight decrease
S < −0.005Z > 1.96Significant decrease
Table 3. Interaction between two explanatory variables and their interaction impacts.
Table 3. Interaction between two explanatory variables and their interaction impacts.
Interaction RelationshipInteraction TypesDescription
q(X1 ∩ X2) < Min(q(X1), q(X2))Weaken, nonlinearThe interaction of two variables nonlinearly weakens the impacts of a single variable.
Min(q(X1), q(X2)) < q(X1 ∩ X2) < Max(q(X1), q(X2))Weaken, univariateThe interaction univariably weakens the impacts of single variables.
q(X1 ∩ X2) > Max(q(X1), q(X2))Enhanced, bivariateThe interaction of two variables bivariable enhances the impacts of a single variable.
q(X1 ∩ X2) = q(X1) + q(X2)IndependentThe impacts of the two variables are independent.
q(X1 ∩ X2) > q(X1) + q(X2)Enhance, nonlinearThe impacts of the variables are nonlinearly enhanced.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guo, Y.; Wang, X.; Cao, H.; Peng, Q.; Dong, Y.; Qi, Y.; Liu, J.; Lv, N.; Yin, F.; Yuan, X.; et al. Anthropogenic Activities Dominate Vegetation Improvement in Arid Areas of China. Remote Sens. 2025, 17, 2634. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17152634

AMA Style

Guo Y, Wang X, Cao H, Peng Q, Dong Y, Qi Y, Liu J, Lv N, Yin F, Yuan X, et al. Anthropogenic Activities Dominate Vegetation Improvement in Arid Areas of China. Remote Sensing. 2025; 17(15):2634. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17152634

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guo, Yu, Xinwei Wang, Hongying Cao, Qin Peng, Yunshe Dong, Yunchun Qi, Jian Liu, Ning Lv, Feihu Yin, Xiujin Yuan, and et al. 2025. "Anthropogenic Activities Dominate Vegetation Improvement in Arid Areas of China" Remote Sensing 17, no. 15: 2634. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17152634

APA Style

Guo, Y., Wang, X., Cao, H., Peng, Q., Dong, Y., Qi, Y., Liu, J., Lv, N., Yin, F., Yuan, X., & Zeng, M. (2025). Anthropogenic Activities Dominate Vegetation Improvement in Arid Areas of China. Remote Sensing, 17(15), 2634. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17152634

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop