Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Smart City Construction on the Spatial Distribution of Urban Carbon Emissions Based on the Panel Data Analysis of 277 Prefecture-Level Cities in China
Previous Article in Journal
A Review of Industrial Load Flexibility Enhancement for Demand-Response Interaction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Roses in the City Environment: A Heavy Metals Case Study

by
Dawid Krakowiak
,
Dorota Adamczyk-Szabela
*,
Małgorzata Szczesio
and
Wojciech M. Wolf
Faculty of Chemistry, Institute of General and Ecological Chemistry, Lodz University of Technology, Żeromskiego 116, 90-924 Lodz, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(11), 4939; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17114939
Submission received: 25 April 2025 / Revised: 22 May 2025 / Accepted: 26 May 2025 / Published: 27 May 2025

Abstract

:
Kutno is a picturesque city in central Poland, known for extensive rose breeding worldwide. Soil samples and rose petals were collected from 13 locations in the city and characterized by diverse environments. This allowed determining the response of plants to changing cultivation conditions. Rose petals have found a wide range of applications. They are used in the food, pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries. The aim of the research was to assess the contents of Cu, Zn, Cd, Ni, Pb and Cr in soils and their accumulation in rose petals. Samples were subjected to the microwave mineralization process using a mixture of concentrated HCl and HNO3. The metal contents in the soil and roses were determined by HR-CS-AAS and ICP-OES, respectively. Roses are usually cultivated in soils with a limited mobile fraction of heavy metals. In these unfavorable conditions, flower petals can absorb heavy metals substantially. Petals of roses cultivated for cosmetic, pharmaceutical or food purposes should be tested for heavy metal content. This study indicates that toxic metals are blocked at the root zone, and their transport to the above-ground parts is severely hampered. Nevertheless, metals related to the photo-synthesis process (Zn, Cu) are more intensively taken up by roses, while the uptake of toxic metals is partially inhibited.

1. Introduction

Kutno is an ancient city located in the central part of Poland. It is world known for extensive rose breeding. The planting area covers approximately 7.800 square meters, with numerous sites situated either in parks or road lanes, which are close to major traffic routes [1,2]. Kutno is an important communication hub of either national or international importance. It is surrounded by typical agricultural areas. The city is situated on a ground moraine altered by terminal moraine, river and stream valleys. This landscape is dominated by a flat or slightly undulating Earth form. Additionally, the area of Kutno is affected by the Ochnia River proglacial valley. The city extends 101–107 m above the sea level, with a slope from the northwest to the southeast. The maximum slope is about 6%. However, the majority of the city is fairly flat, with slopes not exceeding 4%. The investigated area is located far from the waste disposals or mining areas. In Kutno, according to the soil agronomic classification, light clays predominate, and all investigated soils are of natural origin [3,4,5].
The rose bushes are subjected to careful seasonal maintenance, which includes flower pruning. On the global flower market, roses are commonly regarded as “queens of flowers”. They are perennial flowering plants, with over 20,000 varieties cultivated worldwide [6]. Over the centuries, rose petals have been highly valued for their scent, color, health and distinguished cosmetic properties. They are finding applications in a plethora of life activities. In particular, rose petals have been used in many countries as an ingredient of dishes and drinks [7]. They are the basis for rose jams, syrups and flavored waters and teas. Thanks to their moisturizing, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, rose petals are valued in the cosmetics industry. The rose petal tea is a useful medication for digestive problems [8]. The essential oil is mainly applied for non-edible purposes, such as the production of soaps and detergents and the preparation of insect repellents, cosmetics and perfumes. Roses are grown all over the world due to either their natural beauty or wide range of uses [9]. Moreover, the use of certain rose species for the phytoremediation of heavy metals in soil was also reported [10]. Nevertheless, reliable data on the content of heavy metals in roses are quite scarce indeed. In particular, Ramil et al. [11] determined contents of several heavy metals in rose petals, supplemented with organic and inorganic fertilizers. Unfortunately, they did not defined the rose species. Copper contents ranged from 10 to 204 µg·kg−1, zinc from 1.38 to 1.58 µg·g−1, cadmium from 0 to 2.25 µg·kg−1, nickel from 35 to 193 µg·kg−1, and lead was not detected. Metal levels depended heavily on the fertilizer applied. Dos Santos et al. [12] determined the content of macro- and microelements in rose petals of different colors. Cadmium and chromium were not detected. The concentration of copper ranged from 0.085 to 3.36, zinc from 2.38 to 5.17 and nickel from 0.04 to 0.2 µg·g−1. Additionally, Li Jung et al. [13] analyzed heavy metal contents in several soil and rose samples. All sampling sites were selected away from identified polluting sources. The following metal contents were determined: Cd 0–0.01; Cr 0–8.14; Cu 0.059–8.92; Ni 0–9.94; Pb 0–0.4, Zn 0.094–16.4 µg·g−1. The major outcome of this work is that the uptake of heavy metal from the soil into the roses was significantly influenced by the physicochemical properties of the soil; cultivation conditions, including the use of fertilizers; and the environment around the plants.
The continuous development of industry and technology fosters the use of chemicals in agriculture and contributes to increasing pollution of the natural environment. Especially, heavy metals pose a continuous threat to agricultural and municipal soils worldwide. The latter are also used for food production in garden and allotment areas, which are of particular importance in Poland. A growing number of people who prefer living in a suburban environment instead of densely populated cities prompts small-scale homemade food and flowers production. Kutno is a representative example of a medium-size town with substantial industrial capacity, located in a green, human-friendly area. According to the literature data, the main stream of heavy metals contaminating soil and roadside vegetation follows industrial activity and transport [14,15,16]. Petrol and diesel engines are widely used in the automotive transportation sector worldwide and are reported to be the main sources of atmospheric air pollutants in major cities. Heavy metals like zinc, cadmium and copper are reported to come from brake and tires wear [17]. Zinc oxide and zinc sulfide added as a component compound in the manufacturing of car tires during the vulcanization process contribute to zinc as a heavy metal during tire wear on roads [18].
In limited doses, many heavy metals are essential elements for plants but can be quite dangerous when they approach toxicity levels [19]. In general, metal contamination of urban soils is currently not regulated by the European Environment Agency [20]. The applicable standards regarding soil contamination and assessment of their quality apply only to agricultural areas [21,22,23]. However, it should be remembered that the bioavailability of metals to plants depends on many factors, including on the physicochemical properties of the soil, soil pH and organic matter content [24,25].
It is well documented that heavy metals as present in the soil from urban areas, especially grasslands, come mostly from industry, road traffic and solid-fuel combustion [26,27,28]. The bioavailability of metals to plants depends on many factors, including on the physicochemical properties of the soil, soil pH and organic matter content.
Plants have developed a number of mechanisms for the efficient uptake, transfer and storage of nutrients. Different parts of plants show different levels of tolerance to the accumulation of heavy metals [29]. Metals can be taken up and transferred using specific protein carriers. Their transport is facilitated by water and realized through either apoplastic or symplastic pathways [30]. On the entry to the roots, water penetrates the epidermis and goes inside, through the cortex and endoderm, towards the xylem. In the endoderm, the apoplastic mechanism is blocked by suberin, which hampers this water pathway and activates the symplast avenue. This water movement is mostly facilitated by pressure generated by transpiration through the Cohesion–Tension (C-T) mechanism [31]. Notably, abiotic factors, like heavy metals, can disrupt this flow at a number of points and interfere with the water transport pathways [32,33,34].
The primary goal of this study was to assess contents of Cu, Zn, Cd, Ni, Pb and Cr in soils and their accumulation in rose petals, with the major aim the influence of cultivation conditions. Obviously, the latter may affect the quality of relevant food and cosmetic products. Copper belongs to the group of micronutrients and in soil is strongly bound by organic matter components and clay minerals. In soil, it forms sulfates, sulfides and carbonates, with a very limited soluble fraction available to plants. Copper is a vital component of enzymes and proteins involved in photosynthesis and nitrogen metabolism [35,36]. On the contrary, zinc is a very mobile element in the soil easily absorbed by plants. Moreover, it is an important cofactor of several enzymes involved in plant photosynthesis, ribosome formation and the permeability of cell membranes. Nickel is recently regarded as an essential micronutrient characterized by high migratory properties. It is a cofactor of ureases, which are key enzymes involved in plant nitrogen metabolism [37]. Chromium and lead are toxic metals of limited mobility and phytoaccumulation, which are mostly taken up by plants via passive mechanisms. They inflict disturbances in photosynthesis and affect cell divisions. On the other hand, cadmium is a mobile metal and can readily be transferred to the upper, green parts of plant. In the soil environment, it is prone to complexing by chelating organic species. It hampers photosynthesis, disrupts cell membranes and affects DNA structures [35,38].

2. Materials and Methods

Rose petals and soils samples were collected in June 2023 from thirteen major locations in the city of Kutno (Figure 1 and Figure S1). Soil samples were taken according to the procedure as in PN-ISO 10381-4:2007, from the plant root zone (0–25 cm) [39]. Selected soil and plant sampling points were chosen to be representative for rose cultivation in urban areas subjected to significant anthropopreasure. Additionally, city park areas situated away from communication routes were considered for comparison. In particular, samples were taken from areas with heavy traffic—such as roundabouts (points 4–6), streets with heavy traffic (points 8–10, 12) and streets with medium traffic (points 1, 11, 13)—as well as green areas, such as parks in the city center (point 2) and on the outskirts of the city (point 3) and a square (point 7).

2.1. The Soil Samples Analysis

All soil samples were subsequently dried in a well-ventilated place, sifted through a 2 mm stainless steel sieve and finally stored in plastic bags. The soil pH of soil was measured by the potentiometric method in 1 mol/dm3 potassium chloride solution (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) [40]. Organic matter content in soil was determined by the gravimetric method [41,42]. The bioavailable forms of metals in soil were determined in 1 mol L−1 hydrochloric acid (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) extracts [43]. The total metal content in soil was measured in samples mineralized using the Anton Paar Multiwave 3000 closed system instrument (Graz, Austria). The mixture of concentrated HNO3 (6 mL) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and HCl (2 mL) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was applied (0.5000 g of soil). Metal concentrations were measured by the HR-CS-AAS technique. The reliability of the analytical procedures was checked using the certified reference material Light Sandy Soil 7001 (Analytica Co. Ltd., Prague, Czech Republic) (Table S1).

2.2. The Roses Petals Samples Analysis

2.2.1. Determination of Heavy Metals in Roses Petals

The rose petals were left to dry in a well-ventilated room for two weeks to a constant weight, grounded and homogenized. The dried plants (0.5 g sample) were subjected to microwave mineralization in concentrated HNO3 (6 mL) and HCl (1 mL) acid solutions using the Anton Paar Multiwave 3000 closed system instrument. Metal contents were determined by the ICP-OES technique. Respective metal nitrates (Me(NO3)2, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) were used for calibration curve determinations. The reliability of the analytical procedures was checked using the certified reference material INCT-MPH-2, containing a mixture of selected Polish herbs (Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology, Warsaw, Poland) (Table S2) [44].

2.2.2. Determination of Chlorophyll Content in Roses Petals

The index of chlorophyll was measured in roses petals using the Konica Minolta SPAD-502 Plus, Tokyo, Japan.

2.3. Digital Maps Preparation

All maps were computed with the Esri ArcGIS Pro 3.2.2. software (Esri Polska sp. z o.o., Warsaw, Poland). The basemaps used are as implemented in the software. Additional auxiliary maps have been downloaded from the website https://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl/imap/Imgp_2.html (accessed on 24 April 2025).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

All the analytical measurements were performed in five replications. Single-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed. The arithmetic mean values are shown in tables ± standard deviation. All parameters were determined in parallel for five independent samples. Bartlett’s and Hartley’s tests were applied to check the equality of variance (STATISTICA 10 PL package). Normality of the data sets was evaluated using the Shapiro–Wilk test.

3. Results

The locations of soils and rose petals sampling in the city of Kutno are presented in Figure 1. All investigated soils were mineral, with pH ranging from neutral and slightly alkaline (Table 1). The bioavailable and total metals contents are shown on maps, as summarized in Figure 2.
The highest metals concentrations were observed at points 6 and 8. The lowest percentage of bioavailable metal forms in the soil as related to its total content was observed for chromium (7–10%), cadmium and nickel (11–15%). On the other hand, the highest values were determined for copper (61–66%) and zinc (52–67%). Only moderate mobility was observed for lead (38%).
Table 2 shows the metal contents in rose petals samples according to the location.
Three species of roses, namely, Gebrüder Grim, Bad Birnbach and Lady Kutno, grew in different places in the city of Kutno. They were located both close to traffic and in parks. In order to show the possible influence of the place of growth, the metal content in the petals of these species was compared. The metals uptake by rose petals was assessed by one-way ANOVA at the 0.95 probability level (Table 3). The null hypothesis supported by these calculations was whether the location of a given rose species affects the migration of metals from the soil to the petals. These calculations showed that the location of growth can contribute to the uptake of metals by roses.
In addition, one-way Anova analysis was used to estimate the uptake of metals by rose petals of different species (Table 4). The null hypothesis was whether there are differences in the uptake of heavy metals by rose petals of different species growing in one location.
The highest concentrations of lead and chromium were observed in the Artemis (locations 2 and 5) and Marathon (locations 6 and 9) varieties. The Lady Kutno variety is characterized by the highest content of Cu, Zn and Ni (locations 2 and 10). It is worth noting that site 2 is located in the park. Higher metal contents in rose petals are not related to high content of these elements in the soil. However, the park is located on a significant slope of the terrain, which may result in the above differences.
The Queen Elizabeth variety was characterized by the lowest content of the tested metals (locations 3 and 5). Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5 present the metal contents in individual rose species depending on the place of their collection. For the Gebrüder Grim variety (Figure 3), relatively constant copper contents (6.04–8.23 μg·g−1) in petals, regardless the place of growth, were observed. Similarly, no clear relationship was determined for zinc and nickel contents. The highest lead concentrations were observed at locations 10 and 12, which are located in the vicinity of two major traffic routes. The Bad Birnbach variety (Figure 4) did not show significant relationships between the content of copper and zinc and the place of plant growth. The highest nickel content was found in rose petals collected from location 10. The lead and chromium contents were quite similar in all locations. The highest concentrations were found in samples collected from locations 4 and 10, i.e., places in the city center. The cadmium content in all samples of this variety is at the limit of analytical quantification and ranges from 0 to 0.0025 μg·g−1. Figure 5 shows metal concentrations in the Lady Kutno variety. The contents of copper, zinc, nickel and lead changed depending on the particular location. The highest metal content was found in sample 2 and the lowest in sample 13. The cadmium content, as in the previous samples, was below the limit of quantification (0.0063 μg·mL−1).
In this work, we applied the generally accepted bioaccumulation factor (BAF) to rose petals instead of leaves and named it BAFp. We calculated BAFp, a factor that we defined as the ratio of the metal content in rose petals to its content in the soil. Series of those coefficients stated in an ordered way (Table 5 and Table 6) provide useful information on metals migrations and associated interactions, which may affect plant tissues. In all analyzed rose varieties, BAFp coefficients calculated for Cu, Zn and Ni occupy the same position in the series, regardless of the place of plant growth. Minor changes were observed for Cr, Pb and Cd.

4. Discussion

Soil degradation prompted by growing urbanization is becoming an important environmental issue. The resulting waste accumulation and contamination with chemical and radioactive substances significantly deteriorates soil conditions [45]. In particular, substantial amounts of pollutants enter urban soils as a result of waste accumulation, transport (wear and tear of parts, emissions from fuel combustion) and industrial facilities (technological chains of production) [46]. Concrete and asphalt pavements, typical for urban areas, limit the penetration of water and air into the soil and make an additional negative contribution to the degradation of soil resources [47,48].
The total copper content in the analyzed area ranged from 9.78 to 27.3 µg·g−1, while the bioavailable form was 4.50–18.0 µg·g−1. According to the commonly accepted review of Kabata-Pendias [35], the average content in agriculturally used soils is 1–140 µg·g−1. The total zinc content in soil ranged from 43.5 to 156 µg·g−1, and the bioavailable form 23.5–81.3 µg·g−1. Kabata-Pendias [35] shows that the average zinc content in soils is within the limits 30–125 µg·g−1, while the permissible value is 250–300 µg·g−1. In the studied area of the city, the total cadmium content in the soil ranged from 1.90 to 3.10, and the bioavailable forms 0.21–0.47 µg·g−1. These values are within the permissible cadmium content in soil, which is 3–5 µg·g−1. The total nickel content in the analyzed area ranged from 14.2 to 19.9 µg·g−1, while the bioavailable form was 1.50–3.00 µg·g−1. According to Kabata-Pendias [35], the average permissible nickel content in soil is 100 µg·g−1. The total content in the soil determined for lead is 25–58.7 µg·g−1 (bioavailable forms 9.6–33 µg·g−1) and for chromium 13.7–29.3 µg·g−1 (bioavailable forms 0.91–2.91 µg·g−1). These values do not exceed the permissible standards for lead of 100 µg·g−1 and chromium of 150 µg·g−1. Analyzing the above data, we can conclude that the permissible standards were not exceeded in the studied area with respect to the determined metals [49].
Roses are a very important ornamental plant, cultivated as either cut flowers or gardening plants [50,51]. The object of our investigations was the petals of selected rose species. We analyzed the content of metals in well-opened rose flowers. We made every effort to collect petals from plants after pollination.
The copper content in rose petals ranged from 2.30 µg·g−1 (Queen Elizabeth, location 3) to 8.79 µg·g−1 (Lady Kutno, location 10). According to Kabata-Pendias [35], the copper content in garden plants is usually below 4–5 µg·g−1, with the average content in above-ground parts ranging from 5 to 20 µg·g−1. Therefore, those values were not exceeded over all analyzed petals.
Our results showed significant dependance between particular rose species and their availability to zinc uptake and accumulation. This phenomenon was initially described by Khoshgoftarmanesh et al. [52] for rose leaves and was presumably attributed to the dilution effect resulting from the increase in shoot dry matter weight. Notable, the zinc content in rose petals from location 2 ranged from 11.7 µg·g−1 (Diamant) to 31.7 µg·g−1 (Lady Kutno). However, in location 8, a similar pattern was not observed. This may indicate the vital influence of soil parameters on the uptake of this metal.
Cadmium concentrations in rose petals were very close to the detection limit, ranging in value from 0 to 0.0281 µg·g−1, and therefore, they are not shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4.
The nickel content in rose petals ranged from 0.0415 µg·g−1 (Queen Elizabeth, location 7) to 1.21 µg·g−1 (Lady Kutno, locations 2 and 10) and the lead content from 0 (Diamant, location 2, and Lady Kutno, location 13) to 1.03 µg·g−1 (Artemis, location 5). Nickel contents in plants range from 0.15 to 8.2 µg·g−1. The toxic concentration depends on the sensitivity or resistance of the plants and ranges from 10 to 100 µg·g−1. The uptake of lead by plants is a passive process and proportional to the presence of available lead in the soil. The amount of lead in plants ranges from 0.4 to 3.6 µg·g−1. The critical value is above 30 ppm. The chromium content in food plants ranges from 0.02 to 1.0 µg·g−1. It is generally assumed that for very sensitive plants, chromium is harmful at a concentration of 2 µg·g−1, and for medium sensitive plants, above 20 µg·g−1. None of the analyzed rose petals exceeded the limit values for the determined elements. The Lady Kutno rose species was the most sensitive to changing growing conditions. Chromium levels in rose petals adopted values ranging from 0.0025 µg·g−1 (Lady Kutno, location 13) to 0.3725 µg·g−1 (Diamant, location 8). An increase in lead content (location 8), along with an enhanced level of bioavailable forms of this element in the soil (30.7 µg·g−1), was observed for the Diamant rose species. However, a similar situation was not detected at location 2, where other elements present in the soil environment influence the uptake of lead by roses.
The investigated plant material was characterized by a bioaccumulation factor (Table S3). The BAF value was higher than the one for copper, as determined in Lady Kutno rose petals at location 2 only (BAFp = 1.26). High values of this parameter indicate a well-developed system of transporting copper to above-ground parts. It is surprising that the place of growth of Lady Kutno (location 2) is not characterized by the highest copper content in the soil (6.40 µg·g−1) in comparison to other locations. The accumulation of heavy metals in the plant increases along with the concentration of the assimilable form of the metal in the soil. However, the bioavailability of metals depends on the physicochemical properties of the soil and the presence of microorganisms that are inhabitants of the rhizosphere. Copper plays important roles in photosynthetic and respiratory electron transport chains, cell wall metabolism, oxidative stress protection and biogenesis of the molybdenum cofactor [53]. Therefore, plants developed efficient ways for extracting copper from soils with limited copper concentrations, which is reflected by the high BAFs of that metal. Our results clearly indicate that the presence of other elements in the soil is also extremely important for the way metals are uptaken and transported by plants.
The phenomenon of flower opening consists of both petal cell division and cell expansion, and they greatly affect petal growth and development. Many research studies indicate that petal growth associated with flower opening is mainly attributable to cell expansion, and the accumulation of osmosis is required [54,55,56]. Soluble carbohydrates, which act as osmotica and substrates for both respiration and cell wall synthesis for cell expansion, accumulate in the petal cells of many flowers, including roses [57]. The sugar accumulation in petal cells is pivotal for reducing petal water potential promotion of water influx, which is vital for cell enlargement and flower opening [51,58,59]. Flowers develop from florally determined meristems, which in turn proliferate to form the floral organs, including sepals, petals, stamens and carpels. During those morphological changes, each part of a floral organ shows a distinct pattern of color change that is specific to each plant species [60]. Metals penetrate rose petals during their formation and growth phase, along with the transport of water. After pollination, the flowers receive a signal to stop turgor, and the process of flower death begins. In this research, we collected rose flowers during the peak blooming phase but before the withering phase. All roses were grown in soils with a neutral or slightly alkaline reaction, which prompted a low content of bioavailable forms of metals in the soil. These circumstances reduced the impact of metals on the plant development.
The root system of roses is well developed, which increases their resistance to short periods of drought. However, during intensive growth, especially when the plants are preparing to flower and developing buds, their water requirements increase significantly. Water is essential for the transport of nutrients and plays a key role in the photosynthesis process and maintaining turgor, or the right cell tension. Hydration plays a fundamental role in the health and flowering of roses, affecting all aspects of their physiology. Flowering is one of the most water-intensive stages in the life cycle of a rose. Each flower bud requires a sufficient amount of water to develop and open properly. Water shortages during this crucial period can lead to weakened buds, their drying out and even premature drop. As a result, the plants can produce fewer and significantly reduced-quality flowers.
Chlorophyll plays a significant role in the photosynthesis process and is necessary for collecting light and transmitting energy. However, the petals of many flowering plants contain chlorophyll at the early stages of development only. In the mature petals, the chlorophyll content is very limited indeed. On the contrary, other pigments like anthocyanins, carotenoids and betalains are being accumulated [61,62]. The loss of chlorophyll during petal development is an important feature of flowering plants. It allows flowers to be visually distinguished from the surrounding leaves and attracts pollinators [60]. Chlorophyll is closely associated with the chlorophyll-binding proteins of photosystem I (PSI) and II (PSII) complexes [63,64] and accumulates in tissues where PSI and PSII are produced. It is well known that the flowers of most plant species consist of non-photosynthetic tissues or those with residual photosynthetic activity [65,66]. However, the mechanism behind that phenomenon has not been thoroughly investigated as yet. In our future work, we would like to explain this phenomenon and describe how it can be facilitated in rose cultivation and development.

5. Conclusions

Our investigations have shown that, despite the marvelous beauty of their petals, rose plants should be treated thoroughly as a complete organism, with special attention paid to their growing conditions and environment. Roses are usually cultivated in soils with a limited mobile fraction of heavy metals. However, even in these unfavorable conditions, flower petals can absorb heavy metals substantially. Therefore, petals of roses cultivated for cosmetic, pharmaceutical or food purposes should be tested for heavy metal content. The analyzed area located within the municipality of Kutno was characterized by diverse heavy metal contents. Especially, the highest heavy metal levels were determined in soil samples collected from points close to heavy traffic areas (6, 8 points). In particular, we have shown a significant relationship between the content of metals in rose petals and their level in soil. Metal ions transport in plants is facilitated by water flow, which in turn is stimulated by photosynthesis. We did not detect chlorophyll content in well-developed rose petals, which indicates that photosynthesis was limited to the early stage of petal formation in roses only. In well-developed petals, water transport is inhibited after pollination [67]. Our studies indicate that toxic metals can be blocked at the root zone, and thus, their transport to the above-ground parts is severely hampered [25,68,69]. Nevertheless, metals related to the photosynthesis process (Zn, Cu) are more likely to be taken up by roses, while the uptake of toxic metals is partially inhibited.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/su17114939/s1, Figure S1: Locations of soils and rose petals sampling in the city of Kutno; Table S1: Metals content in certified reference materials, Light Sandy Soil 7001; p = 0.95, n = 5; Table S2: Metals content in certified reference materials INCT-MPH-2 Mixed Polish Herbs; p = 0.95, n = 5; Table S3: Bioaccumulation factors for rose petals in different locations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.K., D.A.-S., M.S. and W.M.W.; methodology, D.K., D.A.-S. and M.S.; validation, D.K. and D.A.-S.; formal analysis, D.K., D.A.-S. and M.S.; investigation, D.K., D.A.-S., M.S. and W.M.W.; writing—original draft preparation, D.K., D.A.-S., M.S. and W.M.W.; writing—review and editing, D.A.-S. and W.M.W.; visualization, D.K. and D.A.-S.; supervision, D.A.-S. and W.M.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Roses in Urban Space. Kutno City Hall. Available online: https://um.kutno.pl/roze-w-przestrzeni-miejskiej (accessed on 26 December 2022).
  2. Rose Tradition in Kutno—TPZK. Available online: https://tpzk.eu/tradycja-rozana/tradycja-rozana-w-kutnie/ (accessed on 11 January 2023).
  3. Year-Round Climate and Average Weather Conditions in Kutno. Available online: https://pl.weatherspark.com (accessed on 19 March 2025).
  4. City of Kutno. Environmental Impact Forecast. Zbigniew Bronowicki. Available online: https://um.kutno.pl/sites/default/files/attachments/2021-07/Prognoza_tekst.pdf (accessed on 10 March 2025).
  5. Gruszecki, J.; Lis, J.; Pasieczna, A.; Tomassi-Morawiec, H.; Kozłowska, O. State Geological Institute, Kutno Sheet, Warsaw 2004. Available online: https://bazadata.pgi.gov.pl/data/mgsp/txt/mgsp0517.pdf (accessed on 25 May 2025).
  6. Ahsan, M.; Nafees, M.; Amin, M.; Nawaz, F.; Tufail, A.; Sardar, H.; Shokralla, S.; Mahmoud, E.A.; El-Sabrout, A.M.; Elansary, H.O. Nutrients uptake and accumulation in plant parts of fragrant rosa species irrigated with treated and untreated wastewater. Plants 2022, 11, 1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lim, W.-C.; Choi, H.-K.; Kim, K.-T.; Lim, T.-G. Rose (Rosa gallica) petal extract suppress proliferation. Migration, and invasion of human lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells through via the EGFR Signaling Pathway. Molecules 2020, 25, 5119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Galal, T.M.; Majrashi, A.; Al-Yasi, H.M.; Farahat, E.A.; Eid, E.M.; Ali, E.F. Taif’s Rose (Rosa damascena Mill var. trigentipetala) wastes are a potential candidate for heavy metals remediation from agricultural soil. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1319. [Google Scholar]
  9. Galal, T.M.; Al-Yasi, H.M.; Fawzy, M.A.; Abdelkader, T.G.; Hamza, R.Z.; Eid, E.M.; Ali, E.F. Evaluation of the phytochemical and pharmacological potential of taif’s rose (Rosa damascena mill var. trigintipetala) for possible recycling of pruning wastes. Life 2022, 12, 273. [Google Scholar]
  10. Antonkiewicz, J.; Kołodziej, B.; Bielińska, E.J. Phytoextraction of heavy metals from municipal sewage sludge by Rosa multiflora and Sida hermaphrodita. Intern. J. Phytoremediat. 2017, 19, 309–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ramli, N.H.; Hisham, N.E.B.; Said, F.M.; Baharulrazi, N.; Othman, M.H.S. Potential of heavy metal and mould contamination in rose petal tea. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2022, 97, 325–330. [Google Scholar]
  12. dos Santos, A.M.P.; Silva, E.F.R.; dos Santos, W.N.L.; da Silva, E.G.P.; dos Santos, L.O.; da S. Santos, B.R.; da S. Sauthier, M.C.; dos Santos, W.P.C. Evaluation of minerals, toxic elements and bioactive compounds in rose petals (Rosa spp.) using chemometric tools and Artificial Neural Networks. Microchem. J. 2018, 138, 98–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, J.; Ma, L.B.; Liu, J.Z.; Li, X.; Yang, Y.Q.; Tai, X.S.; Zhou FYZang, F. Advanced matter-element extension model and machine learning for source-specific probabilistic health risk assessment of heavy metals/metaloids in soil-rose systems in Kushui, Northwest China. Ecol. Indic. 2025, 170, 113017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ebong, G.A.; Etuk, H.S.; Anweting, I.B.; Ekot, A.E. Relationship between traffic density, metal accumulation, pollution status, and human health problems in adjoining soils and vegetables within the South-South Region of Nigeria. Int. J. Environ. Agric. Biotechnol. 2023, 8, 65–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Oluwole, S.O.; Olubunmi Makinde, S.C.; Yusuf, K.A.; Fajana, O.O.; Odumosu, A.O. Determination of heavy metal contaminants in leafy vegetables cultivated by the road side. Int. J. Eng. Res. Dev. 2013, 7, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  16. Bolaji, B.O.; Adejuyigbe, S.B. Vehicle emissions and their effects on the natural environment—A review. J. Ghana Inst. Eng. 2006, 4, 35–41. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wang, M.; Zhang, H. Accumulation of heavy metals in roadside soil in urban area and the related impacting factors. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Adamiec, E.; Jarosz-Krzemińska, E.; Wieszała, R. Heavy metals from non-exhaust vehicle emissions in urban and motorway road dusts. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2016, 188, 369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Krstić, M.; Stupar, M.; Đukić-Ćosić, D.; Baralić, K.; Mračević, S.Đ. Health risk assessment of toxic metals and toxigenic fungi in commercial herbal tea samples from Belgrade, Serbia. J. Food Comp. Anal. 2021, 104, 104159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Paya, P.A.; Rodriguez, E.N. Status of Local Soil Contamination in Europe: Revision of the Indicator; Progress in the Management Contaminated Sites in Europe; JRC Publ. Reposts; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  21. Sager, M. Urban soils and road dust—Civilization effects and metal pollution—A review. Environments 2020, 7, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tóth, G.; Hermann, T.; Ravina da Silva, M.; Montanarella, L. Heavy metals in agricultural soils of the European Union with implications for food safety. Environ. Int. 2016, 88, 299–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Binner, H.T.; Sullivan, M.A.K.; Jansen, M.E. McNamara. Metals in urban soils of Europe: A systematic review. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 854, 158734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Adamczyk-Szabela, D.; Wolf, W.M. The Impact of soil pH on heavy metals uptake and photosynthesis efficiency in Melissa officinalis, Taraxacum officinalis, Ocimum basilicum. Molecules 2022, 27, 4671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Adamczyk-Szabela, D.; Lisowska, K.; Romanowska-Duda, Z.; Wolf, W.M. Combined cadmium-zinc interactions alter manganese, lead, copper uptake by Melissa officinalis. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Appleton, J.D.; Cave, M.R. Variation in soil chemistry related to different classes and eras of urbanisation in the London area. Appl. Geochem. 2018, 90, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cachada, A.; Dias, A.C.; Pato, P.; Mieiro, C.; Rocha-Santos, T.; Pereira, M.E.; Da Silva, E.F.; Duarte, A.C. Major inputs and mobility of potentially toxic elements contamination in urban areas. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2013, 185, 279–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Cicchella, D.; Zuzolo, D.; Albanese, S.; Fedele, L.; Di Tota, I.; Guagliardi, I.; Thiombane, M.; De Vivo, B.; Lima, A. Urban soil contamination in Salerno (Italy): Concentrations and patterns of major, minor, trace and ultra-trace elements in soils. J. Geochem. Explor. 2020, 213, 106519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Azam, I.; Sajjad, B.; Sarwar, H.; Javeed, A.; Riaz, A.; Yaseen, W.; Ajaz, H. Study of Heavy metals (lead and magnesium) stress on Rosa indica. Int. J. Agric. Sustain. Dev. 2019, 01, 115–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Steudle, E. The cohesion-tension mechanism and the acquisition of water by plants roots. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Mol. Biol. 2001, 52, 847–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. McElrone, A.J.; Choat, B.; Gambetta, G.A.; Brodersen, C.R. Water uptake and transport in vascular plants. Nat. Educ. Knowl. 2013, 4, 6. [Google Scholar]
  32. Wheeler, T.D.; Stroock, A.D. The transpiration of water at negative pressures in a synthetic tree. Nature 2008, 455, 208–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. McDowell, N.G.; Pockman, W.T.; Allen, C.D.; Breshears, D.D.; Cobb, N.; Kolb, T.; Plaut, J.; Sperry, J.; West, A.; Williams, D.G.; et al. Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: Why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought? New Phytol. 2008, 178, 719–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Steudle, E. Transport of water in plants. Environ. Cont. Biol. 2002, 40, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kabata-Pendias, A.; Pendias, H. Biogeochemistry of Trace Elements; PWN: Warsaw, Poland, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  36. Chen, G.; Li, J.; Han, H.; Du, R.; Wang, X. Physiological and molecular mechanisms of plant responses to copper stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 12950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mazzafera, P.; Tezotto, T.; Polacco, J.C. Nickel in Plants. In Encyclopedia of Metalloproteins; Kretsinger, R.H., Uversky, V.N., Permyakov, E.A., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  38. Priya, A.K.; Muruganandam, M.; Ali, S.S.; Kornaros, M. Clean-up of heavy metals from contaminated soil by phytoremediation: A multidisciplinary and eco-friendly approach. Toxics 2023, 11, 422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. PN-ISO 10381-4; Soil Quality—Sampling—Part 4: Rules for Procedure During the Research Areas of Natural, Semi-Natural and Cultivated. The International Organization for Standardization (ISO): Geneva, Switzerland, 2007.
  40. PN-ISO 10390; Agricultural Chemical Analysis of the Soil. Determination of pH. The International Organization for Standardization (ISO): Geneva, Switzerland, 1997.
  41. ASTMD2974-00; Standard Test Methods for Moisture, Ash, and Organic Matter of Peat and Other Organic Soils. American Society for Testing and Materials: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2000.
  42. Schumacher, B.A. Methods for the Determination of Total Organic Carbon (TOC) in Soils and Sediments; United States Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Sciences Division, National Exposure Research Laboratory: Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  43. PN-ISO 11259; Soil Quality—Simplified Soil Description. The International Organization for Standardization (ISO): Geneva, Switzerland, 2001.
  44. Dybczyński, R.; Danko, B.; Kulisa, K.; Maleszewska, E.; Motrenko, H.P.; Samczynski, Z.; Szopa, Z. Preparation and preliminary certification of two new Polish CRMs for inorganic trace analysis. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2004, 259, 409–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kanwar, V.S.; Sharma, A.; Srivastav, A.L.; Rani, L. Phytoremediation of toxic metals present in soil and water environment: A critical review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2020, 27, 44835–44860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Arole, K.; Velhal, M.; Tajedini, M.; Xavier, G.P.; Bardasz, E.; Green, M.J.; Liang, H. Impacts of particles released from vehicles on environment and health. Tribol. Int. 2023, 184, 108417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ahmad, W.; Alharthy, R.D.; Zubair, M. Toxic and heavy metals contamination assessment in soil and water to evaluate human health risk. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 17006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Li, G.; Sun, G.-X.; Ren, Y.; Luo, X.-S.; Zhu, Y.-G. Urban soil and human health: A review. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2018, 69, 196–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Regulation of the Minister of Environment. Item 1395, 1 August 2016. Available online: https://eli.gov.pl/api/acts/DU/2016/1395/text/O/D20161395.pdf (accessed on 25 May 2025).
  50. Ichimura, K.Y.; Kawabata, M.; Kishimoto, R.; Goto, K.Y. Shortage of soluble carbohydrates is largely responsible for short vase life of cut ‘Sonia’ rose flowers. J. Jpn. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2003, 72, 292–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yamada, K.; Norikoshi, R.; Suzuki, K.; Nishijima, T.; Iman, H.; Ichimura, K. Cell division and expansion growth during rose petal development. J. Jpn. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2009, 78, 356–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Khoshgoftarmanesh, A.H.; Khademi, H.; Hosseini, F.; Aghajani, R. Influence of additional micronutrient supply on growth, nutritional status and flower quality of three rose cultivars in a soilless culture. J. Plant Nut. 2008, 31, 1543–1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yruela, I. Copper in plants: Acquisition, transport and interactions. Funct. Plant Biol. 2009, 36, 409–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Norikoshi, R.; Shibata, T.; Niki, T.; Ichimura, K. Sucrose treatment enlarges petal cell size and increases vacuolar sugar concentrations in cut rose flowers. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2016, 116, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Norikoshi, R.; Shibata, T.; Ichimura, K. Cell division and expansion in petals during flower development and opening in Eustoma grandiflorum. Hortic. J. 2015, 85, 154–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Beauzamy, L.; Nakayama, N.; Boudaoud, A. Flowers under pressure: Ins and outs of turgor regulation in development. Ann. Bot. 2014, 114, 1517–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Evans, R.Y.; Reid, M.S. Changes in carbohydrates and osmotic potential during rhythmic expansion of rose petals. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1988, 113, 884–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Horibe, T.; Yamada, K. Petal growth physiology of cut rose flowers: Progress and future prospects. J. Hortic. Res. 2017, 25, 5–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Norikoshi, R.; Kohata, K.; Shimizu-Yumoto, H.; Goto, R.; Ichimura, K. Identification of soluble carbohydrates and their subcellular concentrations in petals during flower opening in Eustoma grandiflorum. Hortic. J. 2016, 85, 238–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ohmiya, A.; Hirashima, M.; Yagi, M.; Tanase, K.; Yamamizo, C. Identification of genes associated with chlorophyll accumulation in flower petals. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Tanaka, Y.; Sasaki, N.; Ohmiya, A. Biosynthesis of plant pigments: Anthocyanins, betalains and carotenoids. Plant J. 2008, 54, 733–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sakuta, M.; Ohmiya, A. Pigment biosynthesis II: Betacyanins and carotenoids. In Plant Metabolism and Biotechnology; Crozier, A., Ashihara, H., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons. Ltd.: West Sussex, UK, 2011; pp. 343–371. [Google Scholar]
  63. Kim, J.; Eichacker, L.A.; Rudiger, W.; Mullet, J.E. Chlorophyll regulates accumulation of the plastidencoded chlorophyll proteins P700 and D1 by increasing apoprotein stability. Plant Physiol. 1994, 104, 907–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Croce, R. Chlorophyll-binding proteins of higher plants and cyanobacteria. Photosynthesis 2012, 34, 127–149. [Google Scholar]
  65. Weiss, D.; Shomer-Ilan, A.; Vainstein, A.; Halevy, H. Photosynthesis carbon fixation in the corollas of Petunia hybrida. Physiol. Plant 1990, 78, 345–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Lysenko, D. Anthocyanin-dependent anoxygenic photosynthesis in colored flower petals? Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 3373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Cavallini-Speisser, Q.; Morel, P.; Monniaux, M. Petal Cellular Identities. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 745507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Adamczyk-Szabela, D.; Wolf, W.M. The influence of copper and zinc on photosynthesis and phenolic levels in basil (Ocimum basilicum L.), borage (Borago officinalis L.), common Nettle (Urtica dioica L.) and peppermint (Mentha piperita L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 3612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Adamczyk-Szabela, D.; Lisowska, K.; Romanowska-Duda, Z.; Wolf, W.M. Associated effects of cadmium and copper alter the heavy metals uptake by Melissa offcinalis. Molecules 2019, 24, 2458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Locations of soils and rose petals sampling in the city of Kutno.
Figure 1. Locations of soils and rose petals sampling in the city of Kutno.
Sustainability 17 04939 g001
Figure 2. Spatial distribution of the bioavailable and total copper (a), zinc (b), cadmium (c), nickel (d), lead (e) and chromium (f) contents in soils of Kutno city, according to the used IDW interpolation method.
Figure 2. Spatial distribution of the bioavailable and total copper (a), zinc (b), cadmium (c), nickel (d), lead (e) and chromium (f) contents in soils of Kutno city, according to the used IDW interpolation method.
Sustainability 17 04939 g002
Figure 3. Copper, zinc (a), nickel, lead and chromium (b) contents in the Gebrüder Grim variety with relevant standard deviations (n = 5).
Figure 3. Copper, zinc (a), nickel, lead and chromium (b) contents in the Gebrüder Grim variety with relevant standard deviations (n = 5).
Sustainability 17 04939 g003
Figure 4. Copper, zinc (a), nickel, lead and chromium (b) contents in the Bad Birnbach variety with relevant standard deviations (n = 5).
Figure 4. Copper, zinc (a), nickel, lead and chromium (b) contents in the Bad Birnbach variety with relevant standard deviations (n = 5).
Sustainability 17 04939 g004
Figure 5. Copper, zinc (a), nickel, lead and chromium (b) contents in the Lady Kutno variety with relevant standard deviations (n = 5).
Figure 5. Copper, zinc (a), nickel, lead and chromium (b) contents in the Lady Kutno variety with relevant standard deviations (n = 5).
Sustainability 17 04939 g005
Table 1. Analysis of soil samples taken from selected locations (Figure 1) in Kutno.
Table 1. Analysis of soil samples taken from selected locations (Figure 1) in Kutno.
Location NumberpH Average ValueOrganic Matter [%]
17.593.51
27.064.22
37.484.03
47.643.18
57.393.96
67.484.11
77.624.87
87.613.42
97.374.57
107.553.77
117.554.20
127.064.48
136.823.13
Table 2. Heavy metal contents in rose petals grown in Kutno city area. The number of samples n = 5; probability level p = 0.05.
Table 2. Heavy metal contents in rose petals grown in Kutno city area. The number of samples n = 5; probability level p = 0.05.
Location NumberVarietyMetal Content of Rose Petals μg·g−1
CuZnCdNiPbCr
1Gebrüder Grim5.24 ± 0.3727.0 ± 1.5<0.00200.68 ± 0.030.26 ± 0.010.11 ± 0.002
2Artemis3.93 ± 0.1818.2 ± 0.90.0281 ± 0.00060.78 ± 0.050.78 ± 0.050.33 ± 0.04
Apache4.08 ± 0.1515.1 ± 0.60.0123 ± 0.00030.39 ± 0.040.21 ± 0.030.068 ± 0.004
Charmant5.94 ± 0.1513.5 ± 0.30.0025 ± 0.00010.43 ± 0.050.36 ± 0.050.14 ± 0.02
Cherry Girl4.88 ± 0.1119.4 ± 0.4<0.00200.12 ± 0.020.35 ± 0.030.054 ± 0.002
Gebrüder Grim6.28 ± 0.2922.4 ± 0.5<0.00200.52 ± 0.030.30 ± 0.010.017 ± 0.003
Bad Birnbach5.97 ± 0.1613.3 ± 0.7<0.00200.39 ± 0.050.11 ± 0.030.059 ± 0.005
Orient Express3.21 ± 0.2117.2 ± 0.40.0023 ± 0.00010.56 ± 0.040.31 ± 0.03 0.21 ± 0.02
Rosa rugosa “Hansa”4.76 ± 0.1220.1 ± 0.50.0050 ± 0.00010.31 ± 0.03<0.00230.022 ± 0.002
Diamant4.49 ± 0.2011.7 ± 0.20.0024 ± 0.00010.21 ± 0.01<0.00230.038 ± 0.002
Lady Kutno8.07 ± 0.4631.7 ± 1.1<0.00201.21 ± 0.020.39 ± 0.020.025 ± 0.003
3Nina6.84 ± 0.3022.5 ± 0.60.012 ± 0.00020.43 ± 0.030.36 ± 0.020.12 ± 0.01
Queen Elizabeth2.30 ± 0.1013.8 ± 0.3<0.00200.056 ± 0.0010.35 ± 0.020.011 ± 0.001
4Apache4.91 ± 0.2012.4 ± 0.30.0049 ± 0.00010.80 ± 0.040.017 ± 0.0010.14 ± 0.01
Bad Birnbach6.02 ± 0.1715.4 ± 0.80.0025 ± 0.00010.35 ± 0.040.15 ± 0.020.12 ± 0.02
5Artemis3.47 ± 0.1213.8 ± 0.20.0071 ± 0.0010.23 ± 0.011.03 ± 0.020.094 ± 0.002
6Marathon7.02 ± 0.4320.2 ± 0.40.0050 ± 0.00011.04 ± 0.050.91 ± 0.050.23 ± 0.01
7Nina3.35 ± 0.1315.9 ± 0.3<0.00200.37 ± 0.020.017 ± 0.0010.098 ± 0.005
Queen Elizabeth3.99 ± 0.0814.6 ± 0.20.0025 ± 0.00010.042 ± 0.0010.24 ± 0.010.023 ± 0.001
8Cherry Girl5.89 ± 0.1914.2 ± 0.30.0073 ± 0.00010.41 ± 0.030.39 ± 0.020.24 ± 0.02
Diamant6.09 ± 0.3116.8 ± 0.40.0049 ± 0.00010.28 ± 0.010.54 ± 0.030.37 ± 0.01
Rosa rugosa “Hansa”6.53 ± 0.3717.2 ± 0.40.0025 ± 0.00010.15 ± 0.010.11 ± 0.0080.020 ± 0.001
Orient Express8.06 ± 0.6119.4 ± 0.50.0024 ± 0.00010.37 ± 0.020.23 ± 0.010.17± 0.01
9Marathon3.94 ± 0.1116.7 ± 0.30.0025 ± 0.00010.43 ± 0.030.39 ± 0.020.32 ± 0.02
Charmant6.13 ± 0.1814.9 ± 0.3<0.00200.25 ± 0.010.17 ± 0.0070.097 ± 0.006
10Gebrüder Grim8.28 ± 0.2427.0 ± 0.50.0049 ± 0.00010.35 ± 0.020.56 ± 0.030.084 ± 0.007
Bad Birnbach3.37 ± 0.3513.9 ± 0.80.0025 ± 0.00010.55 ± 0.060.12 ± 0.030.10 ± 0.02
Lady Kutno8.79 ± 0.4528.0 ± 1.70.0023 ± 0.00011.21 ± 0.030.038 ± 0.0020.10 ± 0.03
11Bad Birnbach6.10 ± 0.3614.7 ± 0.70.0025 ± 0.00010.41 ± 0.030.099 ± 0.010.084 ± 0.010
12Gebrüder Grim6.04 ± 0.1515.5 ± 0.30.0025 ± 0.00010.23 ± 0.010.60 ± 0.040.056 ± 0.006
13Lady Kutno3.75 ± 0.3218.8 ± 0.4<0.00200.13 ± 0.02<0.0023<0.0030
Table 3. One-way ANOVA for copper, zinc, nickel, lead and chromium contents in petals of three rose species across location (For Bad Birnbach, location 2, 4, 10, 11; Fcryt = 3.2389. For Gebrüder Grim, location 1, 2, 10, 12; Fcryt = 3.2389. For Lady Kutno, location 2, 10, 13; Fcryt = 3.8853).
Table 3. One-way ANOVA for copper, zinc, nickel, lead and chromium contents in petals of three rose species across location (For Bad Birnbach, location 2, 4, 10, 11; Fcryt = 3.2389. For Gebrüder Grim, location 1, 2, 10, 12; Fcryt = 3.2389. For Lady Kutno, location 2, 10, 13; Fcryt = 3.8853).
CuZnNiPbCr
Bad BirnbachF = 111.3649
p = 6.22 × 10−11
F = 4.8588
p = 1.37 × 10−2
F = 12.6996
p = 1.68 × 10−4
F = 2.5637
p = 9.11 × 10−2
F = 12.3475
p = 1.96 × 10−4
Gebrüder GrimF = 105.7409
p = 9.23 × 10−11
F = 284.2421
p = 4.38 × 10−14
F = 73.3449
p = 1.44 × 10−9
F = 78.0890
p = 9.05 × 10−10
F = 89.6899
p = 3.20 × 10−10
Lady KutnoF = 210.7356
p = 4.50 × 10−10
F = 130.8882
p = 7.09 × 10−9
F = 3124.50
p = 4.96 × 10−17
F = 2685.15
p = 1.23 × 10−16
F = 51.0783
p = 1.35 × 10−6
Table 4. One-way ANOVA for copper, zinc, nickel, lead and chromium contents across rose petals of Gebrüder Grim, Artemis, Apache, Charmant, Cherry Girl, Gebrüder Grim, Bad Birnbach, Orient Express, Rosa rugosa “Hansa”, Diamant, Lady Kutno in location 2; Fcryt = 2.1240.
Table 4. One-way ANOVA for copper, zinc, nickel, lead and chromium contents across rose petals of Gebrüder Grim, Artemis, Apache, Charmant, Cherry Girl, Gebrüder Grim, Bad Birnbach, Orient Express, Rosa rugosa “Hansa”, Diamant, Lady Kutno in location 2; Fcryt = 2.1240.
CuZnNiPbCr
F = 186.0752
p = 9.38 × 10−30
F = 285.5443
p = 2.16 × 10−33
F = 263.7759
p = 1.03 × 10−32
F = 183.1288
p = 1.28 × 10−29
F = 143.6139
p = 1.42 × 10−27
Table 5. Bioaccumulation factor (p) for rose petals in different locations.
Table 5. Bioaccumulation factor (p) for rose petals in different locations.
Location NumberRose VarietyBAF(p) Factors
1Gebrüder GrimCu > Zn > Ni > Cr > Pb > Cd
2ArtemisCu > Zn > Ni > Cd > Cr > Pb
ApacheCu > Zn > Ni > Cd > Cr > Pb
CharmantCu > Zn > Ni > Cr > Pb > Cd
Cherry GirlCu > Zn > Ni > Cr > Pb > Cd
Gebrüder GrimCu > Zn > Ni > Pb > Cr > Cd
Bad BirnbachCu > Zn > Ni > Cr > Pb > Cd
Orient ExpressCu > Zn > Ni > Cr > Pb > Cd
Rosa rugosa “Hansa”Cu > Zn > Ni > Cd > Cr > Pb
DiamantCu > Zn > Ni > Cr > Cd > Pb
Lady KutnoCu > Zn > Ni > Pb > Cr > Cd
3NinaCu > Zn > Ni > Pb > Cr > Cd
Queen ElizabethZn > Cu > Pb >Ni > Cr > Cd
4ApacheCu > Zn > Ni > Cr > Cd > Pb
Bad BirnbachCu > Zn > Ni > Cr > Cd > Pb
5ArtemisCu > Zn > Ni > Pb > Cr > Cd
6MarathonNi > Cu > Zn > Cr > Pb > Cd
7NinaZn > Cu > Ni > Cr > Pb > Cd
Queen ElizabethZn > Cu > Ni > Cr > Pb > Cd
8Cherry GirlCu > Zn > Ni > Cr > Cd > Pb
DiamantCu > Cr > Zn > Ni > Pb > Cd
Rosa rugosa “Hansa”Cu > Zn > Ni > Cr > Pb = Cd
Orient ExpressCu > Zn > Ni > Cr > Pb > Cd
9MarathonCu > Ni > Zn > Cr > Pb > Cd
CharmantCu > Zn > Ni > Cr > Pb > Cd
10Gebrüder GrimCu > Zn > Ni > Cr > Pb > Cd
Bad BirnbachCu > Zn > Ni > Cr > Cd > Pb
Lady KutnoCu > Zn > Ni > Cr > Cd > Pb
11Bad BirnbachCu > Zn > Ni > Cr > Cd > Pb
12Gebrüder GrimCu > Zn > Ni > Pb > Cr > Cd
13Lady KutnoCu > Zn > Ni > Cr > Cd = Pb
Table 6. Bioaccumulation factors BAF(p) calculated for Gebrüder Grim, Bad Birnbach and Lady Kutno rose petals. Elements are shown in decreasing order of particular factor. Each value is the average of the data from five replicates.
Table 6. Bioaccumulation factors BAF(p) calculated for Gebrüder Grim, Bad Birnbach and Lady Kutno rose petals. Elements are shown in decreasing order of particular factor. Each value is the average of the data from five replicates.
Location NumberBioaccumulation Factor (p)
Gebrüder Grim
1Cu > Zn > Ni > Cr > Pb > Cd
2Cu > Zn > Ni > Pb > Cr > Cd
10Cu > Zn > Ni > Cr > Pb > Cd
12Cu > Zn > Ni > Pb > Cr > Cd
Bad Birnbach
2Cu > Zn > Ni > Cr > Pb > Cd
4Cu > Zn > Ni > Cr > Pb > Cd
10Cu > Zn > Ni > Cr > Cd > Pb
11Cu > Zn > Ni > Cr > Cd > Pb
Lady Kutno
2Cu > Zn > Ni > Pb > Cr > Cd
10Cu > Zn > Ni > Cr > Cd > Pb
11Cu > Zn > Ni > Cr > Cd > Pb
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Krakowiak, D.; Adamczyk-Szabela, D.; Szczesio, M.; Wolf, W.M. Roses in the City Environment: A Heavy Metals Case Study. Sustainability 2025, 17, 4939. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17114939

AMA Style

Krakowiak D, Adamczyk-Szabela D, Szczesio M, Wolf WM. Roses in the City Environment: A Heavy Metals Case Study. Sustainability. 2025; 17(11):4939. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17114939

Chicago/Turabian Style

Krakowiak, Dawid, Dorota Adamczyk-Szabela, Małgorzata Szczesio, and Wojciech M. Wolf. 2025. "Roses in the City Environment: A Heavy Metals Case Study" Sustainability 17, no. 11: 4939. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17114939

APA Style

Krakowiak, D., Adamczyk-Szabela, D., Szczesio, M., & Wolf, W. M. (2025). Roses in the City Environment: A Heavy Metals Case Study. Sustainability, 17(11), 4939. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17114939

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop