The Impact of Social Media Activities on Marine and Coastal Litter in Cyprus
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Scope and Objectives of the Study
- To assess the effectiveness of social media campaigns in raising public awareness about marine litter in Cyprus.
- To evaluate the role of community-based organizations in utilizing social media to engage the public and foster behavioral change.
- To identify the challenges and limitations of using social media as a tool for environmental advocacy, with a particular focus on achieving sustained, long-term impact.
1.2. Importance of the Study
1.3. Literature Review
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Research Design
2.2. Data Collection
2.3. Content Analysis
2.4. Interviews
2.5. Engagement Metrics
2.6. Data Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Interviews with Community Action Groups
3.2. Sentiment Analysis Findings
3.3. Engagement Metrics Analysis
3.4. Visual Content Dominance
3.5. Action-Oriented Posts
3.6. Polarized Responses to Advocacy
3.7. Comparative Analysis of Campaign Effectiveness
- Primary Audience: Youth (18–34)
- Content Strength: Visual media (Stories, Reels)
- Engagement Type: High visual interaction
- Effectiveness Summary: Most effective for awareness and reach
- Primary Audience: Middle-aged and older users
- Content Strength: Informational posts
- Engagement Type: Moderate interaction, less dynamic
- Effectiveness Summary: Useful for broader reach, but engagement is inconsistent
- Primary Audience: Policymakers, academics, and professionals
- Content Strength: Text-based discussions and hashtags
- Engagement Type: Discourse-driven, low public interaction
- Effectiveness Summary: Best for advocacy and institutional dialogue
3.8. Long-Term Impacts of Social Media Campaigns
3.9. From Clicks to Action: Evaluating Clean-Up Events Through Social Media and Participation Data
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Recommendations
- Strengthening Social Media Campaign Strategies
- 2.
- Integrating Social Media with Offline Efforts
- 3.
- Enhancing Collaboration Among Stakeholders
- 4.
- Addressing Challenges of Misinformation and Sustained Engagement
- 5.
- Policy and Infrastructure Improvements
- 6.
- Monitoring and Measuring Impact
- 7.
- Leveraging Artificial Intelligence for Smarter Environmental Advocacy
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Derraik, J.G.B. The pollution of the marine environment by plastic debris: A review. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2002, 44, 842–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barnes, D.K.; Galgani, F.; Thompson, R.C.; Barlaz, M. Accumulation and fragmentation of plastic debris in global environments. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2009, 364, 1985–1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jambeck, J.R.; Geyer, R.; Wilcox, C.; Siegler, T.R.; Perryman, M.; Andrady, A.; Law, K.L. Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science 2015, 347, 768–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryan, P.G.; Moore, C.J.; van Franeker, J.A.; Moloney, C.L. Monitoring the abundance of plastic debris in the marine environment. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2009, 364, 1999–2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanke, G.; Canals, M.; Vescovo, V.; MacDonald, T.; Martini, E.; Ruiz-Orejón, L.F.; Galgani, F.; Palma, M.; Papatheodorou, G.; Ioakeimidis, C.; et al. Marine litter in the deepest site of the Mediterranean Sea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2025, 213, 117610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sbrana, A.; Galli, S.; Russo, T. The effect of marine litter on fishery economic performance. Fish. Res. 2025, 285, 107346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UNEP. Plastic Pollution & Marine Litter. United Nations Environment Programme. 2025. Available online: https://www.unep.org/resources (accessed on 17 April 2025).
- Kaplan, A.M.; Haenlein, M. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Bus. Horiz. 2010, 53, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, P.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, R.; Lin, Z.; Lu, N. Social media’s impact on environmental awareness: A marginal treatment effect analysis of WeChat usage in China. BMC Public Health 2024, 24, 3237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaeri, P.; Mohammadpour, Y.; Beigi, A.; Middel, A.; Liu, H. Sentiment and social signals in the climate crisis: A survey on analyzing social media responses to extreme weather events. arXiv 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amangeldi, D.; Usmanova, A.; Shamoi, P. Understanding environmental posts: Sentiment and emotion analysis of social media data. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2312.03095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garcia-Garin, O.; Monleón-Getino, T.; López-Brosa, P.; Borrell, A.; Aguilar, A.; Borja-Robalino, R.; Cardona, L. Automatic detection and quantification of floating marine macro-litter in aerial images: Introducing a novel deep learning approach connected to a web application in R. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 273, 116490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kietzmann, J.H.; Paschen, J.; Treen, E.R. Artificial intelligence in advertising: How marketers can leverage AI to generate value. J. Advert. Res. 2018, 58, 263–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giachanou, A.; Crestani, F. Like it or not: A survey of Twitter sentiment analysis methods. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 2016, 49, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UNEP/MAP. Marine Litter Assessment in the Mediterranean. United Nations Environment Programme. 2015. Available online: https://apps1.unep.org/resolutions/uploads/marine_litter_assessment_in_the_mediterranea-2015.pdf (accessed on 12 April 2025).
- Orthodoxou, D.L.; Loizidou, X.I.; Baldwin, C.; Kocareis, C.; Karonias, A.; Ateş, M.A. Seasonal and geographic variations of marine litter: A comprehensive study from the island of Cyprus. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2022, 177, 113495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Borrelle, S.B.; Ringma, J.; Law, K.L.; Monnahan, C.C.; Lebreton, L.; McGivern, A.; Murphy, E.; Jambeck, J.; Leonard, G.H.; Hilleary, M.A.; et al. Predicted growth in plastic waste exceeds efforts to mitigate plastic pollution. Science 2020, 369, 1515–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jirasit, A. The impact of social media campaigns on reducing plastic waste in Thailand’s coastal areas. Stud. Soc. Sci. Humanit. 2024, 3, 44–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tran, M.T. The Role of Social Media in Communicating Environmental Information From AI-Driven Geospatial Technologies. In Harnessing AI in Geospatial Technology for Environmental Monitoring and Management; Mobo, F., Ed.; IGI Global Scientific Publishing: Hershey, PA, USA, 2025; pp. 327–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islam, T.; Goldwasser, D. Post-hoc study of climate microtargeting on social media ads with LLMs: Thematic insights and fairness evaluation. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2410.05401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galaz, V.; Metzler, H.; Daume, S.; Olsson, A.; Lindström, B.; Marklund, A. AI could create a perfect storm of climate misinformation. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2306.12807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van der Ven, H.; Corry, D.; Elnur, R.; Provost, V.J.; Syukron, M. Generative AI and social media may exacerbate the climate crisis. Glob. Environ. Politics 2024, 24, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Binns, R.; Van Kleek, M.; Veale, M.; Lyngs, U.; Zhao, J.; Shadbolt, N. “It’s reducing a human being to a percentage”: Perceptions of justice in algorithmic decisions. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal, QC, Canada, 21–26 April 2018; Volume 377, pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ison, S.; Cvitanovic, C.; Pecl, G.T.; Hobday, A.J.; van Putten, I. The role of visual framing in marine conservation communication. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2024, 248, 106938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scherman, A.; Valenzuela, S.; Rivera, S. Youth environmental activism in the age of social media: The case of Chile (2009–2019). J. Youth Stud. 2021, 25, 751–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uwaga, M.A.; Ogunbiyi, E.O. Artificial intelligence in environmental conservation: Evaluating cyber risks and opportunities for sustainable practices. Comput. Sci. IT Res. J. 2024, 5, 1178–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Owusu-Berko, L. Harnessing big data, machine learning, and sentiment analysis to optimize customer engagement, loyalty, and market positioning. Int. J. Comput. Appl. Technol. Res. 2025, 14, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Oosterhout, L.; Dijkstra, H.; van Beukering, P.; Rehdanz, K.; Khedr, S.; Brouwer, R.; Duijndam, S. Public perceptions of marine plastic litter: A comparative study across European countries and seas. Front. Mar. Sci. 2022, 8, 784829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Owens, K.A. Using experiential marine debris education to make an impact: Collecting debris, informing policy makers, and influencing students. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2018, 127, 804–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tufekci, Z. Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest; Yale University Press: New Haven, CT, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sadek, S.S. Sustainable development of plastic pollution awareness campaigns on social media. Int. Des. J. 2021, 11, 339–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Löhr, A.; Broers, V.; Tabuenca, B.; Savelli, H.; Zwimpfer, T.; Folbert, M.; Brouns, F. Informing and inspiring worldwide action against marine litter: The impact of the Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) on Marine Litter. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2024, 198, 115811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paganelli, F.; Mylonas, G.; Cuffaro, G.; Nesi, I. Experiences from using gamification and IoT-based educational tools in high schools towards energy savings. arXiv 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Post Type | Content Example | Sentiment | Keywords | Engagement | Intensity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Visual pollution | Sea turtle entangled in plastic | Negative | “devastating”, “sad”, “horrible” | High | 5 |
Informational | Carousel about microplastics | Neutral | “interesting”, “informative” | Medium | 2 |
Clean-up event | Group photo + clean-up stats | Positive | “hopeful”, “great work” | High | 4 |
Policy criticism | Caption on failed recycling laws | Inconclusive | “corrupt”, “finally”, “hopeless” | Low | 3 |
Youth initiative | Teen-led animated video | Positive | “cute”, “important”, “respect” | Medium | 3 |
Post Type | Avg. Likes | Avg. Shares | Avg. Comments | Engagement Score * |
---|---|---|---|---|
Visual pollution | 870 | 120 | 95 | 1085 |
Event invitation | 640 | 210 | 60 | 910 |
Informational | 420 | 80 | 50 | 550 |
Policy critique | 500 | 60 | 110 | 670 |
Youth-led content | 750 | 140 | 90 | 980 |
Date | Event Name | Platform | Likes | Comments | Shares | In-Person Participants | Waste Collected (kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
15 January 2024 | Teneke Cocuk Clean-up Event #1 | 95 | 45 | 19 | 164 | 263 | |
14 February 2024 | Spot Turtle Project Clean-up Event #2 | 88 | 25 | 17 | 151 | 346 | |
26 February 2024 | Spot Turtle Project Clean-up Event #3 | 101 | 27 | 5 | 154 | 229 | |
14 February 2024 | Yesil Baris Hareketi Clean-up Event #4 | 127 | 16 | 18 | 174 | 195 | |
11 March 2024 | Yesil Baris Hareketi Clean-up Event #5 | 111 | 32 | 9 | 189 | 227 | |
19 May 2024 | Yesil Baris Hareketi Clean-up Event #6 | 143 | 22 | 11 | 183 | 350 | |
30 July 2024 | Yesil Baris Hareketi Clean-up Event #7 | 77 | 36 | 5 | 157 | 291 | |
2 September 2024 | Spot Turtle Project Clean-up Event #8 | 103 | 10 | 17 | 180 | 414 | |
5 October 2024 | Spot Turtle Project Clean-up Event #9 | 81 | 21 | 15 | 166 | 213 | |
25 June 2024 | Spot Turtle Project Clean-up Event #10 | 85 | 13 | 17 | 121 | 417 | |
2 August 2024 | Spot Turtle Project Clean-up Event #11 | 77 | 21 | 7 | 137 | 317 | |
26 May 2024 | Teneke Cocuk Clean-up Event #12 | 102 | 22 | 18 | 170 | 220 | |
9 January 2025 | Teneke Cocuk Clean-up Event #13 | 136 | 43 | 11 | 196 | 320 | |
19 March 2025 | Teneke Cocuk Clean-up Event #14 | 105 | 50 | 5 | 173 | 415 | |
4 November 2024 | Yesil Baris Hareketi Clean-up Event #15 | 89 | 31 | 17 | 181 | 407 | |
6 September 2024 | Teneke Cocuk Clean-up Event #16 | 133 | 38 | 19 | 231 | 237 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Emirzade, K.; Huseyinoglu, M.F. The Impact of Social Media Activities on Marine and Coastal Litter in Cyprus. Sustainability 2025, 17, 4821. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17114821
Emirzade K, Huseyinoglu MF. The Impact of Social Media Activities on Marine and Coastal Litter in Cyprus. Sustainability. 2025; 17(11):4821. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17114821
Chicago/Turabian StyleEmirzade, Kemal, and Mehmet Fatih Huseyinoglu. 2025. "The Impact of Social Media Activities on Marine and Coastal Litter in Cyprus" Sustainability 17, no. 11: 4821. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17114821
APA StyleEmirzade, K., & Huseyinoglu, M. F. (2025). The Impact of Social Media Activities on Marine and Coastal Litter in Cyprus. Sustainability, 17(11), 4821. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17114821