A Method to Construct an Environmental Vulnerability Model Based on Multi-Source Data to Evaluate the Hazard of Short-Term Precipitation-Induced Flooding
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- (1)
- The present study proposes a novel framework of short-term flood vulnerability analysis through a deep learning-based U-Net++ as well as Exposure–Sensitivity–Adaptive capacity indicators.
- (2)
- Flood areal extension extraction and land-use classification based on multi-source satellite remote sensing images have high real-time performance.
2. Experimental Data and Methodology
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Flooding scope Extraction and Land-Use Classification Based on Multi-source Remote Sensing Images
2.3. Disaster Evaluation System Based on Multi-Source Data
2.3.1. Establishing Vulnerability Model
- (1)
- Exposure
- (2)
- Sensitivity
- (3)
- Adaptive capacity
2.3.2. Confirming Weights of Indicators
3. Results
3.1. Flooding Scope Extraction and Land-Use Types Results
3.2. Analysis of Building Disaster Vulnerability Model Based on Multi-source Data
Results and Analysis of Criterion Layer Elements
- (1)
- Exposure
- (2)
- Sensitivity
- (3)
- Adaptive capacity
- (4)
- Composite vulnerability
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
- U-Net++ is used as the backbone of the network to realize the classification of land uses and the extraction of flooding scope, and then analyze the flooding scope and the results of the surrounding land use erosion. During this short-term rainfall, the water area has increased by 0.18%. The rainfall has the greatest impact on crops lands, but has a weak impact on areas of vegetation and bare lands, and a very weak impact on buildings. The model can quickly and pertinently analyze the land use types affected by short-term precipitation-induced floods, and then provide data support for post-disaster reconstruction and recovery. The proposed feature extraction framework, on account of giving the consideration of land use characteristics and real-time extraction of flooding scope, shows its wide applicability, especially for resource and data-constrained flood regions.
- In this paper, the Exposure–Sensitivity–Adaptive capacity framework is used as the vulnerability assessment system on short-term precipitation-induced floods, and the EVAM is constructed based on multi-source data. The vulnerability is divided into four levels: very high, high, medium, and low. The proportion of the four levels in the study area from high to low is 22.22%, 22.22%, 38.89%, and 16.67%, respectively. The EVAM proposed has well transferability for vulnerability analysis to other types of disasters and can better estimate the relative vulnerability of other regions.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Dottori, F.; Szewczyk, W.; Ciscar, J.-C.; Zhao, F.; Alfieri, L.; Hirabayashi, Y.; Bianchi, A.; Mongelli, I.; Frieler, K.; Betts, R.A.; et al. Increased human and economic losses from river flooding with anthropogenic warming. Nat. Clim. Change 2018, 8, 781–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bamidele, O.F.; Badiora, A.I. Flood Disaster Vulnerability in North Central Nigeria. Int. J. Res. Innov. Soc. Sci. 2019, 3, 42–49. [Google Scholar]
- Ma, S.; Lyu, S.; Zhang, Y. Weighted clustering-based risk assessment on urban rainstorm and flood disaster. Urban Clim. 2021, 39, 100974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shoyama, K.; Cui, Q.; Hanashima, M.; Sano, H.; Usuda, Y. Emergency flood detection using multiple information sources: Integrated analysis of natural hazard monitoring and social media data. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 767, 144371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rahman, M.; Ningsheng, C.; Mahmud, G.I.; Islam, M.; Pourghasemi, H.R.; Ahmad, H.; Habumugisha, J.M.; Washakh, R.M.A.; Alam, M.; Liu, E.; et al. Flooding and its relationship with land cover change, population growth, and road density. Geosci. Front. 2021, 12, 101224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Guo, H.; Wang, D.; Ke, X.; Li, S.; Huang, S. Flood vulnerability and resilience assessment in China based on super-efficiency DEA and SBM-DEA methods. J. Hydrol. 2021, 600, 126470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schwarz, I.; Kuleshov, Y. Flood Vulnerability Assessment and Mapping: A Case Study for Australia’s Hawkesbury-Nepean Catch-ment. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 4894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, B.; Loo, B.P.; Zhen, F.; Xi, G. Urban resilience from the lens of social media data: Responses to urban flooding in Nanjing, China. Cities 2020, 106, 102884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, W.; Ma, C.; Xu, H.; Zhao, K. Urban flood response analysis for designed rainstorms with different characteristics based on a tracer-aided modeling simulation. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 355, 131797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, H.; Pallathadka, A.; Sauer, J.; Grimm, N.B.; Zimmerman, R.; Cheng, C.; Iwaniec, D.M.; Kim, Y.; Lloyd, R.; McPhearson, T.; et al. Assessment of urban flood vulnerability using the social-ecological-technological systems framework in six US cities. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021, 68, 102786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Yang, S.; Ye, T.; An, R.; Chen, C. A new approach to estimating flood-affected populations by combining mobility patterns with multi-source data: A case study of Wuhan, China. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2021, 55, 102106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, K.; Pant, P.; Yamashita, E. Integrating travel demand modeling and flood hazard risk analysis for evacuation and sheltering. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2018, 31, 1177–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. UNISDR Terminology on Disaster Risk Reduction; United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Wood, R.M.; Drayton, M.; Berger, A.; Burgess, A.; Wright, T. Catastrophe loss modelling of storm-surge flood risk in eastern England. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 2005, 363, 1407–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wisner, B.; Blaikie, P.; Cannon, T.; Davis, I. At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters, 2nd ed.; Routledge: London, UK, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Lopez-Valencia, A.P. Vulnerability assessment in urban areas exposed to flood risk: Methodology to explore green infrastructure benefits in a simulation scenario involving the Canaveralejo River in Cali, Colombia. Nat. Hazards 2019, 99, 217–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, Y. Population vulnerability assessment based on scenario simulation of rainstorm-induced waterlogging: A case study of Xuhui District, Shanghai City. Nat. Hazards 2013, 66, 1189–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Budiyono, Y.; Aerts, J.; Brinkman, J.; Marfai, M.; Ward, P. Flood risk assessment for delta mega-cities: A case study of Jakarta. Nat. Hazards 2015, 75, 389–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hendrawan, V.S.A.; Komori, D. Developing flood vulnerability curve for rice crop using remote sensing and hydro-dynamic modeling. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduc. 2021, 54, 102058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adikari, Y.; Osti, R.; Noro, T. Flood-related disaster vulnerability: An impending crisis of megacities in Asia. J. Flood Risk Manag. 2010, 3, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jongman, B.; Winsemius, H.C.; Aerts, J.C.J.H.; de Perez, E.C.; van Aalst, M.K.; Kron, W.; Ward, P.J. Declining vulnerability to river floods and the global benefits of adap-tation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, E2271–E2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, M.; Heiser, M.; Hübl, J.; Fuchs, S. Regional vulnerability assessment for debris flows in China-a CWS approach. Landslides 2016, 13, 537–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duan, Y.; Xiong, J.; Cheng, W.; Wang, N.; Li, Y.; He, Y.; Liu, J.; He, W.; Yang, G. Flood vulnerability assessment using the triangular fuzzy number-based analytic hierarchy process and support vector machine model for the Belt and Road region. Nat. Hazards 2022, 110, 269–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, W.; Xu, K.; Lian, J.; Bin, L.; Ma, C. Multiple flood vulnerability assessment approach based on fuzzy com-prehensive evaluation method and coordinated development degree model. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 213, 440–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, Y.; Gong, S.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, M.; Sun, C.; Xhan, Y. Vulnerability evaluation of rainstorm disaster based on ESA conceptual frame-work: A case study of Liaoning province, China. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021, 64, 102540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IPCC. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- IPCC. Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part a: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Duan, Y.; Xiong, J.; Cheng, W.; Wang, N.; He, W.; He, Y.; Liu, J.; Yang, G.; Wang, J.; Yang, J. Assessment and spatiotemporal analysis of global flood vulnerability in 2005–2020. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2022, 80, 103201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, G.; Chen, H.; Wang, S. Risk assessment and prediction of rainstorm and flood disaster based on henan province, China. Math. Probl. Eng. 2022, 2022, 5310920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Hu, Y.; Guo, Y.; Wu, Z.; Yan, D. Urban flood forecasting based on the coupling of numerical weather model and stormwater model: A case study of Zhengzhou city. J. Hydrol. 2022, 39, 100985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, K.; Wu, Y.; Fan, Q. Construction of rainstorm security pattern based on waterlogging prevention and control: A case study on Zhengzhou City. Alex-Eng. J. 2022, 61, 8911–8918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.; Ma, Z.; Li, Z.; Zhang, P.; Liu, Q.; Nan, Y.; Zhang, J.; Hu, S.; Feng, Y.; Zhao, H. Using CYGNSS Data to Map Flood Inundation during the 2021 Extreme Precipitation in Henan Province, China. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 5181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Z.; Siddiquee, M.M.; Tajbakhsh, N.; Liang, J. UNet++: Redesigning Skip Connections to Exploit Multiscale Features in Image Segmentation. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2020, 39, 1856–1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Liu, L.; Zhao, T.; Gao, Y.; Chen, X.; Mi, J. GISD30: Global 30 m impervious-surface dynamic dataset from 1985 to 2020 using time-series Landsat imagery on the Google Earth Engine platform. Earth Syst. Sci. Data. 2022, 14, 1831–1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saaty, T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1980; pp. 95–115. [Google Scholar]
- Dano, U.L. An AHP-based assessment of flood triggering factors to enhance resiliency in Dammam, Saudi Arabia. GeoJournal 2021, 87, 1945–1960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shannon, C.E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 1948, 27, 379–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nsangou, D.; Kpoumié, A.; Mfonka, Z.; Ngouh, A.N.; Fossi, D.H.; Jourdan, C.; Mbele, H.Z.; Mouncherou, O.F.; Vandervaere, J.-P.; Ngoupayou, J.R.N. Urban flood susceptibility modelling using AHP and GIS approach: Case of the Mfoundi watershed at Yaoundé in the South-Cameroon plateau. Sci. Afr. 2022, 15, e01043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hauke, J.; Kossowski, T. Comparison of Values of Pearson’s and Spearman’s Correlation Coefficients on the Same Sets of Data. Quaest. Geogr. 2011, 30, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arndt, S.; Turvey, C.; Andreasen, N.C. Correlating and predicting psychiatric symptom ratings: Spearmans r versus Kendalls tau correlation. J. Psychiatr. Res. 1999, 33, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ologunorisa, T.E.; Abawua, M.J. Flood risk assessment: A review. J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manag. 2005, 9, 57–63. [Google Scholar]
- Tsakiris, G.J.N.H. Flood risk assessment: Concepts, modelling, applications. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2014, 14, 1361–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lyu, H.M.; Shen, S.L.; Zhou, A.; Yang, J. Perspectives for flood risk assessment and management for mega-city metro system. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2019, 84, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Data | Type | Image Level | Spatial Resolution | Data Quantity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sentinel-1A | SAR | IW-GRD | ~12 m | 25 (image) |
Landsat-8 | Multispectral | L1T (Fusion-Band 4,3,2) | 30 m | 36 (image) |
Vulnerability Index | First Index | S-Index | Index Attribute | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Index | Index | Weight (%) | ||
Exposure (0.491) | Precipitation | Short-term accumulated precipitation (mm) | 10.45 | positive |
Heavy precipitation coverage ratio | 18.57 | positive | ||
Inundated area ratio | 39.07 | positive | ||
Population | Population density (person/km2) | 10.95 | positive | |
Economy | GDP | 20.96 | positive | |
Sensitivity (0.384) | Basin runoff condition | Soil moisture | 8.40 | positive |
Impervious surface ratio | 14.19 | positive | ||
Land use | Crops (%) | 21.19 | positive | |
Vegetation (%) | 5.99 | positive | ||
Water (%) | 18.21 | positive | ||
Built (%) | 6.12 | positive | ||
Bare (%) | 21.19 | positive | ||
Population structure | Aged 0–14 (%) | 8.62 | positive | |
Aged over 65 (%) | 3.11 | positive | ||
Adaptive capacity (0.125) | Drainage | Drainage network density | 14.04 | negative |
Medical care | Medical institution | 17.12 | negative | |
Education | School institution | 60.03 | negative | |
Transport | Road network density (km/km^2) | 8.80 | negative |
Land Use Transfer Matrix | Post-Flood | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Crops | Vegetation | Bare | Water | Built | Total | ||
Pre- flood | Crops | 13,181,352 | 0 | 0 | 35,468 | 0 | 13,216,820 |
Vegetation | 14 | 1,648,268 | 0 | 3712 | 0 | 1,651,994 | |
Bare | 0 | 0 | 12,453 | 1772 | 0 | 14,225 | |
Water | 9524 | 1117 | 1041 | 370,969 | 528 | 383,179 | |
Built | 150 | 0 | 0 | 766 | 931,727 | 932,643 | |
Total | 13,191,040 | 1,649,385 | 13,494 | 412,687 | 932,255 | 16,198,861 |
Exposure | Sensitivity | Adaptive Capacity | |
---|---|---|---|
Exposure | 1.000 | 0.714 | 1.250 |
Sensitivity | 1.400 | 1.000 | 1.492 |
Adaptive capacity | 0.800 | 0.700 | 1.000 |
Vulnerability Index | Feature Vector | Weight Value | Maximum Eigenvalue | CI Value | CR Value | Consistency Test Result |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Exposure | 0.948 | 0.316 | 3.005 | 0.002 | 0.004 | Pass |
Sensitivity | 1.240 | 0.413 | ||||
Adaptive capacity | 0.812 | 0.271 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zhu, H.; Yao, J.; Meng, J.; Cui, C.; Wang, M.; Yang, R. A Method to Construct an Environmental Vulnerability Model Based on Multi-Source Data to Evaluate the Hazard of Short-Term Precipitation-Induced Flooding. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 1609. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15061609
Zhu H, Yao J, Meng J, Cui C, Wang M, Yang R. A Method to Construct an Environmental Vulnerability Model Based on Multi-Source Data to Evaluate the Hazard of Short-Term Precipitation-Induced Flooding. Remote Sensing. 2023; 15(6):1609. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15061609
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhu, Hong, Jiaqi Yao, Jian Meng, Chengling Cui, Mengyao Wang, and Runlu Yang. 2023. "A Method to Construct an Environmental Vulnerability Model Based on Multi-Source Data to Evaluate the Hazard of Short-Term Precipitation-Induced Flooding" Remote Sensing 15, no. 6: 1609. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15061609
APA StyleZhu, H., Yao, J., Meng, J., Cui, C., Wang, M., & Yang, R. (2023). A Method to Construct an Environmental Vulnerability Model Based on Multi-Source Data to Evaluate the Hazard of Short-Term Precipitation-Induced Flooding. Remote Sensing, 15(6), 1609. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15061609