Next Article in Journal
A Three-Layer Coordinated Planning Model for Source–Grid–Load–Storage Considering Electricity–Carbon Coupling and Flexibility Supply–Demand Balance
Previous Article in Journal
Beyond the Shoreline: Rethinking Coastal Futures of Fisheries-Based Communities Through Blue Εntrepreneurial Ecosystems in Greece
Previous Article in Special Issue
Urban Shrinkage in the Qinling–Daba Mountains: Spatiotemporal Patterns and Influencing Factors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Developing the Urban Diversity Index (UDI): A Global Comparison of Urban Qualitative Aspect and Its Implications for Sustainable Urban Planning Using POI Data

by
Yuki Akiyama
1,*,
Chiaki Mizutani Akiyama
2,
Kotaro Mizutani
3 and
Takahito Shimizu
4
1
Faculty of Architecture and Urban Design, Tokyo City University, Tokyo 158-8557, Japan
2
Faculty of Engineering, Reitaku University, Chiba 277-0065, Japan
3
Urban Spatial Research Institute, Inc., Tokyo 151-0071, Japan
4
Graduate School of Integrative Science and Engineering, Tokyo City University, Tokyo 158-8557, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(16), 7286; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167286
Submission received: 30 June 2025 / Revised: 24 July 2025 / Accepted: 31 July 2025 / Published: 12 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Urban Planning and Regional Development)

Abstract

Understanding urban diversity is critical to inclusive planning for sustainable urban development. This study introduces a new Urban Diversity Index (UDI) based on global point-of-interest (POI) data for food-related establishments—defined here as facilities that offer food and beverage services, including various kinds of eating and drinking venues —covering 249 cities across 154 countries. The UDI integrates three components: Pielou’s Evenness Index (J′) to capture the balance of establishment types, a Coverage Ratio (C′) to measure global representativeness of establishment categories, and density (ρ′) to reflect spatial concentration. By applying concentric buffer analysis around city centers, we evaluate the spatial profiles of diversity in each city. Results show that while cities like London and Istanbul have similar index components, they exhibit significant differences in the spatial extent and pattern of high-diversity zones, reflecting their unique morphological and regulatory contexts. Furthermore, the analysis of “Peak Distance Buffer Zones”—areas where UDI remains above 95% of its maximum—reveals diverse urban forms, particularly in Asian megacities. Scatterplots of standardized UDI and peak distances identify distinct typologies of urban diversity structures. Notably, urban population size showed no significant correlation with UDI values. Overall, this study demonstrates the utility of globally standardized POI-based metrics in capturing the spatial heterogeneity of urban qualitative diversity and offers new insights into cross-city comparisons of urban complexity.
Keywords: urban diversity; qualitative evaluation of cities; global urban comparison; point-of-interest (POI) data; foursquare data; food-related establishments; geospatial analysis; sustainable urban planning urban diversity; qualitative evaluation of cities; global urban comparison; point-of-interest (POI) data; foursquare data; food-related establishments; geospatial analysis; sustainable urban planning

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Akiyama, Y.; Akiyama, C.M.; Mizutani, K.; Shimizu, T. Developing the Urban Diversity Index (UDI): A Global Comparison of Urban Qualitative Aspect and Its Implications for Sustainable Urban Planning Using POI Data. Sustainability 2025, 17, 7286. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167286

AMA Style

Akiyama Y, Akiyama CM, Mizutani K, Shimizu T. Developing the Urban Diversity Index (UDI): A Global Comparison of Urban Qualitative Aspect and Its Implications for Sustainable Urban Planning Using POI Data. Sustainability. 2025; 17(16):7286. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167286

Chicago/Turabian Style

Akiyama, Yuki, Chiaki Mizutani Akiyama, Kotaro Mizutani, and Takahito Shimizu. 2025. "Developing the Urban Diversity Index (UDI): A Global Comparison of Urban Qualitative Aspect and Its Implications for Sustainable Urban Planning Using POI Data" Sustainability 17, no. 16: 7286. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167286

APA Style

Akiyama, Y., Akiyama, C. M., Mizutani, K., & Shimizu, T. (2025). Developing the Urban Diversity Index (UDI): A Global Comparison of Urban Qualitative Aspect and Its Implications for Sustainable Urban Planning Using POI Data. Sustainability, 17(16), 7286. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167286

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop