Evaluation and Promotion Strategy of Rural Human Settlements for Aging in Chongqing
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review and Research Strategy
2.1. Literature Review
2.2. Concept Proposal and Research Strategy
3. Study Area and Data Source
3.1. Study Area
3.2. Data Source
4. Methods
4.1. Establishing Index System and Calculating Index Weights
4.2. Spatial Correlation Analysis
4.3. Geographic Detector Model
4.4. Obstacle Degree Analysis
4.5. Robustness Test
5. Results
5.1. Spatial Differentiation Characteristics
5.1.1. Results and Analysis
5.1.2. Robustness Analysis on Evaluation Results
5.2. Spatial Correlation Patterns
5.2.1. Results and Analysis
5.2.2. Robustness Analysis on Spatial Clustering Results
5.3. Obstacle Factors Identification and Interaction Analysis
5.3.1. Obstacle Factors Identification
5.3.2. Interaction Analysis
6. Promotion Strategy of Rural Human Settlements for Aging
- (1)
- Facility enhancement type
- (2)
- Characteristic amplification type
- (3)
- Comprehensive upgrading type
7. Discussion
7.1. Contributions to Sustainable Development Goals
7.2. Innovation and Feasibility
7.3. Limitations and Prospects
8. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Lutz, W.; Sanderson, W.; Scherbov, S. The coming acceleration of global population aging. Nature 2008, 451, 716–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Spatial-Temporal Evolution Characteristics and Its Driving Mechanism of Urban-Rural Inversion of Population Aging in China. (In Chinese). Available online: https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.003379 (accessed on 10 March 2026).
- World Population Prospects 2024. Available online: https://population.un.org/wpp/ (accessed on 3 March 2026).
- Seventh National Population Census of the People’s Republic of China. Available online: https://www.stats.gov.cn/english/PressRelease/202105/t20210510_1817185.html (accessed on 3 March 2026).
- A Study on China’s Rural Population and Rural Transformation Towards 2050. (In Chinese). Available online: https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.13246/j.cnki.iae.2025.06.001 (accessed on 10 March 2026).
- Liu, Y.; Zang, Y.; Yang, Y. China’s rural revitalization and development: Theory, technology and management. J. Geogr. Sci. 2020, 30, 1923–1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- United Nations. Agenda 21: Programme of Action for Sustainable Development, Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, Statement of Forest Principles: The Final Text of Agreements Negotiated by Governments at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), 3–14 June 1992, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; United Nations Department of Public Information: New York, NY, USA, 1993; Available online: https://www.un.org/zh/documents/treaty/21stcentury (accessed on 3 March 2026).
- The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Available online: https://sdgs.un.org/goals (accessed on 3 March 2026).
- Five-Year Action Program for Rural Human Settlements Improvement and Upgrading (2021–2025). Available online: https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2021-12/05/content_5655984.htm (accessed on 3 March 2026).
- Pan, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Peng, D.; Alexandre, C.L.; Cheng, S.; Chen, J.; Li, Z. Promoting the Establishment of China’s Rural Domestic Wastewater Standard System Based on the 6S Principle. Water 2025, 17, 313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The Effects of Rural Living Environment Improvement Programs: Evidence from a Household Survey in 7 Provinces of China. (In Chinese). Available online: https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2021.0163 (accessed on 10 March 2026).
- Liu, J. Elderly Care, Intergenerational Relationships and Social Change in Rural China, 1st ed.; Palgrave Macmillan: Singapore, 2019; pp. 137–155. [Google Scholar]
- Zhan, H.J.; Liu, J.; Qiu, F. Aging in Place with Few Children and Social Services—Understanding Structural and Cultural Lags in Rural China. J. Appl. Gerontol. 2024, 43, 860–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ao, Y.; Li, M.; Peng, P.; Zhou, Z.; Zuo, J.; Martek, I. Equity in public decision-making: A dynamic comparative study of urban–rural elderly care institution resource allocation in China. Hum. Soc. Sci. Commun. 2024, 11, 1526. [Google Scholar]
- Li, M.; Peng, P.; Zhu, H.; Ao, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Long, Y.; Martek, I. Assessing the gap: Resource efficiency of institutionalised elderly care in urban and rural China. Public Health 2025, 238, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bottlenecks and Breakthroughs in the High-Quality Development of Rural Elderly Care Services Against the Backdrop of Rural Revitalization. (In Chinese). Available online: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=JITlTmCwHjJdVl7z9VsqMd_KnyVGvJbfROhTEkIegCuyuPs3zaUKgLQn3MAj3Z0Q06VJPVG20630ClPuSsJVxwgrtt9vUdBsehT3uQlHCS0sUDxzJnfhNZMklBwRUltGPGKOJ5IGlWq9J_XJDwojhHs--PhRs9I_9GQg2JSSkzTYG-mgKU8J4Q==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS (accessed on 10 March 2026).
- Kinsella, K.; Suzman, R. Demographic dimensions of population aging in developing countries. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 1992, 4, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, Y.J.; Schoen, R. Population momentum expresses population aging. Demography 1997, 34, 421–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Grigsby, J.S.; Olshansky, S.J. The demographic components of population aging in China. J. Cross Cult. Gerontol. 1989, 4, 307–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
- Schoeni, R.F.; Ofstedal, M.B. Key themes in research on the demography of aging. Demography 2010, 47, S5–S15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cumming, E.; Henry, W.E. Growing Old: The Process of Disengagement; Basic Books: New York, NY, USA, 1961. [Google Scholar]
- Havighurst, R.J. Activity theory. In Processes of Aging: Social and Psychological Perspectives; Williams, R.H., Tibbitts, C., Donahue, W., Eds.; Atherton Press: New York, NY, USA, 1961; Volume 1, pp. 299–320. [Google Scholar]
- Jolly, C.L. Four Theories of Population Change and the Environment. Popul. Environ. 1994, 16, 61–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schwanen, T.; Hardill, I.; Lucas, S. Spatialities of ageing: The co-construction and co-evolution of old age and space. Geoforum 2012, 43, 1291–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biggar, J.C. Reassessing elderly sunbelt migration. Res. Aging 1980, 2, 177–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, X.; Ma, L.; Cui, X.; Tao, T.; Zhao, S. Spatial Equity Evaluation of Rural Eldercare Service Resources Based on Accessibility: A Case Study of Huanxian County of Gansu Province, China. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 2024, 34, 869–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edmonston, B.; Lee, S.M. Residential mobility of elderly Canadians: Trends and determinants. Can. J. Aging 2014, 33, 378–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bahar, H.İ.; Laçiner, S.; Bal, İ.; Özcan, M. Older migrants to the Mediterranean: The Turkish example. Popul. Space Place 2009, 15, 509–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, M.; Wang, S.; Yang, H. Exploring the spatial-temporal distribution and evolution of population aging and social-economic indicators in China. BMC Public Health 2021, 21, 966. [Google Scholar]
- Doxiadis, C.A. Action for Human Settlements; Athens Publishing Center: Athens, Greece, 1975. [Google Scholar]
- Fang, C.; Ma, H.; Bao, C.; Wang, Z.; Li, G.; Sun, S.; Fan, Y. Urban-rural human settlements in China: Objective evaluation and subjective well-being. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 2022, 9, 395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cong, X.; Li, X.; Gong, Y. Spatiotemporal evolution and driving forces of sustainable development of urban human settlements in China for SDGs. Land 2021, 10, 993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sandström, T.; Frew, A.J.; Svartengren, M.; Viegi, G. The need for a focus on air pollution research in the elderly. Eur. Respir. J. Suppl. 2003, 40, 92s–95s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Terho, H.; Asko, J. The common cold. Lancet 2003, 361, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Hu, K.; Guo, Y.; Stefan, H.S.; Liu, W.; Linda, S.; Yang, X.; Zhong, J.; Fei, F.; Chen, F.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Evidence for urban-rural disparity in temperature: Mortality relationships in Zhejiang Province, China. Environ. Health Perspect. 2019, 127, 37001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lin, C.; Wu, L. Green and blue space availability and self-rated health among seniors in China: Evidence from a national survey. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Krawchenko, T.; Keefe, J.; Manuel, P.; Rapaport, E. Coastal climate change, vulnerability and age friendly communities: Linking planning for climate change to the age-friendly communities agenda. J. Rural Stud. 2016, 44, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wanless, D.; Mitchell, B.A.; Wister, A.V. Social determinants of health for older women in Canada: Does rural–urban residency matter? Can. J. Aging 2010, 29, 233–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ogliari, G.; Ryg, J.; Andersen-Ranberg, K.; Scheel-Hincke, L.L.; Masud, T. Perceived neighbourhood environment and falls among community-dwelling adults: Cross-sectional and prospective findings from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). Eur. J. Ageing 2022, 19, 1121–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Menec, V.H.; Means, R.; Keating, N.; Parkhurst, G.; Eales, J. Conceptualizing age-friendly communities. Can. J. Aging 2011, 30, 479–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- AARP. Livable Communities: An Evaluation Guide; AARP Public Policy Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2005; pp. 2–18. [Google Scholar]
- Harding, E.D. Towards Lifetime Neighborhoods: Designing Sustainable Communities for All; Department for Communities and Local Government: London, UK, 2007.
- Lawton, M.P.; Simon, B. The ecology of social relationships in housing for the elderly. Gerontologist 1968, 8, 108–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- WHO. Global Age-Friendly Cities: A Guide; World Health Organization Press: Geneva, Switzerland, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Keating, N.; Eales, J.; Phillips, J.E. Age-friendly rural communities: Conceptualizing ‘best fit’. Can. J. Aging 2013, 32, 319–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Torku, A.; Chan, A.P.C.; Young, B.R. Age-friendly cities and communities: A review and future directions. Ageing Soc. 2021, 33, 159–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, M.; Bolt, G.; Hooimeijer, P. The impact of residential environment on older people‘s capabilities to live independently: A survey in Beijing. BMC Public Health 2024, 24, 821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Scharlach, A.; Lehning, A. Ageing-friendly communities and social inclusion in the United States of America. Aging Soc. 2013, 33, 110–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khambhaita, P. Age-friendly cities and communities: A global perspective. Ageing Soc. 2019, 39, 1552–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xia, Z.; Wang, X.; Wang, H.; Jiang, J.; Chen, S.; Cao, H. Age-friendly street construction: The synergy of the physical environment in old urban communities in Suzhou. Buildings 2024, 14, 3378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inspirations from the Deployment and Development Experiences of the Community-Based Elderly Facilities in Japan for China. (In Chinese). Available online: https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.19830/j.upi.2019.670 (accessed on 10 March 2026).
- Han, J.; Ma, H.; Wang, M.; Li, J. Construction and improvement strategies of an age-friendly evaluation system for public spaces in affordable housing communities: A case study of Shenzhen. Front. Public Health 2024, 12, 1399852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jian, I.Y.; Mo, K.H.; Ng, E.; Chen, W.X.; Jim, C.Y.; Woo, J. Age-friendly spatial design for residential neighbourhoods in a compact city: Participatory planning with older adults and stakeholders. Habitat Int. 2025, 161, 103428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Zhao, R.; Zhang, X. Aging-friendly design strategies for community public service facilities based on context analysis. Front. Public Health 2025, 13, 1649904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, C.; Loukaitou-Sideris, A. Comparing age-friendly city and community policies from China and the world: A systematic review. Front. Public Health 2026, 13, 1707802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, Y.; Li, Y. Revitalize the world’s countryside. Nature 2017, 548, 275–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Song, X.; Huang, S.; Xu, M. Research on the Impact of Population Aging on Agricultural Sustainable Development. Sustainability 2025, 17, 4738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Fang, Y.; Wang, G.; Liu, B.; Wang, R. The aging of farmers and its challenges for labor-intensive agriculture in China: A perspective on farmland transfer plans for farmers’ retirement. J. Rural Stud. 2023, 100, 103013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- From Fragmentation to Integration: Transformation and Restructuring of Rural Elderly Care Governance. (In Chinese). Available online: https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.13891/j.cnki.mer.2025.05.008 (accessed on 10 March 2026).
- Wang, W. Analysis on the development of rural family elderly care system under the background of land transfer. Aging Res. 2023, 10, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, F.; Liu, G. Population aging in China. In International Handbook of Population Aging; Uhlenberg, P., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2009; Volume 1, pp. 30–35. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Y.; Goza, F.W. Who will care for the elderly in China?: A review of the problems caused by China’s one-child policy and their potential solutions. J. Aging Stud. 2006, 20, 151–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The Impacts of the New Demographic Normal of Population Aging and Declining Birthrate on Integrated Urban-Rural Development and Its Strategic Response. (In Chinese). Available online: https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.15884/j.cnki.issn.1007-0672.2025.03.001 (accessed on 10 March 2026).
- Rugel, E.J.; Chow, C.K.; Corsi, D.J.; Hystad, P.; Rangarajan, S.; Yusuf, S.; Lear, S.A. Developing indicators of age-friendly neighbourhood environments for urban and rural communities across 20 low-, middle-, and high-income countries. BMC Public Health 2022, 22, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Research on the Evolution Mechanism and Governance Strategy of the Adaptive Aging Renewal of Japanese Settlements. (In Chinese). Available online: https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.19830/j.upi.2020.107 (accessed on 10 March 2026).
- Fields, B.; Yanes, C.; Ennis, M.; Toto, P. Community Aging in Place, Advancing Better Living for Elders (CAPABLE) program: Understanding the potential involvement of care partners. Health Soc. Care Community 2022, 30, E1212–E1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Allen, J.C.; Rickards, T.S.; Roberts, C.L.H.; Baird, E.S. Aging in Place and ‘The Little Things’: Prioritizing Mobile Health and Social Care in Rural Communities. J. Aging Soc. Policy 2025, 37, 1302–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brown, D.L.; Glasgow, N.; Kulcsar, L.J.; Sanders, S.; Thiede, B.C. The multi-scalar organization of aging-related services in US rural places. J. Rural Stud. 2019, 68, 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matysiak, T. What Makes a Rural Community Age-Friendly? Insights into Aging in Place in Small Iowa Towns. J. Aging Soc. Policy 2025, 37, 1319–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Campbell, N. Aging in place: The evolution of accessible housing over two decades. J. Aging Environ. 2025, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, K.; Wang, W. Housing conditions, cooking fuels, and health-related quality of life among rural middle-aged and elderly in northwest China: A ten-year balanced panel study. Prev. Med. Rep. 2024, 36, 102475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mirza, N.A.; Hulko, W. The complex nature of transportation as a key determinant of health in primary and community care restructuring initiatives in rural Canada. J. Aging Stud. 2022, 60, 101002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chukwusa, E.; Verne, J.; Polato, G.; Taylor, R.; Higginson, I.J.; Gao, W. Urban and rural differences in geographical accessibility to inpatient palliative and end-of-life (PEoLC) facilities and place of death: A national population-based study in England, UK. Int. J. Health Geogr. 2019, 18, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fersch, B.; Noe, E.B.; Thuesen, A.A.; Langer, B. The rural risk of digital exclusion: A case study of municipal digital health and social care services in Denmark. SSM Qual. Res. Health 2025, 7, 100537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leung, W.K.S.; Chang, M.K.; Cheung, M.L.; Shi, S. Swift trust development and prosocial behavior in time banking: A trust transfer and social support theory perspective. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2022, 129, 107137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, Q.C.; Pope, N.; Greenfield, E. “I‘m part of something that matters”: Exploring what older adults value through their engagement in age-friendly community initiatives. J. Gerontol. Soc. Work 2024, 67, 715–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, X.; Warner, M.E. Cross-agency collaboration to address rural aging: The role of county government. J. Aging Soc. Policy 2024, 36, 302–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bao, M.; Tian, B. Rural integration and resource integration: A study on the sustainable pathway of social work intervention in rural elderly care services. Sustainability 2026, 18, 1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.; Lee, Y. Perceived Barriers to Rural Elderly Women’s Health-Promoting Behaviors: An Ecological Perspective. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6107. [Google Scholar]
- van Boetzelaer, E.; Rathod, L.; Keating, P.; Pellecchia, U.; Sharma, S.; Nickerson, J.; van de Kamp, J.; Franco, O.H.; Smith, J.; Escobio, F.; et al. Health needs of older people and age-inclusive health care in humanitarian emergencies in low-income and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2025, 6, 100663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dableh, S.; Frazer, K.; Stokes, D.; Kroll, T. Access of older people to primary health care in low and middle-income countries: A systematic scoping review. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0298973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Al Asmri, M.; Almalki, M.J.; Fitzgerald, G.; Clark, M. The public health care system and primary care services in Saudi Arabia: A system in transition. East. Mediterr. Health J. 2020, 26, 468–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Family and Community Role in the Provision of Informal Care for Older People Living with Chronic Life-Limiting Illnesses in Rural Ghana. Available online: https://webvpn.swu.edu.cn/https/537775736869676568616f78756565212aae45f5769c8683de4f2d551be3ff4c9c/core/journals/social-policy-and-society/article/family-and-community-role-in-the-provision-of-informal-care-for-older-people-living-with-chronic-lifelimiting-illnesses-in-rural-ghana/674B2029F7A0B58A904B1A8C4681723A (accessed on 3 March 2026).
- Oware, P.M.; Zembe, Y.; Zembe-Mkabile, W. Reconfiguration of informal social protection systems of older adults in Sub-Saharan Africa amid the COVID-19 pandemic: A narrative review. Soc. Sci. 2025, 14, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gyan, C.; Kwakye, J. Building resiliency in community development: The experiences of women in rural communities in Ghana. Soc. Incl. 2025, 13, 8705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, Z.; Qian, Y.; Gill, T.M.; Hou, X.; Allore, H.; Chen, S.; Chen, X. Absence of care among community-dwelling older adults with dementia and functional limitations. Nat. Aging 2025, 5, 548–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Wu, M.; Qin, Y.; Li, T.; Zheng, X. Social capital and rural household energy poverty: Evidence from the China Family Panel Studies. Energy 2025, 335, 138286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gitlin, L. Environmental Adaptations for Individuals with Functional Difficulties and Their Families in the Home and Community; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 45–65. [Google Scholar]
- Bossé, R.; Aldwin, C.M.; Levenson, M.R.; Workmandaniels, K. How stressful is retirement? findings from the normative aging study. J. Gerontol. 1991, 46, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, Q.; Qiu, Z. Exploring daily activity patterns on the typical day of older adults for supporting aging-in-place in China’s rural environment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 8416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marcellini, F.; Giuli, C.; Gagliardi, C.; Papa, R. Aging in Italy: Urban-rural differences. Arch Gerontol. Geriatr. 2007, 44, 243–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jan, G. Life Between Buildings, 4th ed.; China Architecture & Building Press: Beijing, China, 2002; pp. 200–223. [Google Scholar]
- Oswald, F.; Wahl, H.-W. Dimensions of the meaning of home in later life. In Home and Identity in Late Life: International Perspectives; Springer Publishing Company: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Park, S.; Ko, Y.J. The Sociocultural Meaning of “My Place”: Rural Korean Elderly People’s Perspective of Aging in Place. Asian Nurs. Res. 2020, 14, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liljas, A.; Barboza, M.; Basanisi, C.; Muzzi, G.; Nigussie, A.H.; Agerholm, J.; Burström, B.; Lose, E. Risk factors for infection in older adults with home care: A mixed methods systematic review with meta-analysis. BMC Public Health 2025, 25, 1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brewer, T.F.; Zhang, M.; Gordon, D.; Chung, R.Y.N.; Dejene, N.; Fonta, C.L.; Grieve, T.; Halleröd, B.; Harris, R.; Lanau, A.; et al. Housing, sanitation and living conditions affecting SARS-CoV-2 prevention interventions in 54 African countries. Epidemiol. Infect. 2021, 149, e183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, K.; Huang, Y.Z.; May, W.B.; Wu, Q.H.; Liang, Q.T. Evaluating age-friendly community environments: Model development and application in Guangzhou, China. Public Health Nurs. 2026, 43, 380–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Wu, B.; Yang, W. Can formal home and community-based care substitute informal care? Evidence from Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey. BMC Geriatr. 2024, 24, 730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dou, H.; Wang, C.; Cheng, G.; Lei, X.; Xu, S. The vision of younger-seniors-based elderly care in rural China: Based on population aging predictions from 2020 to 2050. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 2025, 12, 669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Addressing the Challenge of the Urban-Rural Reversal of Aging with Quality Population Development. (In Chinese). Available online: https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.13240/j.cnki.caujsse.2024.02.002 (accessed on 10 March 2026).
- Cheng, T.; Liu, C.; Yang, H.; Wang, N.; Liu, Y. From service capacity to spatial equity: Exploring a multi-stage decision-making approach for optimizing elderly-care facility distribution in the city centre of Tianjin, China. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2022, 85, 104076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mao, R.; Yang, X.; Zhang, D. Older adults’ service demands in community sports parks for active aging: A Kano model approach. Front. Public Health 2025, 13, 1703037. [Google Scholar]
- An Analysis of Ways for Retirement Living Supported by Community Sports Culture from the Perspective of “Retirement Living Supported by Culture”. (In Chinese). Available online: https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.16237/j.cnki.cn44-1404/g8.2014.04.014 (accessed on 10 March 2026).
- Maslow, A. A theory of human motivation. Psychol. Rev. 1943, 50, 370–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Construction of Evaluation System for Needs of Social Support for Left-Behind Elderly in Rural Based on Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs Theory. (In Chinese). Available online: https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.08.001 (accessed on 10 March 2026).
- Liu, W.; Zheng, R.; Zhang, W. Differences in the influence of daily behavior on health among older adults in urban and rural areas: Evidence from China. Front. Public Health 2023, 11, 1259204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xia, Y.; Wang, G.; Yang, F. A nationwide study of the impact of social quality factors on life satisfaction among older adults in rural China. Sci. Rep. 2024, 11, 11614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The Impact of Labor Migration on Healthy Well-Being of Elderly Left Behind in Rural China: Studies Based on Surveys in Inflow and Outflow Places. (In Chinese). Available online: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=JITlTmCwHjLIv0pR6zjrJbeZOcv0aimiCIUXvg3uUsq0KpRuO6zgTdCY7PeoJzq5CzwqdVXuca7E5ufFWQwXeNlm0AIbFhDbBXX1F49op6yWHrZ0AjuSvLztxar9-lixJWh08GcdC6VqIRE3QF3OEM8YJwIJVYXHBRMt5oEXjKjp9Ucf-7Q_mw==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS (accessed on 10 March 2026).
- Fu, W.; Wu, X.; Lyu, L.; Cheng, G.; Geng, Y.; Ding, Y. Residential greenness associate with psychiatric problem and physical-psychological multimorbidity among 6900 Chinese middle-aged and older adults. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 40222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Analysis of Manpower Policy of Integrated Medical and Nursing Care Services in Home Communities in China. (In Chinese). Available online: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=JITlTmCwHjJLrWaYZab81cT3nyPZrjMXuh-hCjf0ZHtR5gbF3YUnbz9NnkFZxuzn0ak8CYvBtNaE6KnFzHAjFlWHcTwLbWDDM8J9pKUXQIkzY-QHB8nYTqK5elXete27QGNedqNeMaKOFDOs9fsIfRGpNUF7E2LIE80VFrlrNMLrBW04LX_a6g==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS (accessed on 10 March 2026).
- Vecchio, G.; Ochoa-Covarrubias, G.; Luneke, A.; Pérez-Duarte-Fernández, A. Public safety and security for older people when walking: Perceptions and practices in Santiago de chile and Guadalajara, Mexico. Urbano 2025, 28, 122–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bath, P.A.; Deeg, D. Social engagement and health outcomes among older people: Introduction to a special section. Eur. J. Ageing. 2005, 2, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beck, T.; Levine, R.; Loayza, N. Finance and the sources of growth. J. Financ. Econ. 2020, 58, 261–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di, X.; Wang, L. The Impact of Accessibility of Community Elderly Care Services on Quality of Life of the Elderly. Healthcare 2025, 13, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Liu, B.; Shen, Y.; Li, L. Assessing accessibility to service facilities for older people in age-restricted communities from the perspective of equity. J. Transp. Health 2022, 27, 101515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, W.; Zhu, J.; Dong, Y.; Zhao, Y. Linking mobility-supportive neighborhood environment to social relationships in older adults: The roles of social interaction and community type. J. Transp. Health 2025, 45, 102204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, H.; Chen, Y.; Liu, Y.; Gu, Y.; Gu, Y. Equity of elderly care facility allocation in a multi-ethnic city under the aging background. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 3291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Wang, Z.; Qiu, Z. Unveiling the Evolution of Eldercare Facilities in Rural China: Tracing the Trajectory from Eldercare Support Pattern and Service to Facilities for the Aging Population. Healthcare 2023, 11, 2474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Zhang, C. Practice models of rural China‘s ageing in place: From the perspective of multiple collaborative governance. China Perspect. 2023, 9–18. [Google Scholar]
- Legal System Provision for Rural Collective Pension Schemes in China. (In Chinese). Available online: https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.14111/j.cnki.zgfx.2025.02.002 (accessed on 10 March 2026).
- Wen, Z.; Zheng, C.; Hao, J.; Yu, S. Built environment and elderly safety risks in old residential communities under urban renewal. Urban Sci. 2026, 10, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Evenson, K.R.; Block, R.; Roux, A.V.D.; McGinn, A.P.; Wen, F.; Rodríguez, D.A. Associations of adult physical activity with perceived safety and police-recorded crime: The Multi-ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2012, 9, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Zhan, Z.; Li, Y. Enhancing age-friendly rural public space design. Buildings 2025, 15, 3078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- A Study of Rural Adaptive Housing for the Aged in the Severely Cold Region in Northeast China. (In Chinese). Available online: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=JITlTmCwHjL65BiPO8Xaw0y2ibCBn7jynD6VvWNlgY-8y_f03ANViR76k_rX62dzuoausMXG_Gf5JnvUcw2UE29775O4yQbvp828WRMBeaC1VyoQuZLhGVYypubfWPTdHbzoAZ5LVWN0I-J7ccV4WrTsbjSZXTZ2YSchX74Naj9sp9iwPqcNqA==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS (accessed on 10 March 2026).
- Sanchaniya, R.J.; Cerneckiene, J.; Geipele, I.; Kundzina, A.; Jansons, L.; Pudzis, E.; Drukis, P. Determinants of Property Reuse for Age-Friendly Social Housing Development in Shrinking and Ageing Cities: Evidence from Latvia. Land 2025, 14, 2375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, K.; Lei, Y.; Liu, Q.; Shao, J.; Yang, X. Integrating Aging-Friendly Strategies into Smart City Construction: Managing Vulnerability in Rural Mountainous Areas. Buildings 2025, 15, 2885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, N.; Xu, S.; Zhang, J. Community social capital, family social capital, and self-rated health among older rural Chinese adults: Empirical evidence from rural Northeastern China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 5516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Research on the Organizational Foundations of the Countryside-Based Community’s Mutual-Aid Elderly Care. (In Chinese). Available online: https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.4558.G.20230118.1110.003 (accessed on 10 March 2026).
- Advantages, Challenges, and Countermeasures for the Development of Rural “Time Bank” Elderly Care Models. (In Chinese). Available online: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=JITlTmCwHjJZyt3kzy8Omn7FRE7SPaTnDuMv44lQ7i1-Bi7mcWnaaL7Kz4f32K8JvOlb3t-61o2Dk4huLQCFr3mskjaK5j3jWcwgQMsSsNrPSPyZiEv_4DfXfbX1xCajoRZ-fGv7MXQyK9z5lcVmibdnfRQfypuH4JEm5tMYWrqA-Z8ufZxSjA==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS (accessed on 10 March 2026).
- A Study on the Multivariate Collaborative Spatial Governance Mechanism of Homestay Villages: Taking Beigou Village, Huairou District, Beijing as an Example. (In Chinese). Available online: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=JITlTmCwHjLQA9Xv9_rgVbU82E8V39bLatwh1OuHx7dMRvE74lrDqriAGxCvLUhlkCNlO17jbC3e8LeSE3ITNHTiBiDUmaHfmgzdBBowpZzsoffb10bNHVAy5ycgOnzMz5lTesliO7mHqNCRN_lKUFC8dVeDfHNgGULAXHtuYQWexlbWGO6rtw==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS (accessed on 10 March 2026).
- The Construction Path of Village-Community Elderly Care Community Under the Mutual Aid Elderly Care Model: An Empirical Study Based on Z Town, Beijing. (In Chinese). Available online: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=JITlTmCwHjJstljDYP4S4sXrUCni3uwrtAsoGDwJSrIdY2zQU_kkZ9KCEREdld_op26EeaOQZ46Itkgi75lAvRzcpPpe4FxpU3TOVQmnPRDxaPXPZgmuzXU4j3q_srL75v6cHo-hB5k-11tsKtiQIg9lR-wfQ66pPTx0UH1tUAqdpEnhSrdC9A==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS (accessed on 10 March 2026).
- Zhou, J.; Walsh, K.; Mahon, M.; O’Connor, N. Policy discourses on homecare services for rural older people in Ireland: Spatial and age-based drivers of narratives and absences. J. Rural Stud. 2025, 116, 103630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, M.; Buffel, T.; Phillipson, C. Ageing in Place in Urban Environments: Critical Perspectives. Sociol. Inq. 2020, 95, 854–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buffel, T.; van Hees, P. Reimagining Age-Friendly Communities: Urban Ageing and Spatial Justice; Policy Press: Bristol, UK, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Z.; Chen, H. The Relationship among Community Environment, Behavior, Activity Ability, and Self-Rated Health of Older Adults: A Hierarchical and Multi-Dimensional Comparative Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 7387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elderly Services and Rural-Family Elderly Care: Evidence from the Pilot Reform of Home and Community-Based Elderly Care Services in China. (In Chinese). Available online: https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.20231120.404 (accessed on 10 March 2026).
- Chiu, Y.T. Socioeconomic factors influencing the growth and sustainability of the village movement. J. Aging Res. 2025, 2025, 5295292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morán Uriel, J.; Camerin, F.; Córdoba Hernández, R. Urban Horizons in China: Challenges and Opportunities for Community Intervention in a Country Marked by the Heihe-Tengchong Line. In Diversity as Catalyst: Economic Growth and Urban Resilience in Global Cityscapes; Siew, G., Allam, Z., Cheshmehzangi, A., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2024; pp. 105–125. [Google Scholar]









| System Layer | Index | Significance of Index | Index Unit | Index Weigh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Material dimensions | Living space | X1: Proportion of aging-adapted households of older adults with special difficulties (+) | Characterizing the level of housing adaptations for older adults | % | 0.0092 |
| X2: Miles of “ Four Good Rural Roads” per 10,000 people in rural areas (+) | Characterizing the level of rural road construction | km/10,000 people | 0.0603 | ||
| X3: Rural per capita housing area (+) | Characterizing the residential living environment | m2/per person | 0.0531 | ||
| X4: Rural sanitary latrine penetration rate (+) | Characterizing the cleanliness around living space | % | 0.0146 | ||
| Elderly service facilities | X5: Coverage rate of village mutual aid senior care points (+) | Characterizing the distribution of specialized and integrated elderly care service institutions | % | 0.0218 | |
| X6: Coverage rate of township senior care service centers (+) | Characterizing the distribution of self-managed and mutual-aid elderly care facilities | % | 0.0995 | ||
| X7: Coverage rate of village centralized care facilities for disabled special hardship cases (+) | Characterizing the distribution of care facilities for elderly individuals with disabilities | % | 0.1305 | ||
| Cultural and sports service facilities | X8: Coverage rate of village reading rooms (+) | Characterizing the distribution of rural reading rooms | % | 0.1014 | |
| X9: Number of cultural and sports venues per 10,000 population (+) | Representing the level of cultural and sports environment | - | 0.0855 | ||
| Non-material dimensions | Protection and welfare | X10: Amount of Old Age Allowance for persons aged 80 and above (+) | Representing the level of financial welfare support for the elderly | yuan | 0.0135 |
| X11: Coverage rate of basic pension insurance (+) | Characterizing the social coverage of pension insurance | % | 0.0290 | ||
| X12: Income remitted or brought back by rural migrant workers (+) | Represents a household’s financial capacity to support elderly care | yuan | 0.0489 | ||
| Health and safety | X13: Forest cover (+) | Characterizing the level of forest greening | % | 0.0335 | |
| X14: Number of healthcare personnel per 10,000 people (+) | Characterizing medical service capabilities | per 10,000 people | 0.0574 | ||
| X15: Number of road traffic accidents per 10,000 people (−) | Characterizing the traffic safety environment | - | 0.0172 | ||
| X16: Criminal case clearance rate (+) | Representing the social security environment | % | 0.0355 | ||
| Relations and social | X17: Number of cases of mediated marital and family disputes per 10,000 people (−) | Representing the harmony of family relationships | - | 0.0427 | |
| X18: Number of cases of mediated neighborhood disputes per 10,000 people (−) | Representing the harmony in neighborhood relations | - | 0.0619 | ||
| X19: Percentage of rural residents’ expenditure on recreation and socialization (+) | Representing the engagement in entertainment and social activities | % | 0.0351 | ||
| Interaction Characteristics | Interaction Types |
|---|---|
| q(X1 ∩ X2) > q(X1) + q(X2) | Nonlinear enhancement |
| q(X1 ∩ X2) < min[q(X1), q(X2)] | Nonlinear weakening |
| q(X1 ∩ X2) > max[q(X1), q(X2)] | Bi-factor enhancement |
| min[q(X1), q(X2)] < q(X1 ∩ X2) < max[q(X1), q(X2)] | Bi-factor weakening |
| q(X1 ∩ X2) = q(X1) + q(X2) | Independent |
| Comprehensive Score | Material Dimension | Living Space | Elderly Service Facilities | Cultural and Sports Service Facilities | Non-Material Dimension | Protection and Welfare | Health and Safety | Relations and Social | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pearson’s r | 0.988 | 0.979 | 0.925 | 0.931 | 0.999 | 0.994 | 0.971 | 0.978 | 0.999 |
| p | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| ranking differences fall within five positions | 35 | 36 | 29 | 31 | 37 | 33 | 35 | 33 | 37 |
| Comprehensive Score | Material Dimension | Living Space | Elderly Service Facilities | Cultural and Sports Service Facilities | Non-Material Dimension | Protection and Welfare | Health and Safety | Relations and Social | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pearson’s r | 0.964 | 0.928 | 0.930 | 0.799 | 0.999 | 0.938 | 0.958 | 0.826 | 0.999 |
| p | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| ranking differences fall within five positions | 32 | 30 | 32 | 28 | 37 | 23 | 36 | 25 | 37 |
| Material Dimension | Living Space | Elderly Service Facilities | Cultural and Sports Service Facilities | Non-Material Dimension | Protection and Welfare | Health and Safety | Relations and Social | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moran’s I | 0.286 | 0.008 | 0.258 | 0.386 | 0.445 | 0.397 | 0.347 | 0.494 |
| Z | 3.309 | 2.330 | 2.924 | 4.291 | 4.599 | 4.090 | 3.657 | 5.078 |
| p | 0.006 | 0.005 | 0.010 | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Comprehensive Score | Material Dimension | Living Space | Elderly Service Facilities | Cultural and Sports Service Facilities | Non-Material Dimension | Protection and Welfare | Health and Safety | Relations and Social | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| κ | 0.667 | 0.783 | 0.6 | 0.773 | 0.68 | 0.701 | 0.855 | 0.623 | 0.737 |
| Z | 5.678 | 7.036 | 5.226 | 6.555 | 5.436 | 6.141 | 6.294 | 4.584 | 6.616 |
| p | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| X5 | X7 | X8 | X9 | X12 | X14 | X16 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| q | 0.820 | 0.971 | 0.820 | 0.681 | 0.876 | 0.886 | 0.735 |
| p | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.006 | 0.008 | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | X8 | X9 | X10 | X11 | X12 | X13 | X14 | X15 | X16 | X17 | X18 | X19 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | 0.420 | ||||||||||||||||||
| X2 | 0.675 | 0.394 | |||||||||||||||||
| X3 | 0.769 | 0.595 | 0.166 | ||||||||||||||||
| X4 | 0.899 | 0.811 | 0.673 | 0.314 | |||||||||||||||
| X5 | 0.903 | 0.891 | 0.900 | 0.867 | 0.820 | ||||||||||||||
| X6 | 0.638 | 0.657 | 0.521 | 0.528 | 0.886 | 0.093 | |||||||||||||
| X7 | 0.976 | 0.978 | 0.985 | 0.983 | 0.981 | 0.981 | 0.971 | ||||||||||||
| X8 | 0.903 | 0.891 | 0.900 | 0.867 | 0.825 | 0.886 | 0.981 | 0.820 | |||||||||||
| X9 | 0.894 | 0.980 | 0.898 | 0.732 | 0.893 | 0.848 | 0.978 | 0.893 | 0.681 | ||||||||||
| X10 | 0.787 | 0.471 | 0.460 | 0.455 | 0.888 | 0.428 | 0.981 | 0.888 | 0.725 | 0.119 | |||||||||
| X11 | 0.586 | 0.531 | 0.440 | 0.497 | 0.905 | 0.350 | 0.981 | 0.905 | 0.748 | 0.288 | 0.032 | ||||||||
| X12 | 0.914 | 0.927 | 0.941 | 0.906 | 0.945 | 0.936 | 0.975 | 0.945 | 0.940 | 0.987 | 0.988 | 0.876 | |||||||
| X13 | 0.809 | 0.773 | 0.760 | 0.614 | 0.875 | 0.649 | 0.984 | 0.875 | 0.918 | 0.546 | 0.596 | 0.958 | 0.364 | ||||||
| X14 | 0.921 | 0.932 | 0.960 | 0.924 | 0.946 | 0.937 | 0.977 | 0.946 | 0.943 | 0.935 | 0.913 | 0.906 | 0.954 | 0.886 | |||||
| X15 | 0.932 | 0.953 | 0.930 | 0.888 | 0.952 | 0.890 | 0.983 | 0.952 | 0.942 | 0.813 | 0.814 | 0.911 | 0.815 | 0.915 | 0.789 | ||||
| X16 | 0.878 | 0.757 | 0.857 | 0.883 | 0.894 | 0.799 | 0.981 | 0.894 | 0.942 | 0.685 | 0.664 | 0.891 | 0.833 | 0.892 | 0.918 | 0.636 | |||
| X17 | 0.755 | 0.553 | 0.636 | 0.797 | 0.907 | 0.824 | 0.985 | 0.907 | 0.927 | 0.445 | 0.495 | 0.915 | 0.607 | 0.914 | 0.827 | 0.763 | 0.094 | ||
| X18 | 0.680 | 0.754 | 0.564 | 0.742 | 0.971 | 0.504 | 0.981 | 0.971 | 0.918 | 0.456 | 0.354 | 0.930 | 0.790 | 0.937 | 0.860 | 0.718 | 0.657 | 0.184 | |
| X19 | 0.699 | 0.624 | 0.487 | 0.673 | 0.937 | 0.571 | 0.980 | 0.937 | 0.869 | 0.538 | 0.177 | 0.910 | 0.639 | 0.916 | 0.854 | 0.660 | 0.460 | 0.482 | 0.127 |
| Classification | Dominant Obstacle or Main Obstacles | Area |
|---|---|---|
| Facility enhancement type | Living space single dominant obstacle | Beibei |
| Elderly service facilities single dominant obstacle | Jiangjin, Fuling | |
| Elderly service facilities-cultural and sports service main obstacles | Wushan | |
| Living space-elderly service facilities main obstacles | Tongliang, Dazu, Nanchuan, Yunyang | |
| Living space-cultural and sports service main obstacles | Dianjiang, Tongnan, Shizhu, Zhong | |
| Living space-elderly service facilities-cultural and sports service main obstacles | Wuxi | |
| Characteristic amplification type | Health and safety single dominant obstacle | Jiangbei, Wanzhou, Shapingba |
| Relations and social single dominant obstacle | Changshou, Qianjiang, Yongchuan, Dadukou | |
| Protection and welfare-health and safety main obstacles | Fengdu, Jiulongpo | |
| Health and safety-relations and social main obstacles | Kaizhou, Fengjie, Yubei, Liangping, Nanan | |
| Comprehensive upgrading type | Living space-health and safety main obstacles | Bishan |
| Elderly service facilities-relations and social main obstacles | Wulong, Rongchang | |
| Cultural and sports service-health and safety main obstacles | Hechuan | |
| Cultural and sports service-protection and welfare main obstacles | Banan | |
| Living space-elderly service facilities-protection and welfare main obstacles | Youyang | |
| Elderly service facilities-cultural and sports service-health and safety main obstacles | Xiushan, Chengkou | |
| Cultural and sports service-protection and welfare-health and safety main obstacles | Qijiang | |
| Cultural and sports service-protection and welfare-relations and social main obstacles | Pengshui |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Chen, X.; Wang, C.; Cheng, G. Evaluation and Promotion Strategy of Rural Human Settlements for Aging in Chongqing. Sustainability 2026, 18, 3048. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18063048
Chen X, Wang C, Cheng G. Evaluation and Promotion Strategy of Rural Human Settlements for Aging in Chongqing. Sustainability. 2026; 18(6):3048. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18063048
Chicago/Turabian StyleChen, Xuan, Cheng Wang, and Guishan Cheng. 2026. "Evaluation and Promotion Strategy of Rural Human Settlements for Aging in Chongqing" Sustainability 18, no. 6: 3048. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18063048
APA StyleChen, X., Wang, C., & Cheng, G. (2026). Evaluation and Promotion Strategy of Rural Human Settlements for Aging in Chongqing. Sustainability, 18(6), 3048. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18063048
