Next Article in Journal
Increasing the Circularity of Packaging along Pharmaceuticals Value Chain
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Task Complexity on Linguistic Complexity for Sustainable EFL Writing Skills Development
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Political Connections on Corporate Green Innovation: The Mediating Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility and the Moderating Effect of Environmental Public Opinion
Previous Article in Special Issue
Examining English Ability-Grouping Practices by Aligning CEFR Levels with University-Level General English Courses in Taiwan
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Understanding Novice and Experienced Teachers’ Cognitions and Practices for Sustainable Teacher Development: The Case of Form-Focused Instruction in English Language Teaching

1
School of Foreign Languages, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454003, China
2
School of Foreign Studies, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
3
Faculty of Education and Social Work, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92601, Symonds Street, Auckland 1150, New Zealand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(8), 4711; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084711
Submission received: 7 March 2022 / Revised: 10 April 2022 / Accepted: 12 April 2022 / Published: 14 April 2022

Abstract

Framed in Complexity Theory, this paper presents a multi-case study of Chinese university English teachers’ cognitions and practices about form-focused instruction in English language teaching. Four teachers, including two novice teachers and two experienced ones, were involved in the study. A triangulation method, including semi-structured interviews, classroom observations and stimulated recall interviews, was used to examine and compare their cognitions and practices. Research findings reveal that all teachers favoured focus on form instruction rather than focus on forms instruction in English teaching in their cognitions; however, the two novice teachers failed to implement focus on form instruction in practices, whereas the two experienced teachers carried it out consistently. The result calls for effective teacher education programmes for sustainable teacher development, particularly in sustaining the development of novice teachers’ knowledge about how to implement focus on form instruction in pedagogical practice. The implications arising from this study for L2 teacher education in China and similar L2 contexts are also discussed.
Keywords: teachers’ cognitions; Complexity Theory; form-focused instruction; novice teachers; experienced teachers; Chinese English as a foreign language (EFL) teachers teachers’ cognitions; Complexity Theory; form-focused instruction; novice teachers; experienced teachers; Chinese English as a foreign language (EFL) teachers

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, Q.; Zhang, L.J. Understanding Novice and Experienced Teachers’ Cognitions and Practices for Sustainable Teacher Development: The Case of Form-Focused Instruction in English Language Teaching . Sustainability 2022, 14, 4711. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084711

AMA Style

Sun Q, Zhang LJ. Understanding Novice and Experienced Teachers’ Cognitions and Practices for Sustainable Teacher Development: The Case of Form-Focused Instruction in English Language Teaching . Sustainability. 2022; 14(8):4711. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084711

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Qiang, and Lawrence Jun Zhang. 2022. "Understanding Novice and Experienced Teachers’ Cognitions and Practices for Sustainable Teacher Development: The Case of Form-Focused Instruction in English Language Teaching " Sustainability 14, no. 8: 4711. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084711

APA Style

Sun, Q., & Zhang, L. J. (2022). Understanding Novice and Experienced Teachers’ Cognitions and Practices for Sustainable Teacher Development: The Case of Form-Focused Instruction in English Language Teaching . Sustainability, 14(8), 4711. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084711

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop