Sustaining Consumer Excitement: The Role of Online Customer Experience and Engagement in Shaping Behavioural Intentions in Food Social Commerce
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Research Framework and Hypothesis Development
2.1. The Stimulus-Organism-Response (S-O-R) Framework in the S-Commerce Food Sector
- (1)
- Stimuli (S): In the context of healthy food s-commerce, the stimuli are represented by online content quality (OCQ) and customer value experiences (functional, hedonic, price, and social). OCQ represents the key stimulus for companies to provide more valuable information, enabling users to leverage social tools to obtain and share information and control the flow of information [29]. Content quality in digital commerce significantly influences user perceptions, especially in s-commerce, where decisions are highly context-driven [27,62]. Then, customer online experiences with value-based concepts are also considered the integral stimulus component reflecting the perceived value derived from online platforms. Previous research proposed that value perceptions formed during digital transactions, such as convenience (functional value), enjoyment (hedonic value), affordability (price value), and connection with others (social value). Functional and hedonic values address utilitarian and emotional aspects, respectively, while price and social values represent cost–benefit perceptions and social interactions. This interpretation is aligned with recent digital commerce literature that defines value perception as the critical stimuli that shape consumer judgments, and each significantly contributes to shaping online customer engagement [63,64,65]. These elements are expected to motivate consumers to process information and evaluate the platform positively
- (2)
- Organism (O): In the S-O-R model, the organism captures the individual’s cognitive or affective response to stimuli, which is represented by online customer engagement, which comprises cognitive and emotional reactions to stimuli. Customer engagement is a multidimensional construct of users’ psychological involvement, consisting of attention, enthusiasm, and interaction with the platform [66,67]. Previous studies have consistently conceptualised engagement as an organismic response to online stimuli, thereby supporting its role in mediating stimulus and behavioural response [68,69]. This concept has also further emphasised its relevance in emerging markets, where online engagement is essential for behavioural change [69,70] that can easily be observed with the increasing use of social media [22]. Online Customer Engagement (OCE) serves as the central mediator in this model, consistent with the study’s aim to identify how stimuli influence internal states that drive behavioural outcomes.
- (3)
- Response (R): The response component captures the consumer’s subsequent action or behavioural intentions due to their internal state. In this study, behavioural intentions are argued as the outcome of the S-O-R model encompassing actions such as usage continuity, purchase or repurchase intentions, or word-of-mouth, which logically follow from intense engagement. Several studies show that the relationship between customer involvement and outcome includes purchase intention, electronic word-of-mouth, repurchase, customer referrals, and co-production, with significant effects in s-commerce [45,46,71]. This is also consistent with the current literature that links behavioural intentions as the key consequences of customer engagement within the S-O-R framework [72,73,74].
2.2. Content Quality and Online Customer Engagement (OCE)
2.3. Customer Online Experience (Value Dimension) and Online Customer Engagement
2.4. Online Customer Engagement (OCE) and Behavioural Intentions
3. Methodology
3.1. Measurement and Data Collection
3.2. Sampling and Respondent Demographics
4. Analysis and Results
4.1. Measurement Model Analysis
4.2. Structural Model Analysis
5. Discussion
6. Implications
6.1. Theoretical Implications
6.2. Practical Implications
7. Conclusions
8. Limitations and Further Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
- Online content quality (OCQ)
| Code | Question | Answer | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KKT1 | I find the information on this healthy food social commerce to be valuable | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| KKT2 | I think this healthy food social commerce page is a helpful resource | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| KKT3 | There is helpful information on this healthy food social commerce page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
- Customer online experience
| Code | Question | Answer | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NF1 | The healthy food social commerce has a consistent quality | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| NF2 | The healthy food social commerce is well-made | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| NF3 | The healthy food social commerce has an acceptable standard of quality | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Code | Question | Answer | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NE1 | The healthy food social commerce is one that I would enjoy | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| NE2 | The healthy food social commerce would make me want to use it | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| NE3 | The healthy food social commerce would make me feel good | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Code | Question | Answer | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NH1 | The healthy food social commerce is reasonably priced | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| NH2 | The healthy food social commerce offers value for money | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| NH3 | The healthy food social commerce is a good product for the price | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Code | Question | Answer | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NS1 | The healthy food social commerce would help me to feel acceptable | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| NS2 | The healthy food social commerce would improve the way I am perceived | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| NS3 | The healthy food social commerce would make a good impression on other people | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
- Online customer engagement (OCE)
| Code | Question | Answer | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EM1 | I am enthusiastic about this healthy food social commerce platform | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| EM2 | This healthy food social commerce platform inspires me | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| EM3 | found this healthy food social commerce full of meaning and purpose | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| EM4 | I am excited when using this healthy food social commerce platform | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| EM5 | I am interested in this healthy food social commerce platform | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
- Repurchase intention (RI)
| Code | Question | Answer | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RT1 | I think it is a pleasure to buy healthy food from social commerce | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| RT2 | I won’t hesitate to refer others to buy healthy food from this social commerce platform | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| RT3 | I think I will continue to buy healthy food from this social commerce platform | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| RT4 | I feel the quality of products and services offered by this healthy food social commerce influences me to continue to buy | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
References
- Hajli, M.N. A study of the impact of social media on consumers. Int. J. Mark. Res. 2014, 56, 387–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.; Park, H. Effects of various characteristics of social commerce (s-commerce) on consumers’ trust and trust performance. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2013, 33, 318–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alalwan, A.A. Mobile food ordering apps: An empirical study of the factors affecting customer e-satisfaction and continued intention to reuse. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2020, 50, 28–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Statista. Social Commerce—Statistics & Facts; Statista Research Department: Hamburg, Germany, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Statista. Number of Social Commerce Users in Indonesia from 2020 to 2028; Statista Research Department: Hamburg, Germany, 2024; Available online: https://www.statista.com/forecasts/1450115/indonesia-social-commerce-users (accessed on 15 June 2025).
- Herbalife. Survey: Changing Health Priorities in Asia Pacific. New Survey Reveals Changing Health Priorities Among Asia Pacific Con-sumers [Internet]. Asia Pacific Health Priority Survey 2023. 2024. Available online: https://www.herbalife.com/en-th/about-herbalife/press-room/press-releases/2023-asia-pacific-health-priority-survey (accessed on 15 June 2025).
- Suryana, A.; Ariani, M.; Lokollo, E.M. the Role of Modern Markets in Influencing Lifestyles in Indonesia. J. Litbang Pertan. 2008, 27, 10–15. [Google Scholar]
- Jacoby, J. Stimulus-organism-response reconsidered: An evolutionary step in modeling (consumer) behavior. J. Consum. Psychol. 2002, 12, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehrabian, A.; Russell, J.A. An Approach to Environmental Psychology; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1974. [Google Scholar]
- Utami, H.N.; Alamanos, E.; Kuznesof, S. ‘A social justice logic’: How digital commerce enables value co-creation at the bottom of the pyramid. J. Mark. Manag. 2021, 37, 816–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuvykaitė, R.; Tarutė, A. A Critical Analysis of Consumer Engagement Dimensionality. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015, 213, 654–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Mahony, L.; O’Shea, E.; O’Connor, E.M.; Tierney, A.; Harkin, M.; Harrington, J.; Kennelly, S.; Arendt, E.; O’Toole, P.W.; Timmons, S. A qualitative study of older adults’ and healthcare professionals’ perspectives on the potential of functional food products to support healthy ageing. J. Funct. Foods 2023, 107, 105689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, H.; Yao, X.; Liu, Z.; Yang, Q. Impact of Pricing and Product Information on Consumer Buying Behavior With Customer Satisfaction in a Mediating Role. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 720151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Babin, B.J.; Darden, W.R.; Griffin, M. Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value. J. Consum. Res. 1994, 20, 644–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gallarza, M.G.; Saura, I.G. Value dimensions, perceived value, satisfaction and loyalty: An investigation of university students’ travel behaviour. Tour. Manag. 2006, 27, 437–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheth, J.N.; Newman, B.I.; Gross, B.L. Why We Buy What We Buy: A Theory of Consumption Values. J. Bus. Res. 1991, 22, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, Y.M.; Poole, M.S. Antecedents of flow in online shopping: A test of alternative models. Inf. Syst. J. 2009, 19, 369–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nusair, K.; Parsa, H.G. Introducing flow theory to explain the interactive online shopping experience in a travel context. Int. J. Hosp. Tour. Adm. 2011, 12, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thakur, R. The moderating role of customer engagement experiences in customer satisfaction–loyalty relationship. Eur. J. Mark. 2019, 53, 1278–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arora, L.; Singh, P.; Bhatt, V.; Sharma, B. Understanding and managing customer engagement through social customer relationship management. J. Decis. Syst. 2021, 30, 215–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Savitha, D.R.; Phil, M. A Study on Effect of Content Marketing on Customer Engagement with Respect NIKE. J. Surv. Fish. Sci. 2023, 10, 1806–1816. [Google Scholar]
- Agrawal, S.R.; Mittal, D. Optimizing customer engagement content strategy in retail and E-tail: Available on online product review videos. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2022, 67, 102966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, Y.; Kroff, M.W.; Kim, J. Developing brand advocacy through brand activities on Facebook. J. Consum. Mark. 2021, 38, 328–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schepers, J.; Nijssen, E.J. Brand advocacy in the frontline: How does it affect customer satisfaction? J. Serv. Manag. 2018, 29, 230–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilk, V.; Harrigan, P.; Soutar, G.N. NAVIGATING ONLINE BRAND ADVOCACY (OBA): AN EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 2018, 26, 99–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kenny, D.A.; Kaniskan, B.; Mccoach, D.B. The Performance of RMSEA in Models With Small Degrees of Freedom. Sociol Methods Res. 2015, 44, 486–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Busalim, A.; Hollebeek, L.D.; Lynn, T. The effect of social commerce attributes on customer engagement: An empirical investigation. Internet Res. 2023, 34, 187–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Attar, R.W.; Shanmugam, M.; Hajli, N. Investigating the antecedents of e-commerce satisfaction in social commerce context. Br. Food J. 2021, 123, 849–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herrando, C.; Jimenez-Martinez, J.; Martin-De Hoyos, M.J. Tell me your age and I tell you what you trust: The moderating effect of generations. Internet Res. 2019, 29, 799–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shirazi, F.; Hajli, N.; Sims, J.; Lemke, F. The role of social factors in purchase journey in the social commerce era. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2022, 183, 121861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Lu, Y.; Gupta, S.; Zhao, L. What motivates customers to participate in social commerce? the impact of technological environments and virtual customer experiences. Inf. Manag. 2014, 51, 1017–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Revilla-Camacho, M.Á.; Vega-Vázquez, M.; Cossío-Silva, F.J. Customer participation and citizenship behavior effects on turnover intention. J. Bus. Res. 2015, 68, 1607–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.; Hu, M.; Guo, L.; Liu, W. Understanding relationships among customer experience, engagement, and word-of-mouth intention on online brand communities. Internet Res. 2017, 27, 839–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wongkitrungrueng, A.; Assarut, N. The role of live streaming in building consumer trust and engagement with social commerce sellers. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 117, 543–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marriott, J.; Bektaş, T.; Leung, E.K.H.; Lyons, A. The billion-pound question in fashion E-commerce: Investigating the anatomy of returns. Transp. Res. E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2025, 194, 103904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vinerean, S.; Opreana, A. Measuring customer engagement in social media marketing: A higher-order model. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2021, 16, 2633–2654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, K.; Jo, H. What Drives Consumer Engagement and Purchase Intentions in Fashion Live Commerce? Sustainability 2025, 17, 5734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, T.T.H.; Nguyen, N.; Nguyen, T.B.L.; Phan, T.T.H.; Bui, L.P.; Moon, H.C. Investigating consumer attitude and intention towards online food purchasing in an emerging economy: An extended TAM approach. Foods 2019, 8, 576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mouloudj, K.; Aprile, M.C.; Bouarar, A.C.; Njoku, A.; Evans, M.A.; Oanh, L.V.L.; Asanza, D.M.; Mouloudj, S. Investigating Antecedents of Intention to Use Green Agri-Food Delivery Apps: Merging TPB with Trust and Electronic Word of Mouth. Sustainability 2025, 17, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hajli, N. Social commerce constructs and consumer’s intention to buy. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2015, 35, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carlson, J.; Rahman, M.; Voola, R.; De Vries, N. Customer engagement behaviours in social media: Capturing innovation opportunities. J. Serv. Mark. 2018, 32, 83–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Zheng, S.; Zhu, P. Why are Indonesian consumers buying on live streaming platforms? Research on consumer perceived value theory. Heliyon 2024, 10, e33518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hofstede, G. Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context. Online Read. Psychol. Cult. 2011, 2, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Macready, A.L.; Hieke, S.; Klimczuk-Kochańska, M.; Szumiał, S.; Wachter, K.; Arnoult, M.H.; Vranken, L.; Grunert, K.G. Why trust is crucial—The moderating role of trust in the relationship between motivation and intention to buy healthy, sustainable and novel foods. Food Qual. Prefer. 2025, 126, 105386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meilatinova, N. Social commerce: Factors affecting customer repurchase and word-of-mouth intentions. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2021, 57, 102300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarkis, N.; Jabbour Al Maalouf, N.; Al Geitany, S. The Power of Digital Engagement: Unveiling How Social Media Shapes Customer Responsiveness in the Food and Beverage Industry. Adm. Sci. 2025, 15, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ashley, C.; Tuten, T. Creative Strategies in Social Media Marketing: An Exploratory Study of Branded Social Content and Consumer Engagement. Psychol. Mark. 2015, 32, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Yan, X.; Fan, W.; Gordon, M. The joint moderating role of trust propensity and gender on consumers’ online shopping behavior. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2015, 43, 272–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shareef, M.A.; Mukerji, B.; Dwivedi, Y.K.; Rana, N.P.; Islam, R. Social media marketing: Comparative effect of advertisement sources. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2019, 46, 58–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tariyal, A.; Bisht, S.; Rana, V.; Roy, S.; Pratap, S. Utilitarian and Hedonic Values of eWOM Media and Online Booking Decisions for Tourist Destinations in India. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2022, 8, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barrett, J.A.M.; Jaakkola, E.; Heller, J.; Brüggen, E.C. Customer Engagement in Utilitarian vs. Hedonic Service Contexts. J. Serv. Res. 2024, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akdim, K.; Casaló, L.V.; Flavián, C. The role of utilitarian and hedonic aspects in the continuance intention to use social mobile apps. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2022, 66, 102888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sweeney, J.C.; Soutar, G.N. Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. J. Retail. 2001, 77, 203–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryu, K.; Han, H.; Jang, S. Relationships among hedonic and utilitarian values, satisfaction and behavioral intentions in the fast-casual restaurant industry. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2010, 22, 416–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DBS. 5 Emerging Opportunities for Indonesia’s Consumer Market [Internet]. DBS Asian Insights. 2022; p. 1–5. Available online: https://www.dbs.id/id/corporate/research-and-insights/business-insights/5-emerging-opportunities-for-indonesia-s-consumer-market (accessed on 17 August 2025).
- Eroglu, S.A.; Machleit, K.A.; Davis, L.M. Atmospheric qualities of online retailing. J. Bus. Res. 2001, 2, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Z.; Benyoucef, M. From e-commerce to social commerce: A close look at design features. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2013, 12, 246–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, W.M.; Rasul, T. Customer engagement and social media: Revisiting the past to inform the future. J. Bus. Res. 2022, 148, 325–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sturiale, L.; Timpanaro, G.; La Via, G. THE ONLINE SALES MODELS OF FRESH FRUIT AND VEGETABLES: OPPORTUNITIES AND LIMITS FOR TYPICAL ITALIAN PRODUCTS. Qual.-Access Success. 2017, 18, 444–451. Available online: https://research.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id=d1b73e6d-9cc2-3e41-931a-4def210a614e (accessed on 17 August 2025).
- Permani, R.; Sahara, S.; Satria, D.; Suprehatin, S.; Nuryartono, N. The impacts of food certificate adoption on e-commerce income among small online agri-food sellers. J. Agribus. Dev. Emerg. Econ. 2025, 15, 579–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sari, D.A.P.; Musyaffi, A.M.; Bahfen, N.; Simangunsong, E.S.; Cahyani, D.I. Determinant Of Purchase Intention on Online Menu Restaurant Through Organism Response (SOR) Model. Qual.-Access Success. 2022, 23, 359–363. [Google Scholar]
- Islam, J.U.; Rahman, Z. The impact of online brand community characteristics on customer engagement: An application of Stimulus-Organism-Response paradigm. Telemat. Inform. 2017, 4, 96–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, T.; Yang, S.O.; Leo, C. The beginning of value co-creation: Understanding dynamics, efforts and betterment. J. Serv. Theory Pract. 2017, 27, 1145–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, A.R.; Kim, K.K. Customer benefits and value co-creation activities in corporate social networking services. Behav. Inf. Technol. 2018, 37, 675–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Zhao, X.; Xu, W.; Pu, W. Measuring ease of use of mobile applications in e-commerce retailing from the perspective of consumer online shopping behaviour patterns. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2020, 55, 102093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brodie, R.J.; Hollebeek, L.D.; Jurić, B.; Ilić, A. Customer Engagement: Conceptual Domain, Fundamental Propositions, and Implications for Research. J. Serv. Res. 2011, 14, 252–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lei, S.I.; Ye, S.; Wang, D.; Law, R. Engaging Customers in Value Co-Creation Through Mobile Instant Messaging in the Tourism and Hospitality Industry. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2020, 44, 229–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brodie, R.J.; Ilic, A.; Juric, B.; Hollebeek, L. Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: An exploratory analysis. J. Bus. Res. 2013, 1, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islam, J.U.; Rahman, Z. Linking Customer Engagement to Trust and Word-of-Mouth on Facebook Brand Communities: An Empirical Study. J. Internet Commer. 2016, 15, 40–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Firdaus, M.I.; Utama, C.A.; Gayatri, G.; Rofianto, W. Co-creation experience in Indonesian mobile commerce: A self-determination theory perspective. Innov. Mark. 2023, 19, 145–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbasi, A.Z.; Qummar, H.; Bashir, S.; Aziz, S.; Ting, D.H. Customer engagement in Saudi food delivery apps through social media marketing: Examining the antecedents and consequences using PLS-SEM and NCA. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2024, 81, 104001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hollebeek, L.D.; Srivastava, R.K.; Chen, T. S-D logic–informed customer engagement: Integrative framework, revised fundamental propositions, and application to CRM. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2019, 47, 161–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hollebeek, L.D.; Glynn, M.S.; Brodie, R.J. Consumer Brand Engagement in Social Media: Conceptualization, Scale Development and Validation. J. Interact. Mark. 2014, 28, 149–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pansari, A.; Kumar, V. Customer engagement: The construct, antecedents, and consequences. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2017, 45, 294–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, T.P.; Turban, E. Introduction to the special issue social commerce: A research framework for social commerce. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 2011, 16, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tueanrat, Y.; Papagiannidis, S.; Alamanos, E. Going on a journey: A review of the customer journey literature. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 125, 336–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, N.; Gao, Y.; Chen, X.; Wang, M.; Niu, X.; Li, G.; An, T. A critical review of environmental exposure, metabolic transformation, and the human health risks of synthetic musks. Crit. Rev. Env. Sci. Technol. 2023, 53, 2132–2149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Żyminkowska, K. Hedonic and Utilitarian Drivers of Customer Engagement. Cent. Eur. Bus. Rev. 2018, 7, 15–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, T.; Kandampully, J.; Bilgihan, A. Motivations for customer engagement in online co-innovation communities (OCCs): A conceptual framework. J. Hosp. Tour. Technol. 2015, 6, 311–328. [Google Scholar]
- Banik, S.; Giri, A.; Chatterjee, S. Antecedents and Consequences of Viewers’ Engagement Toward Vlogging. J. Consum. Behav. Int. Res. Rev. 2025, 24, 1249–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bento, M.; Martinez, L.M.; Martinez, L.F. Brand engagement and search for brands on social media: Comparing Generations X and Y in Portugal. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2018, 43, 234–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasanov, J.; Khalid, H. The Impact of Website Quality on Online Purchase Intention of Organic Food in Malaysia: A WebQual Model Approach. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2015, 72, 382–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, P.; Zhang, J. Dual-Pathway Effects of Product and Technological Attributes on Consumer Engagement in Augmented Reality Advertising. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2025, 20, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rubera, G.; Kirca, A.H. Firm innovativeness and its performance outcomes: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. J. Mark. 2012, 76, 130–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alrawad, M.; Lutfi, A.; Alyatama, S.; Al Khattab, A.; Alsoboa, S.S.; Almaiah, M.A.; Ramadan, M.H.; Arafa, H.M.; Ahmed, N.A.; Alsyouf, A.; et al. Assessing customers perception of online shopping risks: A structural equation modeling–based multigroup analysis. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2023, 71, 103188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carù, A.; Cova, B. Revisiting consumption experience: A more humble but complete view of the concept. Mark. Theory 2003, 3, 267–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Banik, S.; Gao, Y. Exploring the hedonic factors affecting customer experiences in phygital retailing. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2023, 70, 103147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prakash, P.; Munilkumar, S.; Narsale, S.A.; Marbaniang, B.J.; Devi, G.A.; Kadam, R.; Malik, M.A.; Sheikh, S.; Mohanta, K.N.; Baidya, S.; et al. An improved recirculatory system model for culture of sludge worm: A cleaner innovative choice. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2024, 36, 103889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ong, A.K.S.; Prasetyo, Y.T.; Vallespin, B.E.; Persada, S.F.; Nadlifatin, R. Evaluating the influence of service quality, hedonic, and utilitarian value on shopper’s behavioral intentions in urban shopping malls during the COVID-19 pandemic. Heliyon 2022, 12, e12542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ke, J.; Wang, Y.; Fan, M.; Chen, X.; Zhang, W.; Gou, J. Discovering e-commerce user groups from online comments: An emotional correlation analysis-based clustering method. Comput. Electr. Eng. 2024, 113, 109035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Y.; Huang, H. Influence of Perceived Value on Consumers’ Continuous Purchase Intention in Live-Streaming E-Commerce—Mediated by Consumer Trust. Sustainability 2023, 15, 4432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, X. Consumers’ purchase intentions in social commerce: The role of social psychological distance, perceived value, and perceived cognitive effort. Inf. Technol. People 2022, 35, 330–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, W.K.; Chen, C.W.; Silalahi, A.D.K. Understanding Consumers’ Purchase Intention and Gift-Giving in Live Streaming Commerce: Findings from SEM and fsQCA. Emerg. Sci. J. 2022, 6, 460–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.Y.; Kim, S.M.; Lee, R.S.; Park, I.R. Effect of Participation Motivation in Sports Climbing on Leisure Satisfaction and Physical Self-Efficacy. Behav. Sci. 2024, 14, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeithaml, V.A.; Berry, L.L. The Nature and Determinant of Customer Expectation of Service Cost-Effective Service. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 1993, 21, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davlembayeva, D.; Papagiannidis, S.; Alamanos, E. Sharing economy: Studying the social and psychological factors and the outcomes of social exchange. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2020, 158, 120143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F., Jr.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E. Multivariate Data Analysis, 8th ed.; Cengage Learning: Hampshire, UK, 2019; 813p. [Google Scholar]
- Creswell, J.W.; Creswell, J.D. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th ed.; SAGE Publications, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Taherdoost, H. What Is the Best Response Scale for Survey and Questionnaire Design; Review of Different Lengths of Rating Scale/Attitude Scale/Likert Scale. Int. J. Acad. Res. Manag. (IJARM) 2019, 8, hal-02557308. [Google Scholar]
- Finstad, K. Response interpolation and scale sensitivity: Evidence against 5-point scales. J. Usability Stud. 2010, 5, 104–110. [Google Scholar]
- Munshi, J. A Method for Constructing Likert Scales. SSRN Electron. J. 2014, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, L.; Guan, X.; He, Y.; Huan, T.C. Wellness tourism: Customer-perceived value on customer engagement. Tour. Rev. 2022, 77, 859–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheung, C.M.K.; Zheng, X.; Lee, M.K.O. Customer loyalty to C2C online shopping platforms: An exploration of the role of customer engagement. In Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Waikoloa, HI, USA, 6–9 January 2014; pp. 3065–3072. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, J.F., Jr.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; Babin, R.J.; Anderson, R.E. Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed.; Prentice Hall: London, UK, 2010; 785p. [Google Scholar]
- Jager, J.; Putnick, D.L.; Bornstein, M.H. More than Just Convenient: The Scientific Merits of Homogeneous Convenience Samples. Monogr. Soc. Res. Child. Dev. 2017, 82, 13–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dharmesti, M.D.D.; Nugroho, S.S. The Antecedents of online customer satisfaction and customer loyalty Maria Delarosa Dipta Dharmesti and Sahid Susilo Nugroho. J. Bus. Retail. Manag. Res. 2013, 7, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Hurlock, E.B. Developmental Psychology, 4th ed.; McGraw-Hill, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1976; p. 420. [Google Scholar]
- APJII (Association of Indonesian Internet Service Providers). Laporan Survei Internet APJII 2022 [Internet]. Survei ISP Market Profile 2024. 2023. Available online: https://survei.apjii.or.id/survei?emailSent=1 (accessed on 17 August 2025).
- Zafirah, D.T.; Tandos, R. Strategi Bisnis Online Para Pelaku UMKM Industri Makanan Selama Masa Pandemi COVID-19 di Jalan Jatayu. Dakwah J. Kaji. Dakwah Kemasyarakatan 2021, 25, 174–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Badan Pusat Statistik. Statistik E-Commerce 2022; Badan Pusat Statistik: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Wright, K.B. Researching internet-based populations: Advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and web survey services. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 2017, 10, 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Evans, J.R.; Mathur, A. The value of online surveys: A look back and a look ahead. Internet Res. 2018, 28, 854–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E. Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed.; Pearson: Harlow, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, J.F.; Risher, J.J.; Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C.M. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur. Bus. Rev. 2019, 31, 2–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deliana, Y. Market Segmentation for Organic Products in Bandung West Java, Indonesia [Internet]. Res. J. Recent Sci. 2012, 1, 48–56. [Google Scholar]
- Hadiningrat, G. Women’s Role in Food Waste Management in Indonesia (Study Case in Bandung). In Proceedings of the 1st International Scientific Meeting on Public Health and Sports (ISMOPHS 2019) Malang, Paris, France, 22 August 2020; Atlantis Press: Paris, France, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Glazebrook, T.; Noll, S.; Opoku, E. Gender Matters: Climate Change, Gender Bias, and Women’s Farming in the Global South and North. Agriculture 2020, 10, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, A.; Mcinerney, P.; Smith, T.R.; Yamakawa, N. What makes Asia-Pacific’s Generation Z different? McKinsey & Company: Tokyo, Japan, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Asti, W.P.; Handayani, P.W.; Azzahro, F. Influence of Trust, Perceived Value, and Attitude on Customers’ Repurchase Intention for E-Grocery. J. Food Prod. Mark. 2021, 27, 157–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poureisa, A.; Aziz, Y.A.; Ng, S.I. Swipe to Sustain: Exploring Consumer Behaviors in Organic Food Purchasing via Instagram Social Commerce. Sustainability 2024, 16, 2338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarstedt, M.; Mooi, E. A Concise Guide to Market Research; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Habib, A.; Irfan, M.; Shahzad, M. Modeling the enablers of online consumer engagement and platform preference in online food delivery platforms during COVID-19. Future Bus. J. 2022, 8, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Y. To shop or not: Understanding Chinese consumers’ live-stream shopping intentions from the perspectives of uses and gratifications, perceived network size, perceptions of digital celebrities, and shopping orientations. Telemat. Inform. 2021, 59, 101562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Korschun, D.; Du, S. How virtual corporate social responsibility dialogs generate value: A framework and propositions. J. Bus. Res. 2013, 9, 1494–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dessart, L.; Veloutsou, C.; Morgan-Thomas, A. Consumer engagement in online brand communities: A social media perspective. J. Prod. Brand. Manag. 2015, 24, 28–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ho, C.; Wang, Y. Re-purchase intentions and virtual customer relationships on social media brand community. Hum. -Centric Comput. Inf. Sci. 2015, 5, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Filieri, R.; McLeay, F. E-WOM and Accommodation: An Analysis of the Factors That Influence Travelers’ Adoption of Information from Online Reviews. J. Travel. Res. 2013, 53, 44–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bao, Z.; Zhu, Y. Why customers have the intention to reuse food delivery apps: Evidence from China. Br. Food J. 2022, 124, 179–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kurniati, N.M.T.; Worthington, E.L.; Widyarini, N.; Citra, A.F.; Dwiwardani, C. Does forgiving in a collectivistic culture affect only decisions to forgive and not emotions? REACH forgiveness collectivistic in Indonesia. Int. J. Psychol. 2020, 55, 861–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gorodnichenko, Y.; Roland, G. Culture, institutions and democratization. Public. Choice 2021, 187, 165–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jiang, S.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, H.; Pan, Y. What Influences Users’ Continuous Behavioral Intention in Cultural Heritage Virtual Tourism: Integrating Experience Economy Theory and Stimulus–Organism–Response (SOR) Model. Sustainability 2024, 16, 10231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fioravanti, G.; Casale, S.; Benucci, S.B.; Prostamo, A.; Falone, A.; Ricca, V.; Rotella, F. Fear of missing out and social networking sites use and abuse: A meta-analysis. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2021, 122, 106839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roberts, J.A.; David, M.E. The Social Media Party: Fear of Missing Out (FoMO), Social Media Intensity, Connection, and Well-Being. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 2020, 36, 386–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jun, K.; Yoon, B.; Lee, S.; Lee, D.S. Factors Influencing Customer Decisions to Use Online Food Delivery Service during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Foods 2021, 11, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Poon, W.C.; Tung, S.E.H. The rise of online food delivery culture during the COVID-19 pandemic: An analysis of intention and its associated risk. Eur. J. Manag. Bus. Econ. 2024, 33, 54–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, J.; Xuan, Z.; Wang, H.; Wang, S. Business Model of Social Commerce Platform from the Perspective of Value Co-Creation: Based on a Case Research of Wechat Ecology. In Proceedings of the 2021 5th International Conference on Economics, Management Engineering and Education Technology (ICEMEET 2021), Berlin, Germany, 17–19 December 2021; Francis Academic Press: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Sohn, J.W.; Kim, J.K. Factors that influence purchase intentions in social commerce. Technol. Soc. 2020, 63, 101365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Noort, G.; Voorveld, H.A.M.; van Reijmersdal, E.A. Interactivity in Brand Web Sites: Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Responses Explained by Consumers’ Online Flow Experience. J. Interact. Mark. 2012, 26, 223–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mattila, A.S. The impact of service failures on customer loyalty: The moderating role of affective commitment. Int. J. Serv. Ind. Manag. 2004, 15, 134–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sloan, S.; Bodey, K.; Gyrd-Jones, R. Knowledge sharing in online brand communities. Qual. Mark. Res. Int. J. 2015, 18, 320–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wong, A. How social capital builds online brand advocacy in luxury social media brand communities. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2023, 70, 103143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Utami, H.N.; Sari, D.N.; Wiyono, S.N. Value co-creation through digital technology and business relations: A case study in an agribusiness cooperative company Islamic’ education-based. BIO Web Conf. 2024, 123, 03006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

| Profile | Subject (N = 300) | |
|---|---|---|
| Frequency | Percentage | |
| Gender | ||
| Female | 33 | 11 |
| Male | 267 | 89 |
| Age | ||
| <21 years | 3 | 1 |
| 21–30 years | 150 | 50 |
| 31–40 years | 105 | 35 |
| >40 years | 42 | 14 |
| Occupation | ||
| Student | 18 | 6 |
| Entrepreneur | 57 | 19 |
| Government employee | 17 | 5.7 |
| Private company employee | 109 | 36.3 |
| Professional | 21 | 7 |
| Housewife | 56 | 18.7 |
| Others | 22 | 7.3 |
| Income per month | ||
| <USD 350 | 143 | 47.7 |
| USD 350–450 | 34 | 11.3 |
| USD 450–600 | 38 | 12.7 |
| >USD 600 | 85 | 28.3 |
| Length of subscription | ||
| <3 months | 62 | 20.7 |
| 3–6 months | 51 | 17 |
| 6–9 months | 28 | 9.3 |
| >9 months | 159 | 53 |
| Construct | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Repurchase intention | 0.847 | ||||||
| 2. Online content quality | 0.596 | 0.939 | |||||
| 3. Online customer engagement | 0.731 | 0.648 | 0.864 | ||||
| 4. Functional value experience | 0.605 | 0.615 | 0.569 | 0.905 | |||
| 5. Hedonic value experience | 0.648 | 0.595 | 0.636 | 0.721 | 0.925 | ||
| 6. Price value experience | 0.555 | 0.519 | 0.487 | 0.592 | 0.625 | 0.900 | |
| 7. Social value experience | 0.291 | 0.162 | 0.351 | 0.227 | 0.171 | 0.279 | 0.914 |
| Variables | Formative Dimension | Items | Loadings (t-Value) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Online content quality (OCQ) [113] | α: 0.93, CR: 0.96, AVE: 0.89 | ||
| I find the information on this healthy food social commerce to be valuable | 0.941 | ||
| I think this healthy food social commerce page is a helpful resource | 0.933 | ||
| There is helpful information on this healthy food social commerce page | 0.944 | ||
| Customer online experience [114] | Functional value experience (FVE) “The healthy food social commerce… | α: 0.89, CR: 0.93, AVE: 0.82 | |
| … has consistent quality | 0.868 | ||
| … is well made | 0.936 | ||
| … has an acceptable standard of quality | 0.910 | ||
| Hedonic value experience (HVE) “The healthy food social commerce… | α: 0.92, CR: 0.95, AVE: 0.86 | ||
| … is one that I would enjoy | 0.926 | ||
| … would make me want to use it | 0.927 | ||
| … would make me feel good | 0.923 | ||
| Price value experience (PVE) “The healthy food social commerce… | α: 0.89, CR: 0.93, AVE: 0.81 | ||
| … is reasonably priced | 0.873 | ||
| … offers value for money | 0.929 | ||
| … is a good product for the price | 0.896 | ||
| Social value experience (SVE) “The healthy food social commerce… | α: 0.90, CR: 0.94, AVE: 0.84 | ||
| … would help me to feel acceptable | 0.881 | ||
| … would improve the way I am perceived | 0.942 | ||
| … would make a good impression on other people | 0.918 | ||
| Online customer engagement (OCE) [115] | α: 0.92, CR: 0.94, AVE: 0.75 | ||
| I am enthusiastic about this healthy food social commerce platform | 0.846 | ||
| This healthy food social commerce platform inspires me | 0.862 | ||
| found this healthy food social commerce full of meaning and purpose | 0.836 | ||
| I am excited when using this healthy food social commerce platform | 0.884 | ||
| I am interested in this healthy food social commerce platform | 0.889 | ||
| Repurchase intention (RI) [20] | α: 0.88, CR: 0.91, AVE: 0.72 | ||
| I think it is a pleasure to buy healthy food from social commerce | 0.879 | ||
| I won’t hesitate to refer others to buy healthy food from this social commerce platform | 0.875 | ||
| I think I will continue to buy healthy food from this social commerce platform | 0.877 | ||
| I feel the quality of products and services offered by this healthy food social commerce influences me to continue to buy | 0.752 |
| Hypothesis | Cause | Effect | Coef. | T-Value | p-Value | f2 | Effect Size | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | OCQ | OCE | 0.390 | 6.453 | 0.000 *** | 0.196 | Moderate | Supported |
| H2a | FVE | OCE | 0.036 | 0.605 | 0.531 | 0.001 | Small | Not supported |
| H2b | HVE | OCE | 0.351 | 4.329 | 0.000 *** | 0.114 | Moderate | Supported |
| H2c | PVE | OCE | −0.018 | 0.274 | 0.794 | 0.000 | Small | Not supported |
| H2d | SVE | OCE | 0.225 | 4.949 | 0.000 *** | 0.107 | Moderate | Supported |
| H3 | OCE | RI | 0.731 | 20.009 | 0.000 *** | 1.151 | Large | Supported |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Utami, H.N.; Elfa, M.O.J.; Wiyono, S.N.; Sari, D.N.; Perdana, T. Sustaining Consumer Excitement: The Role of Online Customer Experience and Engagement in Shaping Behavioural Intentions in Food Social Commerce. Sustainability 2025, 17, 8061. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17178061
Utami HN, Elfa MOJ, Wiyono SN, Sari DN, Perdana T. Sustaining Consumer Excitement: The Role of Online Customer Experience and Engagement in Shaping Behavioural Intentions in Food Social Commerce. Sustainability. 2025; 17(17):8061. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17178061
Chicago/Turabian StyleUtami, Hesty Nurul, Muhammad Okiba Jauhari Elfa, Sulistyodewi Nur Wiyono, Dwi Novanda Sari, and Tomy Perdana. 2025. "Sustaining Consumer Excitement: The Role of Online Customer Experience and Engagement in Shaping Behavioural Intentions in Food Social Commerce" Sustainability 17, no. 17: 8061. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17178061
APA StyleUtami, H. N., Elfa, M. O. J., Wiyono, S. N., Sari, D. N., & Perdana, T. (2025). Sustaining Consumer Excitement: The Role of Online Customer Experience and Engagement in Shaping Behavioural Intentions in Food Social Commerce. Sustainability, 17(17), 8061. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17178061

