Next Article in Journal
An All-Weather Land Surface Temperature Product Based on MSG/SEVIRI Observations
Previous Article in Journal
A Review of RFI Mitigation Techniques in Microwave Radiometry
Open AccessArticle

Evaluation and Intercomparison of SMOS, Aquarius, and SMAP Sea Surface Salinity Products in the Arctic Ocean

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA
Polar Science Center, Applied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA
Physical & Technological Oceanography Department, Barcelona Expert Center, Institut de Ciencies del Mar -CMIMA (CSIC), 08003 Barcelona, Spain
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2019, 11(24), 3043;
Received: 6 November 2019 / Revised: 9 December 2019 / Accepted: 10 December 2019 / Published: 17 December 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Ocean Remote Sensing)
Salinity is a critical parameter in the Arctic Ocean, having potential implications for climate and weather. This study presents the first systematic analysis of 6 commonly used sea surface salinity (SSS) products from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Aquarius and Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) satellites and the European Space Agency (ESA) Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) mission, in terms of their consistency among one another and with in-situ data. Overall, the satellite SSS products provide a similar characterization of the time mean SSS large-scale patterns and are relatively consistent in depicting the regions with strong SSS temporal variability. When averaged over the Arctic Ocean, the SSS show an excellent consistency in describing the seasonal and interannual variations. Comparison of satellite SSS with in-situ salinity measurements along ship transects suggest that satellite SSS captures salinity gradients away from regions with significant sea-ice concentration. The root-mean square differences (RMSD) of satellite SSS with respect to in-situ measurements improves with increasing temperature, reflecting the limitation of L-band radiometric sensitivity to SSS in cold water. However, the satellite SSS biases with respect to the in-situ measurements do not show a consistent dependence on temperature. The results have significant implications for the calibration and validation of satellite SSS as well as for the modeling community and the design of future satellite missions. View Full-Text
Keywords: sea surface salinity; Arctic; SMAP; Aquarius; SMOS sea surface salinity; Arctic; SMAP; Aquarius; SMOS
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Fournier, S.; Lee, T.; Tang, W.; Steele, M.; Olmedo, E. Evaluation and Intercomparison of SMOS, Aquarius, and SMAP Sea Surface Salinity Products in the Arctic Ocean. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 3043.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop