Integrated Assessment for Optimal Urban Development in Oman: A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis of Physical and Socioeconomic Factors
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Materials
2.3. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Kilicoglu, C.; Cetin, M.; Aricak, B.; Sevik, H. Site selection by using the multi-criteria technique—A case study of Bafra, Turkey. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2020, 192, 608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hatami, M.; Siahooei, E. Examines Criteria Applicable in the Optimal Location New Cities, with Approach for Sustainable Urban Development. Middle-East J. Sci. Res. 2013, 14, 734–743. [Google Scholar]
- Hereher, M.; Al-Awadhi, T.; Mansour, S.A. Assessment of the optimized sanitary landfill sites in Muscat, Oman. Egypt. J. Remote Sens. Space Sci. 2020, 23, 355–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mansour Sh Al-Awadhi, T.; Al-Hatrushi, S. Geospatial based multi-criteria analysis for ecotourism land suitability using GIS & AHP: A case study of Masirah Island, Oman. J. Ecotourism 2019, 19, 148–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sandipan, D.; Anirban, B.; Sagar, M. Study on urban land suitability assessment using remote sensing and GIS: A case study of Khairagarh, in Chhattisgarh. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 2013, 74, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- AlFanatseh, A. Land suitability analysis of urban development in the Aqaba area, Jordan, using a GIS-based analytic hierarchy process. GeoJournal 2021, 87, 4143–4159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lourdes, K.T.; Hamel, P.; Gibbins, C.N.; Sanusi, R.; Azhar, B.; Lechner, A.M. Planning for green infrastructure using multiple urban ecosystem service models and multicriteria analysis. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2022, 226, 104500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lambarki, R.; Elmostafa, A.; Maanan, M.; Rhinane, H. Assessing the potential of green roofs in urban areas: A multicriteria Boolean analysis utilizing GIS and remote sensing data in the city of Nador, Morocco. Green Technol. Sustain. 2025, 3, 100171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akyol, E.; Alkan, M.; Kaya, A.; Tasdelen, S.; Aydin, A. Environmental Urbanization Assessment Using GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis: A Case Study for Denizli (Turkey) Municipal Area. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2018, 2018, 6915938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Majid, M.; Mir, B. Landfill site selection using GIS based multi criteria evaluation technique. A case study of Srinagar city, India. Environ. Chall. 2021, 3, 100031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, M.; Szabó, G. A Geospatial Approach to Measure Social Benefits in Urban Land Use Optimization Problem. Land 2021, 10, 1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, T.T.; Verdoodt, A.; Van, Y.N.T.; Delbecque, N.; Tran, T.C.; Van Ranst, E. Design of a GIS and multi-criteria based land evaluation procedure for sustainable land-use planning at the regional level. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2015, 200, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palacios, R.; Sannwald, E.; Barrios, L.; Paz, F.; Hernández, J.; Mendoza, M. Landscape diversity in a rural territory: Emerging land use mosaics coupled to livelihood diversification. Land Use Policy 2013, 30, 814–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, K.; Jin, B.; Fan, H.; Song, W.; Zhou, S.; Jiang, Y. High-Performance Overlay Analysis of Massive Geographic Polygons That Considers Shape Complexity in a Cloud Environment. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2019, 8, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hereher, M.; El Kenawy, A. Exploring the potential of solar, tidal, and wind energy resources in Oman using an integrated climatic-socioeconomic approach. Renew. Energy 2020, 161, 662–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saleh, M.S.; Alalouch, C. Towards Sustainable Construction in Oman: Challenges & Opportunities. Procedia Eng. 2015, 118, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Safinia, S.; Al-Hinai, Z.; Yahia, H.; Abushammala, M. Sustainable Construction in Sultanate of Oman: Factors Effecting Materials Utilization. Procedia Eng. 2017, 196, 980–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Badi, A.; Al Wahaibi, A.; Ahshan, R.; Malik, A. Techno-Economic Feasibility of a Solar-Wind-Fuel Cell Energy System in Duqm, Oman. Energies 2022, 15, 5379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benkari, N. Urban development in Oman: An overview. In WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment; WIT Press: Southampton, UK, 2017; Volume 9, pp. 143–156. [Google Scholar]
- Mabry, R.; Al Siyabi, H.; Kannan, M.; Al Siyabi, A. Move for health: Addressing the built environment and physical activity in Oman. East. Mediterr. Health J. 2019, 25, 923–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ansari, T.; Singh, C.; Albawwab, W. Urbanization and its Impact on Land Use and Land Cover in Al Buraimi City, Oman Using Remote Sensing and GIS. J. Landsc. Ecol. 2025, 18, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Awadhi, T.; Ramadan, E.; Charabi, Y. Urban development and landuse change patterns in Muscat city, Oman. Int. J. Geoinform. 2017, 13, 45–55. [Google Scholar]
- Mansour, S.; Alahmadi, M.; Atkinson, P.; Dewan, A. Forecasting of Built-Up Land Expansion in a Desert Urban Environment. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Awadhi, T. Local Spatial Impacts of Globalization in Developing Countries: The Case of Sohar, Oman. Int. Rev. Spat. Plan. Sustain. Dev. 2017, 5, 25–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alnejem, M.; Taghipour, M. The Sustainable Development of Urban Planning and Architectural Identity in Barka City—Oman. Int. J. Res. Sci. Innov. 2024, 6, 76–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sallam, I.; Abdelghani, M. Systemic Approach to Smart Urban Transformations of Cities Case of Muscat- Oman. Int. J. Membr. Sci. Technol. 2023, 10, 630–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwarteng, A.Y.; Dorvlo, A.S.; Vijaya, G.T. Analysis of a 27-year rainfall data (1977–2003) in the Sultanate of Oman. Int. J. Climatol. 2009, 29, 605–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fick, S.E.; Hijmans, R.J. WorldClim 2: New 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 2017, 37, 4302–4315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamdar, I.; Ali, S.; Bennui, A.; Techato, K.; Jutidamrongphan, W. Municipal solid waste landfill siting using an integrated GIS-AHP approach: A case study from Songkhla, Thailand. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 149, 220–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Issa, S.; Shehhi, B. A GIS-based multi-criteria evaluation system for selection of landfill sites: A case study from Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2012, 39, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eskandari, M.; Homaee, M.; Mahmoodi, S.; Pazira, E.; Van Genuchten, M.T. Optimizing landfill site selection by using land classification maps. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 7754–7765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hariz, H.; Dönmez, C.; Sennaroglu, B. Siting of a central healthcare waste incinerator using GIS-based Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 166, 1031–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maleika, W. Inverse distance weighting method optimization in the process of digital terrain model creation based on data collected from a multibeam echosounder. Appl. Geomatics 2020, 12, 397–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shukla, K.; Kumar, P.; Mann, G.S.; Khare, M. Mapping spatial distribution of particulate matter using Kriging and Inverse Distance Weighting at supersites of megacity Delhi. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 54, 101997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, G.Y.; Wong, D.W. An adaptive inverse-distance weighting spatial interpolation technique. Comput. Geosci. 2008, 34, 1044–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, M.; Zhong, S.; Al Ghassani, M.A.M.; Johanning, L.; Sucala, V.I. Simulation and feasibility assessment of a green hydrogen supply chain: A case study in Oman. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2024, 32, 13313–13328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Mulla, Y.; Al-Ruheili, A.; Al-Lawati, A.; Parimi, K.; Ali, A.; Al-Sadi, N.; Al-Harrasi, F. Assessment of Urban Expansion’s Impact on Changes in Vegetation Patterns in Dhofar, Oman, Using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 86782–86792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Kindi, K.M.; Al Nadhairi, R.; Al Akhzami, S. Dynamic Change in Normalised Vegetation Index (NDVI) from 2015 to 2021 in Dhofar, Southern Oman in Response to the Climate Change. Agriculture 2023, 13, 592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kazem, H. Renewable energy in Oman: Status and future prospects. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15, 3465–3469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khalid, A.; Al-Mamery, M. Competitiveness of Arabian gulf ports from shipping lines’ perspectives: Case of Sohar port in Oman. J. Ind. Eng. Manag. 2019, 12, 458–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, M.; Szabó, G. Sustainable Urban Land-Use Optimization Using GIS-Based Multicriteria Decision-Making (GIS-MCDM) Approach. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2022, 11, 313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hereher, M.E. Climate Change during the Third Millennium—The Gulf Cooperation Council Countries. Sustainability 2022, 14, 14181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Block, S.; Emerson, J.W.; Esty, D.C.; de Sherbinin, A.; Wendling, Z.A. 2024 Environmental Performance Index; Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy: New Haven, CT, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]




| Parameter | Data Type | Resolution | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Topography | ASTER Global Digital Elevation Models (GDEM) | 30 m | Application for Extracting and Exploring Analysis Ready Samples (AρρEEARS) (https://appeears.earthdatacloud.nasa.gov (accessed on 15 February 2025)) |
| Temperature diurnal variation | MODIS LST 8-day composite (MYD11A2) | 1000 m | Land Processed Distributed Active Archive Center of the United States Geological Survey (https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/ (accessed on 15 February 2025)) |
| Relative humidity (%RH) | AIRS satellite–monthly average | 1.0° × 1.0° | Geospatial Interactive Online Visualization and Analysis Infrastructure (Giovanni) platform (https://giovanni.gsfc.nasa.gov/giovanni/ (accessed on 15 February 2025)) |
| Atmospheric dust (kg m−2) | MERRA2 reanalysis data | 0.5° × 0.625° | Geospatial Interactive Online Visualization and Analysis Infrastructure (Giovanni) platform (https://giovanni.gsfc.nasa.gov/giovanni/ (accessed on 15 February 2025)) |
| Wind speed (m/s) | MERRA2 reanalysis data | 0.5° × 0.625° | Geospatial Interactive Online Visualization and Analysis Infrastructure (Giovanni) platform (https://giovanni.gsfc.nasa.gov/giovanni/ (accessed on 15 February 2025)) |
| Solar radiation | Ground station reanalysis data | 10 min × 10 min | WorldClim (https://www.worldclim.org/data/index.html (accessed on 15 February 2025)) |
| Access to electricity | VIIRS nighttime lights data | Shapefile | Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (sedac) (https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/data/tools/sedac-map-viewer (accessed on 15 February 2025)) |
| Parameter | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Class | ||||||
| Topography (m) | <100 | 100–250 | 250–500 | 500–750 | >750 | |
| Diurnal T. variation (°C) | <5 | 5–10 | 10–15 | 15–20 | >20 | |
| Relative humidity (%) | <21 | 21–26 | 26–34 | 34–42 | >42 | |
| Atmospheric dust (g m−2) | <0.37 | 0.37–0.41 | 0.41–0.45 | 0.45–0.5 | >0.5 | |
| Wind speed (m/s) | >6.2 | 5.6–6.2 | 5.6–5.1 | 5.1–4.5 | <4.5 | |
| Solar radiation (MJ m−2 day−1) | >21.4 | 21.4–21.1 | 21.1–20.9 | 20.9–20.6 | <20.6 | |
| Access to electricity (population × 1000) | >167 | 167–96 | 96–52 | 52–18 | <18 | |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Hereher, M.E. Integrated Assessment for Optimal Urban Development in Oman: A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis of Physical and Socioeconomic Factors. Sustainability 2026, 18, 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18010060
Hereher ME. Integrated Assessment for Optimal Urban Development in Oman: A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis of Physical and Socioeconomic Factors. Sustainability. 2026; 18(1):60. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18010060
Chicago/Turabian StyleHereher, Mohamed E. 2026. "Integrated Assessment for Optimal Urban Development in Oman: A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis of Physical and Socioeconomic Factors" Sustainability 18, no. 1: 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18010060
APA StyleHereher, M. E. (2026). Integrated Assessment for Optimal Urban Development in Oman: A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis of Physical and Socioeconomic Factors. Sustainability, 18(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18010060
