What Influences Potential Users’ Intentions to Use Hotel Robots?
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Framework and Hypotheses
2.1. Basic Theory
2.2. Social Presence (SP)
2.3. Perceived Playfulness (PP)
2.4. Trust (TR)
2.5. Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) and Perceived Usefulness (PU)
2.6. Attitude (ATT)
3. Methodology
3.1. Sample and Data Collection
3.2. Measurement
3.3. Data Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Measurement Model
4.2. Structural Model
4.3. Interview Results
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions, Contributions, and Future Directions
6.1. Conclusions
6.2. Contributions
6.3. Future Directions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Variable | Items | Indicator Loadings | Cronbach’s α | Composite Reliability | Average Variance Extracted |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATT | ATT1 | 0.779 | 0.789 | 0.876 | 0.702 |
ATT2 | 0.864 | ||||
ATT3 | 0.868 | ||||
ITU | ITU1 | 0.893 | 0.875 | 0.923 | 0.799 |
ITU2 | 0.877 | ||||
ITU3 | 0.912 | ||||
PEOU | PEOU1 | 0.769 | 0.777 | 0.870 | 0.691 |
PEOU2 | 0.871 | ||||
PEOU3 | 0.850 | ||||
PP | PP1 | 0.845 | 0.861 | 0.905 | 0.705 |
PP2 | 0.862 | ||||
PP3 | 0.828 | ||||
PP4 | 0.822 | ||||
PU | PU1 | 0.712 | 0.776 | 0.862 | 0.677 |
PU2 | 0.859 | ||||
PU3 | 0.887 | ||||
SP | SP1 | 0.912 | 0.901 | 0.931 | 0.774 |
SP2 | 0.930 | ||||
SP3 | 0.900 | ||||
SP4 | 0.766 | ||||
TR | TR1 | 0.877 | 0.827 | 0.886 | 0.664 |
TR2 | 0.862 | ||||
TR3 | 0.865 | ||||
TR4 | 0.627 |
Variable | M | SD | ATT | ITU | PEOU | PP | PU | SP | TR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATT | 4.619 | 0.951 | 0.838 | ||||||
ITU | 4.971 | 1.053 | 0.449 | 0.894 | |||||
PEOU | 4.852 | 0.946 | 0.462 | 0.417 | 0.831 | ||||
PP | 4.679 | 1.067 | 0.482 | 0.406 | 0.470 | 0.839 | |||
PU | 5.316 | 0.950 | 0.101 | 0.315 | 0.236 | 0.130 | 0.823 | ||
SP | 4.210 | 0.978 | 0.469 | 0.483 | 0.379 | 0.490 | 0.244 | 0.880 | |
TR | 4.804 | 1.046 | 0.437 | 0.475 | 0.521 | 0.464 | 0.288 | 0.508 | 0.815 |
Variable | ATT | ITU | PEOU | PP | PU | SP | TR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATT | |||||||
ITU | 0.526 | ||||||
PEOU | 0.577 | 0.493 | |||||
PP | 0.572 | 0.462 | 0.567 | ||||
PU | 0.123 | 0.374 | 0.253 | 0.143 | |||
SP | 0.543 | 0.538 | 0.436 | 0.546 | 0.281 | ||
TR | 0.534 | 0.542 | 0.629 | 0.539 | 0.334 | 0.580 |
Hypothesis Code | Hypothesis Path | Path Coefficient | t-Statistic | p-Value | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1 | SP -> PP | 0.490 | 8.845 | 0.000 | Supported |
H2 | SP -> ATT | 0.355 | 6.422 | 0.000 | Supported |
H3 | SP -> Trust | 0.508 | 9.166 | 0.000 | Supported |
H4 | PP -> ITU | 0.148 | 2.053 | 0.040 | Supported |
H5 | Trust -> ITU | 0.238 | 3.203 | 0.001 | Supported |
H6 | PEOU -> ATT | 0.343 | 5.355 | 0.000 | Supported |
H7 | PEOU -> PU | 0.236 | 3.604 | 0.000 | Supported |
H8 | PU -> ATT | -0.066 | 1.175 | 0.240 | Not supported |
H9 | PU -> ITU | 0.201 | 3.712 | 0.000 | Supported |
H10 | ATT -> ITU | 0.253 | 3.630 | 0.000 | Supported |
Question | Main Answer |
---|---|
Do you think hotel robots would be helpful for your stay? | “Now is the era of intelligence, hotel robots can provide us with intelligent services, which is very convenient” (Respondent 1, male, 20) “Helpful, it can she can carry my luggage” (Respondent 2, female, 27) “Depending on the situation, some people may think it is good, but I am more independent, so I think the help of hotel robots is limited” (Respondent 3, male, 32) “Hotel robots can provide food delivery service, which is very thoughtful” (Respondent 4, male, 41) “It should help me check in” (Respondent 6, female, 28) “My friends and I occasionally travel, and when we have too much luggage or are not clear about the travel route, the hotel robot may provide assistance” (Respondent 7, female, 65) “It can provide me with room guidance, which is very good for me who has no sense of direction” (Respondent 8, female, 62) “It will help, I am old and often go to the wrong room when I go to the hotel recently, it should provide me with room guidance” (Respondent 9, male, 63) “Helpful, specific may vary from person to person, such as helping me clean my hotel room” (Respondent 10, female, 38) “With hotel robots, we may be more efficient in checking into hotels” (Respondent 11, male, 48) “I think it may not be useful, because I don’t know how to use these technologies” (Respondent 12, female, 54) “I think it is helpful to some extent, especially for us old people. Of course, it needs to be intelligent and easy to operate” (Respondent 13, male, 57) “If robots can act like those on TV, it must be good for customers to check into hotels” (Respondent 15, female, 58) “It seems that there is no hotel robot now. If there is a hotel with a robot, I think this hotel will give me a different feeling. At least I will try to provide services with it, such as carrying luggage and checking in” (Respondent 16, female, 46) “It would be convenient if hotel robots could provide services anytime and anywhere, such as ordering food at midnight” (Respondent 17, male, 31) “It will be helpful to provide luggage handling services for the elderly and women” (Respondent 18, female, 35) “Hotel robots are valuable if they can remind me of the traffic and weather conditions in the place where I am on a business trip” (Respondent 19, male, 43) |
What about a hotel robot would motivate you to use it? | “Good-looking and easy to use, with a sense of technology” (interviewee 1, male, 20) “It can help me carry my luggage” (Respondent 2, female, 27) “It is innovative in design, such as intelligence” (Respondent 4, male, 41) “Interesting ones, such as different sounds like car navigation” (Respondent 5, male, 22) “Of course, if it looks distinctive in appearance, it can attract people” (Respondent 6, female, 28) “Can provide me with guidance service, of course, must be easy for us elderly people to operate” (Respondent 7, female, 65) “The service is very considerate and thoughtful” (Respondent 9, male, 63) “Accurate induction, now many smart products are not accurate induction, do not receive customer instructions correctly” (Respondent 10, female, 38) “It can provide reliable guidance” (Respondent 12, female, 54) “It is useful” (Respondent 13, male, 57) “Looks cute and can interact with me” (Respondent 14, female, 44) “It must be easy to use, otherwise I will not use it no matter how good it is” (Respondent 15, female, 58) “It can protect my personal information when I stay in the hotel” (Respondent 16, female, 46) “First of all, look comfortable, and then maybe be interesting, for example, have a sense of humor when providing service” (Respondent 17, male, 31) “The service it provides must be what customers really need and can protect their privacy” (Respondent 19, male, 43) “Can answer my questions correctly and provide me with services” (Respondent 20, female, 66) |
What factors do you consider when choosing to use a hotel robot for your services? | “Hotel robots should not only be useful, but also feel interesting” (Respondent 1, male, 20) “Intimate services, such as cleaning up and wake-up service” (Respondent 2, female, 27) “It looks very new, like beautiful looks, cute type; Of course, it has to be useful” (Respondent 3, male, 32) “No extra charge, useful” (Respondent 4, male, 41) “It has a sweet voice and can communicate smoothly with me” (Respondent 5, male, 22) “Can remind me whether I have missed something” (Respondent 6, female, 28) “I can operate by myself” (Respondent 7, female, 65) “Don’t look too scary, too scary, does not conform to our elderly aesthetic” (Respondent 8, female, 62) “The elderly can operate, speak slowly” (Respondent 9, male, 63) “It can provide hotel check-in instructions so that it is more convenient” (Respondent 11, male, 48) “Voice communication must be able to facilitate our communication, otherwise I may not be able to operate” (Respondent 12, female, 54) “The service it provides should be thoughtful” (Respondent 13, male, 57) “I prefer hotel robots to have something unique. For example, unique appearance, unique function, not only the basic functions such as carrying luggage“ (Respondent 14, female, 44) “The information provided to me is true and can make me believe it” (Respondent 15, female, 58) “It can help me clean up in time and provide wake-up service” (Respondent 16, female, 46) “No special consideration, as long as the hotel has a robot, I think I should use it” (Respondent 17, male, 31) “Can meet the basic service of the hotel, in addition to a certain emotional bar, otherwise the use of artificial services is similar” (Respondent 18, female, 35) “It can carry luggage” (Respondent 20, female, 66) |
References
- Jungbluth, J.; Krieger, R.; Gerke, W.; Plapper, P. Combining virtual and robot assistants-a case study about integrating amazon’s alexa as a voice interface in robotics. In Proceedings of the Robotix-Academy Conference for Industrial Robotics (RACIR) 2018, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg, 4–5 June 2018; p. 5. [Google Scholar]
- Department, S.R. Artificial Intelligence (AI) Use in Hospitality–Statistics & Facts. Available online: https://www.statista.com/topics/12390/artificial-intelligence-ai-use-in-hospitality (accessed on 8 May 2025).
- IFR. Service Robots. Available online: http://www.ifr.org/service-robots (accessed on 26 March 2025).
- Zalama, E.; García-Bermejo, J.G.; Marcos, S.; Domínguez, S.; Feliz, R.; Pinillos, R.; López, J. Sacarino, a service robot in a hotel environment. In Proceedings of the ROBOT 2013: First Iberian Robotics Conference: Advances in Robotics, Madrid, Spain, 28–29 November 2013; Volume 2, pp. 3–14. [Google Scholar]
- Ivanov, S. Ultimate transformation: How will automation technologies disrupt the travel, tourism and hospitality industries? Z. Tour. 2019, 11, 25–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Q.S.; Zhang, K.; Zhang, X.L.; Fu, J.; Liu, F.Y.; Gao, Y.E.; Lin, R.J. WeChat mini-program, a preliminary applied study of the gestational blood glucose management model for pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2025, 219, 111943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Begum, N.; Faisal, M.N.; Sobh, R.; Nunkoo, R.; Rana, N.P. Consumers acceptance of service robots in hotels: A meta-analytic review. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2025, 126, 104052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lei, C.; Hossain, M.S.; Wong, E. Determinants of Repurchase Intentions of Hospitality Services Delivered by Artificially Intelligent (AI) Service Robots. Sustainability 2023, 15, 4914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, Z.; Chen, P.-J.; Lew, A.A. From high-touch to high-tech: COVID-19 drives robotics adoption. Tour. Geogr. 2020, 22, 724–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gursoy, D.; Chi, C.G. Effects of COVID-19 pandemic on hospitality industry: Review of the current situations and a research agenda. J. Hosp. Market. Manag. 2020, 29, 527–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choubey, V.; Chakraborty, D.; Joshi, Y. Human-robot trust dynamics: Understanding tourist confidence in service robots in tourism & hospitality. Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res. 2025, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ivanov, S.H.; Webster, C.; Berezina, K. Adoption of robots and service automation by tourism and hospitality companies. Rev. Tur. Desenvolv. 2017, 27, 1501–1517. [Google Scholar]
- Minor, K.; Mcloughlin, E.; Richards, V. Enhancing the Visitor Experience in the Time of COVID 19: The Use of AI Robotics in Pembrokeshire Coastal Pathway. In Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2021; Worndl, W., Koo, C., Stienmetz, J.L., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 570–577. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, J.J.; Chew, E. A Systematic Review for Service Humanoid Robotics Model in Hospitality. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2021, 13, 1397–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, W.; Shao, B. The impact of voice assistants’ intelligent attributes on consumer well-being: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2023, 70, 103130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Bonn, M.A.; Ye, B.H. Hotel employee’s artificial intelligence and robotics awareness and its impact on turnover intention: The moderating roles of perceived organizational support and competitive psychological climate. Tour. Manag. 2019, 73, 172–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Doorn, J.; Mende, M.; Noble, S.M.; Hulland, J.; Ostrom, A.L.; Grewal, D.; Petersen, J.A. Domo arigato Mr. Roboto: Emergence of automated social presence in organizational frontlines and customers’ service experiences. J. Serv. Res. 2017, 20, 43–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, W.H.; Lin, C.W.; Shih, K.H. A technology acceptance model for the perception of restaurant service robots for trust, interactivity, and output quality. Int. J. Mob. Commun. 2018, 16, 361–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ivanov, S.; Webster, C.; Garenko, A. Young Russian adults’ attitudes towards the potential use of robots in hotels. Technol. Soc. 2018, 55, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, T.; Ren, C.; Yin, L.; Liao, Z.X.; Li, W.Y.; Sun, F.L.; Wang, H. Scheduling Scheme Design of Hotel Service Robot: A Heuristic Algorithm to Provide Personalized Scheme. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. 2022, 2022, 7611308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guth, L.; Vander Meer, P. Telepresence robotics in an academic library A study of exposure and adaptation among patrons and employees. Libr. Hi Tech 2017, 35, 408–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rañó, I.; Raducanu, B.; Subramanian, S. Human presence detection and tracking for a concierge robot. IFAC Proc. Vol. 2004, 37, 986–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murphy, J.; Hofacker, C.; Gretzel, U. Dawning of the age of robots in hospitality and tourism: Challenges for teaching and research. Eur. J. Tour. Res. 2017, 15, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sousa, N.; Aln, E.; Losada, N.; Melo, M. Breaking Barriers: Unveiling Challenges of Introducing Virtual Reality for Managers in the Tourism Industry. Tour. Hosp. Manag. 2024, 30, 269–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allied Analytics. Hospitality Robots Market by Type and End User Sales Channel: Global Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast 2021–2030. Available online: https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/5457347/hospitality-robots-market-by-type-and-end-user (accessed on 7 May 2025).
- Miley, J. Japanese Hotel Fires Robot Staff After They Annoy Human Staff and Guests. Available online: https://interestingengineering.com/culture/japanese-hotel-fires-robot-staff-after-they-annoy-human-staff-and-guests (accessed on 7 May 2025).
- Kraft, A. Chinese Restaurant Fires Subpar Robot Waiters. Available online: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/chinese-restaurant-fires-subpar-robot-waiters/ (accessed on 7 May 2025).
- Binesh, F.; Balolu, S. Are we ready for hotel robots after the pandemic? A profile analysis. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2023, 147, 107854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, S.; Sahni, M.M.; Kovid, R.K. What drives FinTech adoption? A multimethod evaluation using an adapted technology acceptance model. Manag. Decis. 2020, 58, 1675–1697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ivanov, S.; Webster, C.; Seyyedi, P. Consumers’ attitudes towards the introduction of robots in accommodation establishments. Tour. Int. Interdiscip. J. 2018, 66, 302–317. [Google Scholar]
- Webster, C.; Ivanov, S. Robots in Travel, Tourism and Hospitality: Key Findings from a Global Study; Zangador: Varna, Bulgaria, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Martinez, P.; Herrero, A.; del Mar Garcia-de los Salmones, M. Determinants of eWOM on hospitality CSR issues. In Facebook we trust? J. Sustain. Tour. 2020, 28, 1479–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manosuthi, N.; Lee, J.-S.; Han, H. Green behavior at work of hospitality and tourism employees: Evidence from IGSCA-SEM and fsQCA. J. Sustain. Tour. 2024, 32, 85–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agag, G.; Brown, A.; Hassanein, A.; Shaalan, A. Decoding travellers’ willingness to pay more for green travel products: Closing the intention-behaviour gap. J. Sustain. Tour. 2020, 28, 1551–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, B.; Zhang, M.; Wu, P. Driven by technology or sociality? Use intention of service robots in hospitality from the human–robot interaction perspective. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2022, 106, 103278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, T.; Zheng, Y.-H.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Z. “They” threaten my work: How AI service robots negatively impact frontline hotel employees through organizational dehumanization. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2025, 128, 104162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gajic, T.; Vukolic, D.; Bugarcic, J.; Dokovic, F.; Spasojevic, A.; Knezevic, S.; Boljanovic, J.D.; Glisic, S.; Matovic, S.; David, L.D. The Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Serbian Hospitality: A Potential Path to Sustainable Practice. Sustainability 2024, 16, 3172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsu, H. Facing the next chapter of smartness: Designing smarter hospitality customer experience with artificial intelligence of things (AIoT). Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2025, 128, 104163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saputra, F.E.; Buhalis, D.; Augustyn, M.M.; Marangos, S. Anthropomorphism-based artificial intelligence (AI) robots typology in hospitality and tourism. J. Hosp. Tour. Technol. 2024, 15, 790–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pitardi, V.; Wirtz, J.; Paluch, S.; Kunz, W.H. Metaperception benefits of service robots in uncomfortable service encounters. Tour. Manag. 2024, 105, 104939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mori, M. The Uncanny Valley. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 2012, 19, 98–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blut, M.; Wang, C.; Wuenderlich, N.V.; Brock, C. Understanding anthropomorphism in service provision: A meta-analysis of physical robots, chatbots, and other AI. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2021, 49, 632–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Della Corte, V.; Sepe, F.; Gursoy, D.; Prisco, A. Role of trust in customer attitude and behaviour formation towards social service robots. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2023, 114, 103587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liao, J.; Huang, J. Think like a robot: How interactions with humanoid service robots affect consumers’ decision strategies. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2024, 76, 103575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, S.; Kim, S. Consumer perception of employees with disabilities using robots. Ann. Touris. Res. 2025, 112, 103945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parvez, M.O.; Hossain, M.S.; Patwary, A.K.; Elkhwesky, Z.; Rehman, S.U.; Ali, F. Meeting the needs of physically disabled tourists: Use of service robots toward the hotel attachment. J. Hosp. Tour. Technol. 2024, 15, 574–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pizam, A.; Ozturk, A.B.; Hacikara, A.; Zhang, T.; Balderas-Cejudo, A.; Buhalis, D.; Fuchs, G.; Hara, T.; Meira, J.; Revilla, R.G.M.; et al. The role of perceived risk and information security on customers’ acceptance of service robots in the hotel industry. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2024, 117, 103641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skubis, I.; Mesjasz-Lech, A.; Nowakowska-Grunt, J. Humanoid Robots in Tourism and Hospitality-Exploring Managerial, Ethical, and Societal Challenges. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 11823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ladeira, W.; Perin, M.G.; Santini, F. Acceptance of service robots: A meta-analysis in the hospitality and tourism industry. J. Hosp. Market. Manag. 2023, 32, 694–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brochado, A.; Rita, P.; Margarido, A. High tech meets high touch in upscale hotels. J. Hosp. Tour. Technol. 2016, 7, 347–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wirtz, J.; Patterson, P.G.; Kunz, W.H.; Gruber, T.; Lu, V.N.; Paluch, S.; Martins, A. Brave new world: Service robots in the frontline. J. Serv. Manag. 2018, 29, 907–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, Z.Y.; Wu, L.; Li, X. When art meets tech: The role of augmented reality in enhancing museum experiences and purchase intentions. Tour. Manag. 2018, 68, 127–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Im, I.; Hong, S.; Kang, M.S. An international comparison of technology adoption Testing the UTAUT model. Inf. Manag. 2011, 48, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamble, S.; Gunasekaran, A.; Arha, H. Understanding the Blockchain technology adoption in supply chains-Indian context. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 57, 2009–2033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lazarus, R.S. Cognition and Motivation in Emotion. Am. Psychol. 1991, 46, 352–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bowlby, J. Attachment and Loss, 3rd ed.; Random House: New York, NY, USA, 1969. [Google Scholar]
- Song, X.; Li, Y.; Leung, X.Y.; Mei, D. Service robots and hotel guests’ perceptions: Anthropomorphism and stereotypes. Tour. Rev. 2024, 79, 505–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wong, I.A.; Zhang, T.; Lin, Z.; Peng, Q. Hotel AI service: Are employees still needed? J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2023, 55, 416–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baser, M.Y.; Buyukbese, T.; Durmaz, Y. “Yes, It’s Cute, But How Can I Be Sure It’s Safe or Not?” Investigating the Intention to Use Service Robots in the Context of Privacy Calculus. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2024, 40, 6151–6166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsu, H. Facing the era of smartness—delivering excellent smart hospitality experiences through cloud computing. J. Hosp. Market. Manag. 2024, 33, 333–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buhalis, D.; O’Connor, P.; Leung, R. Smart hospitality: From smart cities and smart tourism towards agile business ecosystems in networked destinations. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2023, 35, 369–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Etemad-Sajadi, R.; Sturman, M.C. How to Increase the Customer Experience by the Usage of Remote Control Robot Concierge Solutions. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2022, 14, 429–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.; So, K.K.F.; Wirtz, J. Service robots: Applying social exchange theory to better understand human-robot interactions. Tour. Manag. 2022, 92, 104537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, Y.; Lee, S.; Kim, D.-Y. Exploring hotel guests’ perceptions of using robot assistants. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2021, 37, 100781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shuqair, S.; Pinto, D.C.; Miltgen, C.L.; Viglia, G. When powerful artificial intelligence backfires. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2024, 120, 103778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989, 13, 319–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seo, K.H.; Lee, J.H. The Emergence of Service Robots at Restaurants: Integrating Trust, Perceived Risk, and Satisfaction. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuen, K.F.; Cai, L.H.; Qi, G.Q.; Wang, X.Q. Factors influencing autonomous vehicle adoption: An application of the technology acceptance model and innovation diffusion theory. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 2021, 33, 505–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Michels, M.; Von Hobe, C.F.; von Ahlefeld, P.J.W.; Musshoff, O. An extended technology acceptance model for the adoption of drones in German agriculture. In Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Precision Agriculture (ECPA), Budapest, Hungary, 18–22 July 2021; pp. 761–767. [Google Scholar]
- Lowry, P.B.; Romano, N.C.; Jenkins, J.L.; Guthrie, R.W. The CMC interactivity model: How interactivity enhances communication quality and process satisfaction in lean-media groups. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2009, 26, 155–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Romero, J.; Lado, N. Service robots and COVID-19: Exploring perceptions of prevention efficacy at hotels in generation Z. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2021, 33, 4057–4078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cicek, M.; Gursoy, D.; Lu, L. Adverse impacts of revealing the presence of “Artificial Intelligence (AI)” technology in product and service descriptions on purchase intentions: The mediating role of emotional trust and the moderating role of perceived risk. J. Hosp. Market. Manag. 2025, 34, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gambino, A.; Fox, J.; Ratan, R.A. Building a stronger CASA: Extending the computers are social actors paradigm. Hum.-Mach. Commun. 2020, 1, 71–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Kervenoael, R.; Hasan, R.; Schwob, A.; Goh, E. Leveraging human-robot interaction in hospitality services: Incorporating the role of perceived value, empathy, and information sharing into visitors’ intentions to use social robots. Tour. Manag. 2020, 78, 104042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heerink, M.; Kröse, B.; Evers, V.; Wielinga, B. Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: The almere model. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2010, 2, 361–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belanche, D.; Casaló, L.V.; Flavián, C.; Schepers, J. Robots or frontline employees? Exploring customers’ attributions of responsibility and stability after service failure or success. J. Serv. Manag. 2020, 3, 267–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caic, M.; Avelino, J.; Mahr, D.; Odekerken-Schroder, G.; Bernardino, A. Robotic Versus Human Coaches for Active Aging: An Automated Social Presence Perspective. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2020, 12, 867–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, B.Z.; Fan, W.G.; Zhou, M. Social presence, trust, and social commerce purchase intention: An empirical research. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 56, 225–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jang, H.-J.; Noh, G.-Y. The Effect of Health Consciousness and Playfulness on Intention to Use Tangible Fitness Game: Extended TAM. J. Korea Contents Assoc. 2017, 17, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Xue, T.; Tuomi, A.; Wang, Z. Hotel robots: An exploratory study of Generation Z customers in China. Tour. Rev. 2022, 77, 1262–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Go, H.; Kang, M.; Suh, S.C. Machine learning of robots in tourism and hospitality: Interactive technology acceptance model (iTAM)—cutting edge. Tour. Rev. 2020, 75, 625–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, E.; Yang, H.; Wang, Y.-C.; Song, H. Building restaurant customers’ technology readiness through robot-assisted experiences at multiple product levels. Tour. Manag. 2022, 93, 104610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hepola, J.; Leppäniemi, M.; Karjaluoto, H. Is it all about consumer engagement? Explaining continuance intention for utilitarian and hedonic service consumption. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2020, 57, 102232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thong, J.Y.L.; Hong, S.J.; Tam, K.Y. The effects of post-adoption beliefs on the expectation-confirmation model for information technology continuance. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 2006, 64, 799–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, W.; Karan, K. Consumers’ privacy concern and privacy protection on social network sites in the era of big data: Empirical evidence from college students. J. Interact. Advert. 2019, 19, 187–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gallimore, D.; Lyons, J.B.; Vo, T.; Mahoney, S.; Wynne, K.T. Trusting robocop: Gender-based effects on trust of an autonomous robot. Front. Psychol. 2019, 10, 482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mayer, R.C.; Davis, J.H.; Schoorman, F.D. An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1995, 20, 709–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beldad, A.D.; Hegner, S.M. Expanding the technology acceptance model with the inclusion of trust, social influence, and health valuation to determine the predictors of German users’ willingness to continue using a fitness app: A structural equation modeling approach. Int. J. Hum.–Comput. Interact. 2018, 34, 882–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tussyadiah, I.P.; Zach, F.J.; Wang, J.X. Do travelers trust intelligent service robots? Ann. Touris. Res. 2020, 81, 102886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- You, S.; Kim, J.-H.; Lee, S.; Kamat, V.; Robert, L.P., Jr. Enhancing perceived safety in human–robot collaborative construction using immersive virtual environments. Autom. Constr. 2018, 96, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.; Erdem, M.; Kim, B. Hi Alexa, do hotel guests have privacy concerns with you?: A cross-cultural study. J. Hosp. Mark. Manag. 2023, 33, 360–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pillai, R.; Sivathanu, B. Adoption of AI-based chatbots for hospitality and tourism. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2020, 32, 3199–3226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Graaf, M.M.A.; Ben Allouch, S. Exploring influencing variables for the acceptance of social robots. Robot. Auton. Syst. 2013, 61, 1476–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, K.; Park, N.; Heo, W. Factors influencing intranet acceptance in restaurant industry: Use of technology acceptance model. Int. Bus. Res. 2018, 11, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, T.Y. Research on the use intention of potential designers of unmanned cars based on technology acceptance model. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0256570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaushik, A.K.; Agrawal, A.K.; Rahman, Z. Tourist behaviour towards self-service hotel technology adoption: Trust and subjective norm as key antecedents. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2015, 16, 278–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liebana-Cabanillas, F.; Alonso-Dos-Santos, M.; Soto-Fuentes, Y.; Valderrama-Palma, V.A. Unobserved heterogeneity and the importance of customer loyalty in mobile banking. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 2017, 29, 1015–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aggelidis, V.P.; Chatzoglou, P.D. Using a modified technology acceptance model in hospitals. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2009, 78, 115–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.Y.; Fan, J.; Zhao, D.T.; Yang, S.; Fu, Y.G. Predicting consumers’ intention to adopt hybrid electric vehicles: Using an extended version of the theory of planned behavior model. Transportation 2016, 43, 123–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kasilingam, D.; Krishna, R. Understanding the adoption and willingness to pay for internet of things services. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2022, 46, 102–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I.; Fishbein, M. A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes. Psychol. Bull. 1975, 82, 261–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, L.A.; Zhang, X.Y.; Rong, J.; Chan, H.K.; Xiao, J.Y.; Kong, H.Y. Construction and empirical research on acceptance model of service robots applied in hotel industry. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2021, 121, 1325–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belanche, D.; Casalo, L.V.; Flavian, C.; Schepers, J. Service robot implementation: A theoretical framework and research agenda. Serv. Ind. J. 2020, 40, 203–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soliman, M.; Ivanov, S.; Elgammal, I.; Webster, C.; Al-Alawi, A. Pursuing the drivers of consumer behaviour toward service robots in the hotel industry. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2024, 120, 103752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gorsuch, R. Factor Analysis; Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1983. [Google Scholar]
- Forgas-Coll, S.; Huertas-Garcia, R.; Andriella, A.; Alenya, G. The effects of gender and personality of robot assistants on customers’ acceptance of their service. Serv. Bus. 2022, 16, 359–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, K.M.; Peng, W.; Jin, S.-A.; Yan, C. Can robots manifest personality?: An empirical test of personality recognition, social responses, and social presence in human–robot interaction. J. Commun. 2006, 56, 754–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ponte, E.B.; Carvajal-Trujillo, E.; Escobar-Rodriguez, T. Influence of trust and perceived value on the intention to purchase travel online: Integrating the effects of assurance on trust antecedents. Tour. Manag. 2015, 47, 286–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roy, M.C.; Dewit, O.; Aubert, B.A. The impact of interface usability on trust in Web retailers. Internet Res.-Electron. Netw. Appl. Policy 2001, 11, 388–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venkatesh, V.; Morris, M.G.; Davis, G.B.; Davis, F.D. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. Mis Q. 2003, 27, 425–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Sarstedt, M.; Matthews, L.M.; Ringle, C.M. Identifying and treating unobserved heterogeneity with FIMIX-PLS: Part I—Method. Eur. Bus. Rev. 2016, 28, 63–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fornell, C.; Bookstein, F. Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. J. Mark. Res. 1982, 19, 440–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, F.; Rasoolimanesh, S.M.; Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C.M.; Ryu, K. An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in hospitality research. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2018, 30, 514–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Podsakoff, P.M.; Organ, D.W. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. J. Manag. 1986, 12, 531–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 2011, 19, 139–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chin, W.W. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Mod. Methods Bus. Res. 1998, 295, 295–336. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, J.F., Jr.; Hult, G.T.M.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM); Sage Publications: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Voorhees, C.M.; Brady, M.K.; Calantone, R.; Ramirez, E. Discriminant validity testing in marketing: An analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2016, 44, 119–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Falk, R.F.; Miller, N.B. A Primer for Soft Modeling; University of Akron Press: Akron, OH, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
- Tenenhaus, M.; Vinzi, V.E.; Chatelin, Y.-M.; Lauro, C. PLS path modeling. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 2005, 48, 159–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heerink, M.; Krose, B.; Evers, V.; Wielinga, B. Measuring acceptance of an assistive social robot: A suggested toolkit. In Proceedings of the ROMAN 2009-The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Toyama, Japan, 27 September–2 October 2009; pp. 528–533. [Google Scholar]
- Heater, C. Being there: The subjective experience of presence. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 1992, 1, 262–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Broadbent, E.; Stafford, R.; MacDonald, B. Acceptance of Healthcare Robots for the Older Population: Review and Future Directions. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2009, 1, 319–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bowen, J.; Whalen, E. Trends that are changing travel and tourism. Worldw. Hosp. Tour. Themes 2017, 9, 592–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noone, B.M.; Kimes, S.E.; Mattila, A.S.; Wirtz, J. Perceived service encounter pace and customer satisfaction An empirical study of restaurant experiences. J. Serv. Manag. 2009, 20, 380–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Horng, J.-S.; Hsu, H. Esthetic Dining Experience: The relations among aesthetic stimulation, pleasantness, memorable experience, and behavioral intentions. J. Hosp. Market. Manag. 2021, 30, 419–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pelet, J.-E.; Lick, E.; Taieb, B. The internet of things in upscale hotels: Its impact on guests’ sensory experiences and behavior. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2021, 33, 4035–4056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernandes, T.; Oliveira, E. Understanding consumers’ acceptance of automated technologies in service encounters: Drivers of digital voice assistants adoption. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 122, 180–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, D.; Li, M.; Qiu, H. Do customers exhibit engagement behaviors in AI environments? The role of psychological benefits and technology readiness. Tour. Manag. 2023, 97, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamal, S.A.; Shafiq, M.; Kakria, P. Investigating acceptance of telemedicine services through an extended technology acceptance model (TAM). Technol. Soc. 2020, 60, 101212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vorobeva, D.; El Fassi, Y.; Costa Pinto, D.; Hildebrand, D.; Herter, M.M.; Mattila, A.S. Thinking Skills Don’t Protect Service Workers from Replacement by Artificial Intelligence. J. Serv. Res. 2022, 25, 601–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryan, C.; Rao, U. Holiday Users of the Internet—Ease of Use, Functionality and Novelty. Int. J. Tour. Res. 2008, 10, 329–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chi, O.H.; Chi, C.G.; Gursoy, D.; Nunkoo, R. Customers? acceptance of artificially intelligent service robots: The influence of trust and culture. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2023, 70, 102623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, L.; Cai, R.; Gursoy, D. Developing and validating a service robot integration willingness scale. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2019, 80, 36–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jung, I.; Quan, W.; Yu, J.; Han, H. Are you ready for robot services? Exploring robot-service adoption behaviors of hotel-goers. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2023, 109, 103404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variable (Sources) | Items |
---|---|
PP [106] | PP1: It is fun to use hotel robot services PP2: It is fun to interact with hotel robots PP3: Hotel robots look enjoyable PP4: Hotel robots seem charming |
SP [107] | SP1: I feel as if I am interacting with an intelligent being SP2: I feel as if I have the services of an intelligent being SP3: I feel as if I am involved with the hotel robot SP4: I feel as if the hotel robot and I were communicating with each other |
TR [108,109] | TR1: I feel that the service provided by the hotel robot is real TR2: I feel that the service provided by the hotel robot is clear and reliable TR3: I feel that using robots to provide services in hotels is trustworthy TR4: I feel that hotel robots have the necessary capabilities to provide customer service |
PU [66] | PU1: Using a hotel robot can provide me with convenient services PU2: Using a hotel robot can improve the efficiency of service PU3: Using a hotel robot takes the stress out of my hotel stay |
PEOU [66] | PEOU1: Learning to operate a hotel robot is easy for me PEOU2: It is very easy for me to be proficient in using hotel service robots PEOU3: I would find hotel service robots easy to use |
ATT [66,110] | ATT1: It is a good idea to use hotel robot services ATT2: It is a wise choice to use hotel robot services ATT3: I like using hotel robots for service |
ITU [66] | ITU1: I plan to use hotel robots to provide services in the future ITU2: I hope to provide services using hotel robots in the future ITU3: I plan to use hotel robots to provide services in the future |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ren, G.; Wang, G.; Huang, T. What Influences Potential Users’ Intentions to Use Hotel Robots? Sustainability 2025, 17, 5271. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125271
Ren G, Wang G, Huang T. What Influences Potential Users’ Intentions to Use Hotel Robots? Sustainability. 2025; 17(12):5271. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125271
Chicago/Turabian StyleRen, Gang, Gang Wang, and Tianyang Huang. 2025. "What Influences Potential Users’ Intentions to Use Hotel Robots?" Sustainability 17, no. 12: 5271. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125271
APA StyleRen, G., Wang, G., & Huang, T. (2025). What Influences Potential Users’ Intentions to Use Hotel Robots? Sustainability, 17(12), 5271. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125271