Next Article in Journal
Multispectral UAS Data Accuracy for Different Radiometric Calibration Methods
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluating the Temperature Difference Parameter in the SSEBop Model with Satellite-Observed Land Surface Temperature Data
Previous Article in Journal
Mapping Recent Lava Flows at Mount Etna Using Multispectral Sentinel-2 Images and Machine Learning Techniques
Previous Article in Special Issue
Satellite Earth Observation Data in Epidemiological Modeling of Malaria, Dengue and West Nile Virus: A Scoping Review
Open AccessEditor’s ChoiceArticle

An Analysis of Ground-Point Classifiers for Terrestrial LiDAR

Department of Geography, Environment & Geomatics, The University of Guelph, 50 Stone Rd. E, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2019, 11(16), 1915;
Received: 16 July 2019 / Revised: 2 August 2019 / Accepted: 12 August 2019 / Published: 16 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing: 10th Anniversary)
Previous literature has compared the performance of existing ground point classification (GPC) techniques on airborne LiDAR (ALS) data (LiDAR—light detection and ranging); however, their performance when applied to terrestrial LiDAR (TLS) data has not yet been addressed. This research tested the classification accuracy of five openly-available GPC algorithms on seven TLS datasets: Zhang et al.’s inverted cloth simulation (CSF), Kraus and Pfeiffer’s hierarchical weighted robust interpolation classifier (HWRI), Axelsson’s progressive TIN densification filter (TIN), Evans and Hudak’s multiscale curvature classification (MCC), and Vosselman’s modified slope-based filter (MSBF). Classification performance was analyzed using the kappa index of agreement (KIA) and rasterized spatial distribution of classification accuracy datasets generated through comparisons with manually classified reference datasets. The results identified a decrease in classification accuracy for the CSF and HWRI classification of low vegetation, for the HWRI and MCC classifications of variably sloped terrain, for the HWRI and TIN classifications of low outlier points, and for the TIN and MSBF classifications of off-terrain (OT) points without any ground points beneath. Additionally, the results show that while no single algorithm was suitable for use on all datasets containing varying terrain characteristics and OT object types, in general, a mathematical-morphology/slope-based method outperformed other methods, reporting a kappa score of 0.902. View Full-Text
Keywords: LiDAR; terrestrial LiDAR (TLS); ground point classification (GPC); ground point filter; ground point separation; point cloud classification LiDAR; terrestrial LiDAR (TLS); ground point classification (GPC); ground point filter; ground point separation; point cloud classification
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Roberts, K.C.; Lindsay, J.B.; Berg, A.A. An Analysis of Ground-Point Classifiers for Terrestrial LiDAR. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 1915.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop