Next Article in Journal
Near-Coast Tide Model Validation Using GNSS Unmanned Surface Vehicle (USV), a Case Study in the Pertuis Charentais (France)
Previous Article in Journal
Land Use and Degradation in a Desert Margin: The Northern Negev
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparison of Coniferous Plantation Heights Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Laser Scanning and Stereo Photogrammetry

1
Institute of Forest Resource Information Techniques, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China
2
Key Laboratory of Forestry Remote Sensing and Information System, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100091, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(15), 2885; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13152885
Submission received: 21 May 2021 / Revised: 10 July 2021 / Accepted: 20 July 2021 / Published: 23 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Forest Remote Sensing)

Abstract

Plantation forests play a critical role in forest products and ecosystems. Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) remote sensing has become a promising technology in forest related applications. The stand heights will reflect the growth and competition of individual trees in plantation. UAV laser scanning (ULS) and UAV stereo photogrammetry (USP) can both be used to estimate stand heights using different algorithms. Thus, this study aimed to deeply explore the variations of four kinds of stand heights including mean height, Lorey’s height, dominated height, and median height of coniferous plantations using different models based on ULS and USP data. In addition, the impacts of thinned point density of 30 pts to 10 pts, 5 pts, 1 pts, and 0.8 pts/m2 were also analyzed. Forest stand heights were estimated from ULS and USP data metrics by linear regression and the prediction accuracy was assessed by 10-fold cross validation. The results showed that the prediction accuracy of the stand heights using metrics from USP was basically as good as that of ULS. Lorey’s height had the highest prediction accuracy, followed by dominated height, mean height, and median height. The correlation between height percentiles metrics from ULS and USP increased with the increased height. Different stand heights had their corresponding best height percentiles as variables based on stand height characteristics. Furthermore, canopy height model (CHM)-based metrics performed slightly better than normalized point cloud (NPC)-based metrics. The USP was not able to extract exact terrain information in a continuous coniferous plantation for forest canopy cover (CC) over 0.49. The combination of USP and terrain from ULS can be used to estimate forest stand heights with high accuracy. In addition, the estimation accuracy of each forest stand height was slightly affected by point density, which can also be ignored.
Keywords: forest stand height; UAV laser scanning; UAV stereo photogrammetry; point clouds density; CHM; metrics forest stand height; UAV laser scanning; UAV stereo photogrammetry; point clouds density; CHM; metrics
Graphical Abstract

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, M.; Li, Z.; Liu, Q.; Chen, E. Comparison of Coniferous Plantation Heights Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Laser Scanning and Stereo Photogrammetry. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 2885. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13152885

AMA Style

Li M, Li Z, Liu Q, Chen E. Comparison of Coniferous Plantation Heights Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Laser Scanning and Stereo Photogrammetry. Remote Sensing. 2021; 13(15):2885. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13152885

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Mei, Zengyuan Li, Qingwang Liu, and Erxue Chen. 2021. "Comparison of Coniferous Plantation Heights Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Laser Scanning and Stereo Photogrammetry" Remote Sensing 13, no. 15: 2885. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13152885

APA Style

Li, M., Li, Z., Liu, Q., & Chen, E. (2021). Comparison of Coniferous Plantation Heights Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Laser Scanning and Stereo Photogrammetry. Remote Sensing, 13(15), 2885. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13152885

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop