Evaluation of Economic Security and Environmental Protection Benefits from the Perspective of Sustainable Development and Technological Ecological Environment
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Evaluation Methods of SD and Technological Ecological Environment
2.1. Connotation of Economic Safety and Environmental Protection Benefits
2.2. Ecological Technology Innovation
2.3. Construction of Indicator System for Coordinated Development of Economy and Environment
- (1)
- Basic principles for establishing indicator system
- (2)
- Method of empowerment
- (3)
- Comprehensive evaluation index system
3. Evaluation of Experimental Results of Economic Safety and Environmental Protection Benefits
3.1. Enterprise Benefit Evaluation Based on Eco-Technology Innovation Management
3.2. Product Output Change
3.3. Product Cost Evaluation
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Lugo, A.E. Effects of extreme disturbance events: From ecesis to social–ecological–technological systems. Ecosystems 2020, 23, 1726–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Younis, H.; Sundarakani, B. The impact of firm size, firm age and environmental management certification on the relationship between green supply chain practices and corporate performance. Benchmarking 2020, 27, 319–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, H.L.; Tang, C.S. Socially and environmentally responsible value chain innovations: New operations management research opportunities. Manag. Sci. 2018, 64, 983–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shapiro, J.S.; Walker, R. Why is pollution from US manufacturing declining? The roles of environmental regulation, productivity, and trade. Am. Econ. Rev. 2018, 108, 3814–3854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Govindan, K.; Hasanagic, M. A systematic review on drivers, barriers, and practices towards circular economy: A supply chain perspective. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2018, 56, 278–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brogi, M.; Lagasio, V. Environmental, social, and governance and company profitability: Are financial intermediaries different? Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2019, 26, 576–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carmona, M. Place value: Place quality and its impact on health, social, economic and environmental outcomes. J. Urban Des. 2019, 24, 1–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schroeder, P.; Anggraeni, K.; Weber, U. The relevance of circular economy practices to the sustainable development goals. J. Ind. Ecol. 2019, 23, 77–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demirel, P.; Kesidou, E. Sustainability-oriented capabilities for eco-innovation: Meeting the regulatory, technology, and market demands. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2019, 28, 847–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yacob, P.; Wong, L.S.; Khor, S.C. An empirical investigation of green initiatives and environmental sustainability for manufacturing SMEs. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2019, 30, 2–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Egbetokun, S.; Osabuohien, E.; Akinbobola, T.; Onanuga, O.T.; Gershon, O.; Okafor, V. Environmental pollution, economic growth and institutional quality: Exploring the nexus in Nigeria. Manag. Environ. Qual. 2020, 31, 18–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bag, S.; Pretorius, J.H.C. Relationships between industry 4.0, sustainable manufacturing and circular economy: Proposal of a research framework. Int. J. Organ. Anal. 2022, 30, 864–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, S.A.R.; Sharif, A.; Golpira, H.; Kumar, A. A green ideology in Asian emerging economies: From environmental policy and sustainable development. Sustain. Dev. 2019, 27, 1063–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geisendorf, S.; Pietrulla, F. The circular economy and circular economic concepts—A literature analysis and redefinition. Thunderbird Int. Bus. Rev. 2018, 60, 771–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, V.; Sezersan, I.; Garza-Reyes, J.A.; Gonzalez, E.D.R.S.; AL-Shboul, M.A. Circular economy in the manufacturing sector: Benefits, opportunities and barriers. Manag. Decis. 2019, 57, 1067–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, W.; Najmi, A. Developing and analyzing framework for understanding the effects of GSCM on green and economic performance: Perspective of a developing country. Manag. Environ. Qual. 2018, 29, 740–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liao, Y.-C.; Tsai, K.-H. Bridging market demand, proactivity, and technology competence with eco-innovations: The moderating role of innovation openness. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2019, 26, 653–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
2019 | 2020 | |
---|---|---|
Paint | 18.64 CNY/square meter | 13.66 CNY/square meter |
Carton | 2.3 CNY/square meter | 1.88 CNY/square meter |
Labor cost | 11.4 CNY/square meter | 9.15 CNY/square meter |
Total cost | 46.66 CNY/square meter | 34.45 CNY/square meter |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Li, J.; Hai, Q. Evaluation of Economic Security and Environmental Protection Benefits from the Perspective of Sustainable Development and Technological Ecological Environment. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6072. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076072
Li J, Hai Q. Evaluation of Economic Security and Environmental Protection Benefits from the Perspective of Sustainable Development and Technological Ecological Environment. Sustainability. 2023; 15(7):6072. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076072
Chicago/Turabian StyleLi, Jingtong, and Qing Hai. 2023. "Evaluation of Economic Security and Environmental Protection Benefits from the Perspective of Sustainable Development and Technological Ecological Environment" Sustainability 15, no. 7: 6072. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076072
APA StyleLi, J., & Hai, Q. (2023). Evaluation of Economic Security and Environmental Protection Benefits from the Perspective of Sustainable Development and Technological Ecological Environment. Sustainability, 15(7), 6072. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076072