Leveraging ChatGPT to Aid Construction Hazard Recognition and Support Safety Education and Training
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Background
2.1. Construction Hazard Recognition
2.2. Construction Safety Education and Training
2.3. Leveraging ChatGPT for Safety Education and Training
3. Research Methods
3.1. Stage I: Pre-Intervention Hazard Recognition Ability Measurement
3.2. Stage II: Introducing ChatGPT as an Educational Intervention
As you engage in hazard recognition efforts, consider utilizing ChatGPT for assistance. For example, you may use the following example prompts or any others that you believe could be beneficial, as you work on cataloging relevant hazards:
- Present common construction hazards in general (as demonstrated in the class earlier);
- Present hazards posed by a specific work operation (e.g., welding, excavation, etc.);
- Present hazards posed by specific pieces of equipment or tools (e.g., cranes, nail guns, etc.).
3.3. Stage III: Post-Intervention Hazard Recognition Ability Measurement
- ChatGPT is easy to access, use, and navigate;
- The information offered by ChatGPT is clear, relevant, trustworthy, and reliable;
- I am satisfied with my experience of using ChatGPT;
- I plan to use ChatGPT in the future for educational and training purposes;
- I would recommend that ChatGPT be adopted more widely.
4. Data Analysis and Study Results
“I could not think of many hazards before using ChatGPT. ChatGPT helped me think about hazards that I would have otherwise overlooked.”
“ChatGPT offered examples of construction hazards to watch out for. That guidance was super helpful.”
“This should absolutely be used in the industry. Will help improve safety.”
“I can see how this will help in the industry for safety planning. I will be using it. Thank you for the class activity.”
“Thank you, Prof. [Name] for introducing us to this tool. This will help beyond this class and at work. This was a fun and unique class. We need more of these classes.”
“I found ChatGPT to be enjoyable to use in class. It is a tool that has proved to be extremely useful and helped with hazard reporting”
“Extremely useful service. The future is exciting. These tools are so helpful”
“ChatGPT is awesome. Way cooler than Google.”
“The software was at capacity and did not allow access initially”
“I was simply not able to get ChatGPT to work until it worked after more than 10 min”
“Why is it necessary to create an account to access this application. Should be accessible without one.”
“AI is sketchy and dangerous”
“I wish ChatGPT was more capable. It would be nice if I could upload the photographs to ChatGPT and it automatically detects and reports hazards and safety measures that I need.”
“I couldn’t figure out what work was going on. I could not get the help of ChatGPT for this reason. More information about the work will be needed.”
5. Study Contributions and Implications
6. Study Strengths, Limitations, and Proposed Future Research
7. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- U.S. Department of Labor. Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2019–2029; Bernan Press: Lanham, MD, USA, 2021; ISBN 978-1-64143-484-3.
- International Labour Organization. Good Practices and Challenges in Promoting Decent Work in Construction and Infrastructure Projects; ILO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015; p. 48. [Google Scholar]
- U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistic. Industries at a Glance: Construction: NAICS 23. Available online: https://www.bls.gov/iag/tgs/iag23.htm (accessed on 18 February 2023).
- American Society of Civil Engineers ASCE’s 2021 American Infrastructure Report Card | GPA: C-. ASCE’s 2021 Infrastructure Report Card | 2021. Available online: https://infrastructurereportcard.org (accessed on 18 February 2023).
- U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities. Available online: https://www.bls.gov/iif/ (accessed on 4 July 2021).
- Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety. Work Injury, Disease, and Fatality Statistics. Available online: https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/information/injury_statistics.html (accessed on 18 February 2023).
- Alsharef, A.; Albert, A.; Awolusi, I.; Jaselskis, E. Severe Injuries among Construction Workers: Insights from OSHA’s New Severe Injury Reporting Program. Saf. Sci. 2023, 163, 106126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beavers, J.E.; Moore, J.R.; Schriver, W.R. Steel Erection Fatalities in the Construction Industry. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2009, 135, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Overlapping Vulnerabilities: The Occupational Health and Safety of Young Immigrant Workers in Small Construction Firms; National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: Washington, DC, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Estimated Costs of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses and Estimated Impact on a Company’s Profitability Worksheet. Available online: https://www.osha.gov/safetypays/estimator (accessed on 18 February 2023).
- Waehrer, G.M.; Dong, X.S.; Miller, T.; Haile, E.; Men, Y. Costs of Occupational Injuries in Construction in the United States. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2007, 39, 1258–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Doloi, H.; Sawhney, A.; Iyer, K.C.; Rentala, S. Analysing Factors Affecting Delays in Indian Construction Projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2012, 30, 479–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alshihri, S.; Al-Gahtani, K.; Almohsen, A. Risk Factors That Lead to Time and Cost Overruns of Building Projects in Saudi Arabia. Buildings 2022, 12, 902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdelhamid, T.S.; Everett, J.G. Identifying Root Causes of Construction Accidents. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2000, 126, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hinze, J.; Pedersen, C.; Fredley, J. Identifying Root Causes of Construction Injuries. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 1998, 124, 67–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perlman, A.; Sacks, R.; Barak, R. Hazard Recognition and Risk Perception in Construction. Saf. Sci. 2014, 64, 22–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeelani, I.; Albert, A.; Azevedo, R.; Jaselskis, E.J. Development and Testing of a Personalized Hazard-Recognition Training Intervention. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2017, 143, 04016120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carter, G.; Smith, S.D. Safety Hazard Identification on Construction Projects. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2006, 132, 197–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Recommended Practices for Safety and Health Programs; Occupational Safety and Health Administration: Washington, DC, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Albert, A.; Hallowell, M.R.; Kleiner, B.M. Enhancing Construction Hazard Recognition and Communication with Energy-Based Cognitive Mnemonics and Safety Meeting Maturity Model: Multiple Baseline Study. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2014, 140, 04013042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jazayeri, E.; Dadi, G.B. Hazard Recognition and Risk Perception Skills among Union Electricians. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2020, 146, 04020108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bahn, S. Workplace Hazard Identification and Management: The Case of an Underground Mining Operation. Saf. Sci. 2013, 57, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uddin, S.M.J.; Albert, A.; Alsharef, A.; Pandit, B.; Patil, Y.; Nnaji, C. Hazard Recognition Patterns Demonstrated by Construction Workers. Int. J. Envirn. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fleming, M.; Fischer, B. Hazard Recognition: Bridging Knowledge & Competency for Process & Occupational Safety. Prof. Saf. 2017, 62, 52–61. [Google Scholar]
- Hardison, D.; Hallowell, M.; Littlejohn, R. Does the Format of Design Information Affect Hazard Recognition Performance in Construction Hazard Prevention through Design Reviews? Saf. Sci. 2020, 121, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Albert, A.; Jeelani, I.; Han, K. Developing Hazard Recognition Skill among the Next-Generation of Construction Professionals. Constr. Manag. Econ. 2020, 38, 1024–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hinze, J.; Godfrey, R.; Sullivan, J. Integration of Construction Worker Safety and Health in Assessment of Sustainable Construction. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2013, 139, 594–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- USGBC. New LEED Pilot Credit: Prevention through Design | U.S. Green Building Council. Available online: https://www.usgbc.org/articles/new-leed-pilot-credit-prevention-through-design (accessed on 16 April 2023).
- NIOSH. Integrating Occupational Safety and Health into the U.S. Green Building Council LEED New Construction Credits: A Preliminary Report. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/greenconstruction/pdfs/integratingoshintousgbc_leed_newconstructioncredits_june2011.pdf (accessed on 16 February 2023).
- Jeelani, I.; Albert, A.; Gambatese, J.A. Why Do Construction Hazards Remain Unrecognized at the Work Interface? J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2017, 143, 04016128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rozenfeld, O.; Sacks, R.; Rosenfeld, Y.; Baum, H. Construction Job Safety Analysis. Saf. Sci. 2010, 48, 491–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Job Hazard Analysis Guide. Available online: https://www.osha.gov/publications/publication-products?publication_title=3071 (accessed on 18 February 2023).
- The Center for Construction Research and Training. Pre-Task Planning Assessment ChecklistCPWR | Prevention through Augmented Pre-Task Planning. Available online: https://www.cpwr.com/research/current-research/prevention-through-augmented-pre-task-planning/ (accessed on 18 February 2023).
- Vishwas, H.S.; Gidwani, D.G.D. Hazards Identification and Risk Assessment in Metro Railway Line Construction Project at Hyderabad. Int. J. Eng. Res. 2017, V6, IJERTV6IS080126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Memarian, B.; Brooks, S.B.; Le, J.C. Obstacles and Solutions to Implementing Job Hazard Analysis in Construction: A Case Study. Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res. 2022, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borys, D. The Role of Safe Work Method Statements in the Australian Construction Industry. Saf. Sci. 2012, 50, 210–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, B.H.; Yiu, T.W.; González, V.A. Predicting Safety Behavior in the Construction Industry: Development and Test of an Integrative Model. Saf. Sci. 2016, 84, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Namian, M.; Albert, A.; Zuluaga, C.M.; Behm, M. Role of Safety Training: Impact on Hazard Recognition and Safety Risk Perception. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2016, 142, 04016073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilkins, J.R. Construction Workers’ Perceptions of Health and Safety Training Programmes. Constr. Manag. Econ. 2011, 29, 1017–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burke, M.J.; Salvador, R.O.; Smith-Crowe, K.; Chan-Serafin, S.; Smith, A.; Sonesh, S. The Dread Factor: How Hazards and Safety Training Influence Learning and Performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 2011, 96, 46–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhandari, S.; Hallowell, M.R.; Correll, J. Making Construction Safety Training Interesting: A Field-Based Quasi-Experiment to Test the Relationship between Emotional Arousal and Situational Interest among Adult Learners. Saf. Sci. 2019, 117, 58–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Namian, M.; Albert, A.; Zuluaga, C.M.; Jaselskis, E.J. Improving Hazard-Recognition Performance and Safety Training Outcomes: Integrating Strategies for Training Transfer. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2016, 142, 04016048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, X.; Liao, P.-C. Re-Assessing Hazard Recognition Ability in Occupational Environment with Microvascular Function in the Brain. Saf. Sci. 2019, 120, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haslam, R.A.; Hide, S.A.; Gibb, A.G.F.; Gyi, D.E.; Pavitt, T.; Atkinson, S.; Duff, A.R. Contributing Factors in Construction Accidents. Appl. Ergon. 2005, 36, 401–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pandit, B.; Albert, A.; Patil, Y.; Al-Bayati, A.J. Impact of Safety Climate on Hazard Recognition and Safety Risk Perception. Saf. Sci. 2019, 113, 44–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toole, T.M. Construction Site Safety Roles. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2002, 128, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hardison, D.; Behm, M.; Hallowell, M.R.; Fonooni, H. Identifying Construction Supervisor Competencies for Effective Site Safety. Saf. Sci. 2014, 65, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mroszczyk, J.W. Improving Construction Safety: A Team Effort. Prof. Saf. 2015, 60, 55–68. [Google Scholar]
- Government of Canada, Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety. Health and Safety Legislation in Canada—Basic Responsibilities: OSH Answers. Available online: https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/legisl/responsi.html (accessed on 23 February 2023).
- Choudhry, R.M.; Fang, D.; Ahmed, S.M. Safety Management in Construction: Best Practices in Hong Kong. J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 2008, 134, 20–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Duties of a “Construction Manager” on a Multi-Employer Worksite. | Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Available online: https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/standardinterpretations/1993-08-05-1 (accessed on 23 February 2023).
- Toole, T.M. Increasing Engineers’ Role in Construction Safety: Opportunities and Barriers. J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 2005, 131, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gambatese, J.A.; Gibb, A.G.; Brace, C.; Tymvios, N. Motivation for Prevention through Design: Experiential Perspectives and Practice. Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 2017, 22, 04017017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lingard, H.; Pirzadeh, P.; Blismas, N.; Wakefield, R.; Kleiner, B. Exploring the Link between Early Constructor Involvement in Project Decision-Making and the Efficacy of Health and Safety Risk Control. Constr. Manag. Econ. 2014, 32, 918–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toole, T.M.; Gambatese, J.A.; Abowitz, D.A. Owners’ Role in Facilitating Prevention through Design. J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 2017, 143, 04016012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weinstein, M.; Gambatese, J.; Hecker, S. Can Design Improve Construction Safety?: Assessing the Impact of a Collaborative Safety-in-Design Process. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2005, 131, 1125–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soh, J.; Jeong, J.; Jeong, J. Improvements of Design for Safety in Construction through Multi-Participants Perception Analysis. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 4550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martínez Aires, M.D.; Rubio Gámez, M.C.; Gibb, A. Prevention through Design: The Effect of European Directives on Construction Workplace Accidents. Saf. Sci. 2010, 48, 248–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bong, S.; Rameezdeen, R.; Zuo, J.; Li, R.Y.M.; Ye, G. The Designer’s Role in Workplace Health and Safety in the Construction Industry: Post-Harmonized Regulations in South Australia. Int. J. Constr. Manag. 2015, 15, 276–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asmone, A.S.; Goh, Y.M.; Lim, M.S.H. Prioritization of Industry Level Interventions to Improve Implementation of Design for Safety Regulations. J. Saf. Res. 2022, 82, 352–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, B.H.W.; Weston, R.; Jianphinitnan, P.; Liu, W.; Scheepbouwer, E.; van der Walt, D.; Goh, Y.M. A Regulatory Perspective on Safety in Design Practices in New Zealand. Saf. Sci. 2021, 141, 105352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Che Ibrahim, C.K.I.; Manu, P.; Belayutham, S.; Mahamadu, A.-M.; Antwi-Afari, M.F. Design for Safety (DfS) Practice in Construction Engineering and Management Research: A Review of Current Trends and Future Directions. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 52, 104352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahn, Y.H.; Annie, R.P.; Kwon, H. Key Competencies for U.S. Construction Graduates: Industry Perspective. J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 2012, 138, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pariafsai, F.; Behzadan, A.H. Core Competencies for Construction Project Management: Literature Review and Content Analysis. J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 2021, 147, 04021010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benhart, B.L.; Shaurette, M. Establishing New Graduate Competencies: Purdue University’s Construction Management Curriculum Restructuring. Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res. 2014, 10, 19–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clevenger, C.M.; Brothers, H.; Abdallah, M.; Wolf, K. Initial Assessment of a Newly Launched Interdisciplinary Construction Engineering Management Graduate Program. J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 2017, 143, 04017001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cortés, J.M.; Pellicer, E.; Catalá, J. Integration of Occupational Risk Prevention Courses in Engineering Degrees: Delphi Study. J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 2012, 138, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petersen, A.K.; Reynolds, J.H.; Ng, L.W.T. The Attitude of Civil Engineering Students towards Health and Safety Risk Management: A Case Study. Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 2008, 33, 499–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gambatese, J.A. Safety emphasis in university engineering and construction programs. University of Florida: Gainesville, FL, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Lindholm, M.; Väyrynen, S.; Reiman, A. Findings and Views on Occupational Safety and Health Teaching at Universities. WOR 2019, 64, 685–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zaneldin, E.K.; Sweedan, A.M.I.; Maraqa, M.A. Extent of Construction Safety in the Engineering Curricula from the Perspective of Practitioners in the MENA Region. In Proceedings of the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana, 15 June 2014; pp. 24.589.1–24.589.12. [Google Scholar]
- Pedro, A.; Le, Q.T.; Park, C.S. Framework for Integrating Safety into Construction Methods Education through Interactive Virtual Reality. J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 2016, 142, 04015011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pedro, A.; Chien, P.H.; Park, C.S. Towards a Competency-Based Vision for Construction Safety Education. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2018, 143, 012051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Awolusi, I.; Sulbaran, T.; Song, S.; Nnaji, C.; Ostadalimakhmalbaf, M. Safety Education in the Curriculum of Construction Programs. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management (ICCEPM 2022), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 20–23 June 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Bernold, L.E. Paradigm Shift in Construction Education Is Vital for the Future of Our Profession. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2005, 131, 533–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vorster, M.C. Teaching and Learning: The Critical Balance in Effective Education. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2011, 137, 916–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le, Q.T.; Pedro, A.; Park, C.S. A Social Virtual Reality Based Construction Safety Education System for Experiential Learning. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 2015, 79, 487–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dzeng, R.-J.; Hsueh, H.-H.; Chang, R.-N. 3D Game-Based Training System for Hazard Identification on Construction Site. In Proceedings of the 2015 12th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD), Zhangjiajie, China, 15–17 August 2015; pp. 2453–2458. [Google Scholar]
- Bhandari, S.; Hallowell, M.R. Emotional Engagement in Safety Training: Impact of Naturalistic Injury Simulations on the Emotional State of Construction Workers. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2017, 143, 04017090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galbraith, D.D.; Fouch, S.E. Principles of Adult Learning Application to Safety Training. Prof. Saf. 2007, 52, 35–40. [Google Scholar]
- Albert, A.; Hallowel, M.R. Revamping Occupational Safety and Health Training: Integrating Andragogical Principles for the Adult Learner. Australas. J. Constr. Econ. Build. 2013, 13, 128–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loosemore, M.; Malouf, N. Safety Training and Positive Safety Attitude Formation in the Australian Construction Industry. Saf. Sci. 2019, 113, 233–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tam, C.M.; Zeng, S.X.; Deng, Z.M. Identifying Elements of Poor Construction Safety Management in China. Saf. Sci. 2004, 42, 569–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- OpenAI. ChatGPT: Optimizing Language Models for Dialogue. Available online: https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt/ (accessed on 24 February 2023).
- Gao, C.A.; Howard, F.M.; Markov, N.S.; Dyer, E.C.; Ramesh, S.; Luo, Y.; Pearson, A.T. Comparing Scientific Abstracts Generated by ChatGPT to Original Abstracts Using an Artificial Intelligence Output Detector, Plagiarism Detector, and Blinded Human Reviewers. bioRxiv 2022, bioRxiv:2022.12.23.521610. [Google Scholar]
- Rudolph, J.; Tan, S.; Tan, S. ChatGPT: Bullshit Spewer or the End of Traditional Assessments in Higher Education? J. Appl. Learn. Teach. 2023, 6, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, K. ChatGPT Sets Record for Fastest-Growing User Base—Analyst Note. Reuters 2023, 12, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Network, T.L. What Students Are Saying about ChatGPT. The New York Times, 2 February 2023. [Google Scholar]
- What Might ChatGPT Be Able to Do for You and Your Students? Available online: https://www.middleweb.com/48319/introducing-chatgpt-to-your-classroom/ (accessed on 24 February 2023).
- Livemint. How to Use OpenAI’s ChatGPT to Solve Coding-Related Problems. Available online: https://www.livemint.com/technology/tech-news/how-to-use-openai-s-chatgpt-to-solve-coding-related-problems-11672745074892.html (accessed on 24 February 2023).
- King, M.; ChatGPT Can Find Errors and Fix Your Code! I Ran Some Tests in Python to Verify. Medium. 2023. Available online: https://medium.com/@neonforge/chatgpt-can-find-errors-and-fix-your-code-i-ran-some-tests-in-python-to-verify-4ad913fd297f (accessed on 12 February 2023).
- How to Use ChatGPT to Write Emails. Available online: https://www.griproom.com/fun/how-to-use-chatgpt-to-write-emails (accessed on 24 February 2023).
- Aydın, Ö.; Karaarslan, E. OpenAI ChatGPT Generated Literature Review: Digital Twin in Healthcare 2022. Available at SSRN 430 8687.
- Wang, S.; Scells, H.; Koopman, B.; Zuccon, G. Can ChatGPT Write a Good Boolean Query for Systematic Review Literature Search? arXiv 2023, arXiv:2302.03495. [Google Scholar]
- ChatGPT in Advertising: Will Clients Pay the Same for AI-Generated Campaigns? | Advertising. Available online: https://www.campaignasia.com/article/chatgpt-in-advertising-will-clients-pay-the-same-for-ai-generated-campaigns/483021 (accessed on 24 February 2023).
- ChatGPT Writes a Mint Mobile Ad; 2023. Available online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_eHjifELI-k (accessed on 1 March 2023).
- How to Use Chat GPT to Write a Screenplay. Available online: https://www.griproom.com/fun/how-to-use-chat-gpt-to-write-a-screenplay (accessed on 24 February 2023).
- Kim, S. Writing a Film Script Using AI—OpenAI ChatGPT. Geek Culture. 2022. Available online: https://medium.com/geekculture/writing-a-film-script-using-ai-openai-chatgpt-e339fe498fc9 (accessed on 16 February 2023).
- Terwiesch, C. Would Chat GPT3 Get a Wharton MBA? Available online: https://mackinstitute.wharton.upenn.edu/2023/would-chat-gpt3-get-a-wharton-mba-new-white-paper-by-christian-terwiesch (accessed on 24 February 2023).
- Choi, J.H.; Hickman, K.E.; Monahan, A.; Schwarcz, D. ChatGPT Goes to Law School. 2023. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4335905 (accessed on 6 March 2023).
- Kung, T.H.; Cheatham, M.; ChatGPT; Medenilla, A.; Sillos, C.; Leon, L.D.; Elepaño, C.; Madriaga, M.; Aggabao, R.; Diaz-Candido, G.; et al. Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-Assisted Medical Education Using Large Language Models. PLoS Digit. Health 2023, 2, e0000198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gilson, A.; Safranek, C.; Huang, T.; Socrates, V.; Chi, L.; Taylor, R.A.; Chartash, D. How Does ChatGPT Perform on the Medical Licensing Exams? The Implications of Large Language Models for Medical Education and Knowledge Assessment. medRxiv 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mbakwe, A.B.; Lourentzou, I.; Celi, L.A.; Mechanic, O.J.; Dagan, A. ChatGPT Passing USMLE Shines a Spotlight on the Flaws of Medical Education. PLoS Digit. Health 2023, 2, e0000205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Landi, H. Doximity Rolls Out Beta Version of ChatGPT Tool for Docs Aiming to Streamline Administrative Paperwork. Available online: https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/health-tech/doximity-rolls-out-beta-version-chatgpt-tool-docs-aiming-streamline-administrative (accessed on 24 February 2023).
- Biswas, S. ChatGPT and the Future of Medical Writing. Radiology 2023, 223312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zaremba, A.; Demir, E. ChatGPT: Unlocking the Future of NLP in Finance. SSRN. 2023. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4323643 (accessed on 6 March 2023).
- ABA Journal. The Case for ChatGPT: Why Lawyers Should Embrace AI. Available online: https://www.abajournal.com/columns/article/the-case-for-chatgpt-why-lawyers-should-embrace-ai (accessed on 24 February 2023).
- Khalil, M.; Er, E. Will ChatGPT Get You Caught? Rethinking of Plagiarism Detection. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2302.04335. [Google Scholar]
- Marche, S. The College Essay Is Dead. Available online: https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2022/12/chatgpt-ai-writing-college-student-essays/672371/ (accessed on 24 February 2023).
- Stokel-Walker, C. AI Bot ChatGPT Writes Smart Essays—Should Professors Worry. Nature 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Susnjak, T. ChatGPT: The End of Online Exam Integrity? arXiv 2022, arXiv:2212.09292. [Google Scholar]
- Cotton, D.R.E.; Cotton, P.A.; Shipway, J.R. Chatting and Cheating: Ensuring Academic Integrity in the Era of ChatGPT. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int. 2023, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, A. ChatGPT in Schools: Here’s Where It’s Banned—And How It Could Potentially Help Students. Available online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/ariannajohnson/2023/01/18/chatgpt-in-schools-heres-where-its-banned-and-how-it-could-potentially-help-students/ (accessed on 24 February 2023).
- NYC. Schools Ban ChatGPT, Citing Fears about Safety and Accuracy—Bloomberg. Available online: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-01-06/nyc-schools-ban-chatgpt-citing-fears-about-safety-and-accuracy (accessed on 24 February 2023).
- Baidoo-Anu, D.; Owusu Ansah, L. Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the Potential Benefits of ChatGPT in Promoting Teaching and Learning. 2023. Available online: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4337484 (accessed on 6 March 2023).
- Tlili, A.; Shehata, B.; Adarkwah, M.A.; Bozkurt, A.; Hickey, D.T.; Huang, R.; Agyemang, B. What If the Devil Is My Guardian Angel: ChatGPT as a Case Study of Using Chatbots in Education. Smart Learn. Environ. 2023, 10, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, R.A.; Jawaid, M.; Khan, A.R.; Sajjad, M. ChatGPT—Reshaping Medical Education and Clinical Management. Pak. J. Med. Sci. 2023, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhai, X. ChatGPT for Next Generation Science Learning. The ACM Magazine for Students. 2023, 29.3, pp. 42–46. Available online: https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3589649 (accessed on 6 March 2023).
- Lang, F. Using ChatGPT as Your Personal Language Learning Assistant. Medium. 2022. Available online: https://medium.com/@langfab/using-chatgpt-as-your-personal-language-learning-assistant-bdb03bef8565 (accessed on 12 February 2023).
- Welborn, A. ChatGPT and Fake Citations—Duke University Libraries Blogs. Available online: https://blogs.library.duke.edu/blog/2023/03/09/chatgpt-and-fake-citations/ (accessed on 16 April 2023).
- Ross, C. Does ChatGPT Give the Same Answer to Everyone? | by Charles Ross | Mar, 2023 | Medium. Available online: https://medium.com/@charles-ross/does-chatgpt-give-the-same-answer-to-everyone-521e3e9355a4 (accessed on 16 April 2023).
- Russell, B.; Purcell, J. Online Research Essentials: Designing and Implementing Research Studies; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009; ISBN 978-0-470-18568-1. [Google Scholar]
- Beins, B.C.; McCarthy, M.A. Research Methods and Statistics; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2017; ISBN 978-1-108-62691-0. [Google Scholar]
- Myors, B.; Murphy, K.R.; Wolach, A. Statistical Power Analysis: A Simple and General Model for Traditional and Modern Hypothesis Tests, Fourth Edition; Routledge: London, UK, 2014; ISBN 978-1-317-68057-4. [Google Scholar]
- Cicchetti, D. Developmental Psychopathology, Theory and Method; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015; ISBN 978-1-119-12544-0. [Google Scholar]
- Cooksey, R.W. Illustrating Statistical Procedures: Finding Meaning in Quantitative Data; Springer Nature: Berlin, Germany, 2020; ISBN 9789811525377. [Google Scholar]
- Di Tomasso, R.A.; McDermott, P.A. Dilemma of the Untreated Control Group in Applied Research: A Proposed Solution. Psychol. Rep. 1981, 49, 823–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Millum, J.; Grady, C. The Ethics of Placebo-Controlled Trials: Methodological Justifications. Contemp. Clin. Trials 2013, 36, 510–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sprent, P.; Smeeton, N.C. Applied Nonparametric Statistical Methods; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2016; ISBN 978-1-4398-9401-9. [Google Scholar]
- Goldenhar, L.M.; Moran, S.K.; Colligan, M. Health and Safety Training in a Sample of Open-Shop Construction Companies. J. Saf. Res. 2001, 32, 237–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hung, Y.-H.; Winchester, W.W.; Smith-Jackson, T.L.; Kleiner, B.M.; Babski-Reeves, K.L.; Mills, T.H. Identifying Fall-Protection Training Needs for Residential Roofing Subcontractors. Appl. Ergon. 2013, 44, 372–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Goodrum, P.M.; Haas, C.; Glover, R.; Vazari, S. Analysis of the Benefits and Costs of Construction Craft Training in the United States Based on Expert Perceptions and Industry Data. Constr. Manag. Econ. 2010, 28, 1269–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Conditions | Mean | Standard Deviation | t-Test Statistic | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Pre-intervention Hazard Recognition Ability | 34.87% | 5.68% | −18.248 | <0.01 |
Post-intervention Hazard Recognition Ability | 60.26% | 8.60% |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Uddin, S.M.J.; Albert, A.; Ovid, A.; Alsharef, A. Leveraging ChatGPT to Aid Construction Hazard Recognition and Support Safety Education and Training. Sustainability 2023, 15, 7121. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097121
Uddin SMJ, Albert A, Ovid A, Alsharef A. Leveraging ChatGPT to Aid Construction Hazard Recognition and Support Safety Education and Training. Sustainability. 2023; 15(9):7121. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097121
Chicago/Turabian StyleUddin, S M Jamil, Alex Albert, Anto Ovid, and Abdullah Alsharef. 2023. "Leveraging ChatGPT to Aid Construction Hazard Recognition and Support Safety Education and Training" Sustainability 15, no. 9: 7121. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097121
APA StyleUddin, S. M. J., Albert, A., Ovid, A., & Alsharef, A. (2023). Leveraging ChatGPT to Aid Construction Hazard Recognition and Support Safety Education and Training. Sustainability, 15(9), 7121. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097121