Next Article in Journal
Digital Soil Texture Mapping and Spatial Transferability of Machine Learning Models Using Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2, and Terrain-Derived Covariates
Next Article in Special Issue
LRFFNet: Large Receptive Field Feature Fusion Network for Semantic Segmentation of SAR Images in Building Areas
Previous Article in Journal
Responses of Soil Freeze–Thaw Processes to Climate on the Tibetan Plateau from 1980 to 2016
Previous Article in Special Issue
BoxPaste: An Effective Data Augmentation Method for SAR Ship Detection
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Remote Sensing
Volume 14
Issue 23
10.3390/rs14235908
Review Report
remotesensing-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Micro-Motion Parameter Extraction of Multi-Scattering-Point Target Based on Vortex Electromagnetic Wave Radar

Remote Sens. 2022, 14(23), 5908; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14235908
by Lijun Bu †, Yongzhong Zhu *,†, Yijun Chen †, Xiaoou Song †, Yufei Yang † and Yadan Zang †
Reviewer 1:
Naixing Feng
Reviewer 2:
Gaobiao Xiao
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(23), 5908; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14235908
Submission received: 29 September 2022 / Revised: 10 November 2022 / Accepted: 15 November 2022 / Published: 22 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue SAR Images Processing and Analysis)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In the manuscript, authors presented a micro-motion features extraction method for spinning target with multiple scattering points based on VEMW radar, and showed the performance. For their work, several comments have been provided below:

1. For the Fig. 1, it is not very professional, such as x, y, z, which need to show using the italic; Besides, the figure is not high resolution, please improve it.

2. The number size of colorbars looks so small so that readers cannot see them clearly, please revise and increase the size of the font in colorbars, such as Fig. 3, Fig. 6(6), etc. In addition, please keep the same font size for your Figures, for example, the different font sizes are shown between Fig.8 and Fig.9, hope they could be corrected.

3. Authors presented many expressions in the manuscript, for some of them, in my view, it is not necessary to be included, however, some relevent works could be cited instead.

 

3. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments can be found in the attachment

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Thank you for the great work. Paper is nicely written and covers the relevant components.

 

Would it be possible to add a more elaborate captions to the Figures (what is shown, how it is obtained and what is a relevant feature to which the reader should pay attention). This applies especially to the multi-panel figures (e.g. Figure 4, 6, 7, 10).

 

Also, the color bars seem to have values, but there is no unit associated with the values. Maybe a comment on that, even if the value is unitless, it should be specified.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

(1) Most of my concerns have been addressed, and the manuscript has been improved quite a lot.

(2) Although the coordinate system has been changed to right-hand system, the definition of the azimuthal angle phi_p is still questionable.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop