Next Article in Journal
When Do Supply Chains Strengthen Biological and Cultural Diversity? Methods and Indicators for the Socio-Biodiversity Bioeconomy
Next Article in Special Issue
Ice Core Methane Analytical Techniques, Chronology and Concentration History Changes: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Gamification and Controversial Heritage: Trainee Teachers’ Conceptions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Potential Effects of Methane Metabolic Microbial Communities on the Glacial Methane Budget in the Northwestern Tibetan Plateau
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Opinion

Mitigation of Global Climate Change through Genetic Improvement of Resin Production from Resinous Pines: The Case of Pinus halepensis in Greece

by
Maria Tsaktsira
*,
Parthena Tsoulpha
*,
Athanasios Economou
and
Apostolos Scaltsoyiannes
Laboratory of Forest Genetics and Plant Breeding, School of Forestry and Natural Environment, Aristotle University, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(10), 8052; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108052
Submission received: 6 April 2023 / Revised: 8 May 2023 / Accepted: 12 May 2023 / Published: 15 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Global Climate Change: What Are We Doing to Mitigate Its Effects)

Abstract

:
Carbon sequestration by forests and storage in biomass has gained great interest globally in climate change mitigation. Resinous pine forests act as ideal carbon sinks because, in addition to capturing atmospheric CO2 for biomass production, they produce resin (resin concentration in C: 77.17% w/w), contributing further to the mitigation of the greenhouse effect. Greece until the 1970s was considered one of the main resin-producing countries of Europe, due to the quantity and quality of resin products collected from natural populations mainly of Pinus halepensis Mill. Previous and current research has shown that resin production is a genetically controlled trait (h2 > 0.70) that exhibits great variability among trees (resin 0.5–33.0 kg per tree and year). The above led to the genetic selection of P. halepensis genotypes with constant over time high resin yields (≥20 kg per tree and year) and consequently greater atmospheric CO2 sequestration for more effective counteracting climate change but also for economic reasons for the benefit of resin producers. These high-yielding genotypes were cloned through grafting on P. brutia rootstocks and became potential trees for establishing commercial pine plantations. Thus, one hectare of commercial plantation of 500 P. halepensis trees, with a resin yield of 20 kg per tree, is expected to sequester 28.31 tn CO2 per year (instead of 2.82 tn of CO2 per year of a natural stand of 400 P. halepensis trees based on a resin yield of 2.5 kg per tree), at the productive age of 25 years. In this case, commercial plantations with improved genotypes of P. halepensis have great potential not only in mitigating the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere, but also in restoring degraded marginal areas and arid soils, and at the same time can offer social and economic benefits to the local communities.

1. Introduction

Climate change refers to shifts in temperature and weather patterns from the standard average on our planet for a long period of time [1]. Currently, it is the most pressing problem humanity has to deal with, requiring radical and decisive measures as its constantly growing impacts are touching every possible aspect of people’s lives. Among the main causes of climate change are human activities such as deforestation, biomass burning, wetland drainage, soil cultivation, and fossil fuel use that have intensified since the beginning of the industrial revolution [2,3]. The above contributes to the gradual increase in the concentration of greenhouse gases (GHGs) in the atmosphere, especially in carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide, which enhance the natural greenhouse effect and the increase in temperature [4].
The emissions of CO2 in the atmosphere were within constant bounds for at least 400,000 years, until 1950, and turned out to be directly related to temperature [4,5,6]. The concentration of CO2 has increased by 31% from 280 ppm in 1850 to 380 ppm in 2005, and is still rising by 1.7 ppm or 0.46% yearly, reaching 419 ppm in January of 2023 [6]. Methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) concentrations have also a steady increase over the same period [6,7,8,9]. Emissions of increased amounts of CO2 result in climate change that includes: (a) global warming, i.e., atmospheric temperature has risen by 1.18 °C since the end of the 19th century, with the ten warmest years recorded after 2005, indicating a continuous increase in temperature, (b) sea level rise by 15–23 cm during the 20th century, and (c) an increase in the incidence of extreme weather events and catastrophic wildfires along with significant changes in ecosystems [8,9].
Major concerns about the adverse effects of global climate change have led to the need for restrictive measures [10]. In addition to mitigating greenhouse gas emissions (mainly CO2), the effective management of additional forest plantations in order to absorb carbon and convert it into more stable forms, is one of the few low-cost and energy alternatives [3,11,12].
The forest as an ecosystem, directly or indirectly affects natural resources (wood, water, soil, fauna), climatic factors, air pollution, plant biodiversity, recreation, and together with the oceans is the basic regulating mechanism of the global climate and the composition of the atmospheric air. Forests still retain uniqueness in social, ecologic, and economic systems worldwide, not only because of their big size but also due to their longevity and land coverage of up to 30% (3.4 billion ha), while 1/3 of global coal resources are stored in forests’ biomass [13]. The reduction of CO2 emissions through forests has already been monitored [2,14]. For example, one hectare of beech (Fagus sp.) forest absorbs 4 tn CO2 and produces 2.5 tn O2 annually [15].
The scope of the work is to highlight the importance of resin produced yearly by pine trees in sequestering CO2 in a sustainable global carbon pool aiming at mitigating the increase in the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere. This could be achieved by further increasing the resin produced through the genetic selection of highly efficient pine genotypes, which is discussed in this paper.

2. Pinus Species and Their Valuable Byproduct “Oleoresin”

Gymnosperms such as species of the genus Pinus have the ability to grow in a wide range of environmental conditions, even in quite severe and extreme climatic and soil conditions. Pine forests operate as reservoirs of atmospheric CO2 (natural carbon sinks) and contribute to the mitigation of the greenhouse effect [3]. Certainly, a percentage of the stored carbon is distributed to the roots and soil but it is very small compared to the amount of carbon the tree uses to produce wood [16]. Apart from woody biomass, resinous pine forests are able to produce large amounts of resin (pine oleoresin), contributing significantly to further storage of CO2 (Figure 1). Thus, the advantages of creating resinous pine plantations derive from the simple and low-cost cultivation requirements, along with the high yields in biomass and resin. Resin is produced from various pine species around the world (e.g., P. elliottii, P. taeda, P. pinaster and P. palustris in the USA, P. maritima, P. halepensis, P. pinea and P. brutia in Europe, etc.) [17,18,19]. According to Cunningham [19], the global resin production in 2010 reached approximately 1,100,000 tn. The main providers were China, Brazil, and Indonesia.
The chemical composition of resin is a mixture of volatile (turpentine) and non-volatile terpenoids (rosin). The basic structural element of all terpenes is isoprene (C5H8). Polymerization of isoprene units constitutes the various terpene classes. Thus, due to its chemical structure (presence of isoprenes), the resin is considered a natural polymer (mixture of hydrocarbons) (Figure 2) [17,21].
Terpenes are considered the largest chemical group of byproducts on our planet (more than 40,000 different metabolites) and pine terpenes in particular are still the basis of the oldest and largest chemical industry with renewable raw materials [3,22]. They could be used in improving the quality of liquid fuels and also in biofuels [23,24,25,26], in the stored food industry against Listeria monocytogenes [3] and Salmonela enderica [27,28], in a number of pharmaceuticals [29,30,31,32,33,34,35] and environmentally friendly products such as insecticides and repellents [36]. Also, some terpenes exhibit anti-tumoral action [37,38,39], while others have antimicrobial properties [40].
On the other hand, oleoresin is an incriminating factor in summer wildfires at pine forests. Due to its flammability, it could be a potential fuel material. The combustion of the resin is no different from other hydrocarbons currently used to produce energy according to the formula: CxHy + (x + y/4) O2 → xCO2 + y/2H2O + Energy.

3. Production of Oleoresin from P. halepensis Trees

Aleppo pine (P. halepensis) is an evergreen coniferous tree of the Pinaceae family. It is characterized by its high adaptive capacity, as it grows on very different soils, even arid, dry, and shallow. It is a drought-resistant species that withstand dry periods of up to 6 months, but has difficulty adapting to cold climates and low temperatures. It is also a well-adapted species to forest fires, due to the highly competitive ability of its young trees against other types of understorey vegetation and because its cones are produced annually but remain closed for a long time. In addition, it is a very important forest species, ecologically, economically, and aesthetically [15,41].
Aleppo pine is the predominant pine species of resin production in many Mediterranean countries, as it produces significant quantities of resin [15,17]. The resin is a secondary product of pines and generally of all conifers, formed in the process of evolution as a defense mechanism of these species against biotic factors (e.g., pathogens, insects, etc.). It flows through the resin canals and is usually collected by wounding the bark (resin harvesting, tapping). Overall, P. halepensis as a resinous pine is a typical multipurpose tree and in addition, its forests act as “ideal carbon sinks” [3,20].
P. halepensis is a tree widely distributed all over the Mediterranean basin (over 3,000,000 ha) [41]. In Greece, its range extends from Chalkidiki, in the north, to Peloponnese, in the south and certain islands of the Aegean and Ionian Seas (370,000 ha, with a mean annual growth in wood of approximately 2.5 m3/ha) [42]. Greece until the 1970s was the main oleoresin producer country of Europe, due to the quantity and superior quality of resin products from Aleppo pine natural populations with an average annual production of approximately 2.5 kg per tree (Figure 1) [43]. Other pine species used for resin production were P. brutia and P. nigra, with P. halepensis however being the most productive of the three species [17,20].
Considering the wood density of 550 kg/m3 [43], which is equivalent to the carbon content of approximately 50% by weight of wood, it turns out that one hectare of P. halepensis forest sequesters 0.69 tn C/year (or 2.53 tn CO2/year, based on the molecular weight of 44 for CO2) for wood biomass production alone (Table 1). This estimation is close to that of Padilla et al. [44], who have mentioned that the captured amount of CO2 of a P. halepensis plantation in Israel (density of 360 trees/ha) is 0.99 tn C per hectare and year. Furthermore, the total amount of CO2 sequestration by P. halepensis of 5.35 tn per hectare and year, resulting from the annual increase of 2.53 tn in wood production and 2.82 tn from the resin yield of one hectare of natural stand (Table 1), is higher than the amount of CO2 captured by a typical broad-leaved forest (e.g., Fagus sp., 4 tn CO2 per hectare and year) for the annual increase in wood production [15].
Chemical analysis of P. halepensis resin resulted in: C 77.17%, H 9.83%, Ν 0.07%, O and S 12.93% [21]. The average yield of Greek P. halepensis is 1.7–3.3 kg per tree per year [43], but some elite genotypes located in the region of Chalkidiki Peninsula and the Euboea Island reached remarkably high annual yields of resin ranging from 10 to 33 kg/tree/year [45,46,47]. Applying the same calculations (as for the wood biomass), it was estimated that: one hectare of P. halepensis forest, of the same plantation density (400 trees/ha), which produces 2.5 kg of resin per tree per year, accumulates approximately 0.77 tn of carbon per year (Table 1). This amount is almost equal to that of carbon absorbed for wood biomass production.

4. Use of Highly Resin-Yielding Genotypes of P. halepensis to Mitigate the Greenhouse Effect

Genetic improvement strategies [13,48] that include the appropriate selection and reproduction of high-yielding genotypes, both for wood and resin, seem to be an efficient measure to mitigate climate change. To fulfill this purpose, the accurate evaluation of elite phenotypes in two or more growing seasons and their clonal propagation are useful tools [47,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56] as depicted in Figure 3.
The “resin production” and the “oleoresin chemical components” traits have been proved, by numerous studies, to be mainly genetically controlled (heredity h2 = 0.42–0.90) for North American resinous pines [18,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64]. Concerning P. halepensis, the heritability of the “resin production” trait was found to be very high (h2 = 0.75–0.85) [65], showing, also, high variability in resin production between individuals (0.5–33 kg/tree) [45]. The above means that the creation of commercial plantations with seeds is also very effective. In addition, the productivity of resin remains constant over time for each tree, implying that the selected high-performance phenotypes are also superior resin-producing genotypes [45,61,66]. Creating then “super-resinous” commercial plantations, by genetic improvement and cloning methods (Figure 4), could substantially contribute to the storage of atmospheric carbon by following two essential steps, firstly by selecting elite genotypes based on constant (over time) high-resin-yielding phenotypes [66,67], and secondly by cloning these elite genotypes and establishing commercial plantations [50,68,69]. Specifically, for resin production, it is proposed the selection of super-resinous trees (resin yield at least 20 kg/tree/year), according to their constant productivity over time and their cloning by the grafting technique [46,47]. In this case, the density of commercial plantations is suggested to be of 500 trees/ha (plant spacing 4 × 5 m). Plantations of high-performance Aleppo pine clones with a rotation time of 60 years are expected to reach their resin-productive period in their 25th year of age and will be capable to absorb 7.72 tn of carbon/ha/year (or 28.31 tn of CO2/ha/year), i.e., eleven times more compared to the amount of carbon absorbed for the production of wood biomass of 0.69 tn C/ha/year (or 2.53 tn CO2/ha/year) (Table 1).

5. Conclusions

Natural stands of resinous pines such as P. halepensis, besides the biomass production process by utilizing CO2, further contribute to atmospheric CO2 sequestration due to resin production and this contribution increases even more in the case of high-yielding genotypes. Furthermore, commercial plantations with genetically improved genotypes of P. halepensis for high resin production sequestrate at least eleven times more atmospheric CO2 than natural stands, contributing greatly to counteracting the greenhouse effect and thus mitigating climate change on our planet on a sustainable basis. In addition, pine resin (oleoresin) is a renewable product with multiple applications at national and global levels, especially in innovative technological fields of green chemistry and not only, while its exploitation will have multiple positive impacts on the social and circular economy. The added value that the resin acquires with its new applications will drastically reduce the risk of wildfires since local communities, in order to protect their income, are very likely to act as natural custodians of the commercial forest plantations of P. halepensis in their regions. We feel that this carbon-sequestration activity is in line with the Kyoto Protocol under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, which encourages afforestation, that is, the conversion of non-forested land to forest.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: A.S. and M.T.; Data collection: M.T., P.T. and A.S.; Data curation: M.T., P.T., A.E. and A.S.; Literature review: M.T., P.T., A.E. and A.S.; Writing the original manuscript: M.T., P.T., A.E. and A.S.; Visualization: M.T., P.T. and A.S.; Compiling the literature review: A.E. and A.S.; Writing-review and editing: A.E., M.T. and A.S.; Supervision: A.S.; Funding acquisition: M.T., P.T. and A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

There was no external funding for the present research.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to A.A. Skaltsogiannis for his helpful comments and suggestions on the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. United Nations. Climate Action. Available online: https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/what-is-climate-change (accessed on 21 February 2023).
  2. Cooper, C.F. Carbon storage in managed forests. Can. J. For. Res. 1983, 13, 155–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rodrigues-Corrêa, K.C.S.; Lima, J.C.; Fett-Neto, A.G. Pine oleoresin: Tapping green chemicals, biofuels, food protection, and carbon sequestration from multipurpose trees. Food Ener. Secur. 2012, 1, 81–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Andersen, B.G.; Borns, H.W., Jr. The Ice Age World: An Introduction to Quaternary History on Research, 2nd ed.; Scandinavian University Press: Oslo, Norway, 1997; p. 208. ISBN 978-8200376835. [Google Scholar]
  5. Petit, J.R.; Jouzel, J.; Raynaud, D.; Barkov, N.I.; Barnola, J.-M.; Basile, I.; Bender, M.; Chappellaz, J.; Davis, M.; Delaygue, G.; et al. Climate and atmospheric history of the past 420,000 years from the Vostok ice core, Antarctica. Nature 1999, 399, 429–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. NASA. Global Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet. Available online: https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/carbon-dioxide/ (accessed on 10 March 2023).
  7. Lal, R. Carbon sequestration. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2008, 363, 815–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. NASA. Earth Data, Open Access for Open Science. Available online: https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/learn/pathfinders/greenhouse-gases-data-pathfinder (accessed on 20 December 2022).
  9. WMO (World Meteorological Organization). State of Global Climate 2021, WMO Provisional Report; WMO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021; p. 47. [Google Scholar]
  10. Abbass, K.; Qasim, M.Z.; Song, H.; Murshed, M.; Mahmood, H.; Younis, I. A review of the global climate change impacts, adaptation, and sustainable mitigation measures. Environ. Sci. Poll. Res. 2022, 29, 42539–42559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sedjo, R.A.; Wisniewski, J.; Sample, A.V.; Kinsman, J.D. The economics of managing carbon via forestry: Assessment of existing studies. Environ. Resour. Econ. 1995, 6, 139–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Montagnini, F.; Nair, P.K.R. Carbon sequestration: An underexploited environmental benefit of agroforestry systems. Agrofor. Syst. 2004, 61, 281–295. [Google Scholar]
  13. White, T.L.; Adams, W.T.; Neale, D.B. Forest Genetics; CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK, 2007; p. 682. [Google Scholar]
  14. Jacob, K. Forests change the climate. Max Planck Res. 2020, 4, 79–85. [Google Scholar]
  15. Dafis, S. The Forests of Greece; The Goulandris Museum of Natural History: Thessaloniki, Greece, 2010; p. 192. (In Greek) [Google Scholar]
  16. Rodrigues-Corrêa, K.C.S.; Sausen, T.L.; Rocha, F.S.; Fett-Neto, A.G. Oleoresin yield and carbon stocks in tapped subtropical Pinus elliottii forests. In From Genomes to Intergration and Delivery, Proceedings of IUFRO Tree Biotechnology Conference 2011, Arraial d’Ajuda, Bahia, Brazil, 26 June–2 July 2011; BioMed Central: London, UK, 2011; Volume 5, (Suppl. 7), p. 100. Available online: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1753-6561/5/S7/P100 (accessed on 6 April 2023).
  17. Papajannopoulos, A.D.; Song, Z.Q.; Liang, Z.Q.; Spanos, J.A. GC-MS analysis of oleoresin of three Greek pine species. Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 2001, 59, 443–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Roberds, J.H.; Strom, B.L.; Hain, F.P.; Gwaze, D.P.; McKeand, S.E.; Lott, L.H. Estimates of genetic parameters for oleoresin and growth traits in juvenile loblolly pine. Can. J. For. Res. 2003, 33, 2469–2476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cunningham, A. Pine resin tapping techniques used around the world. In Pine Resin: Biology, Chemistry and Applications; Fett-Neto, A.G., Rodrigues-Corrêa, K.C.S., Eds.; Research Signpost: Kerala, India, 2012; pp. 1–8. ISBN 978-81-308-0493-4. [Google Scholar]
  20. Scaltsoyiannes, A.V.; Tsaktsira, M.; Karanikas, C.; Mitras, D.; Scaltsoyiannes, V.A.; Scaltsoyiannes, A.A.; Karkabunas, S.; Kontargiris, E.; Dima, Ι.; Tsanaktsidis, Κ.; et al. Genetic improvement of Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis Mill.) oleoresin production—Application of the oleoresin and its derivatives on: (a) Climate change, (b) Pharmacology and (c) Quality of the liquid fuels (diesel). In Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the Hellenic Forestry Society, Argostoli Kefalonia, Greece, 4–5 October 2015; pp. 24–52. [Google Scholar]
  21. Karanikas, C.; Walker, V.; Scaltsoyiannes, A.; Compte, G.; Betrand, C. High vs. low yielding oleores in Pinus halepensis Mill. trees. GC terpenoids profiling as diagnostic tool. Ann. For. Sci. 2010, 67, 412–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Susaeta, A.; Peter, G.F.; Hodges, A.W.; Carter, D.R. Oleoresin tapping of planted slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm. var. elliottii) adds value and management flexibility to landowners in the southern United States. Biom. Bioen. 2014, 68, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bohlmann, J.; Keeling, C.I. Terpenoid biomaterials. Plant J. 2008, 54, 656–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Tsanaktsidis, C.G.; Favvas, E.P.; Scaltsoyiannes, A.A.; Christidis, S.G.; Katsidi, E.X.; Scaltsoyiannes, A.V. Natural resins and their application in antifouling fuel technology. Part I: Improving the physicochemical properties of diesel fuel using natural resin polymer as a removable additive. Fuel Process. Technol. 2013, 114, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tsanaktsidis, C.G.; Favvas, E.P.; Tzilantonis, G.T.; Scaltsoyiannes, A.V. A new fuel (D-BD-J) from the blending of conventional diesel, biodiesel and JP8. Fuel Process. Technol. 2014, 127, 66–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tsanaktsidis, C.G.; Scaltsoyiannes, A.V.; Katsidi, E.X.; Christidis, S.G.; Tzilantonis, G.T. Use of natural resin to reduce water content in diesel fuel. Chem. Technol. Fuels Oils 2014, 49, 497–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lu, Y.; Wu, C. Reduction of Salmonella enterica contamination on grape tomatoes by washing with thyme oil, thymol, and carvacrol as compared with chlorine treatment. J. Food Protect. 2010, 73, 2270–2275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ravishankar, S.; Zhu, L.; Reyna-Granados, J.; Law, B.; Joens, L.; Friedman, M. Carvacrol and cinnamaldehyde inactivate antibiotic-resistant Salmonella enterica in buffer and on celery and oysters. J. Food Protect. 2010, 73, 234–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Behr, A.; Johnen, L. Myrcene as a natural base chemical in sustainable chemistry: A critical review. Chem. Sustain. Chem. 2009, 2, 1072–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mercier, B.; Prost, J.; Prost, M. The essential oil of turpentine and its major volatile fraction (α- and β-pinenes): A review. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health 2009, 22, 331–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Marzec, K.M.; Reva, I.; Fausto, R.; Malek, K.; Proniewicz, L.M. Conformational space and photochemistry of α-terpinene. J. Phys. Chem. A 2010, 114, 5526–5536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zulak, K.G.; Bohlmann, J. Terpenoid biosynthesis and specialized vascular cells of conifer defense. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2010, 52, 86–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Adams, T.B.; Gavin, C.L.; McGowen, M.M.; Waddell, W.J.; Cohen, S.M.; Feron, V.J.; Marnett, L.J.; Munro, I.C.; Portoghese, P.S.; Rietjens, I.M.C.M.; et al. The FEMA GRAS assessment of aliphatic and aromatic terpene hydrocarbons used as flavor ingredients. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2011, 49, 2471–2494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. da Silva, A.C.R.; Lopes, P.M.; de Azevedo, M.M.B.; Costa, D.C.M.; Alviano, C.S.; Alviano, D.S. Biological activities of α-pinene and β-pinene enantiomers. Molecules 2012, 17, 6305–6316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Rudbäck, J.; Bergström, M.A.; Börje, A.; Nilsson, U.; Karlberg, A.-T. α-Terpinene, an antioxidant in tea tree oil, autoxidizes rapidly to skin allergens on air exposure. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2012, 25, 713–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Nerio, L.S.; Olivero-Verbel, J.; Stashenko, E. Repellent activity of essential oils: A review. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 372–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Peng, X.; Zhao, Y.; Liang, X.; Wu, L.; Cui, S.; Guo, A.; Wang, W. Assessing the quality of RCTs on the effect of β-elemene, one ingredient of a Chinese herb, against malignant tumors. Contemp. Clin. Trials 2006, 27, 70–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yao, Y.-Q.; Ding, X.; Jia, Y.-C.; Huang, C.-X.; Wang, Y.-Z.; Xu, Y.-H. Anti-tumor effect of beta-elemene in glioblastoma cells depends on p38 MAPK activation. Cancer Lett. 2008, 264, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Adio, A.M. (-)-trans-β-Elemene and related compounds: Occurrence, synthesis, and anticancer activity. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 5145–5159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Belletti, N.; Kamdem, S.S.; Tabanelli, G.; Lanciotti, R.; Gardini, F. Modeling of combined effects of citral, linalool and beta-pinene used against Saccharomyces cerevisiae in citrus-based beverages subjected to a mild heat treatment. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2010, 136, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Vidakovic, M. Conifers: Morphology and Variation; Graficki Zavod Hrvatske: Zagreb, Croatia, 1991; p. 755. [Google Scholar]
  42. Ministry of Agriculture of Greece. Results of the First National Forest Inventory; General Directorate of Forests and Natural Environment Development and Protection: Athens, Greece, 1992; p. 134. Available online: https://dasarxeio.com/2020/11/27/89385/ (accessed on 20 December 2022). (In Greek)
  43. Tsoumis, G. Harvesting Forest Products; Stobart Davies Ltd.: Pontyclerc, UK, 1992; p. 159. ISBN 085442 055 X. [Google Scholar]
  44. Padilla, F.M.; Vidal, B.; Sánchez, J.; Pugnaire, F.I. Land-use changes and carbon sequestration through the twentieth century in a Mediterranean mountain ecosystem: Implications for land management. J. Εnviron. Μanag. 2010, 91, 2688–2695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Karanikas, C. Selection and Biochemical Analysis of High-Yielding Oleoresin Genotypes of Pinus halepensis Mill.—Qualitative and Quantitative Oleoresin Analysis. Ph.D. Thesis, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece, 2008; p. 284. Available online: http:/hdl.handle.net/10442/hedi/20675 (accessed on 6 April 2023). [CrossRef]
  46. Mitras, D. Selection, Identification and Cloning of High Resin Yielding Pinus halepensis Mill. Genotypes. Ph.D. Thesis, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece, 2011; p. 172. Available online: http:/hdl.handle.net/10442/hedi/26219 (accessed on 6 April 2023). [CrossRef]
  47. Tsaktsira, M.; Karanikas, C.; Mitras, D.; Zhelev, P.; Scaltsoyiannes, A. Genetic analysis of selected high-yielding oleoresin trees of Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis Mill.). For. Ideas 2022, 28, 420–433. [Google Scholar]
  48. Zobel, B.; Talbert, J. Applied Forest Tree Improvement; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1984; p. 505. ISBN 9780471096825. [Google Scholar]
  49. Schiller, G.; Conkle, M.T.; Grunwald, C. Local differentiation among Mediterranean populations of Aleppo pine in their isoenzymes. Silvae Gen. 1986, 35, 11–19. [Google Scholar]
  50. Scaltsoyiannes, A.; Panetsos, K.; Economou, A.; Tsoulpha, P. Micropropagation of the pine hybrid Pinus brutia (Ten.) × Pinus halepensis (Mill.) by culturing interfascicular shoots. Ann. Sci. For. 1994, 51, 175–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Korol, L.; Madmony, A.; Riov, Y.; Schiller, G. Pinus halepensis × Pinus brutia subsp. brutia hybrids? Identification using morphological and biochemical traits. Silvae Gen. 1995, 44, 186–190. [Google Scholar]
  52. Gomez, A.; Alia, R.; Bueno, M.A. Genetic diversity of Pinus halepensis Mill. populations detected by RAPD loci. Ann. For. Sci. 2001, 58, 869–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Gomez, A.; Aravanopoulos, F.A.; Bueno, M.A.; Alia, R. Linkage of random amplified polymorphic DNA markers in Pinus halepensis Mill. Silvae Gen. 2002, 51, 196–201. [Google Scholar]
  54. Aravanopoulos, F.A.; Panetsos, K.P.; Scaltsoyiannes, A. Genetic structure of Pinus brutia stands exposed to wild fires. Plant Ecol. 2004, 171, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Scaltsoyiannes, A. Identification by isozyme gene markers of European pine species used for ornamental purposes. Prop. Ornam. Plants 2004, 4, 42–46. [Google Scholar]
  56. Yi, M.; Zhang, L.; Cheng, Z.; Hu, R.; Gao, Y.; Jin, C.; Yuan, S.; Sun, S.; Lai, M. Identification of key genes for oleoresin biosynthesis in high and low oleoresin-yielding slash pine based on transcriptome analysis. Forests 2022, 13, 1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hanover, J.W. Genetics of terpenes. I. Gene control of monoterpene levels in Pinus monticola Dougl. Heredity 1966, 21, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Peters, W.J. Variation in oleoresin yielding potential of selected slash pines. For. Sci. 1971, 17, 306–307. [Google Scholar]
  59. Squillace, A.E. Inheritance of monoterpene composition in cortical oleoresin of slash pine. For. Sci. 1971, 17, 381–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. McReynolds, R.D.; Kossuth, S.V.; Clements, R.W. Gum naval stores methodology. In Naval Stores; Zinkel, D.F., Russel, J., Eds.; Pulp Chemical Association: New York, NY, USA, 1989; pp. 82–122. [Google Scholar]
  61. Westbrook, J.W.; Resende, M.F.R., Jr.; Munoz, P.; Walker, A.R.; Wegrzyn, J.L.; Nelson, C.D.; Neale, D.B.; Kirst, M.; Huber, D.A.; Gezan, S.A.; et al. Association genetics of oleoresin flow in loblolly pine: Discovering genes and predicting phenotype for improved resistance to bark beetles and bioenergy potential. New Phytol. 2013, 199, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhang, S.; Jiang, J.; Luan, Q. Genetic and correlation analysis of oleoresin chemical components in slash pine. Gen. Mol. Res. 2016, 15, gmr.15038982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Li, Z.; Shen, L.; Hou, Q.; Zhou, Z.; Mei, L.; Zhao, H.; Wen, X. Identification of genes and metabolic pathways involved in resin yield in masson pine by integrative analysis of transcriptome, proteome and biochemical characteristics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 11420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Ding, X.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Diao, S.; Luan, Q.; Jiang, J. Genetic analysis and elite tree selection of the main resin components of slash pine. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1079952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ditoras, N. Inheritance of Gum Yielding Ability of Pinus halepensis Mill. Ph.D. Thesis, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece, 1989; p. 147. Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/10442/hedi/1040 (accessed on 6 April 2023). (In Greek). [CrossRef]
  66. Roberds, J.H.; Strom, B.L. Repeatability estimates for oleoresin yield measurements in three species of the southern pines. For. Ecol. Manag. 2006, 228, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Gonçalves, P.d.S.; Bortoletto, N.; Martins, A.L.M.; da Costa, R.B.; Gallo, P.B. Genotype-environment interaction and phenotypic stability for girth growth and rubber yield of Hevea clones in São Paulo State, Brazil. Gen. Mol. Biol. 2003, 26, 441–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Panetsos, K.; Scaltsoyiannes, A.; Alizoti, P. Effect of genotype and cutting type on the vegetative propagation of the pine hybrid Pinus brutia (Ten.) × Pinus halepensis (Mill.). Ann. Sci. For. 1994, 51, 447–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Economou, A.S. From macrocutting rooting to microplant establishment: Key points to consider for maximum success in woody plants. Acta Hort. 2013, 988, 43–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Resin harvest from a P. halepensis tree in Chalkidiki, Greece (based on [20]).
Figure 1. Resin harvest from a P. halepensis tree in Chalkidiki, Greece (based on [20]).
Sustainability 15 08052 g001
Figure 2. The isoprene building block (left) and the constituents of Aleppo pine oleoresin (right) (based on [20]).
Figure 2. The isoprene building block (left) and the constituents of Aleppo pine oleoresin (right) (based on [20]).
Sustainability 15 08052 g002
Figure 3. Diagram of genetic improvement routes of P. halepensis for resin production (based on [20]).
Figure 3. Diagram of genetic improvement routes of P. halepensis for resin production (based on [20]).
Sustainability 15 08052 g003
Figure 4. Clonal reproduction of P. halepensis (scion) by grafting on P. brutia (rootstock) (Experimental plantation of Forest Genetics and Breeding Lab., Aristotle University, Greece).
Figure 4. Clonal reproduction of P. halepensis (scion) by grafting on P. brutia (rootstock) (Experimental plantation of Forest Genetics and Breeding Lab., Aristotle University, Greece).
Sustainability 15 08052 g004
Table 1. Carbon (C) and CO2 sequestration rates for the various types of management of P. halepensis trees.
Table 1. Carbon (C) and CO2 sequestration rates for the various types of management of P. halepensis trees.
Management TypeSequestration of C
(tn of C/ha/year)
Sequestration of CO2
(tn of CO2/ha/year)
Wood biomass production from natural stands of
P. halepensis
(density 400 trees/ha)
0.69
(0.55 * × 2.5 m3/ha ** × 0.5 ***)
2.53
(0.69 × 44 ÷ 12)
Resin production from natural stands of P. halepensis
(2.5 kg resin/tree)
(density 400 trees/ha)
0.77
(1 tn/ha × 0.7717 ****)
2.82
(0.77 × 44 ÷ 12)
Resin production from commercial plantations of genetically improved
P. halepensis
(20 kg resin/tree)
(density 500 trees/ha)
7.72
(10 tn/ha × 0.7717)
28.31
(7.72 × 44 ÷ 12)
* Rate of dry weight of wood (w/v), ** Annual growth of wood per hectare, *** Content of wood in C (w/w), **** Content rate of C (0.7717) in resin (w/w).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tsaktsira, M.; Tsoulpha, P.; Economou, A.; Scaltsoyiannes, A. Mitigation of Global Climate Change through Genetic Improvement of Resin Production from Resinous Pines: The Case of Pinus halepensis in Greece. Sustainability 2023, 15, 8052. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108052

AMA Style

Tsaktsira M, Tsoulpha P, Economou A, Scaltsoyiannes A. Mitigation of Global Climate Change through Genetic Improvement of Resin Production from Resinous Pines: The Case of Pinus halepensis in Greece. Sustainability. 2023; 15(10):8052. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108052

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tsaktsira, Maria, Parthena Tsoulpha, Athanasios Economou, and Apostolos Scaltsoyiannes. 2023. "Mitigation of Global Climate Change through Genetic Improvement of Resin Production from Resinous Pines: The Case of Pinus halepensis in Greece" Sustainability 15, no. 10: 8052. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108052

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop