Next Article in Journal
Analysis on Ecological Network Pattern Changes in the Pearl River Delta Forest Urban Agglomeration from 2000 to 2020
Next Article in Special Issue
Leveraging the Potential of PRISMA Hyperspectral Data for Forest Tree Species Classification: A Case Study in Southern Italy
Previous Article in Journal
Modeling of Biologically Effective Daily Radiant Exposures over Europe from Space Using SEVIRI Measurements and MERRA-2 Reanalysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Method of Chestnut Forest Identification Based on Time Series and Key Phenology from Sentinel-2
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluating ICESat-2 and GEDI with Integrated Landsat-8 and PALSAR-2 for Mapping Tropical Forest Canopy Height

1
College of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China
2
School of Geospatial Engineering and Science, Sun Yat-sen University, and Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai 519082, China
3
Key Laboratory of Comprehensive Observation of Polar Environment, Sun Yat-sen University, Ministry of Education, Zhuhai 519082, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(20), 3798; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16203798
Submission received: 7 September 2024 / Revised: 10 October 2024 / Accepted: 11 October 2024 / Published: 12 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Machine Learning in Global Change Ecology: Methods and Applications)

Abstract

Mapping forest canopy height is critical for climate modeling and forest management, and tropical forests present unique challenges for remote sensing due to their dense vegetation and complex structure. The advent of ICESat-2 and GEDI, two advanced lidar datasets, offers new opportunities for improving canopy height estimation. In this study, we used footprint-level canopy height products from ICESat-2 and GEDI, combined with features extracted from Landsat-8, PALSAR-2, and FABDEM products. The AutoGluon stacking ensemble learning algorithm was employed to construct inversion models, generating 30 m resolution continuous canopy height maps for the tropical forests of Puerto Rico. Accuracy validation was performed using the high-resolution G-LiHT airborne lidar products. Results show that tropical forest canopy height inversion remains challenging, with all models yielding relative root mean square errors (rRMSE) exceeding 0.30. The stacking ensemble model outperformed all base learners, and the GEDI-based map had slightly higher accuracy than the ICESat-2-based map, with RMSE values of 4.81 and 4.99 m, respectively. Both models showed systematic biases, but the GEDI-based model exhibited less underestimation for taller canopies, making it more suitable for biomass estimation. The proposed approach can be applied to other forest ecosystems, enabling fine-resolution canopy height mapping and enhancing forest conservation efforts.
Keywords: canopy height; tropical forest; ICESat-2; GEDI; stacking ensemble learning canopy height; tropical forest; ICESat-2; GEDI; stacking ensemble learning

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, A.; Chen, Y.; Cheng, X. Evaluating ICESat-2 and GEDI with Integrated Landsat-8 and PALSAR-2 for Mapping Tropical Forest Canopy Height. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 3798. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16203798

AMA Style

Liu A, Chen Y, Cheng X. Evaluating ICESat-2 and GEDI with Integrated Landsat-8 and PALSAR-2 for Mapping Tropical Forest Canopy Height. Remote Sensing. 2024; 16(20):3798. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16203798

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Aobo, Yating Chen, and Xiao Cheng. 2024. "Evaluating ICESat-2 and GEDI with Integrated Landsat-8 and PALSAR-2 for Mapping Tropical Forest Canopy Height" Remote Sensing 16, no. 20: 3798. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16203798

APA Style

Liu, A., Chen, Y., & Cheng, X. (2024). Evaluating ICESat-2 and GEDI with Integrated Landsat-8 and PALSAR-2 for Mapping Tropical Forest Canopy Height. Remote Sensing, 16(20), 3798. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16203798

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop