Not Deep Learning but Autonomous Learning of Open Innovation for Sustainable Artificial Intelligence
1
Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology (DGIST), 333, Techno Jungang Daero, Hyeonpung-Myeon, Dalseong-Gun, Daegu 711-873, Korea
2
Department of Business Administration, Sangji University, 660 Woosan-Dong, Wonju-Si 220-702, Kangwon, Korea
3
School of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: G. Ioppolo
Sustainability 2016, 8(8), 797; https://doi.org/10.3390/su8080797
Received: 25 May 2016 / Revised: 25 July 2016 / Accepted: 2 August 2016 / Published: 13 August 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability and Open Innovation Capabilities of Firms for Value Chain Development)
What do we need for sustainable artificial intelligence that is not harmful but beneficial human life? This paper builds up the interaction model between direct and autonomous learning from the human’s cognitive learning process and firms’ open innovation process. It conceptually establishes a direct and autonomous learning interaction model. The key factor of this model is that the process to respond to entries from external environments through interactions between autonomous learning and direct learning as well as to rearrange internal knowledge is incessant. When autonomous learning happens, the units of knowledge determinations that arise from indirect learning are separated. They induce not only broad autonomous learning made through the horizontal combinations that surpass the combinations that occurred in direct learning but also in-depth autonomous learning made through vertical combinations that appear so that new knowledge is added. The core of the interaction model between direct and autonomous learning is the variability of the boundary between proven knowledge and hypothetical knowledge, limitations in knowledge accumulation, as well as complementarity and conflict between direct and autonomous learning. Therefore, these should be considered when introducing the interaction model between direct and autonomous learning into navigations, cleaning robots, search engines, etc. In addition, we should consider the relationship between direct learning and autonomous learning when building up open innovation strategies and policies.
View Full-Text
▼
Show Figures
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
MDPI and ACS Style
Yun, J.J.; Lee, D.; Ahn, H.; Park, K.; Yigitcanlar, T. Not Deep Learning but Autonomous Learning of Open Innovation for Sustainable Artificial Intelligence. Sustainability 2016, 8, 797. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8080797
AMA Style
Yun JJ, Lee D, Ahn H, Park K, Yigitcanlar T. Not Deep Learning but Autonomous Learning of Open Innovation for Sustainable Artificial Intelligence. Sustainability. 2016; 8(8):797. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8080797
Chicago/Turabian StyleYun, JinHyo J.; Lee, Dooseok; Ahn, Heungju; Park, Kyungbae; Yigitcanlar, Tan. 2016. "Not Deep Learning but Autonomous Learning of Open Innovation for Sustainable Artificial Intelligence" Sustainability 8, no. 8: 797. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8080797
Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
Search more from Scilit