Next Article in Journal
Analysis of Different Weighting Functions of Observations for GPS and Galileo Precise Point Positioning Performance
Next Article in Special Issue
Mapping the Distribution of Summer Precipitation Types over China Based on Radar Observations
Previous Article in Journal
A Machine Learning Strategy Based on Kittler’s Taxonomy to Detect Anomalies and Recognize Contexts Applied to Monitor Water Bodies in Environments
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Two-Step Approach to Blending GSMaP Satellite Rainfall Estimates with Gauge Observations over Australia
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Research on the Method of Rainfall Field Retrieval Based on the Combination of Earth–Space Links and Horizontal Microwave Links

Remote Sens. 2022, 14(9), 2220; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14092220
by Yingcheng Zhao, Xichuan Liu *, Kang Pu, Jin Ye and Minghao Xian
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(9), 2220; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14092220
Submission received: 12 April 2022 / Revised: 1 May 2022 / Accepted: 4 May 2022 / Published: 6 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing for Precipitation Retrievals)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

It is a well-written manuscript. However, I still have some questions for clarification. Please see the attached pdf for further details.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thank you for your comments on the paper, which are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have modified the manuscript according to your comments. The detailed responses see the attached pdf.

We appreciate for your work and hope that the corrections will meet with approval. Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions.

Yingcheng Zhao

2022/1/5

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Very clear presentation. Only two minor improvements are suggested:

  1. Figure 7 – what is on the abscissa?
  2. Page 16, lines 500-508. Maybe it would be of interest to derive the theoretical distributions for PDF or DCF. However, it is optional.

Author Response

Response to Reviewer 2

Thank you for your comments on the paper, which are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have modified the manuscript according to your comments. The detailed responses are as follows.

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Very clear presentation. Only two minor improvements are suggested:

  1. Figure 7: what is on the abscissa?

Response: We are very sorry for this error. The abscissa indicates the serial number of the grid points in the area, and we have redrawn the figure 7 (Figure 8 of the revised manuscript) and labelled the corresponding content.

  1. Page 16, lines 500-508. Maybe it would be of interest to derive the theoretical distributions for PDF or CDF. However, it is optional.

Response: Thank you very much for your suggestion. The PDF and CDF are the results of statistics on all rain rates of 300 real rainfall fields from 2017 to 2019. The theoretical distribution of statistics for more historical data on rain rates is important for the study of the raindrop size distribution (DSD) and the changes in climate in the area. We only briefly research the distribution of rain rates from 2017 to 2019 for error analysis in this paper. However, the theoretical distribution of rain rates over the area will be investigated in more depth in our other work.

 

We appreciate for your work and hope that the corrections will meet with approval. Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions.

Yingcheng Zhao

2022/1/5

Reviewer 3 Report

This paper analyzes rainfall fields coupling with the atmospheric propagation model of Earth-Space Links and Horizontal Micro-wave links. Two simulation methods of OK algorithm and RBF neural network were used to reconstruct the sparse distribution of rainfall and a continuous distribution of rainfall fields in the area were obtained through interpolation techniques.

Introduction is well-written with relevant background information

L 95: machine learning technique

L 315: Space between number and letter: 118 °E ~ 118.35 °E and 24.35 °N ~ 24.7 °N.

L 318-319: Space between number and unit i.e. 2 km

L 353: What represents the blue markers?

L 75 – 80: Define “rainfall field”

L 317: Each grid meaning 35 km x 35 km?

L 395: the results show three rain cells. However, in the methodology it is not specify the number of rain cells (L 381)

L 381-382 Is that cell size  35× 35 km?.

L 436: Label X axis of the bottom graphs of Fig. 7. What’s the unit?

L 531 – 534: In Figure 11 caption that indicates 0.5 m hour interval for a-d, if it is applicable to e-h, and i-l, please mention it in the Figure caption.

Journal titles for some references are not abbreviated [15, 16, 27,37,45,46]

 

 

Author Response

Thank you for your comments on the paper, which are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have modified the manuscript according to your comments. The detailed responses can be found in the attached PDF.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop