This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Thermo-Energetic and Environmental Assessment of Alternative Fuels in Cement Clinker Production: A Review
by
Oluwafemi Ezekiel Ige
Oluwafemi Ezekiel Ige *
and
Musasa Kabeya
Musasa Kabeya
Department of Electrical Power Engineering, Durban University of Technology, Durban 4001, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2026, 18(12), 6056; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18126056 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 1 May 2026
/
Revised: 5 June 2026
/
Accepted: 11 June 2026
/
Published: 12 June 2026
Abstract
Cement clinker production is a thermal- and emissions-intensive process requiring high-temperature heat for drying, calcination, and sintering. This review provides a process-based assessment of refuse-derived fuel (RDF), solid recovered fuel (SRF), tire-derived fuel (TDF), and biomass as partial substitutes for coal and petcoke in modern dry-process cement kilns. The study synthesized the evidence from plant-scale trials, pilot and laboratory experiments, process modeling, computational fluid dynamics, emissions studies, life-cycle assessment (LCA), techno-economic analysis (TEA), and regional case studies to evaluate alternative fuels across fuel properties, kiln-zone suitability, process stability, clinker quality, emissions performance, and environmental outcomes. The review shows that stable co-processing generally requires fuels with net calorific values above 14 MJ kg−1 and moisture contents below 15%, although TDF can provide 26–33 MJ kg−1 and sustain high-energy kiln duty when sulfur, zinc, and steel residues are controlled. RDF, SRF, and biomass require pre-processing, homogenization, calibrated dosing, and continuous fuel-quality monitoring to limit incomplete burnout, deposit formation, volatile circulation, and clinker-quality variation. LCA studies show that 20% RDF thermal substitution can reduce global warming potential by about 3.3–4.2%, increasing to approximately 6.7% when avoided landfill methane credits are included. Modern abatement systems can maintain particulate matter at about 10–30 mg Nm−3 and PCDD/F below 0.1 ng TEQ Nm−3 under stable operation. The review concludes that alternative fuels are quality-dependent co-processing options whose mitigation role is complementary to clinker-factor reduction, energy-efficiency improvement, low-clinker binders, electrified heating, oxy-fuel calcination, and carbon capture.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Ige, O.E.; Kabeya, M.
Thermo-Energetic and Environmental Assessment of Alternative Fuels in Cement Clinker Production: A Review. Sustainability 2026, 18, 6056.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18126056
AMA Style
Ige OE, Kabeya M.
Thermo-Energetic and Environmental Assessment of Alternative Fuels in Cement Clinker Production: A Review. Sustainability. 2026; 18(12):6056.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18126056
Chicago/Turabian Style
Ige, Oluwafemi Ezekiel, and Musasa Kabeya.
2026. "Thermo-Energetic and Environmental Assessment of Alternative Fuels in Cement Clinker Production: A Review" Sustainability 18, no. 12: 6056.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18126056
APA Style
Ige, O. E., & Kabeya, M.
(2026). Thermo-Energetic and Environmental Assessment of Alternative Fuels in Cement Clinker Production: A Review. Sustainability, 18(12), 6056.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18126056
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.