This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
AI-Enabled Process Improvement in Information-Intensive Administrative Work: Real-Case Applications of LLMs in a Lean Six Sigma Context
by
Leonor Menano de Carvalho
Leonor Menano de Carvalho 1,
Paulo Peças
Paulo Peças 2,*
and
Diogo Jorge
Diogo Jorge 2
1
IDMEC, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal
2
Efficiencyrising, Lda, 1800-082 Lisbon, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2026, 18(10), 4787; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18104787 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 2 April 2026
/
Revised: 8 May 2026
/
Accepted: 9 May 2026
/
Published: 11 May 2026
Abstract
Lean Six Sigma (LSS) improvement work increasingly depends on information-intensive activities such as document handling, data interpretation, reporting, and communication, yet current discussions of Artificial Intelligence in LSS remain largely technology-centric. This paper proposes a task-first, process-centric framework to support the governed application of Large Language Model (LLM)-enabled tools in such environments. The study makes three contributions: (i) a set of cross-functional organizational process types relevant to LSS practice, (ii) a functional classification of recurring tasks and LLM-enabled tool categories, and (iii) a dual-encoded task–tool matching matrix that separates alignment strength from interaction mode, distinguishing capability fit from governance logic. The framework is empirically anchored through two real-world industrial applications: customs document processing and shop-floor data digitalization and reporting. The results show that (i) stronger outcomes emerge when LLM-enabled support is matched to bounded, repetitive, and structured work, or when analytical support is built on stable and traceable data layers; (ii) operational value depends not only on technical capability, but on workflow embeddedness, data readiness, and human validation checkpoints. The framework also clarifies where support, augmentation, and partial automation are appropriate for different task classes and under explicit accountability constraints in information-intensive administrative work connected to improvement practice and governance.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Menano de Carvalho, L.; Peças, P.; Jorge, D.
AI-Enabled Process Improvement in Information-Intensive Administrative Work: Real-Case Applications of LLMs in a Lean Six Sigma Context. Sustainability 2026, 18, 4787.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18104787
AMA Style
Menano de Carvalho L, Peças P, Jorge D.
AI-Enabled Process Improvement in Information-Intensive Administrative Work: Real-Case Applications of LLMs in a Lean Six Sigma Context. Sustainability. 2026; 18(10):4787.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18104787
Chicago/Turabian Style
Menano de Carvalho, Leonor, Paulo Peças, and Diogo Jorge.
2026. "AI-Enabled Process Improvement in Information-Intensive Administrative Work: Real-Case Applications of LLMs in a Lean Six Sigma Context" Sustainability 18, no. 10: 4787.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18104787
APA Style
Menano de Carvalho, L., Peças, P., & Jorge, D.
(2026). AI-Enabled Process Improvement in Information-Intensive Administrative Work: Real-Case Applications of LLMs in a Lean Six Sigma Context. Sustainability, 18(10), 4787.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18104787
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.