Estimation of Changes of Forest Structural Attributes at Three Different Spatial Aggregation Levels in Northern California using Multitemporal LiDAR
Forest Engineering Resources and Management, College of Forestry, Oregon State University, 2150 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
US Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research Station, 3644 Avtech Parkway, Redding, CA 96002, USA
US Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, 3200 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
US Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 1221 S Main St, Moscow, ID 83843, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 18 March 2019 / Revised: 10 April 2019 / Accepted: 12 April 2019 / Published: 16 April 2019
PDF [10856 KB, uploaded 17 April 2019]
Accurate estimates of growth and structural changes are key for forest management tasks such as determination of optimal rotation times, optimal rotation times, site indices and for identifying areas experiencing difficulties to regenerate. Estimation of structural changes, especially for biomass, is also key to quantify greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions/sequestration. We compared two different modeling strategies to estimate changes in V, BA and B, at three different spatial aggregation levels using auxiliary information from two light detection and ranging (LiDAR) flights. The study area is Blacks Mountains Experimental Forest, a ponderosa pine dominated forest in Northern California for which two LiDAR acquisitions separated by six years were available. Analyzed strategies consisted of (1) directly modeling the observed changes as a function of the LiDAR auxiliary information (
-modeling method) and (2) modeling V, BA and B at two different points in time, including a term to account for the temporal correlation, and then computing the changes as the difference between the predicted values of V, BA and B for time two and time one. We analyzed predictions and measures of uncertainty at three different level of aggregation (i.e., pixels, stands or compartments and the entire study area). Results showed that changes were very weakly correlated with the LiDAR auxiliary information. Both modeling alternatives provided similar results with a better performance of the
-modeling for the entire study area; however, this method also showed some inconsistencies and seemed to be very prone to extrapolation problems. The
-modeling method, which seems to be less prone to extrapolation problems, allows obtaining more outputs that are flexible and can outperform the
-modeling method at the stand level. The weak correlation between changes in structural attributes and LiDAR auxiliary information indicates that pixel-level maps have very large uncertainties and estimation of change clearly requires some degree of spatial aggregation; additionally, in similar environments, it might be necessary to increase the time lapse between LiDAR acquisitions to obtain reliable estimates of change.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
Share & Cite This Article
MDPI and ACS Style
Mauro, F.; Ritchie, M.; Wing, B.; Frank, B.; Monleon, V.; Temesgen, H.; Hudak, A. Estimation of Changes of Forest Structural Attributes at Three Different Spatial Aggregation Levels in Northern California using Multitemporal LiDAR. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 923.
Mauro F, Ritchie M, Wing B, Frank B, Monleon V, Temesgen H, Hudak A. Estimation of Changes of Forest Structural Attributes at Three Different Spatial Aggregation Levels in Northern California using Multitemporal LiDAR. Remote Sensing. 2019; 11(8):923.
Mauro, Francisco; Ritchie, Martin; Wing, Brian; Frank, Bryce; Monleon, Vicente; Temesgen, Hailemariam; Hudak, Andrew. 2019. "Estimation of Changes of Forest Structural Attributes at Three Different Spatial Aggregation Levels in Northern California using Multitemporal LiDAR." Remote Sens. 11, no. 8: 923.
Show more citation formats
Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
[Return to top]
For more information on the journal statistics, click here
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.