You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Remote Sensing
  • Editorial
  • Open Access

6 June 2022

Editorial for the Special Issue: “Human-Environment Interactions Research Using Remote Sensing”

,
and
1
Department of Environmental Sciences, College of the Coast and Environment, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA
2
Department of Geography, Texas A&M University, 3147 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Human–Environment Interactions Research Using Remote Sensing

1. Introduction

In the wake of increasingly frequent extreme weather events and population growth in hazard-prone areas worldwide, human communities are faced with growing threats from natural hazards [1,2]. Sea-level rise caused by climate change, together with coastal erosion and subsidence, erode the coastline and pose additional challenges to coastal human settlements. At the same time, human activities such as urbanization, industrialization, and river diversion continue to alter the landscape, affecting the biodiversity and ecosystem services of the natural environment [3]. Therefore, understanding the interactions between human and natural systems is crucial to predict potential social-environmental transformations and inform governments and residents to plan early. Research findings from studying human-environmental interactions can help human communities become more resilient and sustainable, one of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) outlined by the United Nations [4].
The growing volume of remotely sensed big data [5], as well as advances in automated knowledge discovery from data [6], have brought new opportunities to observe and explore the complex interactions between human and the environment. Remote sensing research has evolved from analyzing images from one satellite sensor to fusing remote sensing data collected from multiple satellite sensors and analyzing their long-term spatial-temporal characteristics. The diverse remote sensing data offer multi-dimensional lenses to observe environmental changes, urban development, and human dynamics. Concurrently, the rapid advances of spatial data science, e.g., novel geo-statistics and machine learning algorithms, have brought forth new methods to reveal patterns observed from remote sensing data and analyze the underlying mechanisms. Given the importance of research on human–environmental interactions and recent development of new technology in remote sensing, it would be useful to have a platform such as this special issue to showcase recent research on the topic. Additionally, through our process of editing the collection, we observe the challenges in human-environmental interactions research using remote sensing and offer suggestions on future research to further advance the field to benefit the good of the society.
This Special Issue contains seven articles, which capture recent advancements in integrating remote sensing data and cutting-edge geospatial analysis technologies, such as spatial modeling, geo-statistics, and machine learning, to answer how human systems respond to natural hazards and environmental dynamics and inform the best pathways to achieve sustainability. The included articles make significant contributions to resilience assessment based on remote sensing data [7,8], novel uses of nighttime light remote sensing in human–environment research [8,9,10], revealing landscape changes from remote sensing [11,12,13], and coupled natural-human system modeling and simulation using remote sensing and machine learning [13].

3. Challenges and Looking Forward

While the Special Issue has successfully showcased important studies on human-environmental interactions using remote sensing with significant findings, the seven articles included in this Special Issue by no means are sufficient to cover the wide range of topics on the theme. Some research topics listed in our call for article submission are touched on but not thoroughly studied, for instance, topics on disease spread, public health, and interaction effects of socio-environmental dynamics on food–water–energy securities; short-term and long-term disaster resilience assessment and modeling; scale effects on coupled human–environmental system modeling; integration of satellite remote sensing data with social media and other geospatial big data; and applications of artificial intelligence algorithms on socio-environmental dynamics simulation and modeling. The scarcity of research on the above-mentioned topics suggests that research on human–environmental interactions using remote sensing is still faced with enormous theoretical and technical challenges. At the same time, it also means that there are lots of opportunities for researchers to contribute to in future research.
We outline below four major challenges, hence research opportunities, in human-environmental interactions research using remote sensing as we move forward [3]. First, human–environmental interactions research typically involves data from various sources and at different spatial and temporal scales. For instance, human data are usually defined in polygon form whereas remote sensing data are in pixel form. Integrating these data into a uniform platform for human–environmental interaction modeling requires efficient and accurate integration and interpolation algorithms, which are not easily available. Development of efficient integration and interpolation algorithms and making them available to researchers would help remove a major obstacle to conducting human-environmental research. Second, at a deeper, theoretical level, there is fundamental incompatibility of the underlying processes and their effects on various human and environmental components. Some processes will take years to observe the difference such as elevation change, whereas others may take place rapidly, such as disease spread. Development of a strong theoretical framework is necessary to help guide the study and to lead to meaningful results. This is important because a major goal of human–environmental modeling is to improve understanding and increase community resilience to adverse events. Collaborating with researchers and stakeholders across boundaries could be a useful step to improve convergence and synergies of the framework [16]. Third, increasing the information content of remote sensing data through better design of new sensors as well as integration of multi-sensors will improve many remote sensing studies [17]. For human–environmental interactions modeling, employing more spatial analytical methods in the analysis of remote sensing data will help increase its information value. For example, landscape indices computed from remote sensing images such as the fractal dimension could be used to study the degree or human disturbance in a forest or estimate the land loss probability in a vulnerable coast [18,19]. Finally, integration of remote sensing with human dynamics and social media data, coupled with the cutting-edge AI technology, is still an infant area that needs further exploration [20,21]. We look forward to, perhaps in the next special issue, seeing more studies in this exciting field.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cai, H.; Lam, N.S.-N.; Zou, L.; Qiang, Y.; Li, K. Assessing community resilience to coastal hazards in the Lower Mississippi River Basin. Water 2016, 8, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Qiang, Y.; Lam, N.S.-N.; Cai, H.; Zou, L. Changes in exposure to flood hazards in the United States. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 2018, 107, 1332–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lam, N.S.-N.; Xu, Y.J.; Liu, K.; Dismukes, D.E.; Reams, M.; Pace, R.K.; Qiang, Y.; Narra, S.; Li, K.; Bianchette, T.A.; et al. Understanding the Mississippi River Delta as a coupled natural-human system: Research methods, challenges, and prospects. Water 2018, 10, 1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. THE 17 GOALS|Sustainable Development. (n.d.). Available online: https://sdgs.un.org/goals (accessed on 15 March 2022).
  5. Zhang, B.; Chen, Z.; Peng, D.; Benediktsson, J.A.; Liu, B.; Zou, L.; Li, J.; Plaza, A. Remotely sensed big data: Evolution in model development for information extraction [point of view]. Proc. IEEE 2019, 107, 2294–2301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gahegan, M. Fourth paradigm GIScience? Prospects for automated discovery and explanation from data. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2020, 34, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Tayyab, M.; Zhang, J.; Hussain, M.; Ullah, S.; Liu, X.; Khan, S.N.; Baig, M.A.; Hassan, W.; Al-Shaibah, B. GIS-based urban flood resilience assessment using Urban Flood Resilience Model: A case study of Peshawar City, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 1864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xu, J.; Qiang, Y. Spatial assessment of community resilience from 2012 Hurricane Sandy using nighttime light. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 4128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lin, Z.; Xu, H. Anthropogenic heat flux estimation based on Luojia 1-01 new nighttime light data: A case study of Jiangsu Province, China. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 3707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. He, Y.; Kuang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Ruan, Z. Spatial correlation between ecosystem services and human disturbances: A Case Study of the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area, China. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Falťan, V.; Petrovi, F.; Gábor, M.; Šagát, V.; Hruška, M. Mountain landscape dynamics after large wind and bark beetle disasters and subsequent logging—Case studies from the Carpathians. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 3873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cohen, M.C.L.; de Souza, A.V.; Liu, K.-B.; Rodrigues, E.; Yao, Q.; Pessenda, L.C.R.; Rossetti, D.; Ryu, J.; Dietz, M. Effects of beach nourishment project on coastal geomorphology and mangrove dynamics in Southern Louisiana, USA. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 2688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yang, M.; Zou, L.; Cai, H.; Qiang, Y.; Lin, B.; Zhou, B.; Abedin, J.; Mandal, D. Spatial–temporal land loss modeling and simulation in a vulnerable coast: A case study in coastal Louisiana. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lam, N.S.-N.; Reams, M.; Li, K.; Li, C.; Mata, L.P. Measuring community resilience to coastal hazards along the Northern Gulf of Mexico. Nat. Hazards Rev. 2016, 17, 04015013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Zou, L. Mapping the disparities of community resilience to natural hazards in the United States. Abstr. ICA 2021, 3, 330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lam, N.S.-N.; Xu, Y.J.; Pace, R.K.; Liu, K.B.; Qiang, Y.; Narra, S.; Bianchette, T.A.; Cai, H.; Zou, L.; Li, K.; et al. Collaboration across boundaries: Reflections on studying the sustainability of the Mississippi River Delta as a coupled natural-human system. In Collaboration across Boundaries for Interdisciplinary Social-Ecological Systems Science; Perz, S., Ed.; Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  17. Dubovik, O.; Schuster, G.L.; Xu, F.; Hu, Y.; Bosch, H.; Landgraf, J.; Li, Z. Grand challenges in satellite remote sensing. Front. Remote Sens. 2021, 2, 619818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Read, J.M.; Lam, N.S.-N. Spatial methods for characterizing land-cover changes for the tropics. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2002, 23, 2457–2474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lam, N.S.-N.; Cheng, W.; Zou, L.; Cai, H. Effects of landscape fragmentation on land loss. Remote Sens. Environ. 2018, 209, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zou, L.; Lam, N.S.-N.; Cai, H.; Qiang, Y. Mining Twitter data for improved understanding of disaster resilience. Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr. 2018, 108, 1422–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zou, L.; Lam, N.S.-N.; Shams, S.; Cai, H.; Meyer, M.A.; Yang, S.; Lee, K.; Park, S.; Reams, M.A. Social and geographical disparities in Twitter use during Hurricane Harvey. Int. J. Digit. Earth 2019, 12, 1300–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.