Next Article in Journal
Measuring Livelihood Resilience in Ecologically Fragile Regions: An Entropy-Obstacle Diagnosis of Forest Farmers in Northern China
Previous Article in Journal
Educational Management and Project Activities in Shaping an Ecological Society: Wartime Challenges and Sustainable Development Strategies of Ukraine
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Management Consultant Competencies for Environmental, Social, and Governance-Oriented Green Transformation in Taiwan: A BWM–TOPSIS Approach

1
Graduate Institute of Human Resource Management, National Changhua University of Education, No. 1, Jin-De Rd., Changhua 500, Taiwan
2
Department of Finance, National Changhua University of Education, No. 1, Jin-De Rd., Changhua 500, Taiwan
3
Department of Electrical and Mechanical Technology, National Changhua University of Education, No. 1, Jin-De Rd., Changhua 500, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2026, 18(10), 4813; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18104813
Submission received: 5 April 2026 / Revised: 6 May 2026 / Accepted: 8 May 2026 / Published: 12 May 2026

Abstract

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG)-oriented green transformation is reshaping the competency requirements for management consultants, particularly in Taiwan, where firms face growing pressure to disclose sustainability information, manage carbon, and comply with regulations. Yet limited research has systematically identified and prioritized the competencies required of consultants supporting this transformation. This study develops an integrated competency-prioritization framework using expert content validation, the best–worst method (BWM), and the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). An initial pool of 150 competency items was generated from a structured literature review and refined by six experts using a strict one-strike rule, yielding 48 validated competencies. Survey data from 54 professionally relevant respondents were then analyzed to estimate competency weights and rankings. The results show that communication and advocacy capability was the leading dimension, with a weight of 37.1206%. At the item level, the highest-ranked competency was the ability to negotiate with stakeholders and build consensus on sustainability initiatives. The study contributes a BWM–TOPSIS-based competency prioritization framework and offers practical guidance for consultant selection, capability assessment, training design, and professional development in ESG-oriented green transformation contexts.
Keywords: environmental, social, and governance (ESG); green transformation; management consultants; competency prioritization; BWM–TOPSIS; Taiwan environmental, social, and governance (ESG); green transformation; management consultants; competency prioritization; BWM–TOPSIS; Taiwan

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lin, C.-L.; Cheng, Y.-P.; Huang, W.-Y.; Huang, L.-Y.; Shyr, W.-J. Management Consultant Competencies for Environmental, Social, and Governance-Oriented Green Transformation in Taiwan: A BWM–TOPSIS Approach. Sustainability 2026, 18, 4813. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18104813

AMA Style

Lin C-L, Cheng Y-P, Huang W-Y, Huang L-Y, Shyr W-J. Management Consultant Competencies for Environmental, Social, and Governance-Oriented Green Transformation in Taiwan: A BWM–TOPSIS Approach. Sustainability. 2026; 18(10):4813. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18104813

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lin, Chen-Liang, Yu-Peng Cheng, Wen-Yen Huang, Lan-Ying Huang, and Wen-Jye Shyr. 2026. "Management Consultant Competencies for Environmental, Social, and Governance-Oriented Green Transformation in Taiwan: A BWM–TOPSIS Approach" Sustainability 18, no. 10: 4813. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18104813

APA Style

Lin, C.-L., Cheng, Y.-P., Huang, W.-Y., Huang, L.-Y., & Shyr, W.-J. (2026). Management Consultant Competencies for Environmental, Social, and Governance-Oriented Green Transformation in Taiwan: A BWM–TOPSIS Approach. Sustainability, 18(10), 4813. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18104813

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop