Next Article in Journal
Agrivoltaic Systems as Socio-Ecological Infrastructure for Mitigating Abiotic Stress Under Climate Change
Previous Article in Journal
Management Consultant Competencies for Environmental, Social, and Governance-Oriented Green Transformation in Taiwan: A BWM–TOPSIS Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Measuring Livelihood Resilience in Ecologically Fragile Regions: An Entropy-Obstacle Diagnosis of Forest Farmers in Northern China

College of Economics and Management, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010011, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2026, 18(10), 4826; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18104826
Submission received: 9 April 2026 / Revised: 7 May 2026 / Accepted: 11 May 2026 / Published: 12 May 2026

Abstract

Ecologically fragile regions face the dual challenge of environmental conservation and improving rural livelihoods. Forest-dependent households are especially exposed to ecological restoration constraints, market fluctuations, and limited institutional access. This study develops a micro-level diagnostic framework that combines the Sustainable Livelihood Framework with resilience theory by adding a risk-resilience dimension to the conventional five-capital structure. Using survey data from 444 forest-farmer households in Songshan District, Inner Mongolia, we calculate livelihood resilience with the entropy-weight method, classify household profiles with K-means clustering, and diagnose constraints with an obstacle-degree model. The mean resilience score is 0.6267, indicating a relatively strong but uneven resilience level. Livelihood risk resilience (0.7476) and financial capital resilience (0.6797) are the strongest dimensions, whereas human capital resilience (0.3521) and physical capital resilience (0.4099) remain weak. The main obstacles are relationships with village cadres (29.66%), household savings (16.25%), livestock and poultry assets (14.70%), village road conditions (13.23%), relationships with relatives and friends (10.99%), and corporate/cooperative assistance effects (6.88%). The findings support targeted interventions in linking social capital, savings capacity, infrastructure, and enterprise-farmer cooperation.
Keywords: livelihood resilience; sustainable livelihoods; forest farmers; ecologically fragile regions; rural development livelihood resilience; sustainable livelihoods; forest farmers; ecologically fragile regions; rural development

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, H.; Bao, Q. Measuring Livelihood Resilience in Ecologically Fragile Regions: An Entropy-Obstacle Diagnosis of Forest Farmers in Northern China. Sustainability 2026, 18, 4826. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18104826

AMA Style

Zhang H, Bao Q. Measuring Livelihood Resilience in Ecologically Fragile Regions: An Entropy-Obstacle Diagnosis of Forest Farmers in Northern China. Sustainability. 2026; 18(10):4826. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18104826

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Hao, and Qingfeng Bao. 2026. "Measuring Livelihood Resilience in Ecologically Fragile Regions: An Entropy-Obstacle Diagnosis of Forest Farmers in Northern China" Sustainability 18, no. 10: 4826. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18104826

APA Style

Zhang, H., & Bao, Q. (2026). Measuring Livelihood Resilience in Ecologically Fragile Regions: An Entropy-Obstacle Diagnosis of Forest Farmers in Northern China. Sustainability, 18(10), 4826. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18104826

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop