Next Article in Journal
Structural Determinants of Behavioral Intention to Use a City Airport Terminal: Evidence from Ulsan
Previous Article in Journal
Digital Policy for Sustainable Agricultural Modernization: A Three-Party Evolutionary Game and Stackelberg Game Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Occurrence, Composition, and Risk Assessment of Microplastics and Adsorbed Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Urban Drainage Sediments Along the Yangtze River, China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Beyond Technology: What Works, What Fails, and How to Scale Multi-Stream Industrial Water Reuse and Resource Recovery

by
Eleonora Santos
1,2
1
CESAM—Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, Department of Environment and Planning, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
2
Centre of Applied Research in Management and Economics, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, 2411-901 Leiria, Portugal
Sustainability 2026, 18(13), 6398; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18136398 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 28 May 2026 / Revised: 16 June 2026 / Accepted: 22 June 2026 / Published: 23 June 2026

Abstract

Industrial water reuse and resource recovery are essential for advancing circular economy principles in water-intensive industries. Despite technological maturity, large-scale implementation continues to lag due to high costs, effluent variability, integration challenges, and weak economic returns. Going beyond technology, this paper critically examines what truly works at scale, why most systems fail, and how to build resilient multi-stream recovery solutions. Drawing on major European demonstration projects (INCOVER, RESURGENCE, MEloDIZER) and recent literature, the paper demonstrates that multi-stream systems significantly outperform single-resource approaches. Success depends less on individual technologies and more on modular design, digital integration, sector-specific adaptation, and supportive governance. The study introduces the Industrial Circular Performance Framework (ICPF) and provides clear, actionable pathways to move from promising pilots to bankable, resilient circular industrial water systems.
Keywords: industrial water reuse; resource recovery; circular economy; multi-stream recovery; wastewater treatment; scaling barriers; digital integration; industrial symbiosis industrial water reuse; resource recovery; circular economy; multi-stream recovery; wastewater treatment; scaling barriers; digital integration; industrial symbiosis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Santos, E. Beyond Technology: What Works, What Fails, and How to Scale Multi-Stream Industrial Water Reuse and Resource Recovery. Sustainability 2026, 18, 6398. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18136398

AMA Style

Santos E. Beyond Technology: What Works, What Fails, and How to Scale Multi-Stream Industrial Water Reuse and Resource Recovery. Sustainability. 2026; 18(13):6398. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18136398

Chicago/Turabian Style

Santos, Eleonora. 2026. "Beyond Technology: What Works, What Fails, and How to Scale Multi-Stream Industrial Water Reuse and Resource Recovery" Sustainability 18, no. 13: 6398. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18136398

APA Style

Santos, E. (2026). Beyond Technology: What Works, What Fails, and How to Scale Multi-Stream Industrial Water Reuse and Resource Recovery. Sustainability, 18(13), 6398. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18136398

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop