Spatial Patterns and Driving Mechanisms of Intangible Cultural Heritage in the Pearl River Basin Area
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Research Area
2.2. Data Resources
2.3. Research Methods
2.3.1. Lorenz Curve and the Imbalance Index
2.3.2. The Nearest Neighbor Index
2.3.3. The Standard Deviational Ellipse
2.3.4. The Kernel Density Estimation
2.3.5. The Geographical Detector
3. Results
3.1. Structural Distribution Characteristics of ICH in the PRBA
3.2. Spatial Cluster Analysis of ICH in the PRBA
3.3. Spatial Evolution Characteristics of ICH in the PRBA
3.4. Density Distribution Characteristics of ICH in the PRBA
3.5. Driving Factors of ICH Spatial Distribution in the PRBA
3.5.1. Physical Geography Factors
3.5.2. Socioeconomic Factors
3.5.3. Historical and Cultural Factors
3.5.4. Interaction Analysis of Driving Factors
4. Discussion
- The number of TSAA and traditional medicine projects in the PRBA is relatively small, and the number of inheritors is insufficient, which is consistent with the trend of “rarity of certain categories” in the western region [43]. In the future, policy support and financial assistance can be strengthened to reduce the risk of their disappearance through measures such as establishing training bases, creating digital archives, and supporting representative inheritors.
- The spatial evolution of ICH was strongly conditioned by existing cultural foundations and policy environments. To avoid imbalances in the spatial structure of ICH, it is necessary to strengthen cross-regional coordination and collaboration by integrating strategies such as the development of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, the Xijiang Economic Belt, and the coordinated development of Guangxi, Yunnan, and Guizhou. Cities with strong cultural foundations and policy implementation capabilities, such as Guangzhou, Chaozhou, Kunming, and Nanning, can be selected as demonstration points to strengthen their leading role.
- Differentiated spatial governance strategies can be adopted for the protection of ICH. In high-density core areas such as the Pearl River Delta and the eastern coastal region of Guangdong, the spatial planning of ICH resources should be integrated with that of public cultural facilities [63]. Representative items should be embedded into urban renewal projects, tourism itineraries, and public spaces to enhance daily visibility and public participation, thereby preventing cultural displacement. In contrast, for medium and low-density areas with distinctive ethnic cultures (e.g., Guangxi, Yunnan, and Guizhou), productive protection and community participation are more appropriate, emphasizing living transmission within traditional villages, ethnic festivals, and everyday life. Furthermore, considering the amplifying effects of interactions between natural and socioeconomic factors, basin-scale management tools should be utilized. These tools can facilitate integrated projects combining ICH conservation, ecological protection, and rural revitalization to achieve the coordinated development of culture, ecology, the economy, and watershed management.
5. Conclusions
- There are pronounced differences in the structural composition of China’s national-level ICH items across the PRBA. The categories of folk techniques and traditional dance are represented by larger numbers of items, whereas traditional sports, recreation, and acrobatics have the fewest. Spatially, folkways, traditional drama, and traditional dance exhibit significant clustering, while quyi and traditional medicine display an approximately random distribution pattern.
- Standard deviation ellipse analysis reveals a spatial evolution trajectory characterized by major-axis contraction and slow centroid migration. The gravity center consistently advances northwestward, while the major axis maintains a stable east–west orientation. The ellipse’s coverage area follows a rhythmic pattern of initial expansion followed by contraction, underscoring the strong dependence of ICH resources on established cultural foundations and policy frameworks.
- ICH exhibits a distinctive spatial distribution characterized by “coastal clustering and inland point-like dispersion”. The Pearl River Delta and eastern Guangdong constitute the core areas with high and sub-high densities, respectively, whereas Hainan, Guangxi, and Guizhou form secondary clustering zones. Specifically, the Pearl River Delta serves as a high-density core for quyi, folkways, traditional medicine, traditional dance, TSAA, and traditional techniques; Hainan functions as a high-density core for traditional music and traditional techniques; traditional drama and traditional art are highly concentrated in eastern Guangdong; and only folk literature shows relatively strong clustering in inland areas.
- The spatial differentiation of ICH is driven primarily by socioeconomic and historical–cultural factors, among which the number of cultural institutions, population size, and gross domestic product (GDP) exhibit the strongest explanatory power. The availability of water resources shows relatively weak explanatory power as a single factor; however, when it interacts with factors such as the configuration of cultural facilities and the process of urbanization, it produces a pronounced nonlinear enhancement effect. This finding corroborates the view that hydrological connectivity, as a fundamental environmental carrier, can substantially amplify the clustering and intergenerational transmission of cultural heritage.
- Future research could expand the scope by incorporating provincial and municipal ICH lists and utilizing finer spatial scales (e.g., county-level data). Integrating diverse drivers, such as tourism and ethnic demographics, would further clarify local spatial heterogeneity that is often overlooked at the macro scale. Additionally, historical waterways data should be included to distinguish causal links from spatial co-occurrence.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| ICH | Intangible Cultural Heritage |
| PRBA | Pearl River Basin Area |
| TSAA | Traditional sports, amusement and acrobatics |
References
- Blake, J. The Impact of UNESCO’s 2003 Convention on National Policy-Making: Developing a New Heritage Protection Paradigm? In The Routledge Companion to Intangible Cultural Heritage; Routledge: Oxfordshire, UK, 2016; pp. 69–78. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, Y.; Tao, Y.; Smith, B. China’s Emerging Legislative and Policy Framework for Safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage. Int. J. Cult. Policy 2022, 28, 566–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Cui, Z.; Fan, T.; Ruan, S.; Wu, J. Spatial Distribution of Intangible Cultural Heritage Resources in China and Its Influencing Factors. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 4960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, Q.; Xu, Y.; Ma, C. Analysis of Contemporary Value and Influence of Intangible Cultural Heritage Based on Online Review Mining. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0315805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zabulis, X.; Partarakis, N.; Zidianakis, E.; Kaplanidi, D. A Critical Review of the Function of Intangible Cultural Heritage as a Driver for Social Resilience and Cohesion. Encyclopedia 2025, 5, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- SDG 11.4 Indicators|Institute for Statistics (UIS). Available online: https://www.uis.unesco.org/en/methods-and-tools/sdg114-indicators (accessed on 5 December 2024).
- Yan, L.; Shen, X.; Pengling, L. Spatiotemporal Evolution of the Coupling Coordination between Inheritance of Local Culture and New-Style Urbanization in China. Herit. Sci. 2022, 10, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Ma, X. Heritage Corridor Construction in the Sui–Tang Grand Canal’s Henan Section Based on the Minimum Cumulative Resistance (MCR) Model. Land 2025, 14, 2128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Y. Mapping Urban Morphological Prototypes: Unveiling Local Identity in Historic Water Towns of the Northern Zhejiang Plain, China. Geocarto Int. 2025, 40, 2547011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bie, J.; de Jong, M.; Derudder, B. Greater Pearl River Delta: Historical Evolution towards a Global City-Region. J. Urban Technol. 2015, 22, 103–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, D. Ethnicity and Culture Along Zhujiang River Basin: The Perspective of Macro-anthropology. Soc. Sci. Front. 2017, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Nie, X.; Xie, Y.; Xie, X.; Zheng, L. The Characteristics and Influencing Factors of the Spatial Distribution of Intangible Cultural Heritage in the Yellow River Basin of China. Herit. Sci. 2022, 10, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Chen, M.; Zhang, H.; Ye, F. Intangible Cultural Heritage in the Yangtze River Basin: Its Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Influencing Factors. Sustainability 2023, 15, 7960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Armstrong-Fumero, F. Artifactual Surface and the Limits of Inclusion: Blurring the Boundary Between Materiality and Intangible Heritage. Anthropol. Q. 2018, 91, 1303–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robischon, M. Nonhuman Animal Behavioral Phenomena Are Central to the Emerging Concept of Intangible Natural Heritage. Soc. Anim. 2019, 27, 628–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, G.; Chen, X.; Law, R.; Zhang, M. Sustainability of Heritage Tourism: A Structural Perspective from Cultural Identity and Consumption Intention. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qing, F.; Tan, G.; Sun, C.; Chen, P. Research on Knowledge Organization of Intangible Cultural Heritage Based on Metadata. Inf. Technol. Libr. 2022, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, J.M.; Hu, Z.; Leong, A.M.W. Exploring the Experience Attributes of Intangible Cultural Heritage through Big Data Analytics. J. Vacat. Mark. 2025, 13567667251323644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Csurgó, B.; Smith, M.K. Cultural Heritage, Sense of Place and Tourism: An Analysis of Cultural Ecosystem Services in Rural Hungary. Sustainability 2022, 14, 7305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, K.; Li, C.; Zhan, J.; Lam, J.F.I. Spatiotemporal Distribution and Influencing Factors of Intangible Cultural Heritage in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Region. npj Herit. Sci. 2025, 13, 407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, F.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, S. MGWR Reveals Scale Heterogeneity Shaping Intangible Cultural Heritage Distribution in China. Npj Herit. Sci. 2025, 13, 367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Q.; Yang, P.; Ma, J.; Wang, M.; He, X. The Spatial Differentiation Characteristics and Influencing Mechanisms of Intangible Cultural Heritage in China. Heliyon 2024, 10, e38689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pang, L.; Wu, L. Distribution Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Intangible Cultural Heritage in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei. Herit. Sci. 2023, 11, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mo, B.; Zhang, X.; Chen, W.; Zhou, R.; Zhang, J. Research on the Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Sports Intangible Cultural Heritage in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 27147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, H.; Li, F.; Zhang, J.; Liang, H.; Huangfu, Y. Spatial Structure and Influencing Factors of Agricultural Civilization Heritage in the Yellow River Basin. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 29836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, T.; Wang, D. Spatial Distribution and Pedigree Age of Traditional Handicraft Intangible Cultural Heritage in the Yellow River Basin. npj Herit. Sci. 2025, 13, 420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Zhang, T.; Duan, L.; Liritzis, I.; Li, J. Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Intangible Cultural Heritage in the Yellow River Basin. J. Cult. Herit. 2024, 66, 254–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuang, R.; Zuo, Y.; Gao, S.; Yin, P.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Cai, S.; Li, N. Research on the Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Central China’s Intangible Cultural Heritage. Sustainability 2023, 15, 5751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Kang, L. How Do Geographical Factors Affect the Distribution of Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Case Study of Xinjiang, China. Sustainability 2023, 15, 8943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Li, Q.; Hu, S. Intangible Cultural Heritage in the Yellow River Basin: Its Spatial–Temporal Distribution Characteristics and Differentiation Causes. Sustainability 2022, 14, 11073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Wang, L.; Wei, S. Spatial Variation and Its Local Influencing Factors of Intangible Cultural Heritage Development along the Grand Canal in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L. Cultural Communication and Diversity along the Grand Canal of China: A Case Study of Folk Songs in Intangible Cultural Heritage. Herit. Sci. 2023, 11, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, L.; Yang, G.; Chen, X. Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Intangible Cultural Heritage in the Yunnan, Guangxi, and Guizhou Rocky Desertification Area. Sustainability 2024, 16, 4722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Shea, J.M. A River Runs Through It: Landscape and the Evolution of Bronze Age Networks in the Carpathian Basin. J. World Prehist. 2011, 24, 161–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schillinger, K.; Lycett, S.J. The Flow of Culture: Assessing the Role of Rivers in the Inter-Community Transmission of Material Traditions in the Upper Amazon. J. Archaeol. Method Theory 2019, 26, 135–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pearl River Water Resources Commission of the Ministry of Water Resources. Available online: https://www.pearlwater.gov.cn/swh/zjzj/201807/t20180720_84920.html (accessed on 1 December 2024).
- Wu, X. Overall Ideas and Countermeasures for the 15th Five-Year Plan for Water Security in the Pearl River Basin. China Water Resour. 2025, 4–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- China Intangible Cultural Heritage. Available online: https://www.ihchina.cn/project (accessed on 8 December 2024).
- The Standard Map Service Website of the Ministry of Natural Resources of the People’s Republic of China. Available online: http://bzdt.ch.mnr.gov.cn/ (accessed on 15 November 2024).
- National Bureau of Statistics. Available online: https://data.stats.gov.cn/ (accessed on 8 December 2024).
- National Geomatics Center of China. Available online: https://www.ngcc.cn/ (accessed on 8 December 2024).
- National Cultural Heritage Administration. Available online: http://www.ncha.gov.cn/index.html (accessed on 8 December 2024).
- Liu, Y.; Chen, M.; Tian, Y. Temporal and Spatial Patterns and Influencing Factors of Intangible Cultural Heritage: Ancient Qin-Shu Roads, Western China. Herit. Sci. 2022, 10, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qian, X.; Yu, Y.; Liu, R. The Spatial Relationship Characteristics and Differentiation Causes Between Traditional Villages and Intangible Cultural Heritage in China. Buildings 2025, 15, 2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Zhao, J.; Zhao, X.; Wang, Z.; Xu, Z.; Li, S.; Liu, W. Study on the Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Intangible Cultural Heritage Along the Great Wall of Hebei Province. Sustainability 2025, 17, 6962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shao, D.; Zoh, K.; Xie, Y. The Spatial Differentiation Mechanism of Intangible Cultural Heritage and Its Integration with Tourism Development Based on Explainable Machine Learning and Coupled Coordination Models: A Case Study of the Jiang-Zhe-Hu in China. Herit. Sci. 2024, 12, 414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sitthiyot, T.; Holasut, K. A Simple Method for Estimating the Lorenz Curve. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 2021, 8, 268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Y.J.; Wang, F.Y. Study on the Spatial Connectivity and Distribution of the Landscape for Maoershan Region in Heilongjiang Province. Adv. Mater. Res. 2014, 955–959, 3987–3993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Zuo, L.; Wang, X.; Zhao, X.; Liu, F.; Hu, S.; Yi, L.; Xu, J. Spatial Evolution of Urban Expansion in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Coordinated Development Region. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ge, B.; Song, Y.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y.; Yuan, X. Spatio-Temporal Pattern and Entropy Variation of Agricultural Heritage in China. Herit. Sci. 2024, 12, 415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, X.; Zheng, Q.; Su, K.; Chen, Q. Mechanisms Influencing Spatiotemporal Differentiation of Tourist Towns Based on Geographic Detector: A Case Study of Fujian Province. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0298078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ouyang, S.; Wen, J. Geospatial Drivers of China’s Nature Reserves: Implications for Sustainable Agricultural Development. Agriculture 2025, 15, 1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, L.; Pan, Z.; Li, H.; Wang, D.; Wang, J.; Wu, C.; Wu, X. Study on the Spatiotemporal Evolution and Driving Factors of Water Resource Carrying Capacity in Typical Arid Regions. Water 2024, 16, 2142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y. Application of Digital Technology in Intangible Cultural Heritage Protection. Mob. Inf. Syst. 2022, 2022, 7471121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, J.; Wu, B. Revitalizing Traditional Villages through Rural Tourism: A Case Study of Yuanjia Village, Shaanxi Province, China. Tour. Manag. 2017, 63, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; He, G. Rivers: Linking Nature, Life, and Civilization. River 2022, 1, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, Y.; Rao, J.; Huang, J.; Zhu, Y. Spatial and Temporal Evolution and Conservation Significance of Traditional Villages in the Yangtze River Basin, China. Buildings 2024, 14, 3249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eichler, J. Intangible Cultural Heritage, Inequalities and Participation: Who Decides on Heritage? Int. J. Hum. Rights 2021, 25, 793–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lixinski, L. Selecting Heritage: The Interplay of Art, Politics and Identity. Eur. J. Int. Law 2011, 22, 81–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Wu, X.; Du, Y. Reframing Cultural Heritage Policy Through Place-Based Perspectives: The Evolution of China’s ICH Governance Amid Historical Continuity and Global Convergence. Land 2025, 14, 1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, Q.; Tao, F.; Hong, Z.; Qin, G.; Wei, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhou, T. Research on the Spatiotemporal Distribution and Factors Influencing Intangible Cultural Heritage in Fujian Province from a Multiscale Perspective. Herit. Sci. 2024, 12, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, W.; Chen, Y.; Cao, W.; Yu, R.; Rong, P.; Cheng, J. Spatial Pattern and Its Influencing Factors of National-Level Cultural Heritage in China. Herit. Sci. 2024, 12, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Selmanović, E.; Rizvic, S.; Harvey, C.; Boskovic, D.; Hulusic, V.; Chahin, M.; Sljivo, S. Improving Accessibility to Intangible Cultural Heritage Preservation Using Virtual Reality. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 2020, 13, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]







| ICH Categories | Secondary Water Resource Zone | Number (Item) | Total (Item) | Proportion (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Folk literature | Hong–Liu River Basin | 5 | 22 | 22.73 |
| Nanpan–Beipan River Basin | 5 | 22.73 | ||
| Traditional music | Hainan Island and the South China Sea river basins | 11 | 49 | 22.45 |
| Traditional dance | Nanpan–Beipan River Basin | 11 | 65 | 16.92 |
| Traditional drama | Han River and eastern Guangdong river basins | 11 | 44 | 25.00 |
| Quyi | Pearl River Delta | 3 | 10 | 30.00 |
| Hong–Liu River Basin | 3 | 30.00 | ||
| Traditional sports, amusement, and acrobatics | Pearl River Delta | 5 | 8 | 62.50 |
| Traditional art | Han River and eastern Guangdong river basins | 16 | 40 | 40.00 |
| Traditional techniques | Hainan Island and the South China Sea river basins | 12 | 48 | 25.00 |
| Traditional medicine | Pearl River Delta | 6 | 13 | 46.15 |
| Folkways | Hong–Liu River Basin | 18 | 78 | 23.08 |
| ICH Categories | Prefecture-Level City | Number (Item) | Total (Item) | Proportion (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Folk literature | Honghe Hani and Yi Autonomous Prefecture | 4 | 22 | 18.18 |
| Traditional music | Qiandongnan Miao and Dong Autonomous Prefecture | 4 | 49 | 8.16 |
| Traditional dance | Shenzhen | 5 | 65 | 7.69 |
| Traditional drama | Nanning | 5 | 44 | 11.36 |
| Quyi | Guilin | 2 | 10 | 20.00 |
| Traditional sports, amusement and acrobatics | Guangzhou | 2 | 8 | 25.00 |
| Traditional art | Chaozhou | 8 | 40 | 20.00 |
| Traditional techniques | Guangzhou | 5 | 48 | 10.42 |
| Traditional medicine | Guangzhou | 4 | 13 | 30.77 |
| Folkways | Hechi | 7 | 78 | 8.97 |
| ICH Categories | Amount | NNI | Average Nearest-Neighbor Distance (km) | Expected Nearest-Neighbor Distance (km) | Z | p | Distribution Pattern |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quyi | 10 | 1.13 | 111.27 | 98.26 | 0.80 | 0.42 | random |
| Folkways | 78 | 0.58 | 35.62 | 60.60 | −6.96 | 0 | clustered |
| Folk literature | 22 | 1.25 | 120.39 | 96.13 | 2.26 | 0.02 | uniform |
| Traditional music | 49 | 0.71 | 61.54 | 85.92 | −3.80 | 0 | clustered |
| Traditional medicine | 13 | 1.23 | 90.30 | 72.86 | 1.65 | 0.09 | random |
| Traditional drama | 44 | 0.55 | 43.50 | 78.57 | −5.66 | 0 | clustered |
| Traditional dance | 65 | 0.55 | 40.91 | 73.82 | −6.87 | 0 | clustered |
| Traditional sports, amusement and acrobatics | 8 | 1.60 | 122.00 | 75.84 | 3.29 | 0 | uniform |
| Traditional art | 40 | 0.41 | 30.05 | 73.22 | −7.13 | 0 | clustered |
| Traditional techniques | 48 | 0.52 | 39.54 | 74.72 | −6.24 | 0 | clustered |
| Total | 377 | 0.26 | 8.51 | 31.61 | −27.14 | 0 | clustered |
| ICH Batch | Amount | NNI | Average Nearest-Neighbor Distance (km) | Expected Nearest-Neighbor Distance (km) | Z | p | Distribution Pattern |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First batch (2006) | 95 | 0.39 | 21.86 | 55.46 | −11.29 | 0.00 | clustered |
| Second batch (2008) | 124 | 0.42 | 21.91 | 51.87 | −12.30 | 0.00 | clustered |
| Third batch (2011) | 66 | 0.80 | 55.90 | 69.02 | −2.95 | 0.00 | clustered |
| Fourth batch (2014) | 44 | 0.69 | 52.16 | 75.57 | −3.93 | 0.00 | clustered |
| Fifth batch (2021) | 48 | 0.66 | 52.91 | 79.49 | −4.43 | 0.00 | clustered |
| Category | Driving Factors | Index Definition | q | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical geography | Xtem: Temperature | Annual average temperature | 0.0687 | 0.0000 |
| Xpre: Precipitation | Annual average precipitation | 0.1859 | 0.0000 | |
| Xele: Elevation | Altitude | 0.0666 | 0.0000 | |
| Xrsy: River system | River network density | 0.0630 | 0.0000 | |
| Xwrv: Water resource volume | Annual water resources volume | 0.2126 | 0.0000 | |
| Socioeconomic | Xpop: Population | Year-end resident population | 0.4284 | 0.0000 |
| Xtra: Transportation | Road network density | 0.0229 | 0.0000 | |
| Xurb: Urban Development Level | Urbanization rate | 0.2117 | 0.0000 | |
| Xgdp: Level of economic development | GDP | 0.3257 | 0.0000 | |
| Xdus: Level of Industrial Development | The proportion of tertiary industry | 0.2609 | 0.0000 | |
| Historical and Cultural | Xvil: Traditional Village | Number of traditional villages | 0.0493 | 0.0026 |
| Xpsi: Cultural Heritage Protection Site | National priority protected site | 0.0741 | 0.0000 | |
| Xcin: Cultural institutions | Number of libraries, art galleries, cultural centers, and museums | 0.3358 | 0.0000 |
| Driving Factors | Xurb | Xgdp | Xdus | Xwrv | Xpre | Xpop | Xele | Xtem | Xrsy | Xtra | Xcin | Xvil | Xpsi |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xurb | 0.2117 | ||||||||||||
| Xgdp | 0.7590 (NE) | 0.3257 | |||||||||||
| Xdus | 0.5901 (NE) | 0.7658 (NE) | 0.2609 | ||||||||||
| Xwrv | 0.8240 (NE) | 0.7560 (NE) | 0.7717 (NE) | 0.2126 | |||||||||
| Xpre | 0.6439 (NE) | 0.7315 (NE) | 0.7813 (NE) | 0.7019 (NE) | 0.1859 | ||||||||
| Xpop | 0.7332 (NE) | 0.5974 (BE) | 0.7501 (NE) | 0.8870 (NE) | 0.7626 (NE) | 0.4284 | |||||||
| Xele | 0.4853 (NE) | 0.6029 (NE) | 0.5270 (NE) | 0.4574 (NE) | 0.4645 (NE) | 0.6658 (NE) | 0.0666 | ||||||
| Xtem | 0.4621 (NE) | 0.4985 (NE) | 0.5329 (NE) | 0.4103 (NE) | 0.3673 (NE) | 0.6427 (NE) | 0.1171 (BE) | 0.0687 | |||||
| Xrsy | 0.3216 (NE) | 0.4046 (NE) | 0.3808 (NE) | 0.3683 (NE) | 0.2623 (NE) | 0.4960 (NE) | 0.1639 (NE) | 0.1554 (NE) | 0.0630 | ||||
| Xtra | 0.3079 (NE) | 0.4378 (NE) | 0.3435 (NE) | 0.3193 (NE) | 0.2723 (NE) | 0.5070 (NE) | 0.1256 (NE) | 0.1223 (NE) | 0.1082 (NE) | 0.0229 | |||
| Xcin | 0.8068 (NE) | 0.8362 (NE) | 0.7536 (NE) | 0.9277 (NE) | 0.7559 (NE) | 0.8145 (NE) | 0.5234 (NE) | 0.5170 (NE) | 0.4525 (NE) | 0.4151 (NE) | 0.3358 | ||
| Xvil | 0.3036 (NE) | 0.4016 (NE) | 0.3682 (NE) | 0.3405 (NE) | 0.3219 (NE) | 0.5028 (NE) | 0.2049 (NE) | 0.1849 (NE) | 0.1476 (NE) | 0.1108 (NE) | 0.4634 (NE) | 0.0493 | |
| Xpsi | 0.2829 (BE) | 0.3703 (BE) | 0.3805 (NE) | 0.3440 (NE) | 0.2469 (BE) | 0.4936 (BE) | 0.1871 (NE) | 0.1726 (NE) | 0.1420 (NE) | 0.1200 (NE) | 0.4253 (NE) | 0.1375 (NE) | 0.0741 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Zhan, J.; Liang, W.; Ren, K.; Lam, J.F.I. Spatial Patterns and Driving Mechanisms of Intangible Cultural Heritage in the Pearl River Basin Area. Sustainability 2026, 18, 1801. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18041801
Zhan J, Liang W, Ren K, Lam JFI. Spatial Patterns and Driving Mechanisms of Intangible Cultural Heritage in the Pearl River Basin Area. Sustainability. 2026; 18(4):1801. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18041801
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhan, Jinghui, Wenshan Liang, Kexin Ren, and Johnny F. I. Lam. 2026. "Spatial Patterns and Driving Mechanisms of Intangible Cultural Heritage in the Pearl River Basin Area" Sustainability 18, no. 4: 1801. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18041801
APA StyleZhan, J., Liang, W., Ren, K., & Lam, J. F. I. (2026). Spatial Patterns and Driving Mechanisms of Intangible Cultural Heritage in the Pearl River Basin Area. Sustainability, 18(4), 1801. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18041801

