3.1. Characteristics of Internal Waves
ADCP and coherent radar data were used to obtain information about the spatiotemporal structure of IWs. The main attributes of the IW manifestation in the ADCP signal are related to the modulation of vertical profiles of acoustic backscattering and the appearance of significant and coherent vertical and horizontal velocity components.
Figure 3 shows a series of acoustic backscatter profiles for each of the four ADCP beams. Beams 1 and 3, directed to the south and west, respectively, did not manifest obstacles related to reflection from platform elements, unlike beams 2 (northward) and 4 (eastward), which were in some cases subject to noise.
Unfortunately, measurements of the vertical distribution of temperature and salinity were not available during the described experiment. However, it can be assumed that the position of the layers corresponding to the greatest scattering of sound ensures the position of the pycnocline. According to our long-term observations, in an undisturbed state, this region in May is characterized by a shallow pycnocline at a depth of 3 m. At a depth of more than 16 m, strong stratification with enhanced backscattering is observed.
Figure 3 shows a leading train of three solitons of the highest intensity (t1 = 01:16, t2 = 01:26, and t3 = 01:36) and two retarding solitons of low amplitude (t4 = 01:56 and t5 = 02:14). Since the total depth H near the platform is about 25–30 m, under such conditions the IW predominantly sinks with an amplitude below the undisturbed pycnocline [
18]. For sinking solitons, the enhancement of the current velocity in the direction of IW propagation is characteristic of the upper layer
h1. The behavior of the vertical velocity component can be characterized by an alternating sign: on the front side of the soliton, the vertical velocity is negative, turning into positive on the back slope [
19]. The described behavior is observed in a field experiment (
Figure 4).
The spatial structure of IWs was studied by analyzing a time series of radar images of the sea surface. It is well known that the characteristic features of the IW manifestation on the sea surface, which are observed in the form of bands of alternating roughness, can be related with different IW phases depending on hydrometeorological conditions (see, for example, [
13,
20]). The time step of radar imaging of the sea surface was 15 s in the experiment.
Figure 5 shows radar images of the state of the sea surface obtained in one revolution of the radar antenna. The 330°–60° sector on the radar image is obscured by the platform and excluded from further consideration. The train of IWs is clearly visible in the south of the platform in the form of bands characterized by lower radar cross section (RCS) values (
Figure 5a,c,e,g,i,j). Doppler velocity (
Figure 5b,d,f,h,j,l) also showed strong variability.
Figure 5a,b at 01:09 on 23 May 2023 show the leading soliton (IW1) and the soliton caching up with it (IW2). In
Figure 5c,d, at 01:15 on 23 May 2023, the leading soliton (IW1) and the second soliton (IW2) merged. In
Figure 5d,f, at 01:19 on 23 May 2023, the second soliton (IW2) passes under the platform. In
Figure 5g,h,i,k,l, the interaction of the IW2 soliton with an artificial slick band occurs. In
Figure 5k,l, at 01:33 on 23 May 2023, the third soliton (IW3) passes under the platform. The propagation speed of IW solitons was calculated by analyzing the position of such bands on successful radar images (
Figure 6b). The area of reduced intensity of surface waves observed in the east of the platform corresponds to an artificial slick band. The IWs propagated from south to north, while the band propagated from west to east.
Figure 5b–d,i,k gives a radar image of the Doppler velocity distribution, which clearly shows that surface waves propagate predominantly from west to east; positive Doppler velocity values correspond to the approaching scatterers, and negative values correspond to the retreating ones. In this case, the waves and wind are directed transversely to the direction of IW propagation. Based on a sequence of radar images, one can create a video demonstrating the dynamics of the processes and download it as
Supplementary Materials.
Figure 6a shows the spatial structure of the bands of reduced signal intensity on the radar image at 1:09 on 23 May 2019. The fronts of IW4 and IW5 at this moment had not yet appeared on the radar image, and their location was retrieved using time reversal based on subsequent radar images and calculated propagation velocity (
Figure 6b). The numbers in
Figure 6a indicate depths in meters. The propagation velocity was calculated from the minimum distance between the positions of the fronts at different times (this can be considered as the lowest estimate of the velocity). The observed slowdown in the propagation of solitons near the platform (
Figure 6b) is due probably to a decrease in depth.
Figure 6c shows the spatial distribution of amplitudes and velocity components of the upper-ocean currents containing IW-related currents. It was obtained by converting time into coordinates (r), taking into account the propagation velocity of surface manifestations of IWs near the platform (
Figure 6b). Soliton amplitudes are retrieved by determining the position of the maximum intensity gradient of sound backscattering, shown in
Figure 3. Current speeds are averaged over the 12 m thick upper layer. It should be noted that the sea depth to the east of the platform is much greater than on the western and southern sides. That is the reason why the IW1 soliton is observed only in one, the fourth ADCP beam, directed exactly to the east (
Figure 3). This can also lead to the observed curvature of the IW fronts as they approach the platform. The leading soliton IW1, when approaching the platform, has the largest width among all the solitons in the packet, which may indicate that it has reached the limiting amplitude [
21]. Its further transformation and collapse are presumably due to a decrease in the depth of the sea and, accordingly, the depth of the lower layer h
2 near the platform. The effective widths of solitons range from 5 to 15 m, the distance between solitons ranges from 30 to 100 m, and the amplitudes of solitons vary from 3 to 10 m.
Based on the analysis of the obtained data, the spatiotemporal characteristics of the passage of solitons near the SOP were retrieved. Since no information about stratification has been collected during the experiment, it is difficult to determine theoretical values of the velocity of soliton propagation. However, it is possible to compare the ratio of amplitudes and half-widths of solitons. The expression for the effective half-width of the Korteweg-de-Vries (KdV) soliton has the form [
22]
where
is the soliton amplitude. The results of the experimental data analysis and theoretical estimates for the assumptions of two- and three-layer stratification are given in
Table 1. The width of the IW1 soliton is shown to have a larger width than both theoretical estimates, indicating that it has reached a critical value and transformed into a Gardner-type soliton [
23]. The remaining solitons are characterized by widths close to theoretical estimates for both cases of stratification and can therefore be considered as KdV solitons.
In this section, the parameters of KdV solitons are determined for further study of the transformation of the structure of an artificial slick band in the field of heterogeneous currents related to IW solitons.
3.2. Transformation of an Artificial Slick Band
The kinematics of an extended artificial slick band (ASB) on the sea surface was first studied in [
16]. The main factors affecting the width and azimuthal position of the band are current and near-surface wind.
Figure 7 shows the speed and direction of the current (
uc,
) at a depth of 1 m, as well as the speed and direction of the wind (
uw,
) at a height of 24 m during the experiment. For ease of perception, the directions of the current and wind are given in a single coordinate system, so the westerly wind has a direction of about 90 degrees. Based on these data, the speed
ud and direction
of the surface current were calculated as the vector sum of the current speed and 3% of the wind speed at a standard meteorological height of 10 m [
16].
The leading soliton IW1, as described above, collapsed on its way to the SOP and did not cause a significant change in the current speed. Although two subsequent solitons IW2 and IW3 had significantly different amplitudes, they caused an increase in the current speed up to 0.25 m/s at a depth of 1 m. Surface currents affecting the ASB dynamics of the ASB can be determined by measuring the Doppler shift of the radar signal from the coherent radar station [
20,
24]. It should be noted that in the observed case, the direction of IW propagation is perpendicular to the wind; these conditions cannot be considered suitable for measuring surface currents based on Doppler shifts of the radar signal. The cross- wind direction is the most sensitive to changes in wind direction since in this case, the Doppler velocity values change near zero (
Figure 5b).
During the passage of the IW packet, strong short-term modulation of the ASB shape was observed in the radar panoramas, which manifested itself in a change in the direction and shape of ASB propagation (
Figure 8). The proposed method for processing the results of ASB radar observations is shown in
Figure 8b. Each radar image obtained in one revolution of the radar antenna (
Figure 8a) provides information about the band boundaries, which can be determined using the maximum brightness gradient condition (
Figure 8b). Next, for each vector
the slick band fragment is characterized by
, where Q is the local angle of the slick fragment in the polar coordinate system, and W is the local band width. Preliminary analysis showed that a spatial resolution of 1 m was sufficient to discern spatial variations of the ASB due to the IW. Previous studies have shown that the effects of surfactant spreading in the band appear on scales of about 100 m from the source [
16]. However, in contrast to [
16], in the presence of heterogeneous currents from the IW, the film concentration in the ASB cannot be considered constant [
13]. According to [
13], the inhomogeneity of the concentration depends on the length over which the IW acts on the film.
It was noted that changes in the band shape occurred at the moment the IW packet passed the platform, according to the ADCP data and taking into account the difference between the location of the ADCP with an offset from the southern side of the platform and the location of the observation area of the slick band to the east of the platform.
Figure 9 shows the results of comparing the direction Q and width W of the ASB at a distance
= 100 m from the radar, calculated using the method described in the previous section, with the direction
and speed
ud of the surface current during the passage of the IW packet. To take into account the spatial difference between the location of the ADCP site and the point characterizing the deformation characteristics of the slick band (
= 100 m), an average time shift of four minutes was used. This value was estimated based on the characteristic propagation velocity of the IW soliton and the described distance of 24 m. It should be noted that there is both qualitative and quantitative consistency between the direction Q of the artificial slick band and the direction of the surface current. The IW2 and IW3 solitons had the greatest effect on the direction of the band, while the IW4 and IW5 solitons manifested themselves only weakly due to their low amplitude. A comparison between the surface current speed and the band width W showed a negative correlation between these values. The observed speed and band width synchronization for IW3 is the result of a random error in determining the time offset between the location of the ADCP and the observation point. Despite this, it appears that the data should be interpreted in the general context of a negative correlation, taking into account the possible small change in the time offset (less than a minute or, accordingly, less than 6 m in space). The introduced time offset of four minutes was the same for all data. Correlation analysis was performed for the direction Q of the ASB and the direction of the surface current, the width W of the band, and the speed
ud of the surface current (shown in
Figure 9b). The resulting correlation coefficients are 0.8 and −0.44, respectively.
To summarize the results of the analysis of experimental data, we can say that the effect of the IW passage on the dynamics of the ASB is manifested in a change in the width W of the band and its direction Q, which can be considered as key parameters characterizing the manifestation of this effect. To interpret observational data and analyze further dynamics of the shape of the slick band in the presence of variable currents, numerical simulation was performed.
3.3. Numerical Simulation Results
To simulate the propagation of surfactants forming a slick band, it is necessary to determine the field of near-surface currents that influence this process. We assumed that the upper-ocean current consists of two components, namely, a constant “background” current, which is affected, among other things, by a wind-wave drift (according to [
16]) and a propagating disturbance of the current field induced by an internal wave soliton. To simulate the propagation of surfactants appearing on the water surface from a stationary source, we assume that at each moment of time a marked point appears at the origin of coordinates (0, 0), while the marker with coordinates (
x,
y) in the Cartesian coordinate system moves in accordance with the local value of the current field. The union of markers represents the shape of the slick band. In the absence of disturbance, the marked points on the surface move along the constant current field. Software permits one to “launch” isolated current field disturbances generated by internal wave solitons in the form
where
is the amplitude of the surface current velocity disturbance related to the passage of the internal wave,
t is the time,
is the phase,
is the effective soliton width, and
and
are unit vectors directed along the
Ox and
Oy axes, respectively. The wave vector
describes the propagation of the disturbance front,
is the direction of propagation, and the propagation velocity of the disturbance is described as
VIW.
It was shown in [
17] that for a slick band formed using a constant surfactant source, the surface concentration of surfactants tends to a constant value at a sufficient distance from the source (more than about 100 m in our conditions). This result is valid when the surface current velocity exceeds the velocity of surfactant propagation over the sea surface. This result also means that each surfactant fragment of a constant volume in the band occupies the same area on the surface when the band is formed. We defined a slick band as a set of individual marked points moving in accordance with the local current velocities. To a first approximation, the occupied area of an individual marker
i can be estimated as the product of half the distance between the neighboring points
i − 1 and
i + 1 and the local width of the band. Based on this condition, the width of the band at point
i is inversely proportional to the distance between two neighboring points
i − 1 and
i + 1. The proportionality coefficient is determined from experimental data based on the values of the undisturbed area’s width and current velocity.
When simulating the case of propagation of the IW2 soliton, we used the following parameters according to experimental data. The background current before the soliton arrival had a value of 23 cm/s and was directed at 86 degrees in the polar coordinate system shown in
Figure 8b (mainly to the east). The amplitude of the current speed disturbance related to the soliton was 16.8 cm/s. The speed of soliton disturbance in the north-northeast direction
VIW was 12 cm/s. The spatial width of the disturbance was 15 m, and the phase φ = 25. The phase was determined to be minimal based on the fact that by the time the soliton arrives, a band that propagates at the speed of the background current should be formed. The calculation time interval
dt = 5 s.
Figure 10 shows the dynamics of propagation of an internal wave soliton and its effect on the shape of an artificial slick band created by a surfactant source placed at the origin of coordinates. The vector field depicted corresponds to the current speeds related to the internal wave soliton.
In this way, the situation realized in the field experiment was simulated. The calculation results presented in
Figure 10a fully simulate IW2 shown in the radar panorama in
Figure 8a. Numerical simulation permits one to consider the further spatiotemporal development of the band shape and to study the possible scenarios for the dynamics of the slick band. The soliton propagates with velocity
at an angle
to the background current
Ubackgr and, accordingly, to the undisturbed direction of propagation of the slick band. However, it was clear that the situation could change depending on the relation between
Ubackgr cos
and
. Therefore, simulations with different parameter ratios were performed, and new effects described in the discussion section were discovered.