1. Introduction
Concrete structures are typically exposed to a variety of diverse environmental conditions throughout their lifespan [
1,
2,
3]. Hence, a concrete structure’s resilience is measured by how well it can resist certain exposure conditions without needing extensive maintenance or rehabilitation [
4,
5]. Concrete is said to be a composite material that can sustain itself for many years, or even centuries, with little to no maintenance [
6]. Without reinforcing, plain cement concrete is made up of cement, fine, and coarse aggregate. To produce different types of concrete that are appropriate for diverse structural loading and environmental conditions, changes can be made to the ingredients used to generate plain cement concrete (PCC) and its mix design. Several performance-related difficulties are presented in order to emphasize the typical concrete’s poor performance even further [
7,
8].
“The advent of ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) in the 1990s was a technological improvement in the creation of concrete [
9,
10]. High compressive strength, high tensile strength, and a good degree of fracture toughness and ductility were the distinguishing characteristics of this innovative concrete [
11,
12,
13]. Additionally, fibers are being employed as a discrete three-dimensional reinforcement to overcome PCC’s shortcomings and as a substitute for UHPC [
14,
15,
16]. In order to increase its resistance to loads, fiber-reinforced concrete (FRC) inserts fiber into its composition. Different kinds of FRC have been developed, each with unique and significant benefits. FRCs have a wide range of applications because of their many benefits—good tensile strength, ductility, and fatigue resistance—which include building pavements, industrial floors, tunnel linings, slope stabilization, and impact-resistant constructions, among others” [
17,
18].
The initiation and spread of cracks in concrete under tensile and compressive loads can be prevented or delayed by using the right fiber type. Commercially accessible reinforcements come in a variety of categories and have features that make them suitable for particular applications. Examples include “carbon fiber [
19,
20], steel fiber (SF) [
21,
22], glass fiber [
23], polypropylene fiber [
24,
25], organic fibers [
26,
27], carbon nanotubes [
28], basalt fiber [
29] and more. In comparison to other industrial fibers, SF is by far the better fiber when it comes to the mechanical performance of concrete. SF has a high elastic modulus of roughly 200 GPa, and a high tensile strength of over 1200 MPa. The literature has established a paradigm that supports the viability of SF as an excellent reinforcement material that ensures satisfactory tensile, compressive, flexural, and shear strength qualities [
30,
31]. Azad, A. K. et al. [
32] expressed the experimental outcomes of the flexural test, the specimens can support more loads once they reach the cracking load; however, once they reach the peak load, a softening mode of collapse is seen, exhibiting great ductility. Additionally, it has been demonstrated that the use of steel fibers increases the reinforced concrete beams’ resistance to shear failure, negating the need for stirrups” [
33,
34,
35].
Mishra, S. et al. [
36] have utilized numerous chemically altered sisal fibers as reinforcement, in addition to glass fibers, in the polyester matrix to improve the mechanical properties of the hybrid composites. According to the experimental findings, hybrid composites absorb less water than unhybridized composites. Mohanty, A. K et al. [
37] demonstrated that these concrete specimens’ water absorption rates were low when compared to un-palmed and categorized composites. When compared to well-known composites, such as glass and palm, bamboo and palm, and glass manufactured using the same techniques, an analysis of the tensile, flexural, and dielectric properties of composites revealed comparable results for characteristics, such as tensile strength. Priya, S. P. et al. [
38] examined the tensile strength of these palm and glass composites and determined that adding more fabric to these composites improved their mechanical qualities. It was discovered that the matrix and the reinforcement had strong interfacial bonding and chemical resistance. Althoey, F. et al. [
39] investigated the engineering characteristics of date palm fiber-infused high-strength concrete as well as the performance of conventional steel and polypropylene fibers. The concrete samples were fabricated using 0.0%, 0.20%, 0.60%, and 1.0% volumes of date palm, steel, and polypropylene fibers. The results revealed that 1% of date palm, steel, and polypropylene fibers boosted the splitting tensile strength by 17%, 43%, and 16%, respectively. For date palm, steel, and polypropylene fibers, the flexural strength was enhanced from 60% to 85%, 67% to 165%, and 61% to 79% respectively, by adding 1% fiber in comparison to the reference sample.
The main aim of this paper is to investigate the influence of three different types of fibers (date palm, polypropylene, and steel) in creating high-strength concrete under the heat–cool exposure cycles.
5. Conclusions
The influence of heat–cool cycles on high-strength concrete reinforced with various percentages (0%, 0.2%, 0.6%, and 1.0%) of date palm, polypropylene, and steel fibers during manufacturing was investigated. The engineering properties were examined, including compressive strength, flexural strength, density, water absorption capacity, ultrasonic pulse velocity, and energy absorption capacity. The following concluding remarks can be illustrated based on the laboratory examination:
The compressive strength of the high-strength concrete comprising date palm, polypropylene, and steel fibers was enhanced significantly with increasing fiber contents without implementing the heat–cool cycles. By contrast, compressive strength was reduced by applying the heat–cool cycles on the specimens containing date palm and polypropylene fibers; however, the steel fibers encompassing specimens expressed a substantial improvement in this case, which was due to the higher compressive load-bearing capacity of the fibers.
The flexural strength substantially improved with increasing the date palm, polypropylene, and steel fibers into the high-strength concrete with and without heat–cool cycles. Increasing the date palm, polypropylene, and steel fibers from 0% to 1.0% enhanced the flexural strength up to 85%, 79%, and 165%, respectively, compared with the reference specimen without the implementation of heat–cool cycles. On the other hand, the flexural strength improved up to 4%, 2%, and 34%, respectively, over the reference specimens with the implementation of heat–cool cycles.
The density was gradually reduced as the date palm and polypropylene fibers increased without applying the heat–cool cycles, whereas the density for steel fibers was noticeably improved by the steel fibers’ heavier unit compared to the date palm and polypropylene fibers. In contrast, the densities were decreased by adding the different amounts of fiber for date palm, polypropylene, and steel fibers, except for the SF1.0 specimen in the application of the heat–cool cycles.
The water absorption capacity was increased with the increasing amounts of date palm, polypropylene, and steel fibers into high-strength concrete as fibers increased the micropore in the concrete both with and without the implementation of heat–cool cycles.
With the addition of the date palm, polypropylene, and steel fibers, the high-strength concrete exhibited an improvement in UPV compared with the reference specimen without heat–cool cycles applied. A negligible impact was observed with the implementation of heat–cool cycles on the date palm, polypropylene, and steel fiber-reinforced high-strength concrete specimens.
The addition of date palm, polypropylene, and steel fibers into high-strength concrete showed a substantial improvement in energy absorption capacity compared with the reference specimen in the cases both with and without the implementation of heat–cool cycles.
Therefore, the natural date palm fibers might be used to produce sustainable fibrous high-strength concrete and be applicable in severe weathering conditions.
This study only applied 60 °C for thermal cycles on the specimens and afterward, specimens were cooled for two days at room temperature 25 ± 5 °C (1 cycle) for 180 days.