Next Article in Journal
Multi-Temporal and Multi-Frequency SAR Analysis for Forest Land Cover Mapping of the Mai-Ndombe District (Democratic Republic of Congo)
Next Article in Special Issue
Retrieval of Particulate Backscattering Using Field and Satellite Radiometry: Assessment of the QAA Algorithm
Previous Article in Journal
Ship Identification and Characterization in Sentinel-1 SAR Images with Multi-Task Deep Learning
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of HY-2A Scatterometer Ocean Surface Wind Data during 2012–2018
Open AccessArticle

Evaluation of Sentinel-3A Wave Height Observations Near the Coast of Southwest England

EOSA, Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth PL1 3DH, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2019, 11(24), 2998; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11242998
Received: 30 October 2019 / Revised: 29 November 2019 / Accepted: 10 December 2019 / Published: 13 December 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Satellite Derived Global Ocean Product Validation/Evaluation)
Due to the smaller ground footprint and higher spatial resolution of the Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) mode, altimeter observations from the Sentinel-3 satellites are expected to be overall more accurate in coastal areas than conventional nadir altimetry. The performance of Sentinel-3A in the coastal region of southwest England was assessed by comparing SAR mode observations of significant wave height against those of Pseudo Low Resolution Mode (PLRM). Sentinel-3A observations were evaluated against in-situ observations from a network of 17 coastal wave buoys, which provided continuous time-series of hourly values of significant wave height, period and direction. As the buoys are evenly distributed along the coast of southwest England, they are representative of a broad range of morphological configurations and swell conditions against which to assess Sentinel-3 SAR observations. The analysis indicates that SAR observations outperform PLRM within 15 km from the coast. Within that region, regression slopes between SAR and buoy observations are close to the 1:1 relation, and the average root mean square error between the two is 0.46 ± 0.14 m. On the other hand, regression slopes for PLRM observations rapidly deviate from the 1:1 relation, while the average root mean square error increases to 0.84 ± 0.45 m. The analysis did not identify any dependence of the bias between SAR and in-situ observation on the swell period or direction. The validation is based on a synergistic approach which combines satellite and in-situ observations with innovative use of numerical wave model output to help inform the choice of comparison regions. Such an approach could be successfully applied in future studies to assess the performance of SAR observations over other combinations of coastal regions and altimeters. View Full-Text
Keywords: satellite altimetry; significant wave height; SAR; wave buoy observations; validation; southwest England; coastal altimetry; Sentinel-3A; SRAL satellite altimetry; significant wave height; SAR; wave buoy observations; validation; southwest England; coastal altimetry; Sentinel-3A; SRAL
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Nencioli, F.; Quartly, G.D. Evaluation of Sentinel-3A Wave Height Observations Near the Coast of Southwest England. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 2998.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop