Optimization of Organic Waste Composting Using the Effective Microorganisms Klebsiella oxytoca, Sphingomonas paucimobilis, and Pantoea spp.
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area and Standardization of the Conventional Composting Process
2.2. Identification of Effective Microorganisms (EM)
2.3. Composting with Effective Microorganisms
2.4. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Standardization of the Conventional Composting Process
3.2. Evaluation of the Effect of the Four Treatments on Temperature, Moisture, and pH
3.3. EM Identification
3.4. Composting with Effective Microorganisms (EM)
3.5. Assessment of the Effect of the Control Group and ME Group on the Behavior of the Temperature, Moisture, and pH Variables
4. Discussion
4.1. Process Dynamics: Temperature and Moisture
4.2. Moisture Behavior and Microbial Activity
4.3. pH Evolution During the Composting Process
4.4. Implications of Microbial Inoculation for Composting Efficiency
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Xu, M.; Legradi, J.; Leonards, P. Using Comprehensive Lipid Profiling to Study Effects of PFHxS during Different Stages of Early Zebrafish Development. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 808, 151739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bagdat, S.; Tokay, F.; Demirci, S.; Yilmaz, S.; Sahiner, N. Removal of Cd(II), Co(II), Cr(III), Ni(II), Pb(II) and Zn(II) Ions from Wastewater Using Polyethyleneimine (PEI) Cryogels. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 329, 117002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaza, S.; Yao, L.C.; Bhada-Tata, P.; Van Woerden, F. What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Aguilar-Paredes, A.; Valdés, G.; Araneda, N.; Valdebenito, E.; Hansen, F.; Nuti, M. Microbial Community in the Composting Process and Its Positive Impact on the Soil Biota in Sustainable Agriculture. Agronomy 2023, 13, 542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meilander, J.; Caporaso, J.G. The Microbiome Science of Composting and Human Excrement Composting: A Review. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2409.07376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Velasquez Huacho, G.I. Uso de Microorganismos Eficientes y Su Impacto Térmico En El Compostaje de Residuos Orgánicos. Sciencevolution 2024, 4, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barry, K.P.; Taylor, E.A. Characterizing the Promiscuity of LigAB, a Lignin Catabolite Degrading Extradiol Dioxygenase from Sphingomonas paucimobilis SYK-6. Biochemistry 2013, 52, 6724–6736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, M.; Chen, L.; Xin, Y.; Wang, X.; Wang, Z.; Meng, X.; Zhang, W.; Sun, H.; Li, Y.; Zhang, W.; et al. Characteristics and Mechanism of Ammonia Nitrogen Removal by Heterotrophic Nitrification Bacterium Klebsiella Pneumoniae LCU1 and Its Application in Wastewater Treatment. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, P.; Pandey, R.; Chauhan, N.S. Unveiling Wheat Growth Promotion Potential of Phosphate Solubilizing Pantoea agglomerans PS1 and PS2 through Genomic, Physiological, and Metagenomic Characterizations. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1467082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gómez-Brandón, M.; Martínez-Cordeiro, H.; Domínguez, J. Changes in the Nutrient Dynamics and Microbiological Properties of Grape Marc in a Continuous-Feeding Vermicomposting System. Waste Manag. 2021, 135, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, F.; Wei, X.; Chen, Y.; Zhu, N.; Zhao, Y.; Cui, B.; Wu, P. Efficient Recovery of Lead and Iron from Disposal Residues of Spent Lead-Acid Batteries. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2022, 187, 106614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, W.; Zhang, J. Assessing the Performance of Gray and Green Strategies for Sustainable Urban Drainage System Development: A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 293, 126191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isiuku, B.O.; Enyoh, C.E. Pollution and Health Risks Assessment of Nitrate and Phosphate Concentrations in Water Bodies in South Eastern, Nigeria. Environ. Adv. 2020, 2, 100018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tahsini, M.J.; Nikaeen, M.; Mohammadi, F.; Taghipour, A.; Tahmasebi, M.; Nafez, A.H. Composting of Municipal Solid Waste with Microbial-Inoculated Biochar Amendment: Impact on Process and End-Product Quality. Biochar 2025, 7, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, W.; Zhou, R.; Li, X.; Yan, H.; Zheng, J.; Peng, N.; Zhao, S. Effect of Simplified Inoculum Agent on Performance and Microbiome during Cow Manure-Composting at Industrial-Scale. Bioresour. Technol. 2024, 393, 130097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, Q.; Li, N.; Jiang, S.; Li, G.; Yuan, J.; Li, Y.; Chang, R.; Gong, X. Composting of Post-Consumption Food Waste Enhanced by Bioaugmentation with Microbial Consortium. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 907, 168107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, L.; Zhao, Y.; Yao, X.; Zhou, M.; Li, W.; Liu, Z.; Hu, B. Inoculation Enhances Directional Humification by Increasing Microbial Interaction Intensity in Food Waste Composting. Chemosphere 2023, 322, 138191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zainudin, M.H.M.; Zulkarnain, A.; Azmi, A.S.; Muniandy, S.; Sakai, K.; Shirai, Y.; Hassan, M.A. Enhancement of Agro-Industrial Waste Composting Process via the Microbial Inoculation: A Brief Review. Agronomy 2022, 12, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balla, A.; Silini, A.; Cherif-Silini, H.; Bouket, A.C.; Boudechicha, A.; Luptakova, L.; Alenezi, F.N.; Belbahri, L. Screening of Cellulolytic Bacteria from Various Ecosystems and Their Cellulases Production under Multi-Stress Conditions. Catalysts 2022, 12, 769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Millones, C.E.; Vásquez, E.R.; Fernandez-Güimac, S.L.; Bustamante, D.E.; Calderon, M.S. Cellulolytic and Amylolytic Bacteria with Potential for Composting Urban Solid Waste at Low Temperatures in Northern Peru. SSRN J. 2022. Epub ahead of printing. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Epstein, E. Industrial Composting; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Bernal, M.P.; Alburquerque, J.A.; Moral, R. Composting of Animal Manures and Chemical Criteria for Compost Maturity Assessment. A Review. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 5444–5453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haug, R.T. The Practical Handbook of Compost Engineering, 1st ed.; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Putri, R.E.; Maharani, I.P.; Putri, I. Real-Time Monitoring System for Temperature, Humidity, and pH for Composting Process. J. Tek. Pertan. Lampung 2025, 14, 380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wood, S.N. Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R, 2nd ed.; Chapman and Hall/CRC: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Biyada, S.; Merzouki, M.; Dėmčėnko, T.; Vasiliauskienė, D.; Ivanec-Goranina, R.; Urbonavičius, J.; Marčiulaitienė, E.; Vasarevičius, S.; Benlemlih, M. Microbial Community Dynamics in the Mesophilic and Thermophilic Phases of Textile Waste Composting Identified through Next-Generation Sequencing. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 23624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaspar, S.S.; Assis, L.L.R.; Carvalho, C.A.; Buttrós, V.H.; Ferreira, G.M.D.R.; Schwan, R.F.; Pasqual, M.; Rodrigues, F.A.; Rigobelo, E.C.; Castro, R.P.; et al. Dynamics of Microbiota and Physicochemical Characterization of Food Waste in a New Type of Composter. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2022, 6, 960196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Kong, Y.; Yang, Y.; Ma, R.; Li, G.; Wang, J.; Cui, Z.; Yuan, J. Effects of Thermophilic Bacteria Inoculation on Maturity, Gaseous Emission and Bacterial Community Succession in Hyperthermophilic Composting. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 927, 172304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Finore, I.; Feola, A.; Russo, L.; Cattaneo, A.; Di Donato, P.; Nicolaus, B.; Poli, A.; Romano, I. Thermophilic Bacteria and Their Thermozymes in Composting Processes: A Review. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2023, 10, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, R.; Liu, Y.; Ma, R.; Zhang, L.; Li, Y.; Li, G.; Wang, D.; Lin, J.; Li, Q.; Yuan, J. Effect of Moisture Content, Aeration Rate, and C/N on Maturity and Gaseous Emissions during Kitchen Waste Rapid Composting. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 326, 116662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gurusamy, N.N.; Puffer, N.; De Jongh, C.; Rodriguez Gil, C.; Aspray, T.J. Effect of Initial Moisture Content and Sample Storage Duration on Compost Stability Using the ORG0020 Dynamic Respiration Test. Waste Manag. 2021, 125, 215–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Blanco, V.M.; Maya, J.J.; Correa, A.; Perenguez, M.; Muñoz, J.S.; Motoa, G.; Pallares, C.J.; Rosso, F.; Matta, L.; Celis, Y.; et al. Prevalencia y factores de riesgo para infecciones del tracto urinario de inicio en la comunidad causadas por Escherichia coli productor de betalactamasas de espectro extendido en Colombia. Enfermedades Infecc. Microbiol. Clín. 2016, 34, 559–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pérémé, M.; Haddon, A.; Steyer, J.-P.; Jimenez, J. SoilFract: A Mechanistic Model Accounting for the Fate of Exogenous Organic Matter in Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Cycles. Waste Manag. 2023, 159, 63–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chinakwe, E.C.; Ibekwe, V.I.; Ofoh, M.C.; Nwogwugwu, N.U.; Adeleye, S.A.; Chinakwe, P.O.; Nwachukwu, I.N.; Ihejirika, C.E. Effect of Temperature Changes on the Bacterial and Fungal Succession Patterns during Composting of Some Organic Wastes in Greenhouse. J. Adv. Microbiol. 2019, 15, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Boer, H.C.; Wiersma, M. Thermophilic Composting of the Pack Can Reduce Nitrogen Loss from Compost-Bedded Dairy Barns. Biosyst. Eng. 2021, 210, 20–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, G.; Zhu, Q.; Niu, Q.; Meng, Q.; Yan, H.; Wang, S.; Li, Q. The Degradation of Organic Matter Coupled with the Functional Characteristics of Microbial Community during Composting with Different Surfactants. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 321, 124446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, P.; Han, S.; Lin, Y. Role of Microbes and Microbial Dynamics during Composting. In Current Developments in Biotechnology and Bioengineering; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 169–220. [Google Scholar]
- Bello, H.; Ajao, J.O.; Sadiku, N.A. Co-Composting of Sawdust with Food Waste: Effects of Physical Properties on Composting Process and Product Quality. Detritus 2023, 23, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kazemi, K.; Zhang, B.; Lye, L.M. Assessment of Microbial Communities and Their Relationship with Enzymatic Activity during Composting. World J. Eng. Technol. 2017, 5, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mironov, V.; Vanteeva, A.; Merkel, A. Microbiological Activity during Co-Composting of Food and Agricultural Waste for Soil Amendment. Agronomy 2021, 11, 928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roy, D.; Gunri, S.K.; Neogi, S.; Ali, O.; Sharma, J.; Bhadu, A.; Singh, B. Effect of Microbes in Enhancing the Composting Process: A Review. Int. J. Plant Soil Sci. 2022, 34, 630–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roy, D.; Gunri, S.K.; Kundu, C.K.; Bandyopadhyay, P.K. Rapid Composting of Groundnut Residues through Novel Microbial Consortium: Evaluating Maturity, Stability, and Microbial Activity. Curr. Res. Microb. Sci. 2024, 7, 100277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sadef, Y.; Poulsen, T.G.; Bester, K. Quantifying Measurement Uncertainty in Full-Scale Compost Piles Using Organic Micro-Pollutant Concentrations. Waste Manag. Res. 2014, 32, 371–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Zhou, W.; Zhu, S.; Liu, F.; Qin, L.; Xu, C.; Wang, Z. Biological Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal by a Phosphorus-Accumulating Bacteria Acinetobacter Sp. Strain C-13 with the Ability of Heterotrophic Nitrification–Aerobic Denitrification. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 322, 124507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Korsa, G.; Masi, C.; Konwarh, R.; Tafesse, M. Harnessing the Potential Use of Cellulolytic Klebsiella oxytoca (M21WG) and Klebsiella Sp. (Z6WG) Isolated from the Guts of Termites (Isoptera). Ann. Microbiol. 2022, 72, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goel, C.; Shakir, C.; Tesfaye, A.; Raghavanpillai Sabu, K.; Idhayadhulla, A.; Manilal, A.; Woldemariam, M.; Vijayan, N.; Shah, S. Antibiofilm Potential of Alpha-Amylase from a Marine Bacterium, Pantoea agglomerans. Can. J. Infect. Dis. Med. Microbiol. 2022, 2022, 7480382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suman, A.; Marag, P.S.; Verma, P.; Gond, S.; Sai Prasad, J. Potential Use of Plant Colonizing Pantoea as Generic Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria for Cereal Crops. J. Environ. Biol. 2020, 41, 987–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, M.; Guo, X.; Wu, J.; Chen, K. Effect of Compost Amendment and Bioaugmentation on PAH Degradation and Microbial Community Shifting in Petroleum-Contaminated Soil. Chemosphere 2020, 256, 126998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sidhu, J.; Toze, S. Human Pathogens and Their Indicators in Biosolids: A Literature Review. Environ. Int. 2009, 35, 187–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gong, Y.; Li, J.; Deng, X.; Chen, Y.; Chen, S.; Huang, H.; Ni, L.; Long, T.; He, W.; Zhang, J.; et al. Application of Starch Degrading Bacteria from Tobacco Leaves in Improving the Flavor of Flue-Cured Tobacco. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1211936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costa, L.A.D.M.; Costa, M.S.S.D.M.; Damaceno, F.M.; Chiarelotto, M.; Bofinger, J.; Gazzola, W. Bioaugmentation as a Strategy to Improve the Compost Quality in the Composting Process of Agro-Industrial Wastes. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 22, 101478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.-K.; Liang, C.-M. Enhancing the Compost Maturation of Swine Manure and Rice Straw by Applying Bioaugmentation. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 6103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, Y.; Zhou, S.; Tian, P.; Qi, C.; Xu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Huh, S.-Y.; Luo, W.; Li, G.; Li, Y. Techno-Economic Assessment of Industrial Food Waste Composting Facility: Evaluating Bulking Agents, Processing Strategies, and Market Dynamics. Bioresour. Technol. 2024, 408, 131210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cao, Z.; Deng, F.; Wang, R.; Li, J.; Liu, X.; Li, D. Bioaugmentation on Humification during Co-Composting of Corn Straw and Biogas Slurry. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 374, 128756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]






| Treatment | Ratio (OW/DM) | Organic Waste (kg) | Dry Material–Sawdust (kg) |
|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 3/1 | 30 | 10 |
| T2 | 2/1 | 30 | 15 |
| T3 | 3/0.5 | 30 | 5 |
| T4 | 2/0.5 | 30 | 7.5 |
| Treatment | Yield (%) | Net Yield (%) |
|---|---|---|
| T1 | 29.6 | 98.6 |
| T2 | 21.3 | 71.0 |
| T3 | 21.6 | 72.0 |
| T4 | 16.6 | 55.3 |
| Variable | Model Terms | F Statistic | p-Value | Outcome | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature | |||||
| Parametric Term: | |||||
| Treatment | 227.2 | <2 × 10−16 | Significant | ||
| Smoothed Terms: | |||||
| s (Time): Treatment 1 | 1482.9 | <2 × 10−16 | Significant | ||
| s (Time): Treatment 2 | 824.6 | <2 × 10−16 | Significant | ||
| s (Time): Treatment 3 | 482.4 | <2 × 10−16 | Significant | ||
| s (Time): Treatment 4 | 414.4 | <2 × 10−16 | Significant | ||
| Moisture | |||||
| Parametric Term: | |||||
| Treatment | 458.9 | <2 × 10−16 | Significant | ||
| Smoothed Terms: | |||||
| s (Time): Treatment 1 | 421.4 | <2 × 10−16 | Significant | ||
| s (Time): Treatment 2 | 691.2 | <2 × 10−16 | Significant | ||
| s (Time): Treatment 3 | 134.4 | <2 × 10−16 | Significant | ||
| s (Time): Treatment 4 | 392.0 | <2 × 10−16 | Significant | ||
| pH | |||||
| Parametric Term: | |||||
| Treatment | 16.31 | 4.13 × 10−9 | Significant | ||
| Smoothed Terms: | |||||
| s (Time): Treatment 1 | 113.5 | <2 × 10−16 | Significant | ||
| s (Time): Treatment 2 | 118.2 | <2 × 10−16 | Significant | ||
| s (Time): Treatment 3 | 121.1 | <2 × 10−16 | Significant | ||
| s (Time): Treatment 4 | 120.7 | <2 × 10−16 | Significant | ||
| Culture ID | Microscopic Description | Vitek ID | Confidence Level and Probability | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genus | Species | |||
| CMC1 | Gram-negative bacilli | Klebsiella | Klebsiella oxytoca | Excellent (99%) |
| ALM1 | Gram-negative bacilli | Sphingomonas | Sphingomonas paucimobilis | Very Good (94%) |
| ALM4 | Gram-negative bacilli | Pantoea | Pantoea spp. | Excellent (97%) |
| Variable | Model Terms | F Statistic | p-Value | Outcome | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature | |||||
| Parametric term: | |||||
| Treatment | 25.63 | <8 × 10−7 | Significant | ||
| Smoothed Terms: | |||||
| s (Time): Control | 528.1 | <2 × 10−16 | Significant | ||
| s (Time): EMs | 1013.0 | <2 × 10−16 | Significant | ||
| Moisture | |||||
| Parametric term: | |||||
| Treatment | 5096 | <2 × 10−16 | Significant | ||
| Smoothed Terms: | |||||
| s (Time): Control | 497.2 | <2 × 10−16 | Significant | ||
| s (Time): EMs | 185.4 | <2 × 10−16 | Significant | ||
| pH | |||||
| Parametric term: | |||||
| Treatment | 0.083 | 0.774 | Not Significant | ||
| Smoothed Terms: | |||||
| s (Time): Control | 82.39 | <2 × 10−16 | Significant | ||
| s (Time): EMs | 131.60 | <2 × 10−16 | Significant | ||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Cosme-Perlaza, J.; Molina, A.; Falco, A.; Quijano, S.A. Optimization of Organic Waste Composting Using the Effective Microorganisms Klebsiella oxytoca, Sphingomonas paucimobilis, and Pantoea spp. Sustainability 2026, 18, 4393. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18094393
Cosme-Perlaza J, Molina A, Falco A, Quijano SA. Optimization of Organic Waste Composting Using the Effective Microorganisms Klebsiella oxytoca, Sphingomonas paucimobilis, and Pantoea spp. Sustainability. 2026; 18(9):4393. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18094393
Chicago/Turabian StyleCosme-Perlaza, Jefrid, Ananda Molina, Aura Falco, and Silvia A. Quijano. 2026. "Optimization of Organic Waste Composting Using the Effective Microorganisms Klebsiella oxytoca, Sphingomonas paucimobilis, and Pantoea spp." Sustainability 18, no. 9: 4393. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18094393
APA StyleCosme-Perlaza, J., Molina, A., Falco, A., & Quijano, S. A. (2026). Optimization of Organic Waste Composting Using the Effective Microorganisms Klebsiella oxytoca, Sphingomonas paucimobilis, and Pantoea spp. Sustainability, 18(9), 4393. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18094393

