Next Article in Journal
Continuous Up-Flow Sand Filtration as an Effective Tertiary Treatment for Wastewater Reuse
Previous Article in Journal
Spatial-Operational Prioritization of Loading and Unloading Bays for Sustainable Urban Freight Distribution in a Medium-Sized Latin American City
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Thermo-Energetic and Environmental Assessment of Alternative Fuels in Cement Clinker Production: A Review

by
Oluwafemi Ezekiel Ige
* and
Musasa Kabeya
Department of Electrical Power Engineering, Durban University of Technology, Durban 4001, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2026, 18(12), 6056; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18126056 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 1 May 2026 / Revised: 5 June 2026 / Accepted: 11 June 2026 / Published: 12 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Materials)

Abstract

Cement clinker production is a thermal- and emissions-intensive process requiring high-temperature heat for drying, calcination, and sintering. This review provides a process-based assessment of refuse-derived fuel (RDF), solid recovered fuel (SRF), tire-derived fuel (TDF), and biomass as partial substitutes for coal and petcoke in modern dry-process cement kilns. The study synthesized the evidence from plant-scale trials, pilot and laboratory experiments, process modeling, computational fluid dynamics, emissions studies, life-cycle assessment (LCA), techno-economic analysis (TEA), and regional case studies to evaluate alternative fuels across fuel properties, kiln-zone suitability, process stability, clinker quality, emissions performance, and environmental outcomes. The review shows that stable co-processing generally requires fuels with net calorific values above 14 MJ kg−1 and moisture contents below 15%, although TDF can provide 26–33 MJ kg−1 and sustain high-energy kiln duty when sulfur, zinc, and steel residues are controlled. RDF, SRF, and biomass require pre-processing, homogenization, calibrated dosing, and continuous fuel-quality monitoring to limit incomplete burnout, deposit formation, volatile circulation, and clinker-quality variation. LCA studies show that 20% RDF thermal substitution can reduce global warming potential by about 3.3–4.2%, increasing to approximately 6.7% when avoided landfill methane credits are included. Modern abatement systems can maintain particulate matter at about 10–30 mg Nm−3 and PCDD/F below 0.1 ng TEQ Nm−3 under stable operation. The review concludes that alternative fuels are quality-dependent co-processing options whose mitigation role is complementary to clinker-factor reduction, energy-efficiency improvement, low-clinker binders, electrified heating, oxy-fuel calcination, and carbon capture.
Keywords: alternative fuels; cement-kiln co-processing; refuse-derived fuel (RDF); tire-derived fuel (TDF); biomass; thermal substitution rate (TSR) alternative fuels; cement-kiln co-processing; refuse-derived fuel (RDF); tire-derived fuel (TDF); biomass; thermal substitution rate (TSR)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ige, O.E.; Kabeya, M. Thermo-Energetic and Environmental Assessment of Alternative Fuels in Cement Clinker Production: A Review. Sustainability 2026, 18, 6056. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18126056

AMA Style

Ige OE, Kabeya M. Thermo-Energetic and Environmental Assessment of Alternative Fuels in Cement Clinker Production: A Review. Sustainability. 2026; 18(12):6056. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18126056

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ige, Oluwafemi Ezekiel, and Musasa Kabeya. 2026. "Thermo-Energetic and Environmental Assessment of Alternative Fuels in Cement Clinker Production: A Review" Sustainability 18, no. 12: 6056. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18126056

APA Style

Ige, O. E., & Kabeya, M. (2026). Thermo-Energetic and Environmental Assessment of Alternative Fuels in Cement Clinker Production: A Review. Sustainability, 18(12), 6056. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18126056

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop