Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Scenario Simulation of Ecosystem Service Value in Ecologically Fragile Hilly Region: A Case Study of Longji Mountain Area in Guangxi, China
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Data Sources
2.3. Processing Methods
2.3.1. Spatial Quantification of ESV
2.3.2. Spatial Autocorrelation Analysis of ESV
2.3.3. Future Simulation of ESV
3. Results
3.1. The Spatiotemporal Dynamics of ESV
3.1.1. The Spatiotemporal Dynamics of ESV in Mountainous Areas
3.1.2. Temporal and Spatial Evolution of Individual Ecosystem Service Values
3.2. Scenario Simulation of Future Ecosystem Service Values
4. Discussion
4.1. A Coupling Framework for the Human–Land System in Ecologically Fragile Hilly Regions
4.2. Revision of Equivalent Factors for ESV
5. Conclusions
- (1)
- The total ESV showed a fluctuating trend of “initial increase, followed by decrease, and then recovery in the later period”. Over the past eleven years, the average annual ESV was 198.32 million CNY, with an average annual growth rate of −0.15%. Spatially, a heterogeneous pattern emerged, characterized by “high-value agglomeration of forest land, mid-value transition of terraced fields, and low-value insertion of construction land”.
- (2)
- The differentiation of individual service functions was distinct, with regulating and supporting services as the dominant types. Regulating and supporting services accounted for over 91.27% of the total ESV, while provisioning services showed a shrinking trend. Water supply services remained negative for a long period but improved greatly, indicating that the regional water ecological deficit has been alleviated but not fundamentally reversed.
- (3)
- The ESV evolution analysis and the scenario simulations confirmed the key regulatory role of human decision-making in shaping ecosystem services. The ESV gain and loss changes over the past decade revealed a spatial pattern characterized by “dominant gains, fragmented losses, and strip-shaped degradation”. Scenario simulations further indicated that the total ESV and spatial structure were optimal under the ecological protection scenario, while the tourism development scenario performed the worst. The total ESV showed an increasing trend under all three scenarios, with a tendency for spatial differences to narrow.
- (4)
- A coupling framework for the human–land system in the ecologically fragile hilly region was constructed, which centered on the core elements of “human activities—land use—ecosystem services—human well-being—decision-making regulation”. This framework provides a theoretical basis for understanding human–land interactions in ecologically fragile regions.
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| ESV | Ecosystem Services Values |
References
- Costanza, R.; d’Arge, R.; de Groot, R.; Farber, S.; Grasso, M.; Hannon, B.; Limburg, K.; Naeem, S.; Oneill, R.V.; Paruelo, J.; et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 1997, 387, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Assessment, M.E. A Framework for Assessment; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Brander, L.M.; de Groot, R.; Schägner, J.P.; Guisado-Goñi, V.; van ’t Hoff, V.; Solomonides, S.; McVittie, A.; Eppink, F.; Sposato, M.; Do, L.; et al. Economic values for ecosystem services: A global synthesis and way forward. Ecosyst. Serv. 2024, 66, 101654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- de Groot, R.; Brander, L.; van der Ploeg, S.; Costanza, R.; Bernard, F.; Braat, L.; Christie, M.; Crossman, N.; Ghermandi, A.; Hein, L.; et al. Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosyst. Serv. 2012, 1, 50–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Xie, G.D.; Zhang, C.X.; Zhang, L.M.; Chen, W.H.; Li, S.M. Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on per unit area value equivalent factor. J. Nat. Resour. 2015, 30, 1243–1254. [Google Scholar]
- Mir, K.; Brouwer, R. Testing the effect of ecosystem service and land classification on global values of forested watershed ecosystem services. For. Policy Econ. 2025, 181, 103342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Akbar, A.; Abulizi, A.; Abliz, A.; Abliz, A.; Jiang, J.; Yu, T.; Ou, B. Land use and land cover change effects on the value of ecosystem services in the Konqi River Basin, China, under ecological water conveyance conditions. Forests 2023, 14, 1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ge, Q.; Lu, Y.; An, G.; Tian, Z.; Fu, M.; Tan, X.; Liu, X.; Sun, Z. Coupling relationship between city development and ecosystem service in the Shandong Peninsula urban agglomeration. Land 2025, 14, 1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ren, X.; Yang, Y.; Wang, Z. A long-term and comprehensive assessment of the ecological costs arising from urban agglomeration expansion in the middle reaches of the Yellow River Basin. Land 2023, 12, 1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Li, J.N.; Yao, L.; Liu, L.Z.; Lian, J.; Li, X.M.; Gan, D.X. Evaluating the social value of ecosystem services for the green heart area of the Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan urban agglomeration using the SolVES model. J. Ecol. Rural Environ. 2025, 41, 987–1001. [Google Scholar]
- Zella, A.Y.; Kitali, L.J. Forecasting the economic value of ecosystem services in coastal areas of the Indian Ocean: A case study of the Kinondoni District, Tanzania. Adv. Res. 2024, 25, 236–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Haines-Young, R.; Potschin, M. The links between biodiversity, ecosystem service and human well-being. In Ecosystem Ecology: A New Synthesis; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Bishop, J.; Brink, P.T.; Gundimeda, H.; Kumar, P.; Nesshver, C.; Schröter-Schlaack, C.; Simmons, B.; Sukhdev, P.; Wittmer, H. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature—A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB; UNEP: Nairobi, Kenya, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Xie, G.D.; Zhang, C.X.; Zhang, C.S.; Xiao, Y.; Lu, C.X. The value of ecosystem services in China. Resour. Sci. 2015, 37, 1740–1746. [Google Scholar]
- Kreuter, U.P.; Harris, H.G.; Matlock, M.D.; Lacey, R.E. Change in ecosystem service values in the San Antonio area, Texas. Ecol. Econ. 2001, 39, 333–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Troy, A.; Wilson, M.A. Mapping ecosystem services: Practical challenges and opportunities in linking GIS and value transfer. Ecol. Econ. 2006, 60, 435–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Quintas-Soriano, C.; Martín-López, B.; Santos-Martín, F.; Loureiro, M.; Montes, C.; Benayas, J.; García-Llorente, M. Ecosystem services values in Spain: A meta-analysis. Environ. Sci. Policy 2016, 55, 186–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Barbier, E.B.; Hacker, S.D.; Kennedy, C.; Koch, E.W.; Stier, A.C.; Silliman, B.R. The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecol. Monogr. 2011, 81, 169–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Vo, Q.T.; Künzer, C.; Vo, Q.M.; Moder, F.; Oppelt, N. Review of valuation methods for mangrove ecosystem services. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 23, 431–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wei, F.; Xiang, M.; Deng, L.; Wang, Y.; Li, W.; Yang, S.; Wu, Z. Spatiotemporal distribution characteristics and their driving forces of ecological service value in transitional geospace: A case study in the upper reaches of the Minjiang River, China. Sustainability 2023, 15, 14559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhuoyao, W.; Yufei, R.; Qunou, J.; Ziyun, Z.; Chen, X. Comprehensive evaluation of ecosystem service functions in Yunnan Province of southwestern China based on InVEST model. J. Beijing For. Univ. 2024, 46, 103–112. [Google Scholar]
- Sannigrahi, S.; Zhang, Q.; Joshi, P.; Sutton, P.C.; Keesstra, S.; Roy, P.; Pilla, F.; Basu, B.; Wang, Y.; Jha, S. Examining effects of climate change and land use dynamic on biophysical and economic values of ecosystem services of a natural reserve region. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 257, 120424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ayşe, K.; Neslihan, D.; Mustafa, Ö.; Oğuz, G.; Faris, K. Integration of drones in landscape research: Technological approaches and applications. Drones 2025, 9, 603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Li, H.; Chen, E.; Lin, S.; Cheng, L.; Zhang, G. Regional calibration of ecosystem service valuation under climate and tourism influences: A case study in subtropical Longyan, China. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 30535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Li, J.; Qiu, J.; Amani-Beni, M.; Wang, Y.; Yang, M.; Chen, J. A modified equivalent factor method evaluation model based on land use changes in Tianfu New Area. Land 2023, 12, 1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ji, Q.; Feng, X.; Sun, S.; Zhang, J.; Li, S.; Fu, B. Cross-scale coupling of ecosystem service flows and socio-ecological interactions in the Yellow River Basin. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 367, 122071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jia, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, S. Evaluation of agricultural ecosystem service value in arid and semiarid regions of northwest China based on the equivalent factor method. Environ. Process. 2021, 8, 713–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Felici, G.; Corsi, G.; Fabbri, S.; Niero, M.; Lavagnolo, M.C. Assessing the value of ecosystem services in decentralized sanitation systems: A case study in a vulnerable mountain area. Sustainability 2025, 17, 8186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Xu, J.; Li, L.; Lin, W.; Xu, D.; Yu, Q.; Xiong, Y.; Shi, Y. Valuation of ecosystem services value based on dynamic equivalent factor in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration. J. Nat. Conserv. 2026, 89, 127158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jiang, Y.; Li, S.; Chen, W.; Cai, D.; Liu, Y. The evolution of crop cultivation and paleoenvironment in the Longji terraces, southern China: Organic geochemical evidence from paleosols. J. Environ. Manag. 2017, 202, 524–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Cao, H.; Wu, Z.; Zheng, W. Impact of touristification and landscape pattern on habitat quality in the Longji rice terrace ecosystem, southern China, based on geographically weighted regression models. Ecol. Indic. 2024, 166, 112259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jiang, Y.; Li, S.; Cai, D.; Chen, W.; Liu, Y.; Yu, Z. The genesis and paleoenvironmental records of Longji agricultural terraces, southern China: A pilot study of human–environment interaction. Quat. Int. 2014, 321, 12–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- National Bureau of Statistics of China. Announcement on Grain Production Data for 2014–2024. Available online: http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/ (accessed on 19 March 2026).
- Department of Grain and Material Reserves of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region. Guangxi Market Grain and Oil Price Weekly Report. Available online: http://lshwzcbj.gxzf.gov.cn/zfxxgkzl/fdzdgknr/sjfb/lyhq/ (accessed on 19 March 2026).
- People’s Government of Longsheng Various Nationalities Autonomous County. Statistical Bulletin on National Economic and Social Development of Longsheng Various Nationalities Autonomous County. Available online: http://www.glls.gov.cn/ (accessed on 19 March 2026).
- People’s Government of Longsheng Various Nationalities Autonomous County. Government Information Disclosure Work Annual Report of Longsheng Various Nationalities Autonomous County. Available online: http://www.glls.gov.cn/ (accessed on 19 March 2026).
- Costanza, R.; de Groot, R.; Sutton, P.; van der Ploeg, S.; Anderson, S.J.; Kubiszewski, I.; Farber, S.; Turner, R.K. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2014, 26, 152–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Xie, G.; Zhang, C.; Zhen, L.; Zhang, L. Dynamic changes in the value of China’s ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 2017, 26, 146–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- National Bureau of Statistics of China. National Data: Provincial Annual Data. Available online: https://data.stats.gov.cn/dg/website/page.html#/pc/national/fsYearData (accessed on 13 May 2026).
- Song, C.; Levine, J.M. Rigorous validation of ecological models against empirical time series. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2025, 9, 2265–2278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Shi, F.; Zhou, B.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, H.; Li, H.; Li, R.; Guo, Z.; Gao, X. Spatial autocorrelation analysis of land use and ecosystem service value in the Huangshui River Basin at the grid scale. Plants 2022, 11, 2294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hu, M.M.; Li, Z.T.; Wang, Y.F.; Jiao, M.Y.; Li, M.; Xia, B.C. Spatio-temporal changes in ecosystem service value in response to land-use/cover changes in the Pearl River Delta. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 149, 106–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Moran, P.A.P. Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika 1950, 37, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Getis, A.; Ord, J.K. The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geogr. Anal. 1992, 24, 189–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Fu, B. Coupling human and natural systems for sustainable development. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2023, 10, nwad086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Guzman, C.B. Networked shorelines: A review of vulnerability interactions between human adaptation to sea level rise and wetland migration. Glob. Environ. Change 2025, 92, 102985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sang, S.; Li, Y.; Zong, S.; Yu, L.; Wang, S.; Liu, Y.; Wu, X.; Song, S.; Wang, X.; Fu, B. The modeling framework of the coupled human and natural systems in the Yellow River Basin. Geogr. Sustain. 2025, 6, 100294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhao, X.; Xu, Y.; Wang, Q.; Pu, J.; Shi, X.; Huang, P.; Gu, Z. Sustainable agricultural development models of the ecologically vulnerable karst areas in southeast Yunnan from the perspective of human–earth areal system. Land 2022, 11, 1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ran, Y.; Zhao, X.; Ye, X.; Wang, X.; Pu, J.; Huang, P.; Zhou, Y.; Tao, J.; Wu, B.; Dong, W. A framework for territorial spatial ecological restoration zoning integrating “carbon neutrality” and “human-geology-ecology”: Theory and application. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2024, 115, 105824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhao, S.; Yu, Z.; Liu, W. The co-evolution and driving mechanism analysis of ecosystem services value and tourism economic resilience from 286 cities in China. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 16311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Feng, T.; Hu, P.; Zhu, H. Ecosystem services and sustainable restoration interlinking soil, geological, and vegetation interactions for sustainable development. Front. Earth Sci. 2025, 13, 1743208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Martinelli, E.; Gonçalves, E.C.C.; Castanho, R.A.M.D.; Pivac, T. Cultural Heritage-Based Sustainable Tourism Approaches; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2025. [Google Scholar]
- Pawęska, K.; Dąbek, P.B. Water and wastewater management in mountain tourist shelters of Karkonosze National Park. J. Ecol. Eng. 2026, 27, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Brunner, S.H.; Huber, R.; Grêt-Regamey, A. Mapping uncertainties in the future provision of ecosystem services in a mountain region in Switzerland. Reg. Environ. Change 2017, 17, 2309–2321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lang, Y.; Song, W. Quantifying and mapping the responses of selected ecosystem services to projected land use changes. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 102, 186–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhang, L.; Zhang, X.; Gao, S.; Gu, X. Revealing nonlinear relationships and thresholds of human activities and climate change on ecosystem services in Anhui Province based on the XGBoost–SHAP model. Sustainability 2025, 17, 8728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sanou, J.; Tengberg, A.; Bazié, H.R.; Mingasson, D.; Ostwald, M. Assessing trade-offs between agricultural productivity and ecosystem functions: A review of science-based tools? Land 2023, 12, 1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Qin, B.; Zhao, J.; Chen, G.; Wang, R.; Lin, Y. An integrated framework for assessing dynamics of ecological spatial network resilience under climate change scenarios: A case study of the Yunnan central urban agglomeration. Land 2025, 14, 1988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhang, Q.; Hong, J.; Wu, F.; Yang, Y.; Dong, C. Gains or losses? A quantitative estimation of environmental and economic effects of an ecological compensation policy. Ecol. Appl. 2021, 31, e02341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Furniss, T.J.; Hessburg, P.F.; Povak, N.A.; Salter, R.B.; Wigmosta, M.S. Predicting future patterns, processes, and their interactions: Benchmark calibration and validation procedures for forest landscape models. Ecol. Model. 2022, 473, 110099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]











| Time (Year) | Grain Yield per Unit Area in Longsheng Autonomous County (kg/ha) | Grain Yield per Unit Area in China(kg/ha) | Purchase Price of Grain Crops (Current Price, CNY/kg) | Constant Price of Grain Crops (Base Year 2013, CNY/kg) | Service Value of Farmland Ecosystem (CNY/ha) | Correction Factor | Equivalent Factor of ESV in Longsheng Autonomous County (CNY/ha) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 5739.13 | 5377 | 2.56 | 2.56 | 2098.88 | 1.07 | 2240.32 |
| 2014 | 6073.85 | 5385 | 2.57 | 2.52 | 2186.58 | 1.13 | 2466.29 |
| 2015 | 5907.44 | 5483 | 2.74 | 2.64 | 2227.95 | 1.08 | 2400.46 |
| 2016 | 5939.48 | 5452 | 2.59 | 2.46 | 2087.30 | 1.09 | 2273.89 |
| 2017 | 5896.08 | 5506 | 2.58 | 2.41 | 2029.94 | 1.07 | 2173.67 |
| 2018 | 5522.64 | 5621 | 2.63 | 2.40 | 1893.48 | 0.98 | 1860.34 |
| 2019 | 5415.41 | 5720 | 2.56 | 2.26 | 1748.40 | 0.95 | 1655.30 |
| 2020 | 5520.79 | 5734 | 2.61 | 2.24 | 1766.65 | 0.96 | 1700.96 |
| 2021 | 5535.85 | 5805 | 2.78 | 2.36 | 1866.37 | 0.95 | 1779.84 |
| 2022 | 5505.56 | 5802 | 2.83 | 2.36 | 1856.16 | 0.95 | 1761.42 |
| 2023 | 5665.03 | 5845 | 2.86 | 2.39 | 1934.20 | 0.97 | 1874.65 |
| Time (Year) | Terraced Fields | Forest Land | Water Bodies | Unused Land |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 0.87 | 5.17 | 28.14 | 0.04 |
| 2014 | 0.96 | 5.69 | 30.98 | 0.05 |
| 2015 | 0.93 | 5.54 | 30.15 | 0.05 |
| 2016 | 0.88 | 5.25 | 28.56 | 0.05 |
| 2017 | 0.85 | 5.02 | 27.30 | 0.04 |
| 2018 | 0.72 | 4.30 | 23.37 | 0.04 |
| 2019 | 0.64 | 3.82 | 20.79 | 0.03 |
| 2020 | 0.66 | 3.93 | 21.37 | 0.03 |
| 2021 | 0.69 | 4.11 | 22.36 | 0.04 |
| 2022 | 0.69 | 4.07 | 22.13 | 0.04 |
| 2023 | 0.73 | 4.33 | 23.55 | 0.04 |
| Mean value | 0.78 | 4.66 | 25.34 | 0.04 |
| Time (Year) | Moran’s I | Z | General G Observations • 10−6 | General G Expectations • 10−6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 0.70 | 76.49 | 8 | 6 |
| 2014 | 0.63 | 68.70 | 8 | 6 |
| 2015 | 0.63 | 68.87 | 7 | 6 |
| 2016 | 0.59 | 64.87 | 8 | 6 |
| 2017 | 0.64 | 69.97 | 7 | 6 |
| 2018 | 0.65 | 71.11 | 7 | 6 |
| 2019 | 0.60 | 65.82 | 7 | 6 |
| 2020 | 0.66 | 71.63 | 7 | 6 |
| 2021 | 0.65 | 71.22 | 7 | 6 |
| 2022 | 0.62 | 67.49 | 7 | 6 |
| 2023 | 0.57 | 62.78 | 7 | 6 |
| Mean value | 0.63 | 69.00 | 7.3 | 6 |
| Service Function | Moran’s I | Z | General G Observations • 10−6 | General G Expectations • 10−6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Food production | 0.67 | 73.06 | 8 | 6 |
| Raw material production | 0.64 | 69.42 | 7 | 6 |
| Water supply | 0.70 | 76.52 | ––* | ––* |
| Gas regulation | 0.56 | 62.12 | 7 | 6 |
| Climate regulation | 0.64 | 70.24 | 7 | 6 |
| Environmental purification | 0.63 | 68.47 | 7 | 6 |
| Hydrological regulation | 0.32 | 35.08 | 8 | 6 |
| Soil conservation | 0.65 | 71.49 | 7 | 6 |
| Nutrient cycling | 0.46 | 50.00 | 7 | 6 |
| Biodiversity maintenance | 0.64 | 70.01 | 8 | 6 |
| Aesthetic value | 0.64 | 69.66 | 7 | 6 |
| Mean value | 0.60 | 65.10 | 7 | 6 |
| Service Function | Changes from 2013 to 2018 | Changes from 2018 to 2023 | Changes from 2013 to 2023 | Average from 2013 to 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Food production | −1.57 | −0.32 | −1.89 | 6.36 |
| Raw material production | −0.24 | 0.40 | 0.16 | 5.89 |
| Water supply | 2.24 | 1.42 | 3.67 | −4.31 |
| Gas regulation | −1.67 | 1.00 | −0.66 | 21.81 |
| Climate regulation | −2.01 | 4.05 | 2.04 | 57.37 |
| Environmental purification | −0.90 | 1.26 | 0.36 | 16.44 |
| Hydrological regulation | −10.04 | 3.46 | −6.58 | 38.91 |
| Soil conservation | −0.58 | 1.73 | 1.15 | 22.71 |
| Nutrient cycling | −0.25 | 0.06 | −0.19 | 2.29 |
| Biodiversity maintenance | −0.85 | 1.54 | 0.68 | 21.28 |
| Aesthetic value | −0.42 | 0.69 | 0.27 | 9.35 |
| Time (Year) | Scene Mode | Maximum Value of Spatial Distribution (Million CNY/ha) | Average Value of Spatial Distribution (1 × 104 CNY/ha) | Total Value of Spatial Distribution (Million CNY) | Total Value of Terraced Fields (Million CNY) | Total Value of Forest Land (Million CNY) | Total Value of Water Bodies (Million CNY) | Total Value of Unused Land (Million CNY) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2028 | Natural development scenario | 0.18 | 3.19 | 194.77 | 9.61 | 179.80 | 5.34 | 0.03 |
| Ecological protection scenario | 0.19 | 3.23 | 200.43 | 10.05 | 184.71 | 5.65 | 0.02 | |
| Tourism development scenario | 0.17 | 3.13 | 194.19 | 9.38 | 179.19 | 5.59 | 0.03 | |
| 2033 | Natural development scenario | 0.23 | 4.15 | 253.68 | 10.91 | 236.89 | 5.86 | 0.02 |
| Ecological protection scenario | 0.24 | 4.17 | 259.39 | 11.25 | 241.82 | 6.30 | 0.02 | |
| Tourism development scenario | 0.20 | 4.07 | 252.75 | 10.58 | 236.09 | 6.05 | 0.02 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Jiang, Y.; Huang, S.; Pu, L.; Zhai, J.; Qie, L. Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Scenario Simulation of Ecosystem Service Value in Ecologically Fragile Hilly Region: A Case Study of Longji Mountain Area in Guangxi, China. Sustainability 2026, 18, 5926. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18125926
Jiang Y, Huang S, Pu L, Zhai J, Qie L. Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Scenario Simulation of Ecosystem Service Value in Ecologically Fragile Hilly Region: A Case Study of Longji Mountain Area in Guangxi, China. Sustainability. 2026; 18(12):5926. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18125926
Chicago/Turabian StyleJiang, Yu, Sihua Huang, Lijie Pu, Jiahao Zhai, and Lu Qie. 2026. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Scenario Simulation of Ecosystem Service Value in Ecologically Fragile Hilly Region: A Case Study of Longji Mountain Area in Guangxi, China" Sustainability 18, no. 12: 5926. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18125926
APA StyleJiang, Y., Huang, S., Pu, L., Zhai, J., & Qie, L. (2026). Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Scenario Simulation of Ecosystem Service Value in Ecologically Fragile Hilly Region: A Case Study of Longji Mountain Area in Guangxi, China. Sustainability, 18(12), 5926. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18125926
