Next Article in Journal
Population Mapping with Multisensor Remote Sensing Images and Point-Of-Interest Data
Next Article in Special Issue
Using Very High Resolution Thermal Infrared Imagery for More Accurate Determination of the Impact of Land Cover Differences on Evapotranspiration in an Irrigated Agricultural Area
Previous Article in Journal
Retrieving Corn Canopy Leaf Area Index from Multitemporal Landsat Imagery and Terrestrial LiDAR Data
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exploring the Potential of Satellite Solar-Induced Fluorescence to Constrain Global Transpiration Estimates
Article Menu
Issue 5 (March-1) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle

Impact of the Revisit of Thermal Infrared Remote Sensing Observations on Evapotranspiration Uncertainty—A Sensitivity Study Using AmeriFlux Data

Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
Terrestrial Information Systems Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA
UMR EMMAH, INRA, Avignon University, 84000 Avignon, France
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA
UMR ISPA, INRA, 33140 Villenave d’Ornon, France
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2019, 11(5), 573;
Received: 30 December 2018 / Revised: 20 February 2019 / Accepted: 4 March 2019 / Published: 8 March 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Remote Sensing of Terrestrial Evaporation)
PDF [7118 KB, uploaded 8 March 2019]


Thermal infrared remote sensing observations have been widely used to provide useful information on surface energy and water stress for estimating evapotranspiration (ET). However, the revisit time of current high spatial resolution (<100 m) thermal infrared remote sensing systems, sixteen days for Landsat for example, can be insufficient to reliably derive ET information for water resources management. We used in situ ET measurements from multiple Ameriflux sites to (1) evaluate different scaling methods that are commonly used to derive daytime ET estimates from time-of-day observations; and (2) quantify the impact of different revisit times on ET estimates at monthly and seasonal time scales. The scaling method based on a constant evaporative ratio between ET and the top-of-atmosphere solar radiation provided slightly better results than methods using the available energy, the surface solar radiation or the potential ET as scaling reference fluxes. On average, revisit time periods of 2, 4, 8 and 16 days resulted in ET uncertainties of 0.37, 0.55, 0.73 and 0.90 mm per day in summer, which represented 13%, 19%, 23% and 31% of the monthly average ET calculated using the one-day revisit dataset. The capability of a system to capture rapid changes in ET was significantly reduced for return periods higher than eight days. The impact of the revisit on ET depended mainly on the land cover type and seasonal climate, and was higher over areas with high ET. We did not observe significant and systematic differences between the impacts of the revisit on monthly ET estimates that are based on morning or afternoon observations. We found that four-day revisit scenarios provided a significant improvement in temporal sampling to monitor surface ET reducing by around 40% the uncertainty of ET products derived from a 16-day revisit system, such as Landsat for instance. View Full-Text
Keywords: Evapotranspiration; remote sensing; revisit time period; AmeriFlux Evapotranspiration; remote sensing; revisit time period; AmeriFlux

Graphical abstract

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Guillevic, P.C.; Olioso, A.; Hook, S.J.; Fisher, J.B.; Lagouarde, J.-P.; Vermote, E.F. Impact of the Revisit of Thermal Infrared Remote Sensing Observations on Evapotranspiration Uncertainty—A Sensitivity Study Using AmeriFlux Data. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 573.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Remote Sens. EISSN 2072-4292 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top