Next Article in Journal
Evaluation and Global-Scale Observation of Nitrous Oxide from IASI on Metop-A
Next Article in Special Issue
Estimation of Intertidal Oyster Reef Density Using Spectral and Structural Characteristics Derived from Unoccupied Aircraft Systems and Structure from Motion Photogrammetry
Previous Article in Journal
Method for Estimating the Optimal Coefficient of L1C/B1C Signal Correlator Joint Receiving
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessment of Canopy Health with Drone-Based Orthoimagery in a Southern Appalachian Red Spruce Forest
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mapping Restoration Activities on Dirk Hartog Island Using Remotely Piloted Aircraft Imagery

1
School of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
2
Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, 17 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington, WA 6151, Australia
3
School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(6), 1402; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14061402
Submission received: 2 December 2021 / Revised: 3 February 2022 / Accepted: 11 March 2022 / Published: 14 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Drones for Ecology and Conservation)

Abstract

Conservation practitioners require cost-effective and repeatable remotely sensed data for assistive monitoring. This paper tests the ability of standard remotely piloted aircraft (DJI Phantom 4 Pro) imagery to discriminate between plant species in a rangeland environment. Flights were performed over two 0.3–0.4 ha exclusion plot sites, established as controls to protect vegetation from translocated animal disturbance on Dirk Hartog Island, Western Australia. Comparisons of discriminatory variables, classification potential, and optimal flight height were made between plot sites with different plant species diversity. We found reflectance bands and height variables to have high differentiation potential, whilst measures of texture were less useful for multisegmented plant canopies. Discrimination between species varied with omission errors ranging from 13 to 93%. Purposely resampling c. 5 mm imagery as captured at 20–25 m above terrain identified that a flight height of 120 m would improve capture efficiency in future surveys without hindering accuracy. Overall accuracy at a site with low species diversity (n = 4) was 70%, which is an encouraging result given the imagery is limited to visible spectral bands. With higher species diversity (n = 10), the accuracy reduced to 53%, although it is expected to improve with additional bands or grouping like species. Findings suggest that in rangeland environments with low species diversity, monitoring using a standard RPA is viable.
Keywords: species differentiation; remote sensing; UAV; monitoring and evaluation; rangelands species differentiation; remote sensing; UAV; monitoring and evaluation; rangelands
Graphical Abstract

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wilson, L.; van Dongen, R.; Cowen, S.; Robinson, T.P. Mapping Restoration Activities on Dirk Hartog Island Using Remotely Piloted Aircraft Imagery. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 1402. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14061402

AMA Style

Wilson L, van Dongen R, Cowen S, Robinson TP. Mapping Restoration Activities on Dirk Hartog Island Using Remotely Piloted Aircraft Imagery. Remote Sensing. 2022; 14(6):1402. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14061402

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wilson, Lucy, Richard van Dongen, Saul Cowen, and Todd P. Robinson. 2022. "Mapping Restoration Activities on Dirk Hartog Island Using Remotely Piloted Aircraft Imagery" Remote Sensing 14, no. 6: 1402. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14061402

APA Style

Wilson, L., van Dongen, R., Cowen, S., & Robinson, T. P. (2022). Mapping Restoration Activities on Dirk Hartog Island Using Remotely Piloted Aircraft Imagery. Remote Sensing, 14(6), 1402. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14061402

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop