Abstract
This review article discusses the performance evaluation and integration strategies for solar façades, focusing on photovoltaic (PV) façades in diverse climatic conditions. It examines recent technology developments and methodologies for performance assessment, highlighting the potential of solar façades to enhance energy performance through on-site electricity generation. This study offers novel insights into the economic viability of façade-mounted photovoltaics, highlighting their potential in urban areas with constrained rooftop availability. Additionally, it emphasizes their distinct advantages in cold climates, such as reduced maintenance requirements and extended operational lifespans. Additionally, it addresses challenges such as technical complexity, esthetic considerations, and market awareness, emphasizing the balance between efficiency and design. Novel findings underscore the promise of advanced materials like perovskites in improving the flexibility and performance, as well as strategies to optimize BIPV integration in different climate zones. For stakeholders, this research highlights the importance of supportive policies and innovative solutions to overcome barriers, while offering researchers valuable perspectives on the advancement of solar façades toward zero-energy and zero-carbon building targets.
1. Introduction
Countries worldwide are progressively transitioning towards renewable energy sources [1] to mitigate climate change and reduce the negative environmental impacts of conventional energy production. The electricity demand is increasing more rapidly than the overall energy demand, driven by established uses such as cooling and emerging needs, including electric mobility and data centers.
Solar energy, in particular, has undergone significant expansion in recent years, driven by its ubiquitous availability and continuous technological advancements [2]. Solar energy ranks as the second-largest renewable energy source globally in terms of installed capacity, following hydropower. Solar PV energy sources are leading the growth in electricity generation, advancing at a pace sufficient to cover the projected rise in the electricity demand. Notably, there is potential for even more significant expansion: the solar manufacturing capacity is approximately 1100 GW per year, but the industry can install and bring online almost three times as much new solar power capacity annually compared to what was deployed in 2023 [3].
According to the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the UN Environment Programme (UNEP), buildings account for about 30–40% of the total global energy use [2]. The Global Alliance for Buildings and Construction (GlobalABC) confirms this range, frequently citing 36–40% for energy use when including operational and embodied energy in materials.
Buildings contribute to approximately 28–33% of the global GHG emissions [4], depending on the scope of analysis (whether indirect emissions related to production are included). UNEP’s Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction estimates emissions at about 28% for direct operations, rising to roughly 33% when indirect emissions are included.
Recent studies reveal that, with the increasing rate of urbanization, the energy demand for buildings is expected to rise by over 50% by 2050, exacerbating their environmental impact [3]. As a result, the building sector is now recognized as a critical target for energy efficiency measures and decarbonization strategies, with efforts focusing on integrating renewable energy sources, such as solar façades, to reduce the energy demand and emissions significantly.
Solar irradiance is one of the most widely utilized, practical, and economically viable renewable resources for energy generation. It can be effectively implemented across diverse geographic regions and climates worldwide [5]. This potential highlights its adaptability, scalability, and relevance in contributing to global energy needs.
In the EU, solar photovoltaics (PV) and wind energy are expected to contribute 42.5% of the total energy mix, reflecting a binding target for the share of energy from renewable sources by 2030 [3,6,7]. Several EU initiatives, such as PVSITES and BIPVBOOST, have aimed to advance BIPV technology. The BIPVBOOST project, in particular, analyzed the regulatory framework for BIPV and developed new assessment procedures addressing energy efficiency, mechanical safety, electrical safety, and fire safety. Furthermore, broader EU programs like the European Green Deal, the REPowerEU plan, and the EU Solar Energy Strategy have been instrumental in promoting photovoltaics, including BIPV. Various countries within the EU have implemented policy measures, such as subsidies for photovoltaic systems and green building certification standards, to encourage the integration of PV technology into building designs, which in turn impacts the construction industry by driving innovation and sustainability practices. Among these policies, green tradable certificates, feed-in tariffs, capital subsidies, tax credits, and net metering have been used to a large extent, providing significant incentives for the adoption of BIPV systems.
The United States aims for carbon-free electricity by 2035, with renewable sources projected to account for about 50% of all electricity generation by 2030 [8]. Federal tax incentives, along with state-specific programs, have significantly promoted the adoption of BIPV systems, making them an attractive option for sustainable building projects. Net metering policies in several states further support BIPV adoption by allowing building owners to offset energy costs with the electricity generated.
Meanwhile, China aims for non-fossil fuels to comprise 25% of its primary energy consumption by 2030 [9], with solar and wind significantly contributing to the new capacity [10], with the solar PV capacity alone reaching 216 GW [11,12]. Subsidies for solar installations and mandatory energy efficiency standards for new buildings have accelerated the use of photovoltaic façade systems in urban areas. Feed-in tariffs and capital subsidies have been particularly effective in encouraging both large-scale and distributed photovoltaic applications.
India plans to achieve 500 GW of renewable energy capacity by 2030, aiming for renewables to constitute 50% of its total power generation [13]. Policies such as reduced tariffs for solar equipment, incentives for green-certified buildings, and net metering regulations have bolstered the adoption of BIPV systems across the country.
In the Middle East, the UAE aims for clean energy to represent 50% of its energy mix by 2050 [14], while Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 includes generating 58.7 GW from renewables, primarily solar [15]. These goals are supported by government-led initiatives to encourage the use of photovoltaic technology in building designs through subsidies, feed-in tariffs, and energy efficiency regulations.
Latin America sees Brazil aiming for 48% of its electricity from renewables by 2030 [16,17,18] and Chile targeting 70% by 2050 [19]. Both countries have introduced policies that promote solar energy, including tax reductions, capital subsidies, and net metering incentives for the use of BIPV technology in residential and commercial buildings.
In Africa, the African Union is focused on enhancing energy access through solar power, with a target of 300 GW of renewable capacity by 2030 [20,21]. Supportive policies, such as grants for renewable energy projects and international partnerships, have encouraged the growth of BIPV systems across the continent. Feed-in tariffs and tax credits have also been used in some regions to stimulate investment in solar technologies.
Building-integrated photovoltaics (BIPV) include various installation types, with rooftop-mounted PV systems currently the most popular due to their straightforward installation and high solar exposure [22]. However, façade-mounted PV systems hold significant potential, as building façades offer a much larger surface area than rooftops [23]. Façade-integrated PV can serve as an additional architectural layer or even as the primary finishing layer of the building exterior, adding both functional and esthetic value. Integrating PV into façades allows these surfaces to contribute considerably to a building’s energy generation capacity, with the potential to surpass the output of rooftop PV installations, both in mid-rise and high-rise buildings [24]. BIPV can maximize renewable energy production and advance sustainability targets in the built environment by utilizing roof and façade surfaces.
Façade-mounted PVs have the potential to deliver substantial energy generation and demonstrate economic viability, particularly in highly urbanized areas, where vertical surfaces are abundant but roof space is limited [25]. In northern countries, façades are more exposed to the sun due to the low solar elevation angle, which allows vertical surfaces to capture more direct and diffuse sunlight, especially during the winter months and under cloudy weather conditions. Façade-mounted PV systems in northern regions can achieve energy yields of 50–150 kWh/m2 annually, making them a viable alternative to rooftop installations in urban environments. According to the International Energy Agency’s (IEA) report on PV installations in 2023, the total capacity of photovoltaic systems can be categorized as follows: 55% are utility-scale installations (solar parks), 35% are building rooftop installations, and the remaining 10% consist of façade-integrated PV systems [3].
Active research is ongoing to evaluate the performance of active solar thermal façades, including their classification, standards, and performance assessment [26]. Solar technologies are being integrated into building façades to improve their energy performance by controlling the solar heat gains, natural lighting, and on-site electricity generation [27,28]. In hot-climate countries, the potential of cooled façades or the use of BIPV for significant cooling energy savings and reduced indoor operative temperatures has been discussed [29].
Despite their recognized potential, challenges related to solar façades need to be addressed, such as technical complexity, the lack of knowledge among market participants [30], and insufficient education among architects [31,32].
The industry is actively working on innovative solutions to overcome these challenges and promote the widespread deployment of solar façades. It focuses on integrating solar technologies into building envelopes and achieving zero-energy or zero-carbon building targets [30,33].
Due to the importance of this topic, more direct information must be provided on the specific applications of solar façades in cold- and warm-climate countries. Emerging technological advancements and forthcoming policies are anticipated to reshape the integration of photovoltaics into buildings, driving widespread adoption [34].
2. Materials and Methods
This review systematically examines case studies of solar PV applications on building façades. We followed a seven-step methodology: (1) defining the aim of the review; (2) formulating the research questions; (3) conducting a search for similar review studies; (4) conducting a comprehensive search for relevant studies; (5) assessing the studies’ quality and extracting data; (6) synthesizing the findings; and (7) interpreting the synthesized data (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Seven-step methodology within the review’s development.
The recent relevant review articles were collected in the first step of this study. The used keywords included (“solar panels”, “BIPV”, “PV façade”) AND (“review”), excluding from the selection those with the keywords (“photovoltaic-thermal”, “hybrid solar systems”, “PVT”) so as to deal only with purely photovoltaic systems. The study period for this review was defined as 2020 to 2024 to ensure distinctiveness and avoid overlap with prior reviews.
Sixteen relevant review articles that met the criteria of this research were found using the WOS, ScienceDirect, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar databases. The existing review studies cover a broad spectrum of topics related to building-integrated photovoltaics (BIPV), each contributing unique perspectives and findings. These reviews collectively address the technological, methodological, and design aspects of BIPV systems, focusing on different applications, innovations, and challenges.
- The most recent BIPV-related review at the time of this study synthesized technological advancements, the actual market, and the regulatory environment affecting BIPV [35]. It was published in 2024 and gave general insights for policymakers and stakeholders. This review strongly supports claims about declining costs driven by technological advancements, the importance of harmonizing standards, and the optimization potential of digital tools. However, areas like the market impact of PV module recycling, ethical production, and life cycle cost analyses lack sufficient evidence.
- Another 2024 review was performed on BIPV windows. It reviewed the development of BIPV façade technologies related to PV and smart windows and summarized the related experimental and simulation studies [36]. It highlights advances in materials and building physics for PV smart windows but lacks evidence for practical energy-saving applications. While switchable building envelopes show potential for energy efficiency, challenges in different climates and building types are underexplored. The need for long-term studies to verify the energy-saving benefits and user acceptance is noted, but this is not supported by sufficient data or case studies.
- An overview performed by Italian scientists [37] focused on bifacial and semi-transparent BIPV systems and covered mostly technological and modeling aspects. It analyzed the electrical, optical, and thermal modeling procedures. However, its conclusions lack depth in critical areas, such as the optimization of semi-transparent perovskite and organic solar cells, where evidence remains insufficient or contradictory. Moreover, the proposed effectiveness of unified models integrating the thermal, optical, and electrical domains is more aspirational than substantiated, leaving significant gaps in addressing practical implementation challenges.
- Another review study, published in 2024, highlights the use of digital twin technologies throughout the entire life cycle of BIPV systems [38]. It identifies key DT applications, including real-time monitoring, predictive analysis, and robotic technologies for installation and maintenance. However, the practical implementation of real-time data optimization and continuous virtual model updates requires further investigation and evidence.
- A recent review analyzes the materials used for solar cells and considers their life cycle analysis using 24 case study projects with BIPV [39]. It emphasizes the role of eco-design in reducing these impacts and suggests that emerging solar technologies, although promising, require further attention to material use and toxicity.
- A group of authors from Australia and Malaysia, in their review [40], emphasize the need for esthetically appealing BIPV systems to overcome the monotonous appearance of traditional PV modules. This review explores high-definition colored PV technology for BIPV systems, focusing on micropatterning to enhance the light transmission and efficiency. While promising, this technology needs optimization to balance the image quality and energy performance for commercial use. Further research is required on non-toxic inks and improving the efficiency in thin-film PV modules. Practical implementation remains uncertain, with more data needed for real-world applications.
- A review study about methods for the potential harvesting of solar energy in urban areas at the district level considers 17 studies of façade and roof solar modeling with the application of GIS [41]. This review emphasizes the need for comprehensive evaluation methods to assess the urban potential of BIPV systems for sustainability. It reviews the current CAD- and GIS-based solar potential analysis approaches, highlighting gaps in integrating architectural features and addressing urban challenges like glare and heat island effects.
- A related review examines approximately 120 case studies of BIPV implementation from 2012 to 2022 across various countries, highlighting that BIPV systems are more advantageous in low-latitude regions. This study finds higher implementation rates in temperate, subtropical, cold, moderate, and Mediterranean climates. Interestingly, due to supportive government policies, BIPV adoption is significant in certain cold-climate countries despite the relatively low solar gains. In contrast, despite the high solar potential in hot and desert climates, BIPV is less commonly deployed. This disparity may stem from the potential of BIPV on vertical surfaces to increase the interior temperatures in hot regions [42].
- Another review, which focuses only on BIPV windows, covers the period from 2005 to 2022 [43] and gives data collected from different case studies of energy savings, locations, countries, and climates according to the Köppen climate classification, window types, and window orientations. This review highlights that, in cold-climate countries, 36% of the building energy is used for heating and 20% for lighting, whereas, in hot-climate countries, 55% of the energy consumption is dedicated to HVAC systems. This review provides valuable insights into the potential of BIPV windows, especially for energy-efficient applications in diverse climates and urban environments. However, while the findings are promising, the conclusions are based on global estimates and limited studies, indicating the need for broader experimental validation and region-specific analyses to fully understand the real-world potential of BIPV window technologies.
- Another review focuses on double-skin façade technology, gives an analysis of recent research on this topic, and discusses the physical properties and parameters of DSF to achieve building sustainability [44]. The review provides a thorough evaluation of PV-DSF systems, offering regulatory insights and a strong foundation for future research. Its focus on both static and dynamic regulation is practical, and the proposed recommendations are well supported. However, the review could benefit from more empirical data and real-world case studies to validate the suggested frameworks. The identified research gaps, particularly regarding dynamic regulation and occupant comfort, highlight the need for multidisciplinary approaches to fully realize PV-DSF’s potential.
- A group of Italian researchers published a review study showing the most common façade PV solutions and their effects on building energy savings. Various photovoltaic technologies and methods used to manufacture façade BIPV devices designed for different purposes are reviewed [45]. This review highlights the growing potential of BIPV technologies in improving buildings’ energy efficiency, particularly through multifunctional and esthetically integrated solutions such as hybrid and semi-transparent systems.
- A study performed in 2022 and published in 2023 by researchers from China and Australia analyzed the bibliographic data of most journals, authors, and countries dedicated to BIPV, giving an analysis of the used keywords and their development. This study takes into account around 1000 research papers. It focuses on the period of 2012 to mid-2022 [46].
- Another research work in the form of a dissertation reviews software workflows for the evaluation of BIPV solar gains at a neighborhood scale [47]. This study reveals significant variability in the results of different tools when predicting solar irradiation under similar input conditions, especially for façades and complex geometries, with deviations reaching up to 40% in some cases. While small variations are observed for flat, unobstructed roofs, complex scenarios like heterogeneous districts lead to larger discrepancies due to shading and geometry intricacies. The findings emphasize the importance of understanding tool-specific assumptions, such as sun position calculations, diffuse models, and reflections, while acknowledging that some deviations remain unexplained, underscoring the need for the further analysis of simulation engines.
- An older (published in 2022) review summarizing the research on fenestration integrated PV [48] is similar to the previously mentioned review of BIPV windows [43]. This review concludes that, in hot climates, single-glazed BIPV windows with high U-values offer better thermal performance but require solar energy penetration control to prevent excess heat and light, making shading or selective transmission critical. In cold climates, double- or triple-glazed BIPV windows are more effective due to their low U-values, with vacuum-integrated BIPV emerging as a promising solution for improved insulation.
- A review of the technological design options for building-integrated photovoltaics (BIPV) [23], conducted in 2021, provides a comparative analysis of various PV panel materials, interlayers, electrical module configurations, and the use of color to conceal PV cells. This review also explores design strategies for complete electrical systems and the constructional integration of BIPV modules within building envelopes.
- Another review is dedicated solely to perovskite technology and gives a summary of this technology, but, because it was performed in 2020, it does not capture the latest technological advancements related to perovskite PV cell production and applications [49].
The existing reviews on building-integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) systems cover various topics, primarily focusing on technology, methodology, and design. Some address specific advancements, such as bifacial and semi-transparent systems, digital twin technologies, and innovative materials like perovskites. Others examine BIPV windows and double-skin façades and their potential for energy efficiency. Broader reviews synthesize case studies across climates, highlighting policy impacts, with colder regions benefiting from incentives despite low solar gains, while hot desert regions face challenges like interior heat gains.
Specific reviews explore esthetic and design aspects, such as the module layout and façade integration, while others use modeling tools to evaluate the solar potential at larger scales. Bibliometric studies reveal research trends and evolving themes. Despite these contributions, a gap remains in understanding climate-specific BIPV performance and its adaptability across diverse conditions.
This review addresses this gap by evaluating BIPV performance in various climates, integrating technological, policy, and climatic insights. It aims to propose region-specific strategies for the optimization of BIPV adoption, supporting sustainable energy solutions tailored to local conditions. Key research questions include identifying emerging technologies (e.g., semi-transparent PV, perovskites), assessing climate-specific challenges, and understanding why façade PV adoption lags behind that of rooftop systems.
3. Literature Review
To ensure novelty, this review focuses on studies from the period of 2023–2024, using keywords such as “BIPV façade”, “double-skin façade”, “solar software”, and “FBIPV”. Articles were sourced from the WOS, ScienceDirect, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar databases. Studies irrelevant to climatic performance, such as those on rooftop PV, acoustics, or regulatory aspects, were excluded. This approach captured advancements in efficiency, materials, and integration methods, providing a foundation for sustainable BIPV implementation across climates. As Figure 2 shows, the main research keywords were compiled from selected article keywords using a free online word cloud generator. The most frequently appearing keywords included BIPV, solar energy, energy performance, integrated building photovoltaic systems, energy performance, and efficiency. These keywords indicate a strong focus on integrating photovoltaic technology into buildings for energy generation, enhancing sustainability, and optimizing energy efficiency in buildings.
Figure 2.
The main research keywords (compiled from selected article keywords with a free online word cloud generator).
The most cited research papers from the earlier 2019–2022 period, according to the Web of Science (WOS) database, are studies investigating solar-active applications on building façades in various climatic conditions. These studies recommend specific façade orientations to optimize heating, cooling, and electricity generation depending on the geographic location [50]. Another study examines the integration of solar thermal and photovoltaic (PV) collectors into building façades to reduce energy consumption across five European locations, highlighting the interplay between the solar energy supply and heating or cooling demand [51]. Solar energy and shading have also been explored in warm climates as strategies to reduce the cooling energy requirements [29].
Research on the mounting and location of solar façades still needs to be completed. One study presents a method for the optimization of the geometric layout of façade-mounted PV arrays, considering the finite height of façades and identifying the optimal tilt angle and number of panels to maximize solar radiation while avoiding shading issues [52]. Another study discuss the design processes for façade PV systems, including selecting suitable panels and developing software to simulate PV energy production and building energy consumption [53].
Innovative architectural designs for solar façades have also been proposed. These include kinetic photovoltaic systems that adjust to the optimal tilt angles for maximum energy generation [54,55] and façade-based BIPV designs optimized for yields within available façade areas [56]. Additionally, studies explore the potential for passive energy solutions, such as integrating solar panels into walls and window canopies, which offer easier maintenance and reduced installation costs compared to rooftop systems [57].
Recent studies (2023 onward) adopt a more comprehensive approach, exploring aspects such as economic viability, design optimization, technological advancements, and methodologies for BIPV placement, often supported by case studies. Many studies integrate multiple dimensions—for instance, analyzing economic feasibility alongside strategies to enhance it, proposing methodologies to estimate solar gains, and simultaneously developing techniques to optimize PV panel placement. These studies can be categorized into overlapping but distinct thematic areas.
- Climatic Adaptation and Optimization: Research on orientation and tilt optimization for solar façades to balance heating, cooling, and electricity generation across various climate zones.
- Building Integration and Design Strategies: Studies on the integration of PV systems into innovative building designs, such as semi-transparent façades, multi-skin façades, and kinetic systems.
- Material and Technological Innovations: The development of novel PV technologies, including bifacial and third-generation panels and façade-integrated materials, enhancing the efficiency and esthetics.
- Energy Performance and Multifunctionality: The analysis of PV façades providing multifunctional benefits, such as electricity and heat generation or passive cooling.
- Economic Feasibility and Social Acceptance: Evaluations of cost-effectiveness, energy savings, and esthetic appeal to enhance the public and market acceptance of BIPV systems.
- Simulation and Predictive Models: The application of modeling tools to optimize PV configurations and predict energy outputs under different conditions.
- Environmental Impact and Sustainability: The exploration of BIPV’s contributions to net-zero energy goals and greenhouse gas emission reductions.
- Architectural and Urban Potential: Research highlighting the potential to maximize façade surfaces, especially in urban areas, where façade-mounted systems can outperform rooftop installations in electricity generation due to larger surface areas.
These categories reflect the multifaceted nature of solar PV research, although dividing the studies into exclusive categories is challenging due to their interdisciplinary focus. Table 1 provides a simplified categorization of the selected articles: case studies (24 papers), design optimization (4), economic factors (6), methodological developments (12), and technology-focused research (28). Some articles fit specifically into these categories and are discussed separately.
Table 1.
Selected research papers and their summaries.
The distribution of research related to specific climatic conditions and economic circumstances among regions is as follows: international and transcontinental (3); European (12), in which Switzerland (3) and Italy (3) dominate; the Middle East (13); Eastern countries (34), in which China (17) and South Korea (8) clearly dominate; Africa (4); North America (3); South America (2); and Australia (2).
4. Discussion: Key Barriers to the Widespread Adoption of BIPV Systems
BIPV systems offer a promising solution for sustainable energy generation in urban environments, yet their widespread adoption faces significant challenges. Recent studies’ main findings reveal critical barriers, such as economic viability, social acceptance, mechanical stability, thermal performance, and regulatory compliance. While BIPV systems provide unique advantages, such as enhanced energy efficiency and integration into building envelopes, their implementation could be improved by considering longer payback compared to rooftop PV systems, esthetic concerns, and complex design requirements.
This section identifies and discusses five key barriers to the widespread adoption of BIPV systems. These barriers include economic viability, where more extended payback periods compared to rooftop PV systems hinder the investment appeal; social acceptance, as esthetic concerns often conflict with architectural and community preferences; mechanical resistance and stability, which impose stringent structural requirements that are unique to façade integration; thermal performance limitations, particularly the heat-related efficiency losses in specific integration methods; and regulatory challenges, with façade-mounted PV systems needing to meet strict construction product standards. Understanding these barriers is crucial in developing strategies to promote BIPV adoption and enhance its role in sustainable energy transitions.
Barrier 1—economic viability and payback period. Solar PV panels are primarily used in power plants or when integrated into buildings. They are universally placed on building roofs since this results in the shortest payback times. According to the study by Li and Liu [129], flat-installed PVs on roofs have a payback period of 6.16 years. In contrast, the most effective BIPV scenarios demonstrate economic viability with a payback period of 14–18 years and internal rates of return (IRR) between 5.3% and 5.9% [84], or, as reported in other recent research, 13–17 years [61]. By inclining the panels [130], it is possible to shorten this gap, but rooftop PV panels remain the most economically viable option. In places beyond a 60° latitude, the inclination on façades is close to optimal, but the shading becomes a significant issue because of the low sun horizon. There is one more bonus for façade panels in cold climates—installing panels on façades eliminates the need for maintenance during the winter season to clear snow from the panels and also avoids the potential increase in roof loads due to snow drift. Although the payback time is longer, the lifetime of façade-mounted PV is longer than that of rooftop-mounted PV because of the lower solar radiance and less exposure to rain, snow, and dust [131]. Some studies report that solar plant cells do not reach the expected 20–25 years and last only 10–12 years because of intense exploitation and other factors [132].
Barrier 2—social acceptance or visual appearance. Social acceptance and visual appearance present significant challenges in the widespread adoption of solar façade technologies. Public and professional perceptions of building-integrated photovoltaics (BIPV) are often influenced by these installations’ visual impacts on building esthetics and urban landscapes. While BIPV systems contribute to sustainable energy goals, their appearance—particularly in urban areas—may not always align with traditional architectural styles [133] or the esthetic expectations of communities [134,135]. To address these concerns, manufacturers have developed customizable options regarding color, texture, transparency, and materials [136]. However, while such customization can improve their visual integration and potentially increase their social acceptance, it may also reduce the efficiency of PV systems and raise the installation costs. Balancing the functional performance of solar façades with esthetic demands thus remains a complex issue, as any compromise in energy efficiency or economic feasibility could further impact public acceptance and slow the adoption of sustainable building technologies.
Barrier 3—ensuring mechanical resistance and stability. This is a critical requirement for BIPV systems due to their dual role as energy generators and integral components of a building’s envelope. Unlike PV panels installed in open fields, BIPV systems must comply with stricter structural standards to limit deflections that could compromise the building’s integrity and safety. For example, façade-integrated PV panels must withstand wind loads, thermal expansion, and vibrations while maintaining their functionality. Additionally, BIPV panels are subject to stringent watertightness standards to prevent leaks that could damage the building’s interior. At the same time, they need to allow for easy access to essential components—such as cable junction boxes, inverters, and connectors—for regular maintenance, inspection, and testing. For instance, roof-integrated PV systems often incorporate modular designs or accessible mounting systems to facilitate quick replacement or repairs without compromising the roof’s waterproofing. Barrier 4—decreased output performance as temperatures rise [137]. This is beneficial in facilitating airflow and cooling over the rear surface of the PV. However, specific integration methods, such as fully sealed double-glazed transparent curtain walls, do not allow for this, resulting in a performance loss of 5% to 10% that must be accepted [138]. Alternatively, integration methods like rain screens do not pose such drawbacks. In these systems, the panels are mounted with an offset from the façade onto the lattice substructure, creating an intermediate ventilated space. The integration method also depends on the type of PV.
Barrier 5—construction product requirements. PV panels are typically installed on rooftops using ground-mounted systems, where the panels are mounted on frames, concrete blocks, or poles optimized for large solar farms. These systems are built with low-cost, standard components and are easily assembled and scalable. They do not serve additional building functions, making them ideal for retrofit applications. Structurally, they only require an assessment of the increased roof load from the weight and ballast of the panels. However, when any object is permanently incorporated into a building, affecting its performance, it becomes a construction product, subject to national building codes. In Europe, these requirements are governed by Directive 305/2011, and similar regulations exist in other regions to ensure the safety, health, and environmental protection of construction products. For example, watertightness is typically achieved using sealants and gaskets. When panels are attached to a façade using structural sealants or frames, they are classified as structural sealant glazing systems and must meet the basic requirements outlined in ETAG 002.
BIPV continues to face challenges that hinder its broader market adoption. While the costs gradually decrease, high initial expenses remain a significant obstacle to investment and widespread uptake. Supportive policies are still essential for BIPV to achieve more significant usage within the construction sector.
5. Findings
This section examines the key findings on building-integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) systems, emphasizing their performance, environmental impacts, and technological advancements. While photovoltaic innovations have made remarkable progress over the past 10–15 years—transforming building-integrated applications through improved efficiency, functionality, and esthetic integration—many of these advancements fall outside the specific timeframe of this review. Semi-transparent photovoltaic (STPV) panels, which gained momentum between 2015 and 2020, now offer improved power conversion efficiency and daylighting benefits. Perovskite solar cells, emerging as a promising technology after 2012, have seen rapid advancements, particularly from 2022 onward, with breakthroughs in stability, scalability, and tandem configurations, pushing them closer to large-scale commercial deployment. Vacuum-insulated BIPV technologies, particularly suited for cold climates, have seen notable progress in integration and thermal performance since 2015.
The regions leading these technologies include Europe, North America, and parts of Asia, particularly China, Japan, and South Korea. Europe has been at the forefront of the integration of semi-transparent and vacuum-insulated BIPV technologies, driven by stringent energy regulations and a focus on sustainable building designs. North America, especially the United States, has been a hub for perovskite solar cell research, with significant contributions to scalability and commercialization. Meanwhile, China leads in the large-scale production and deployment of photovoltaic innovations, leveraging its strong manufacturing capabilities and ambitious renewable energy goals.
5.1. Longevity and Life Cycle Assessment
Solar PV panels have a lifespan of about 25–30 years, which is, on average, 40% lower than the design working life of common structures [39]. Moreover, photovoltaic systems not only experience an annual decrease in performance due to degradation but also require maintenance. Certain components, such as inverters, which are external to the PV module itself, may need repair or replacement due to their shorter life expectancy of approximately 15 years. This means that PV panels come with embodied carbon emissions and only offset the environmental impact through operational carbon savings. In addition, with the global strive for net zero and electrical grid decarbonization, the margin of accepted emissions becomes smaller yearly, as do the environmental benefits of PV panels.
5.2. Climate Zone Impact: Orientation and Angle of Solar Panels
The optimal tilt angle for photovoltaic (PV) panels varies based on the geographic location, the precise latitude, and the desired seasonality of energy production. For locations in the northern hemisphere, the optimal tilt angle is often recommended to be close to the latitude angle of the site for year-round performance. For example, at a northern latitude of 60° (Canada, Norway, Sweden), a tilt angle close to 60° is generally considered optimal. This angle maximizes the annual energy capture by aligning the panel perpendicularly to the average solar path over the year.
The optimal tilt angle may be adjusted for applications prioritizing seasonal performance. For instance, in winter, increasing the tilt angle by 10–15° beyond the latitude angle allows for higher energy capture when the sun is lower in the sky. Conversely, in summer months, a tilt angle 10–15° below the latitude angle can optimize the performance when the sun is higher.
Equatorial regions’ optimal angle is typically low or close to horizontal to maximize the exposure to direct sunlight throughout the year. Near the poles, where sunlight is minimal in winter, adjustments are less impactful, but steeper tilt angles are generally used to capture low-angle sunlight.
Cloud cover affects the number of hours of brightness while using solar energy, which is particularly relevant in cold climates with limited solar energy usage. Cloudy conditions result in diffused light, causing surfaces in all directions, including those opposite to the sun, to contribute similarly to the solar energy yield.
In façade-integrated PV systems, however, panels are often installed at a fixed 90-degree angle relative to the ground, which presents unique challenges in optimizing the solar gain. While such vertical installations may capture less direct sunlight compared to optimally tilted panels, they have the advantage of an extensive surface area on façades, particularly in mid- to high-rise buildings. This allows for a more comprehensive collection area and potential energy generation, which can be significant despite the lower irradiance at such angles. Advanced modeling and orientation techniques for façade-integrated PV systems continue to improve the energy capture and efficiency, even under these suboptimal tilt conditions, underscoring the potential of façade PV to contribute meaningfully to building energy requirements.
5.3. Solar Façade Classification and Technologies in Recent Literature
Solar façades are classified into opaque and transparent/semi-transparent types, with the former designed to reject or absorb solar heat. At the same time, the latter can integrate photovoltaic (PV) and/or thermal solar systems [30,139].
PV modules can be integrated into buildings through various technical arrangements, including roofs, façades, and sun screening, each aiming to improve the power efficiency and reduce air conditioning use [140].
The main types of PV cells include single-crystal, multi-crystalline silicon, amorphous, and thin films, each with different semiconductor materials and manufacturing methods [141]. Over the past decade, perovskite solar cells have achieved significant efficiency improvements, reaching over 25% in laboratory settings and comparable to traditional silicon-based cells. One of the key advantages of perovskite cells is their flexibility, which allows them to be applied to various substrates, including flexible films, and integrated into building materials such as window glass [142] and façades, a potential breakthrough for BIPV applications. Their low-temperature, solution-based manufacturing process reduces the production costs and energy input, making them an attractive option for large-scale deployment. However, perovskite cells face challenges, particularly with stability and long-term durability [143], as they can degrade under exposure to moisture, heat, and UV light [144]. Researchers are actively exploring methods to improve their stability, such as encapsulation techniques and hybrid materials, aiming to make perovskites commercially viable for widespread use [145,146]. The potential for perovskite–silicon tandem cells, which combine perovskites with silicon to overcome the single-junction efficiency limits, is also a promising area of research, with prototypes demonstrating efficiencies of over 30% [147].
5.4. Esthetics
The color, texture, and surface gloss of colored photovoltaics significantly impact their esthetic quality, and angular sensitivity experiments have been conducted to provide architectural design guidelines for façade-integrated photovoltaics [148].
6. Conclusions
6.1. Economic Viability
Solar PV panels are predominantly used on rooftops due to the shorter payback periods compared to façade installations. Rooftop PV systems achieve economic viability with payback times as low as 8–10 years on average for residential buildings and 6–9 years for commercial and industrial buildings [149,150], while, in industrial PV systems with 100% self-consumption, a payback time of less than 4 years can be achieved [151]. Façade-integrated BIPV systems often require 13–18 years to break even [84,152]. However, façade systems benefit from extended operational lifespans due to reduced exposure to environmental degradation. In cold climates, façade panels offer additional advantages, such as snow-free operation and reduced maintenance costs.
6.2. Social Acceptance and Esthetics
Public perception remains a critical barrier to BIPV adoption. While color, texture, and transparency customization options have improved the visual integration of solar façades, these enhancements often reduce the efficiency and increase the costs. Balancing esthetics with energy performance and affordability is necessary to enhance their social acceptance and accelerate the adoption of façade PV technologies.
6.3. Mechanical and Thermal Stability
BIPV systems face stringent mechanical resistance and watertightness requirements, particularly for façade applications. These panels must meet the dual criteria of structural stability and maintainability. Thermal performance is another challenge, as façade installations can suffer from efficiency losses of up to 10% due to limited ventilation. Improved integration designs, such as ventilated rain screens, can mitigate these losses.
6.4. Longevity and Life Cycle Impacts
While PV systems have a projected lifespan of 25–30 years, operational factors such as degradation and maintenance requirements reduce their effectiveness over time. Façade systems, with their lower exposure to environmental stressors, can last longer than rooftop PVs. However, embodied carbon emissions and the increasing demand for low-carbon construction materials emphasize the need for comprehensive life cycle assessments.
6.5. Climate-Specific Considerations
The performance of solar façades is highly influenced by the climatic zone. In northern latitudes, façade-mounted panels with steep angles optimize solar capture and mitigate snow accumulation, but are challenged by shading issues. In contrast, tilt and orientation adjustments are crucial in maximizing their performance in equatorial and temperate regions. Additionally, the effect of diffused light under cloudy conditions remains an underexplored phenomenon. To enhance the performance, particularly for non-ideal installations such as vertical façades, advanced modeling and simulation tools are vital.
6.6. Technological Innovations
Emerging technologies like perovskite solar cells and tandem solar cells show significant potential for BIPV applications but face challenges related to technical maturity and market readiness. Perovskite solar cells have achieved over 25% efficiency in lab settings but suffer from stability issues, moisture sensitivity, and toxic lead content. Efforts to address these include improved encapsulation and lead-free formulations, although scalability and cost reduction remain key hurdles. Tandem solar cells, particularly perovskite–silicon hybrids, offer efficiencies above 30%, but the manufacturing complexity, material compatibility, and high production costs limit their commercial viability. Overcoming these challenges through continued research and industry collaboration is critical for their widespread adoption in BIPV systems.
6.7. Esthetic Design Implications
The esthetic quality of façade-integrated PV systems is increasingly emphasized. Color, surface gloss, and texture are key in architectural integration. Ongoing research into angular sensitivity and design guidelines aims to balance esthetics with energy efficiency, facilitating wider adoption. The potential for customizable PV panel designs and the integration of innovative materials may allow for more flexible and visually appealing solutions, addressing both esthetic and functional needs.
6.8. Policy and Market Implications
Supportive policy frameworks and incentives are crucial in improving the economic feasibility of BIPV systems. Strong incentives in colder regions demonstrate how policy can offset lower solar potential and drive adoption. Broader market strategies must address barriers such as high upfront costs and regulatory requirements to enable the more widespread deployment of solar façade technologies. The current policies on electricity tariffs, which often support solar energy production, cannot directly support BIPV systems. These policies typically provide incentives or subsidies for solar power generation in general, without distinguishing between traditional rooftop PV and building-integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) systems. As a result, while BIPV systems can benefit from such policies, they do not receive specific support tailored to their unique costs and integration challenges. Therefore, for BIPV systems to become more economically viable, additional targeted policy measures that address their higher initial costs, as well as incentives for building integration, would be necessary.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, Z.T. and J.Z.; methodology, J.Z. and Z.T.; investigation, J.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, J.Z.; writing—review and editing, J.Z. and Z.T.; visualization, J.Z.; supervision, Z.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Acknowledgments
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- Hassan, Q.; Viktor, P.; Al-Musawi, T.J.; Ali, B.M.; Algburi, S.; Alzoubi, H.M.; Al-Jiboory, A.K.; Sameen, A.Z.; Salman, H.M.; Jaszczur, M. The renewable energy role in the global energy Transformations. Renew. Energy Focus 2024, 48, 100545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdelsamie, M.M.; Ali, K.; Hassan Ali, M.I. Enhancing building efficiency: Multifunctional glazing windows with integrated semitransparent PV and selective liquid-filters. Appl. Energy 2025, 377, 124723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IEA—International Energy Agency. World Energy Outlook 2024. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2024 (accessed on 1 November 2024).
- Küfeoğlu, S. Residential Sector Emissions. In Net Zero: Decarbonizing the Global Economies; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2024; pp. 449–492. [Google Scholar]
- Şirin, C.; Goggins, J.; Hajdukiewicz, M. A review on building-integrated photovoltaic/thermal systems for green buildings. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2023, 229, 120607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Busch, S.; Kasdorp, R.; Koolen, D.; Mercier, A.; Spooner, M. The development of renewable energy in the electricity market. In European Commission Discussion Paper; European Commission: Luxembourg, 2023; p. 187. [Google Scholar]
- D’Amato, A.; Pronti, A.; Paleari, S. Investment Needs and Gaps for the Sustainability Transition in Europe: Rethinking the European Green Deal as an EU Industrial Strategy; European Environment Agency: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- U.S. Energy Information Administration. Electric Capacity Mix Shifts from Fossil Fuels to Renewables in AEO2023. Available online: https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=56160 (accessed on 1 November 2024).
- Bai, B.; Xiong, S.; Ma, X.; Liao, X. Assessment of floating solar photovoltaic potential in China. Renew. Energy 2024, 220, 119572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- An Energy Sector Roadmap to Carbon Neutrality in China: Executive Summary. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/an-energy-sector-roadmap-to-carbon-neutrality-in-china/executive-summary (accessed on 1 November 2024).
- Hossain, M.; Wadi Al-Fatlawi, A.; Kumar, L.; Fang, Y.R.; Assad, M.E.H. Solar PV high-penetration scenario: An overview of the global PV power status and future growth. Energy Syst. 2024, 1–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Infographic: China’s Solar Capacity Growth in 2023 Sets New Record. Available online: https://www.spglobal.com/commodityinsights/es/market-insights/latest-news/energy-transition/020824-infographic-china-solar-capacity-coal-electricity-renewable-energy-hydro-wind (accessed on 20 January 2025).
- Wiatros-Motyka, M.; Fulghum, N.; Jones, D. Global Electricity Review 2024. 2024. Available online: https://ember-energy.org/latest-insights/global-electricity-review-2024/ (accessed on 23 January 2025).
- Radhia, B.; Mohamed, T. The UAE Energy Experience 2050: A bet on energy diversification and achieving sustainable development. Int. J. Econ. Perspect. 2024, 18, 1166–1177. [Google Scholar]
- Alnaqbi, S.A.; Alami, A.H. Sustainability and Renewable Energy in the UAE: A Case Study of Sharjah. Energies 2023, 16, 7034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saccardo, R.R.; Domingues, A.M.; Battistelle, R.A.G.; Bezerra, B.S.; Siqueira, R.M.; dos Santos Neto, J.B.S. Investment in photovoltaic energy: An attempt to frame Brazil within the 2030 passage target of the Paris agreement. Clean. Energy Syst. 2023, 5, 100070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ottonelli, J.; Lazaro, L.L.B.; Andrade, J.C.S.; Abram, S. Do solar photovoltaic clean development mechanism projects contribute to sustainable development in Latin America? Prospects for the Paris Agreement. Energy Policy 2023, 174, 113428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- da Silva, E.C.M.; Lira, M.A.T.; Gonçalves, M.C.; da Silva, O.A.V.d.O.L.; Jean, W.; dos Santos Júnior, R.B. The role of renewable energies in combating poverty in Brazil: A systematic review. Sustainability 2024, 16, 5584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oyarzún-Aravena, A.M.; Chen, J.; Brownbridge, G.; Akroyd, J.; Kraft, M. An Analysis of Renewable Energy Resources and Options for the Energy Transition in Chile. Appl. Energy 2025, 381, 125107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nwokolo, S.C.; Eyime, E.E.; Obiwulu, A.U.; Ogbulezie, J.C. Africa’s path to sustainability: Harnessing technology, policy, and collaboration. Trends Renew. Energy 2023, 10, 98–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ebhota, W.; Tabakov, P. A Retrospect of Energy Demand and Potential of Sub-Saharan Africa: Leveraging Energy Deficit to Attain Clean Energy Hub Region. Arid. Zone J. Eng. Technol. Environ. 2024, 20, 261–294. [Google Scholar]
- Reddy, V.J.; Hariram, N.; Ghazali, M.F.; Kumarasamy, S. Pathway to sustainability: An overview of renewable energy integration in building systems. Sustainability 2024, 16, 638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuhn, T.E.; Erban, C.; Heinrich, M.; Eisenlohr, J.; Ensslen, F.; Neuhaus, D.H. Review of technological design options for building integrated photovoltaics (BIPV). Energy Build. 2021, 231, 110381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ansah, M.K.; Chen, X.; Yang, H. Two-stage lifecycle energy optimization of mid-rise residential buildings with building-integrated photovoltaic and alternative composite façade materials. Buildings 2021, 11, 642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shirazi, A.M.; Zomorodian, Z.S.; Tahsildoost, M. Techno-economic BIPV evaluation method in urban areas. Renew. Energy 2019, 143, 1235–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Shen, J.; Lu, Y.; He, W.; Xu, P.; Zhao, X.; Qiu, Z.; Zhu, Z.; Zhou, J.; Dong, X. Active Solar Thermal Facades (ASTFs): From concept, application to research questions. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 50, 32–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagy, Z.; Svetozarevic, B.; Jayathissa, P.; Begle, M.; Hofer, J.; Lydon, G.; Willmann, A.; Schlueter, A. The Adaptive Solar Facade: From concept to prototypes. Front. Archit. Res. 2016, 5, 143–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jayathissa, P.; Zarb, J.; Luzzatto, M.; Hofer, J.; Schlueter, A. Sensitivity of Building Properties and Use Types for the Application of Adaptive Photovoltaic Shading Systems. Energy Procedia 2017, 122, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zinzi, M. Exploring the potentialities of cool facades to improve the thermal response of Mediterranean residential buildings. Sol. Energy 2016, 135, 386–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frontini, F.; Bonomo, P.; Moser, D.; Maturi, L. 8—Building integrated photovoltaic facades: Challenges, opportunities and innovations. In Rethinking Building Skins; Gasparri, E., Brambilla, A., Lobaccaro, G., Goia, F., Andaloro, A., Sangiorgio, A., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2022; pp. 201–229. [Google Scholar]
- Cappel, C.; Streicher, W.; Lichtblau, F.; Maurer, C. Barriers to the market penetration of façade-integrated solar thermal systems. Energy Procedia 2014, 48, 1336–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prieto, A.; Knaack, U.; Auer, T.; Klein, T. Solar façades—Main barriers for widespread façade integration of solar technologies. J. Facade Des. Eng. 2017, 5, 51–62. [Google Scholar]
- Kong, J.S.; Dong, Y.T.; Poshnath, A.; Rismanchi, B.; Yap, P.S. Application of Building Integrated Photovoltaic (BIPV) in Net-Zero Energy Buildings (NZEBs). Energies 2023, 16, 6401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan, Q.; Hsu, C.-Y.; Mounich, K.; Algburi, S.; Jaszczur, M.; Telba, A.A.; Viktor, P.; Awwad, E.M.; Ahsan, M.; Ali, B.M. Enhancing smart grid integrated renewable distributed generation capacities: Implications for sustainable energy transformation. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2024, 66, 103793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bonomo, P.; Frontini, F.; Loonen, R.; Reinders, A.H.M.E. Comprehensive review and state of play in the use of photovoltaics in buildings. Energy Build. 2024, 323, 114737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, S.; Zhu, N. Challenges and Optimization of Building-Integrated Photovoltaics (BIPV) Windows: A Review. Sustainability 2023, 15, 15876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belloni, E.; Bianchini, G.; Casini, M.; Faba, A.; Intravaia, M.; Laudani, A.; Lozito, G.M. An overview on building-integrated photovoltaics: Technological solutions, modeling, and control. Energy Build. 2024, 324, 114867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.; Xu, K.; Song, S.; Bao, Y.; Xiang, C. From BIM to digital twin in BIPV: A review of current knowledge. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2024, 67, 103855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cellura, M.; Luu, L.Q.; Guarino, F.; Longo, S. A review on life cycle environmental impacts of emerging solar cells. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 908, 168019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Basher, M.K.; Nur-E-Alam, M.; Rahman, M.M.; Alameh, K.; Hinckley, S. Aesthetically Appealing Building Integrated Photovoltaic Systems for Net-Zero Energy Buildings. Current Status, Challenges, and Future Developments—A Review. Buildings 2023, 13, 863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, H.; Yang, R.J.; Liu, C.; Sun, C. Solar building envelope potential in urban environments: A state-of-the-art review of assessment methods and framework. Build. Environ. 2023, 244, 110831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taşer, A.; Koyunbaba, B.K.; Kazanasmaz, T. Thermal, daylight, and energy potential of building-integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) systems: A comprehensive review of effects and developments. Sol. Energy 2023, 251, 171–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohammad, A.K.; Garrod, A.; Ghosh, A. Do Building Integrated Photovoltaic (BIPV) windows propose a promising solution for the transition toward zero energy buildings? A review. J. Build. Eng. 2023, 79, 107950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Shen, C.; Wang, J.; Zhang, C.; Shuai, Y. Static and dynamic regulations of photovoltaic double skin facades towards building sustainability: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2023, 183, 113458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mangherini, G.; Diolaiti, V.; Bernardoni, P.; Andreoli, A.; Vincenzi, D. Review of Façade Photovoltaic Solutions for Less Energy-Hungry Buildings. Energies 2023, 16, 6901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Li, L.; Deng, W.; Zhu, D.; Hong, L. Building Integrated Photovoltaic (BIPV) Development Knowledge Map: A Review of Visual Analysis Using CiteSpace. Buildings 2023, 13, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baker, N.; Monteiro, R.B.; Boccalatte, A.; Bouty, K.; Brozovsky, J.; Caliot, C.; Pizarro, R.C.; Compagnon, R.; Czachura, A.; Desthieux, G. Identification of existing tools and workflows for solar neighborhood planning. In IEA Solar Heating and Cooling Technology; IEA: Paris, France, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Ghosh, A. Fenestration integrated BIPV (FIPV): A review. Solar Energy 2022, 237, 213–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roy, A.; Ghosh, A.; Bhandari, S.; Sundaram, S.; Mallick, T.K. Perovskite Solar Cells for BIPV Application: A Review. Buildings 2020, 10, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Unguresan, P.V.; Porumb, R.A.; Petreus, D.; Pocola, A.G.; Pop, O.G.; Balan, M.C. Orientation of Facades for Active Solar Energy Applications in Different Climatic Conditions. J. Energy Eng. 2017, 143, 04017059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elguezabal, P.; Arregi, B. An analysis of the potential of envelope-integrated solar heating and cooling technologies for reducing energy consumption in European climates. J. Facade Des. Eng. 2018, 6, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rehman, N.U. Optimal layout for facade—Mounted solar photovoltaic arrays in constrained fields. J. Sol. Energy Eng. Trans. ASME 2021, 143, 4048303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le Nguyen, L.D.; Ngoc, S.D.; Cong, D.T.; Thuong, D.L.; Van, S.N.; Hoang Minh, V.N.; Le, N.T. Facade Integrated Photovoltaic Systems: Potential Applications for Commercial Building in Vietnam. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on System Science and Engineering, ICSSE 2019, Dong Hoi, Vietnam, 20–21 July 2019; pp. 219–223. [Google Scholar]
- Choi, H.S. Kinetic Photovoltaic Facade System Based on a Parametric Design for Application in Signal Box Buildings in Switzerland. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 4633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, H.S. Architectural Experiment Design of Solar Energy Harvesting: A Kinetic Façade System for Educational Facilities. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 5853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jois, S.; Ramamritham, K.; Agarwal, V. Optimization of Facade based Building Integration Photovoltaic Module Installation. In Proceedings of the Conference Record of the IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, Calgary, ON, Canada, 15 June–21 August 2020; pp. 1502–1504. [Google Scholar]
- Krisnawan, S.P.; Hatib, R. Harvesting of Photon Energy through PV on Building Envelope and Windows Canopy. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Makassar, Indonesia, 23–24 November 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Ghasaban, M.; Yeganeh, M.; Irani, M. Optimizing daylight, sky view and energy production in semi-transparent photovoltaic facades of office buildings: A comparative study in four climate zones. Appl. Energy 2025, 377, 124707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vassiliades, C. Optimizing energy efficiency in mediterranean single-family homes: A parametric study of building typology, orientation, and BIPV integration. Renew. Energy 2024, 237, 121541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Babin, M.; Andersen, N.L.; Thorning, J.K.; Thorsteinsson, S. Yield analysis of a BIPV façade prototype installation. Energy Build. 2024, 322, 114730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corti, P.; Follo, A.; Bonomo, P. Workflow to support cost-benefits comparison and sensitivity analysis of BIPV case studies: Three examples of BIPV facades in the south of Switzerland. Energy Build. 2024, 322, 114732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, H.; Liu, X.; Wang, C.; Shen, C.; Han, R.; Kalogirou, S.A.; Wang, J. Investigation on the heating performance of a BIPV/T façade coupled with direct-expansion heat pump system in severe cold region. Renew. Energy 2024, 232, 121065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwag, B.C.; Kim, G.T.; Hwang, I.T. Integration of Photovoltaic Systems for Energy Self-Sufficient Low-Rise Multi-Family Residential Buildings in Republic of Korea. Buildings 2024, 14, 2522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bonomo, P.; Frontini, F. Building Integrated Photovoltaics (BIPV): Analysis of the Technological Transfer Process and Innovation Dynamics in the Swiss Building Sector. Buildings 2024, 14, 1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mangkuto, R.A.; Tresna, D.N.A.T.; Hermawan, I.M.; Pradipta, J.; Jamala, N.; Paramita, B. Atthaillah Experiment and simulation to determine the optimum orientation of building-integrated photovoltaic on tropical building façades considering annual daylight performance and energy yield. Energy Built Environ. 2024, 5, 414–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pedersen, M.; Margaretha Hognestad, H.; Helle, R.; Petter Jelle, B. The challenge of rehabilitating relocated listed heritage Buildings: Requirements and opportunities. Energy Build. 2024, 303, 113577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Safavi, M.; Khoshbakht, M. On the Performance of Solar Thermophotovoltaics (STPVs) and Wavelength-Selective Thermophotovoltaics (TPVs): Case Study of a High-Rise Residential Building in a Hot and Semi-Arid Climate. Buildings 2024, 14, 269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Queiroz Corrêa, L.; Bagnis, D.; Rabelo Melo Franco, P.; Ferreira da Costa Junior, E.; Oliveira Souza da Costa, A. Evaluating energy generation of a building-integrated organic photovoltaic vertical façade: A case study of Latin America’s pioneering installation. Renew. Energy 2024, 220, 119662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marei, Y.A.; Emam, M.; Ahmed, M.; Attia, A.A.A.; Abdelrahman, M.A. Thermal and optical investigations of various transparent wall configurations and building integrated photovoltaic for energy savings in buildings. Energy Conv. Manag. 2024, 299, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Javadijam, R.; Shahverdian, M.H.; Sohani, A.; Sayyaadi, H. A 4E Comparative Study between BIPV and BIPVT Systems in Order to Achieve Zero-Energy Building in Cold Climate. Buildings 2023, 13, 3028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, K.; Gou, Z. Influence of urban morphology on facade solar potential in mixed-use neighborhoods: Block prototypes and design benchmark. Energy Build. 2023, 297, 113446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shono, K.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Perwez, U.; Ma, T.; Dai, Y.; Shimoda, Y. Large-scale building-integrated photovoltaics installation on building façades: Hourly resolution analysis using commercial building stock in Tokyo, Japan. Solar Energy 2023, 253, 137–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.; An, J.; Choi, H.; Hong, T. Assessment the technical and economic performance of a window-integrated PV system using third-generation PV panels. Energy Build. 2023, 286, 112978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panicker, K.; Anand, P.; George, A. Assessment of building energy performance integrated with solar PV: Towards a net zero energy residential campus in India. Energy Build. 2023, 281, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azhar, M.H.A.; Alhammadi, S.; Jang, S.; Kim, J.; Kim, J.; Kim, W.K. Long-Term Field Observation of the Power Generation and System Temperature of a Roof-Integrated Photovoltaic System in South Korea. Sustainability 2023, 15, 493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilson, H.R.; Frontini, F.; Bonomo, P.; Eder, G.C.; Babin, M.; Thorsteinsson, S.; Adami, J.; Maturi, L.; Yang, R.J.; Weerasinghe, N.; et al. Multi-dimensional evaluation of BIPV installations: Development of a tool to assess the performance as building component and electricity generator. Energy Build. 2024, 312, 114207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.R.; Liu, X.; Zhang, H.R.; Yan, D. Integrated physical approach to assessing urban-scale building photovoltaic potential at high spatiotemporal resolution. J. Clean Prod. 2023, 388, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.Y.; Ji, J. Comprehensive performance analysis of a rural building integrated PV/T wall in hot summer and cold winter region. Energy 2023, 282, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oufettoul, H.; Lamdihine, N.; Motahhir, S.; Lamrini, N.; Abdelmoula, I.A.; Aniba, G. Comparative Performance Analysis of PV Module Positions in a Solar PV Array Under Partial Shading Conditions. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 12176–12194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barone, G.; Vassiliades, C.; Elia, C.; Savvides, A.; Kalogirou, S. Design optimization of a solar system integrated double-skin fagade for a clustered housing unit. Renew. Energy 2023, 215, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yilmaz, B.; Yilmaz, Y. Decision support model for PV integrated shading system: Office building case. Energy Rep. 2023, 9, 112–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kabanshi, A.; Choonya, G.; Ameen, A.; Liu, W.; Mulenga, E. Windows of Opportunities: Orientation, Sizing and PV-Shading of the Glazed Area to Reduce Cooling Energy Demand in Sub-Sahara Africa. Energies 2023, 16, 3834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dimd, B.D.; Völler, S.; Midtgård, O.M.; Sevault, A. The effect of mixed orientation on the accuracy of a forecast model for building integrated photovoltaic systems. Energy Rep. 2023, 9, 202–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aguacil, S.; Duque, S.; Lufkin, S.; Rey, E. Designing with building-integrated photovoltaics (BIPV): A pathway to decarbonize residential buildings. J. Build. Eng. 2024, 96, 110486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shankar, A.; Bukya, M. Demystifying the economic and energy potential of Building-Integrated Photovoltaics in achieving India’s intended Nationally Determined Contribution. Vis. Sustain. 2023, 241–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, D.H.W.; Aghimien, E.I.; Alshaibani, K. An Analysis of Real-Time Measured Solar Radiation and Daylight and Its Energy Implications for Semi-Transparent Building-Integrated Photovoltaic Facades. Buildings 2023, 13, 386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Temiz, M.; Dincer, I. Design and assessment of a solar energy based integrated system with hydrogen production and storage for sustainable buildings. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2023, 48, 15817–15830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- An, Y.S.; Kim, J.K.; Joo, H.J.; Lee, W.J.; Han, G.W.; Kim, H.; Kim, M.H. Experimental performance analysis of photovoltaic systems applied to an positive energy community based on building renovation. Renew. Energy 2023, 219, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jahangir, M.H.; Firouzabad, M.R.; Ghasempour, R. Techno-environmental assessment of outdoor glazing cover of a building with multi-passive solar systems. Energy Rep. 2023, 10, 3532–3544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borja Block, A.; Escarre Palou, J.; Courtant, M.; Virtuani, A.; Cattaneo, G.; Roten, M.; Li, H.-Y.; Despeisse, M.; Hessler-Wyser, A.; Desai, U.; et al. Colouring solutions for building integrated photovoltaic modules: A review. Energy Build. 2024, 314, 114253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramos, A.; Romaní, J.; Salom, J. Impact of building integrated photovoltaics on high rise office building in the Mediterranean. Energy Rep. 2023, 10, 3197–3210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Idrissi Kaitouni, S.; Pfafferott, J.; Jamil, A.; Ahachad, M.; Brigui, J. A holistic digital workflow methodology to shifting towards net zero energy urban residential buildings in a semi-arid climate. Solar Energy 2023, 263, 111959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Q.; Yang, G.; Bian, C.; Long, L.; Wang, X.; Gao, C.; Wong, C.L.; Huang, Y.; Zhao, B.; Chen, X.; et al. Autonomous design framework for deploying building integrated photovoltaics. Appl. Energy 2025, 377, 124760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geng, X.; Cai, S.; Gou, Z. Assessing building-integrated photovoltaic potential in dense urban areas using a multi-channel single-dimensional convolutional neural network model. Appl. Energy 2025, 377, 124716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tharushi Imalka, S.; Yang, R.J.; Zhao, Y. Machine learning driven building integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) envelope design optimization. Energy Build. 2024, 324, 114882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, G.; Wang, G.; Luo, T.; Hu, Y.; Wu, S.; Gong, G.; Song, C.; Guo, Z.; Liu, Z. SolarSAM: Building-scale photovoltaic potential assessment based on Segment Anything Model (SAM) and remote sensing for emerging city. Renew. Energy 2024, 237, 121560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, H.; Liu, C.; Jing Yang, R.; Sun, C. Large-scale prediction of solar irradiation, shading impacts, and energy generation on building Façade through urban morphological indicators: A machine learning approach. Energy Build. 2024, 323, 114797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gholami, H. A Holistic Multi-Criteria Assessment of Solar Energy Utilization on Urban Surfaces. Energies 2024, 17, 5328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X.; Tu, W.; Yu, J.; Cao, R.; Yi, S.; Li, Q. LCZ-based city-wide solar radiation potential analysis by coupling physical modeling, machine learning, and 3D buildings. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2024, 113, 102176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaaya, I.; Alzade, A.; Bouguerra, S.; Kyranaki, N.; Bakovasilis, A.; Ramesh, S.; Saelens, D.; Daenen, M.; Morlier, A. A physics-based framework for modelling the performance and reliability of BIPV systems. Sol. Energy 2024, 277, 112730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, J.; Ooka, R. Evaluation of solar energy potential for residential buildings in urban environments based on a parametric approach. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2024, 106, 105350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abouelaziz, I.; Jouane, Y. Photogrammetry and deep learning for energy production prediction and building-integrated photovoltaics decarbonization. Build. Simul. 2024, 17, 189–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sigounis, A.M.; Vallianos, C.; Athienitis, A. Model predictive control of air-based building integrated PV/T systems for optimal HVAC integration. Renew. Energy 2023, 212, 655–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, Y.X.; Zhu, R.; Yan, J.Y.; Lu, L.; Wong, M.S.; Luo, W.; Chen, M.; Zhang, F.; You, L.L.; Wang, Y.F.; et al. Planning the installation of building-integrated photovoltaic shading devices: A GIS-based spatiotemporal analysis and optimization approach. Renew. Energy 2023, 216, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roberts, F.; Yang, S.; Du, H.; Yang, R. Effect of semi-transparent a-Si PV glazing within double-skin façades on visual and energy performances under the UK climate condition. Renew. Energy 2023, 207, 601–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sohani, A.; Cornaro, C.; Shahverdian, M.H.; Pierro, M.; Moser, D.; Nizetic, S.; Karimi, N.; Li, L.K.B.; Doranehgard, M.H. Building integrated photovoltaic/thermal technologies in Middle Eastern and North African countries: Current trends and future perspectives. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2023, 182, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pelle, M.; Gubert, M.; Dalla Maria, E.; Astigarraga, A.; Avesani, S.; Maturi, L. Experimental evaluation of the temperature related behaviour of pigment based coloured BIPV modules integrated in a ventilated façade. Energy Build. 2024, 323, 114763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, H.; Yang, H.; Peng, J. Solar PV vacuum glazing (SVG) insulated building facades: Thermal and electrical performances. Appl. Energy 2024, 376, 124323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- M Ibrahim, M.; William, M.A.; A Hanafy, A.; F Moussa, M.; Suarez-Lopez, M.J. Multi-pronged strategies for enhancing building envelopes toward nearly-zero energy in hot climatic regions. Eng. Res. Express 2024, 6, 045532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, C.; Chen, L.; Zhou, Z.; Wang, Z.; Wang, L.; Wei, W. Heat harvesting characteristics of building façades integrated photovoltaic /thermal-heat pump system in winter. Renew. Energy 2023, 215, 118909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carbone, R.; Borrello, C. A Building-Integrated Bifacial and Transparent PV Generator Operated by an “Under-Glass” Single Axis Solar Tracker. Energies 2023, 16, 6350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, M.G.; Hassan, H.; Ookawara, S.; Nada, S.A. Investigation of the performance enhancement of building-integrated photovoltaic system using evaporative porous clay applied in different building’s directions. J. Build. Eng. 2024, 82, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.Y.; Yang, H.X.; Ji, J. Investigation on overall energy performance of a novel multi-functional PV/T window. Appl. Energy 2023, 352, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yadav, S.; Hachem-Vermette, C.; Eranki, G.A.; Panda, S.K. Performance evaluation of building integrated semitransparent and opaque photovoltaic Trombe wall systems employing periodic thermal models. Energy Build. 2023, 294, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Umar, S.; Waqas, A.; Tanveer, W.; Shahzad, N.; Janjua, A.K.; Dehghan, M.; Qureshi, M.S.; Shakir, S. A building integrated solar PV surface-cleaning setup to optimize the electricity output of PV modules in a polluted atmosphere. Renew. Energy 2023, 216, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, H.; Long, Q.; Li, C.; Li, C. Experimental study of a PV-PCM window under hot summer and warm winter climate. J. Energy Storage 2024, 96, 112724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, Z.R.; Zhang, T.; Cai, J.Y.; Fan, Y.; Shi, Z.R. Investigation on the operating characteristics of a directly-attached light crystalline silicon PV roof. Sol. Energy 2023, 262, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, Y.Y.; Ji, J.; Xie, H.; Zhang, C.Y.; Tian, X.Y. Single- and double-inlet PV curtain wall systems using novel heat recovery technique for PV cooling, fresh and supply air handling: Design and performance assessment. Energy 2023, 282, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.; Lee, H.Y.M.; Choi, M.; Kim, D.; Yoon, J. Power performance assessment of PV blinds system considering self-shading effects. Sol. Energy 2023, 262, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Odeh, S.; Feng, J.X. Long Term Performance Assessment of a Residential PV/Thermal Hybrid System. Energies 2023, 16, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Q.X.; Monticelli, C.; Kutlu, A.; Zanelli, A. Feasibility of textile envelope integrated flexible photovoltaic in Europe: Carbon footprint assessment and life cycle cost analysis. J. Clean Prod. 2023, 430, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, Y.T.; Peng, J.Q.; Luo, Z.Y.; Luo, Y.M.; Ma, T.; Ji, J.; Yang, H.X.; Wang, F.Z.; Zhu, M.F. Multi-function partitioned design method for photovoltaic curtain wall integrated with vacuum glazing towards zero-energy buildings. Renew. Energy 2023, 218, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, X.Y.; Wang, J.; Ji, J. Performance prediction of a curved-type solar balcony combined with the flexible PV/T system during the non-heating season. Energy Conv. Manag. 2023, 292, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tran, T.N.; Seomun, G.; Lee, R.; Lee, H.; Yoon, J.; Kim, D. Development and Implementation of Photovoltaic Integrated Multi-Skin Facade (PV-MSF) Design Based on Geometrical Concepts to Improve Building Energy Efficiency Performance. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, K.H.; Song, Y.H. Analysis of Energy Reduction and Energy Self-Sufficiency Improvement Effects by Applying a Bidirectional Reflectance PV Array with Integrated External Shading at a School Building. Buildings 2023, 13, 2915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, C.X.; Chen, L.; Zhou, Z.Q.; Wang, Z.W.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Y.B. Cooling performance of all-orientated building facades integrated with photovoltaic-sky radiative cooling system in summer. Renew. Energy 2023, 217, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maestro, S.; Chemisana, D.; Moreno, A. Design and performance evaluation of a Micro-CPV system for building integration applications. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2024, 69, 103898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, Y.; Ji, J.; Zhang, C.; Ke, W.; Xie, H. An advanced exhausting airflow photovoltaic curtain wall system coupled with an air source heat pump for outdoor air treatment: Energy-saving performance assessment. Energy Convers. Manag. 2024, 299, 117872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Liu, C. Techno-economic analysis for constructing solar photovoltaic projects on building envelopes. Build. Environ. 2018, 127, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoon, S.D.; Vuthy, S.; Choi, H.S. Design of solar modules for building façades at educational facilities in Korea. Energies 2021, 14, 2441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khalid, H.M.; Rafique, Z.; Muyeen, S.; Raqeeb, A.; Said, Z.; Saidur, R.; Sopian, K. Dust accumulation and aggregation on PV panels: An integrated survey on impacts, mathematical models, cleaning mechanisms, and possible sustainable solution. Sol. Energy 2023, 251, 261–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Libra, M.; Mrázek, D.; Tyukhov, I.; Severová, L.; Poulek, V.; Mach, J.; Šubrt, T.; Beránek, V.; Svoboda, R.; Sedláček, J. Reduced real lifetime of PV panels—Economic consequences. Sol. Energy 2023, 259, 229–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lucchi, E.; Adami, J.; Stawinoga, A.E. Social acceptance of photovoltaic systems in heritage buildings and landscapes: Exploring barriers, benefits, drivers, and challenges for technical stakeholders in northern Italy. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2023, 60, 103544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Molnár, L.; Szép, T. Technology acceptance of balcony solar systems in Hungary–exploring influencing factors in a late-adopter country. Manag. Environ. Qual. Int. J. 2024. ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alnusairat, S.; Qadourah, J.A. Moving to green technologies: Acceptance and perception of architectural solar photovoltaic technology for residential buildings. Archit. Eng. Des. Manag. 2024, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scognamiglio, A. A Trans-Disciplinary Vocabulary for Assessing the Visual Performance of BIPV. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gok, A.; Ozkalay, E.; Friesen, G.; Frontini, F. The influence of operating temperature on the performance of BIPV modules. IEEE J. Photovolt. 2020, 10, 1371–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cross, B. Installation Guidelines: Construction and Integrated PV Roof. In McEvoy’s Handbook of Photovoltaics; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 877–889. [Google Scholar]
- Lai, C.M.; Hokoi, S. Solar façades: A review. Build. Environ. 2015, 91, 152–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abojela, Z.R.K.; Desa, M.K.M.; Sabry, A.H. Current prospects of building-integrated solar PV systems and the application of bifacial PVs. Front. Energy Res. 2023, 11, 1164494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsoutsos, T.; Farmaki, E.; Mandalaki, M. Solar energy for building supply. In Energy Performance of Buildings: Energy Efficiency and Built Environment in Temperate Climates; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; pp. 377–398. [Google Scholar]
- Samiei, S.; Soheyli, E.; Vighnesh, K.; Nabiyouni, G.; Rogach, A.L. Exploring CsPbX3 (X= Cl, Br, I) perovskite nanocrystals in amorphous oxide glasses: Innovations in fabrication and applications. Small 2024, 20, 2307972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azmi, R.; Zhumagali, S.; Bristow, H.; Zhang, S.; Yazmaciyan, A.; Pininti, A.R.; Utomo, D.S.; Subbiah, A.S.; De Wolf, S. Moisture-resilient perovskite solar cells for enhanced stability. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, 2211317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Njema, G.G.; Kibet, J.K.; Ngari, S.M. A review of interface engineering characteristics for high performance perovskite solar cells. Meas. Energy 2024, 2, 100005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mu, L.; Wang, S.; Liu, H.; Li, W.; Zhu, L.; Wang, H.; Chen, H. Innovative Materials for Lamination Encapsulation in Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 2415353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Afre, R.A.; Pugliese, D. Perovskite Solar Cells: A Review of the Latest Advances in Materials, Fabrication Techniques, and Stability Enhancement Strategies. Micromachines 2024, 15, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hou, F.; Ren, X.; Guo, H.; Ning, X.; Wang, Y.; Li, T.; Zhu, C.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, X. Monolithic Perovskite/Silicon Tandem Solar Cells: A Review of the Present Status and Solutions Toward Commercial Application. Nano Energy 2024, 124, 109476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiang, C.; Green, P.; Matusiak, B.S. The impact of surface properties on photovoltaics’ colour angular sensitivity: A comparison study for façade integration. Color Res. Appl. 2021, 46, 524–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xue, L.; Liu, J.; Lin, X.; Li, M.; Kobashi, T. Assessing urban rooftop PV economics for regional deployment by integrating local socioeconomic, technological, and policy conditions. Appl. Energy 2024, 353, 122058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Molnár, G.; Cabeza, L.F.; Chatterjee, S.; Ürge-Vorsatz, D. Modelling the building-related photovoltaic power production potential in the light of the EU’s Solar Rooftop Initiative. Appl. Energy 2024, 360, 122708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vartiainen, E.; Breyer, C.; Moser, D.; Román Medina, E.; Busto, C.; Topič, M.; Mugnier, D. Attractiveness of Photovoltaic Prosumerism in the European Electricity Market. Sol. RRL 2024, 8, 2300576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lekbir, A.; Zaoui, F.; Khenfer, R.; Tey, K.S.; Mekhilef, S. A comprehensive energy, exergy, economic, and environmental impact assessment of building-integrated photovoltaic systems. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2024, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).