Next Article in Journal
Decarbonising and Advancing the Sustainability of Construction and Demolition Waste Management in Australia: A Regionalised Life Cycle Assessment Across States
Previous Article in Journal
Water Surface Ratio and Inflow Rate of Paddy Polder Under the Stella Nitrogen Cycle Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
Rice–Fish Integration as a Pathway to Sustainable Livelihoods Among Smallholder Farmers: Evidence from DPSIR-Informed Analysis in Sub-Saharan Africa
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Investigating Sustainable Development Trajectories in China (2006–2021): A Coupling Coordination Analysis of the Social, Economic, and Ecological Nexus

School of Geomatics and Urban Spatial Informatics, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2026, 18(2), 899; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18020899
Submission received: 30 November 2025 / Revised: 9 January 2026 / Accepted: 13 January 2026 / Published: 15 January 2026

Abstract

The successful attainment of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) necessitates robust monitoring frameworks capable of tracking progress toward tangible outcomes while capturing dynamic sustainability trajectories. However, existing SDG evaluation methods suffer from three critical limitations: (1) misalignment between global targets and national priorities, which undermines contextual relevance; (2) fragmented assessments that neglect holistic integration of social, economic, and ecological dimensions, thereby obscuring systemic interdependencies; and (3) insufficient longitudinal analysis, which restricts insights into temporal patterns of sustainable development and hinders adaptive policymaking. To address these gaps, we employed China’s 31 provinces as a case study and constructed an SDG indicator framework comprising 178 metrics—harmonizing global SDG benchmarks with China’s national development priorities. Using official statistics and open-source data spanning 2006–2021, we evaluate longitudinal SDG scores for all 17 goals (SDGs 1–17). Additionally, we developed a composite SDG index that considers the coupling coordination degree of the social–economic–ecological system and evaluated the index value under different economic region settings. Finally, we developed a two-threshold model to analyze the dynamic evolution of SDG conditions, incorporating temporal sustainability (long-term development resilience) and action urgency (short-term policy intervention needs) as dual evaluation dimensions. This model was applied to conduct a longitudinal analysis (2006–2021) across all 31 Chinese provinces, enabling a granular assessment of regional SDG trajectories while capturing both systemic trends and acute challenges over time. The results indicate that China’s social SDG performance improved substantially over the 2006–2021 period, achieving a cumulative increase of 126.53%, whereas progress in ecological SDGs was comparatively modest, with a cumulative growth of only 23.93%. Over the same period, the average composite SDG score across China’s 31 provinces increased markedly from 0.502 to 0.714, reflecting a strengthened systemic alignment between regional development trajectories and national sustainability objectives. Further analysis shows that all provinces attained a status of “temporal sustainability with low action urgency” throughout the study period, highlighting China’s overall progress in sustainable development. Nevertheless, pronounced regional disparities persist: eastern provinces developed earlier and have consistently maintained leading positions; central and northeastern regions exhibit broadly comparable development levels; and western regions, despite severe early-stage lagging, have demonstrated accelerated growth in later years. Our study holds substantial significance by integrating multi-dimensional indicators—spanning ecological, economic, and social dimensions—to deliver a holistic, longitudinal perspective on sustainable development.
Keywords: sustainable development goals (SDGs); coupling coordination; composite SDG index; and two-threshold model sustainable development goals (SDGs); coupling coordination; composite SDG index; and two-threshold model

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, S.; Cao, S.; Du, M.; Liu, Y.; Qian, Y. Investigating Sustainable Development Trajectories in China (2006–2021): A Coupling Coordination Analysis of the Social, Economic, and Ecological Nexus. Sustainability 2026, 18, 899. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18020899

AMA Style

Wang S, Cao S, Du M, Liu Y, Qian Y. Investigating Sustainable Development Trajectories in China (2006–2021): A Coupling Coordination Analysis of the Social, Economic, and Ecological Nexus. Sustainability. 2026; 18(2):899. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18020899

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Sirui, Shisong Cao, Mingyi Du, Yue Liu, and Yuxin Qian. 2026. "Investigating Sustainable Development Trajectories in China (2006–2021): A Coupling Coordination Analysis of the Social, Economic, and Ecological Nexus" Sustainability 18, no. 2: 899. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18020899

APA Style

Wang, S., Cao, S., Du, M., Liu, Y., & Qian, Y. (2026). Investigating Sustainable Development Trajectories in China (2006–2021): A Coupling Coordination Analysis of the Social, Economic, and Ecological Nexus. Sustainability, 18(2), 899. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18020899

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop