Next Article in Journal
Strategies for Advancing Climate-Resilient Infrastructure in Informal Settlements: A Systematic Review of Global Evidence
Previous Article in Journal
Revitalizing Regional Industries Through Public Innovation Intermediaries: A Multi-Stage Evaluation of the Maritime Open Lab Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
Research on the Nonlinear Mechanism of Gig Workers’ Perception of Algorithmic Control and Their Counterproductive Work Behaviors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

AI-Enabled Process Improvement in Information-Intensive Administrative Work: Real-Case Applications of LLMs in a Lean Six Sigma Context

by
Leonor Menano de Carvalho
1,
Paulo Peças
2,* and
Diogo Jorge
2
1
IDMEC, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal
2
Efficiencyrising, Lda, 1800-082 Lisbon, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2026, 18(10), 4787; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18104787 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 2 April 2026 / Revised: 8 May 2026 / Accepted: 9 May 2026 / Published: 11 May 2026

Abstract

Lean Six Sigma (LSS) improvement work increasingly depends on information-intensive activities such as document handling, data interpretation, reporting, and communication, yet current discussions of Artificial Intelligence in LSS remain largely technology-centric. This paper proposes a task-first, process-centric framework to support the governed application of Large Language Model (LLM)-enabled tools in such environments. The study makes three contributions: (i) a set of cross-functional organizational process types relevant to LSS practice, (ii) a functional classification of recurring tasks and LLM-enabled tool categories, and (iii) a dual-encoded task–tool matching matrix that separates alignment strength from interaction mode, distinguishing capability fit from governance logic. The framework is empirically anchored through two real-world industrial applications: customs document processing and shop-floor data digitalization and reporting. The results show that (i) stronger outcomes emerge when LLM-enabled support is matched to bounded, repetitive, and structured work, or when analytical support is built on stable and traceable data layers; (ii) operational value depends not only on technical capability, but on workflow embeddedness, data readiness, and human validation checkpoints. The framework also clarifies where support, augmentation, and partial automation are appropriate for different task classes and under explicit accountability constraints in information-intensive administrative work connected to improvement practice and governance.
Keywords: large language models; Lean Six Sigma; process improvement; human-in-the-loop; administrative processes large language models; Lean Six Sigma; process improvement; human-in-the-loop; administrative processes

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Menano de Carvalho, L.; Peças, P.; Jorge, D. AI-Enabled Process Improvement in Information-Intensive Administrative Work: Real-Case Applications of LLMs in a Lean Six Sigma Context. Sustainability 2026, 18, 4787. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18104787

AMA Style

Menano de Carvalho L, Peças P, Jorge D. AI-Enabled Process Improvement in Information-Intensive Administrative Work: Real-Case Applications of LLMs in a Lean Six Sigma Context. Sustainability. 2026; 18(10):4787. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18104787

Chicago/Turabian Style

Menano de Carvalho, Leonor, Paulo Peças, and Diogo Jorge. 2026. "AI-Enabled Process Improvement in Information-Intensive Administrative Work: Real-Case Applications of LLMs in a Lean Six Sigma Context" Sustainability 18, no. 10: 4787. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18104787

APA Style

Menano de Carvalho, L., Peças, P., & Jorge, D. (2026). AI-Enabled Process Improvement in Information-Intensive Administrative Work: Real-Case Applications of LLMs in a Lean Six Sigma Context. Sustainability, 18(10), 4787. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18104787

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop