Next Article in Journal
Analysis of Climate Change Impacts on Agricultural Water Availability in Cimanuk Watershed, Indonesia
Next Article in Special Issue
Quaternized Polyethersulfone (QPES) Membrane with Imidazole Functionalized Graphene Oxide (ImGO) for Alkaline Anion Exchange Fuel Cell Application
Previous Article in Journal
Subjective Social Class and the Retention Intentions of Teachers from the Publicly Funded Normal Students Program in China: The Dual Mediating Effect of Organizational and Professional Identity
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Overview of the Architecture of Home Energy Management System as Microgrids, Automation Systems, Communication Protocols, Security, and Cyber Challenges
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Humidification with NaCl Solution Mist on Electrochemical Characteristics of Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Dankook University, 152 Jukjeon-ro, Suji-gu, Yongin-si 16890, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(23), 16242; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316242
Submission received: 3 November 2022 / Revised: 30 November 2022 / Accepted: 1 December 2022 / Published: 5 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Renewable Energy Technologies and Microgrids)

Abstract

:
This study examined the effects of mist generated from NaCl solution on the electrochemical properties of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. Mist-containing Na+ and Cl- ions were generated using a custom-made mist generator. The current density-voltage-power density curves and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy of fuel cells were systematically achieved. Furthermore, long-term stability experiments were carried out using chronoamperometry mode for 20 h with deionized water and NaCl solution. After the chronoamperometry measurement, the regeneration of fuel cells was performed with deionized water. The effects of regeneration methods on the performance of the fuel cell were evaluated. Due to the internally produced H2O, constant voltage regeneration was more effective than open circuit voltage regeneration.

1. Introduction

Fuel cells directly convert the chemical energy of fuel, such as hydrogen or methane, to electrical energy using electrochemical reactions [1,2]. Fuel cells have many strong points, such as high efficiency, no emissions (operated with hydrogen), silence, high power density, etc. [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Among the various types of fuel cells, polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells or proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) are widely used as energy generation devices for mobile applications, such as vehicles, ships, and drones, because of their low operating temperature (<100 °C), rapid start up and shut down, and high power density [10,11,12,13,14]. However, PEMFCs used in power generation systems for mobile applications are exposed to various environments, including low temperatures and contaminated air. An air blower is used to supply oxygen to the fuel cell stack in the power generation system of mobile applications. Generally, chemical and physical filters are used to remove impurities in the air [15]. For example, fuel cells in fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs) are exposed to contaminants, such as SOx, NOx, or CO, generated from other vehicles that use traditional internal combustion engines. Therefore, filters are used in FCEVs to ensure the performance of fuel cells. Furthermore, fuel cells are considered as next-generation power generation devices for ships to reduce NOx produced through traditional diesel engines [16]. Due to the remote operating environment in the ocean, maintenance is significantly essential for a ship’s power generation system [17]. Long-term operation and low noise levels are also required for navy applications (submarines). [17].
Fuel cell systems in a ship also use a blower to supply air to the fuel cell stack. However, the air is different from that on land or in a city, such as higher humidity and the presence of other corrosive ions in the mist. L. Veleva et al. reported that the main governing reason for corrosion of the copper sample exposed to the ocean environment was not SOx but Cl [18]. Generally, seawater contains Cl-, Na+, SO42-, and Mg2+ ions [19]. These ions are also detected in fog near the sea. Among these ions, Cl- and Na+ have known degradation factors in the performance of PEMFCs [19,20]. Mikkola et al. reported that the movement of Na+ in ionomers replaced the movement of H+ [21]. Therefore, the ionic conductivity of the electrolyte in PEMFCs decreased. In addition, Cl- is usually adsorbed on nanosized Pt particle catalysts [22,23]. So, triple phase boundaries (TPBs) decreased where electrochemical reactions occur, and the activation resistance of fuel cells increased [22,23]. Additionally, Cl- affects the degradation of components of PEMFCs, such as the gas diffusion layer (GDL) [23,24,25,26]. B. V. Sasank et al. reported the results of PEMFC operated with actual seawater operation [27]. The cathode of the passive PEMFC was exposed to air containing NaCl.
In this study, we fabricated a custom-made mist generator using an ultrasonic vibrator to generate NaCl solution mist. Air was supplied to the cathode through the custom-made mist generator. Na+ and Cl- ions were carried by air to the fuel cell cathode. The effects of NaCl solution on the electrochemical characteristics of PEMFCs were investigated using the custom-made mist generator. The current density–voltage–power density and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) of fuel cells were measured. The long-term stability of fuel cells operated with NaCl solution mist was also evaluated. The regeneration of fuel cells was conducted with DI water after the long-term stability experiments. We believe that the results of this study provide meaningful insight for other researchers about the marine application of fuel cells.

2. Experiments

This study investigated the effects of NaCl solution mist on the electrochemical characteristics of PEMFCs. As previously mentioned, NaCl (or Na+ and Cl−) mist was supplied to the cathode through the air supply system of fuel cells in ocean environments. In order to simulate NaCl mist, a custom-made mist generator using ultrasonic vibrators was applied between the fuel cell and air mass flow controller (MFC). The concentration of NaCl solution was maintained at 3.5 wt.%. Figure 1 shows the pipe and instrument drawing of the custom-made fuel cell test set-up. A total of 150 sccm of dry H2 (Samjung energy, Paju-si, Republic of Korea) was supplied to the anode of PEMFCs, and 600 sccm of humidified air (Samjung energy, Paju-si, Republic of Korea) was provided. Relative humidity was kept at 100% for all experiments. As shown in Figure 1, humidification was carried out using both a bubbler and a custom-made humidifier. Humidification module No. 1 consisted of an ultrasonic vibrator and a bubbler with de-ionized water (DI water). Humidification module No. 1 was used to evaluate the effects of NaCl on fuel cells. Therefore, clean mist (i.e., DI water mist) was supplied for the reference case, and NaCl mist was supplied for the NaCl case. The bubbler with DI water was placed before fuel cells to simulate NaCl flowing in through an air duct. Humidification module No. 2 consisted of a bubbler with DI water. Module No. 2 was used to regenerate PEMFCs with uncontaminated water. Table 1 summarizes the experiment cases.
For the PEMFC, a commercial membrane electrode assembly (MEA) with a 5.06 cm2 active area (CNL Energy, Seoul, Republic of Korea) was used. The catalyst loading (Pt loading) of the anode was 0.4 mg/cm2 and the cathode was 0.4 mg/cm2, respectively. A commercial gas diffusion layer (GDL) was also used (SGL, GDL 39 BB, Germany). Graphite bipolar plates with serpentine-type flow channels were used. The depth of the flow channel was 0.8 mm, and the width was 1.0 mm.
A commercial potentiostat (HCP-803, BioLogic, Seyssinet-Pariset, France) was used to evaluate the electrochemical characteristics of PEMFCs. The Current density–voltage–power density and EIS of fuel cells were measured. EIS was measured with a sinusoidal frequency range from 200 kHz to 100 mHz at various biased voltages. The effects of NaCl mist on fuel cells were investigated using chronoamperometry measurements between 0.7 V and 0.3 V for 20 h. After the experiments with NaCl solutions (module No. 1), the PEMFCs were regenerated using the bubbler with DI water (module No. 2). For regenerations, humidified air was supplied to the cathode of fuel cells through bubbling at open circuit conditions and constant voltage conditions (0.4 V) for 3 h. All experiments were conducted at 25 °C.

3. Results and Discussions

Figure 2 presents polarization curves of fuel cells measured at different humidification conditions using humidification module No. 1 (Cases 1 and 2). As illustrated in Figure 2a, the initial performances of PEMFCs were almost identical, regardless of the solutions. Both fuel cells achieved very similar open circuit voltages (OCVs). The maximum power densities of fuel cells were about 546 mW/cm2 with DI water mist and NaCl mist. These almost similar performances imply that NaCl solution mist, or Na+ and Cl- ions in the mist, had negligible impact on the electrochemical characteristics of PEMFCs for the first short time. Mikkola et al. reported that Na+ ions, which substituted protons (H+), moved through ionomers [21]. Therefore, in this prior report, proton conductivity in the electrolyte was significantly reduced. B. V. Sasank et al. also reported that the movement of Na+, which was supplied to the cathode of fuel cells, was strenuous because of the difference in electrical potentials between the anode and cathode of fuel cells [27]. In order to verify the detailed electrochemical behavior of fuel cells, EIS measurements at 0.5 V were performed. As shown in Figure 2b, both fuel cells had almost identical ohmic resistances (0.115 Ω·cm2 for DI water and 0.12 Ω·cm2 for NaCl solution) and faradaic resistances (0.314 Ω·cm2 for DI water and 0.313 Ω·cm2 for NaCl solution) at 0.5 V. There was no difference between ohmic resistance and faradaic resistance.
After the characterization of fuel cells at the initial stage, long-term stability experiments were conducted. As previously mentioned, chronoamperometry measurements were conducted for 20 h. Currents of fuel cells at 0.7 V and 0.3 V were measured. The results of the chronoamperometry test are illustrated in Figure 3.
The performance of a fuel cell with NaCl solution decreased more compared to the fuel cell with DI water, as shown in Figure 3. Notably, the higher current area of fuel cells measured at 0.3 V reduced significantly. The current of the PEMFC with DI water reduced from 1.45 A/cm2 to 0.89 A/cm2 at 0.3 V (reduction 0.56 A/cm2, 38.8%). The current at 0.7 V reduced from 0.54 A/cm2 to 0.24 A/cm2 (reduction 0.3 A/cm2, 54.8%). However, in the case of the fuel cell with NaCl solution, the current of the fuel cell at 0.3 V reduced from 1.48 A/cm2 to 0.54 A/cm2 (reduction 0.95 A/cm2, 63.9%). The current at 0.7 V reduced from 0.59 A/cm2 to 0.19 A/cm2.(reduction 0.4 A/cm2, 68%) Furthermore, the degradation rate of the current was high at 0.3 V with NaCl solution. The degradation rates of the fuel cell with DI water were 0.015 A/cm2·h at 0.7 V and 0.028 A/cm2·h at 0.3 V. The degradation rates of the PEMFC humidified with NaCl solution were 0.020 A/cm2·h at 0.7 V and 0.047 A/cm2·h at 0.3 V. Therefore, NaCl solution mist, or Na+ and Cl- in mist, decreased the performance of fuel cells, especially in high current density areas. In other prior research, Cl- ions were adsorbed on Pt catalysts in the catalyst layer [22,23]. Therefore, TPBs in Pt catalysts decreased, and then, activation loss of PEMFCs increased. Thus, in our study, it was assumed that accumulated Na+ and Cl- in PEMFCs degraded electrochemical characteristics.
Electrochemical characterizations of fuel cells were conducted again after chronoamperometry measurements. Figure 4 presents the results of current density–voltage–power density curves and Nyquist plots of fuel cells after chronoamperometry measurements. The polarization curves of fuel cells are presented. As shown in Figure 4a, the performance of PEMFC humidified with NaCl mist decreased significantly compared to the fuel cell with DI water. The maximum power density reduced from 546 mW/cm2 to 314 mW/cm2 (reduction 242 mW/cm2, 42.4%). However, the fuel cell humidified with DI water mist reduced from 546 mW/cm2 to 492 mW/cm2 (reduction 54 mW/cm2, 5%). After 20 h chronoamperometry experiments, the performance of fuel cells humidified with NaCl mist reduced by a factor of 4 compared to the fuel cells humidified with DI water. Figure 4b illustrates Nyquist plots of fuel cells measured at 0.5 V. Compared to the EIS results in Figure 2b, the size of the circle of the fuel cell humidified with NaCl solution increased remarkably.
It is generally known that the x-axis intercept pointing at the high-frequency area in EIS results represents the ohmic resistance of fuel cells [8]. Furthermore, the diameter of the circle illustrated in the low-frequency area in EIS results represents the faradaic resistance of fuel cells [10]. Therefore, as shown in Figure 4b, both the ohmic resistance and faradaic resistance of PEMFC with NaCl solution became higher after 20 h experiments compared to the fuel cell with DI water at 0.5 V. Notably, the faradaic resistance of the fuel cell increased significantly. The ohmic resistance of the fuel cell with DI water was 0.118 Ω·cm2, and the faradaic resistance was 0.23 Ω·cm2. The ohmic resistance of the PEMFC with NaCl solution was 0.15 Ω·cm2 (+0.03 Ω·cm2, +25%). The faradaic resistance was 0.431 Ω·cm2 (+0.118 Ω·cm2, +37.7%) at 0.5 V. All resistances (ohmic resistance and faradaic resistance) increased remarkably compared to the EIS results of the fuel cell with DI water.
Finally, regeneration experiments were performed. Figure 5 shows the electrochemical characteristics of fuel cells before and after regeneration experiments. Clean DI water was supplied to the cathode of fuel cells for regeneration to remove Na+ and Cl- from components of fuel cells, i.e., Pt catalyst, GDL, gasket, and flow channel. Humidification module No. 2 (the bubbler with DI water only) was used to regenerate fuel cells. In addition to the external DI water supplied by the bubbler, water generated by electrochemical reactions of the fuel cell was used. Therefore, two methods were applied to regenerate fuel cells to verify the effects of water generation on fuel cells. First, the contaminated fuel cell operated with NaCl solution after 20 h was regenerated at OCV status and humidified with DI water for 3 h. The other contaminated fuel cell was regenerated at 0.4 V (the high current area) and humidified with DI water for 3 h. Figure 5a presents polarization curves of fuel cells before regeneration. Figure 5b shows polarization curves of fuel cells after regeneration. As shown in Figure 5b, the maximum power densities of fuel cells improved after regeneration with DI water. Interestingly, increased maximum power density was clearly dependent on the regeneration method. The fuel cell regenerated at OCV status for 3 h recovered its performance from 314 mW/cm2 to 326 mW/cm2 (+12 mW/cm2, +3.6%). Remarkably, the PEMFC that was regenerated at 0.4 V, i.e., high current area status, for 3 h recovered its performance from 318 mW/cm2 to 380 mW/cm2 (+62 mW/cm2, +16.3%). In other words, the fuel cell regenerated in the high current area recovered more than five times in performance compared to the fuel cell regenerated in the OCV state. The regeneration rate of each method was 4 mW/cm2·h at OCV status and 20.7 mW/cm2·h at 0.4 V. Additionally, EIS measurements were performed after regeneration at 0.5 V. Figure 5c,d present Nyquist plots of fuel cells before and after the regeneration process. Similar to the results of polarization curves in Figure 5b, faradaic resistances of fuel cells reduced slightly after regeneration. Interestingly, the improved amount of faradaic resistances, i.e., reduced amount of faradaic resistances of fuel cells, was dependent on the regeneration methods. The faradaic resistance of the fuel cell regenerated at 0.4 V reduced from 0.472 Ω·cm2 to 0.305 Ω·cm2 (−0.167 Ω·cm2, −35.4%). However, the faradaic resistance of PEMFC regenerated at OCV status decreased from 0.431 Ω·cm2 to 0.369 Ω·cm2 (−0.062 Ω·cm2, −14.4%). This implies that both external DI water supplied by air and internally generated water were effective in removing Na+ and Cl- ions in fuel cells, especially related to the catalyst for regeneration. It is interesting to note that the ohmic resistances of fuel cells showed negligible changes after regeneration compared to faradaic resistances of fuel cells. The ohmic resistance of the fuel cell regenerated at 0.4 V decreased from 0.138 Ω·cm2 to 0.135 Ω·cm2 (−0.003 Ω·cm2, −0.02%). However, the faradaic resistance of PEMFC regenerated at OCV status decreased from 0.431 Ω·cm2 to 0.369 Ω·cm2 (−0.062 Ω·cm2, −14.4%). This means that, compared to the faradaic resistance, the recovery of the ohmic resistance of PEMFC was not significantly affected by fuel cell regenerations carried out using externally provided water and internally produced water.
Figure 6 summarizes the results of regeneration experiments. Figure 6a shows the maximum power densities of fuel cells. As we mentioned before, the performance of fuel cells humidified with NaCl solution degraded more than the PEMFC with DI water. Additionally, the regeneration of PEMFC at 0.4 V for 3 h was remarkably effective compared to the regeneration at OCV for 3 h. The summary of the EIS analysis is illustrated in Figure 6b. Long-term stability experiments were conducted on fuel cells using chronoamperometry modes between 0.7 V and 0.3 V for 20 h. After chronoamperometry measurements, regeneration tests were carried out using DI water. Faradaic resistance of the fuel cell regenerated at the high current area (0.4 V) decreased notably because of the externally supplied water and the internally generated water compared to the fuel cell regenerated at OCV.

4. Conclusions

This study investigated the effects of humidification with NaCl solution on the electrochemical characteristics of PEMFCs. A custom-made humidification system based on an ultrasonic vibrator was used to fabricate NaCl mist. Long-term stability experiments via the chronoamperometry method were carried out to evaluate the effects of NaCl solutions. The currents of fuel cells at 0.7 V and 0.3 V were measured for 20 h. The performance of the fuel cell humidified with NaCl solution decreased more at both voltages compared to the current of PEMFC with DI water. Current also reduced more at the high current area (0.3 V). As a result, the maximum power densities of all fuel cells decreased after long-term experiments. The performance of the fuel cell with DI water reduced from 546 mW/cm2 to 492 mW/cm2. However, the maximum power density of the PEMFC humidified with NaCl solution reduced from 546 mW/cm2 to 314 mW/cm2 because of the increase in faradaic resistance. The faradaic resistance of the fuel cell with NaCl solution increased remarkably from 0.313 Ω·cm2 to 0.431 Ω·cm2. After the long-term test with NaCl solution, regeneration experiments were conducted using the bubbler with DI water. One fuel cell was regenerated at OCV status for 3 h, and another fuel cell was regenerated at 0.4 V for 3 h, to investigate the effects of internally generated water by electrochemical reactions of fuel cells. Both fuel cells showed recovered performance after regeneration. The fuel cell regenerated at 0.4 V showed more than five times performance recovery compared to the fuel cell regenerated at OCV status because of internally generated water in the fuel cell. The Nyquist plots of regenerated fuel cells showed that the faradaic resistances of fuel cells clearly decreased after regeneration. However, the ohmic resistances of fuel cells were almost identical after regeneration. Therefore, it was concluded that both external DI water and internally generated water of PEMFC were effective on faradaic resistance but ineffective on ohmic resistance.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft, H.J.Y.; Writing—review & editing, G.Y.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partially supported by the Korea Institute Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) grant funded by the Korea government (MOTIE) (no. 20213030030260). This research was partially supported by Institute for Information & communications Technology Promotion (IITP) grant funded by the Korea Government (MSIT) and Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT) grant funded by the Korea Government (MOTIE) (P0017120, The Competency Development Program for Industry Specialist).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. O’Hayre, R.; Cha, S.W.; Colella, W.; Prinz, F.B. Fuel Cell Fundamentals, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  2. Jang, G.E.; Cho, G.Y. Effects of Ag Current Collecting Layer Fabricated by Sputter for 3D-Printed Polymer Bipolar Plate of Ultra-Light Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells. Sustainability 2022, 14, 2997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dosacramento, E.; Delima, L.; Oliveira, C.; Veziroglu, T. A hydrogen energy system and prospects for reducing emissions of fossil fuels pollutants in the Ceará state—Brazil. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2008, 33, 2132–2137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gencoglu, M.T.; Ural, Z. Design of a PEM fuel cell system for residential application. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2009, 34, 5242–5248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lin, Y.; Zhan, Z.; Liu, J.; Barnett, S. Direct operation of solid oxide fuel cells with methane fuel. Solid State Ion. 2005, 176, 1827–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kan, H.; Lee, H. Enhanced stability of Ni–Fe/GDC solid oxide fuel cell anodes for dry methane fuel. Catal. Commun. 2010, 12, 36–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dekel, D.R. Review of cell performance in anion exchange membrane fuel cells. J. Power Sources 2018, 375, 158–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yang, D.; Ma, J.; Xu, L.; Wu, M.; Wang, H. The effect of nitrogen oxides in air on the performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Electrochim. Acta 2006, 51, 4039–4044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, J.; Tang, Y.; Song, C.; Xia, Z.; Li, H.; Wang, H.; Zhang, J. PEM fuel cell relative humidity (RH) and its effect on performance at high temperatures. Electrochim. Acta 2008, 53, 5315–5321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shih, N.-C.; Weng, B.-J.; Lee, J.-Y.; Hsiao, Y.-C. Development of a small fuel cell underwater vehicle. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2013, 38, 11138–11143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tang, Y.; Yuan, W.; Pan, M.; Wan, Z. Experimental investigation on the dynamic performance of a hybrid PEM fuel cell/battery system for lightweight electric vehicle application. Appl. Energy 2011, 88, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, B.; Zhao, D.; Li, W.; Wang, Z.; Huang, Y.; You, Y.; Becker, S. Current technologies and challenges of applying fuel cell hybrid propulsion systems in unmanned aerial vehicles. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 2020, 116, 100620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pan, Z.; An, L.; Wen, C. Recent advances in fuel cells based propulsion systems for unmanned aerial vehicles. Appl. Energy 2019, 240, 473–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Keim, M.; Kallo, J.; Friedrich, K.A.; Werner, C.; Saballus, M.; Gores, F. Multifunctional fuel cell system in an aircraft environment: An investigation focusing on fuel tank inerting and water generation. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 2013, 29, 330–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Özyalcin, C.; Mauermann, P.; Dirkes, S.; Thiele, P.; Sterlepper, S.; Pischinger, S. Investigation of Filtration Phenomena of Air Pollutants on Cathode Air Filters for PEM Fuel Cells. Catalysts 2021, 11, 1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. De-Troya, J.J.; Álvarez, C.; Fernández-Garrido, C.; Carral, L. Analysing the possibilities of using fuel cells in ships. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2016, 41, 2853–2866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shih, N.-C.; Weng, B.-J.; Lee, J.-Y.; Hsiao, Y.-C. Development of a 20 kW generic hybrid fuel cell power system for small ships and underwater vehicles. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39, 13894–13901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Veleva, L.; Farro, W. Influence of seawater and its aerosols on copper patina composition. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2012, 258, 10072–10076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Finlayson-Pitts, B.J.; Hemminger, J.C. Physical Chemistry of Airborne Sea Salt Particles and Their Components. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 11463–11477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, H.; Zhang, S.; Qian, W.; Yu, Y.; Yuan, X.-Z.; Wang, H.; Jiang, M.; Wessel, S.; Cheng, T.T. Impacts of operating conditions on the effects of chloride contamination on PEM fuel cell performance and durability. J. Power Sources 2012, 218, 375–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mikkola, M.S.; Rockward, T.; Uribe, F.A.; Pivovar, B.S. The Effect of NaCl in the Cathode Air Stream on PEMFC Performance. Fuel Cells 2007, 7, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ali, S.T.; Li, Q.; Pan, C.; Jensen, J.O.; Nielsen, L.P.; Møller, P. Effect of chloride impurities on the performance and durability of polybenzimidazole-based high temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2011, 36, 1628–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Schmidt, T.; Paulus, U.; Gasteiger, H.; Behm, R. The oxygen reduction reaction on a Pt/carbon fuel cell catalyst in the presence of chloride anions. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2001, 508, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yan, W.-M.; Chu, H.-S.; Liu, Y.-L.; Chen, F.; Jang, J.-H. Effects of chlorides on the performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2011, 36, 5435–5441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Banerjee, S.; Curtin, D.E. Nafion® perfluorinated membranes in fuel cells. J. Fluor. Chem. 2004, 125, 1211–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shinozaki, K.; Zack, J.W.; Richards, R.M.; Pivovar, B.S.; Kocha, S.S. Oxygen Reduction Reaction Measurements on Platinum Electrocatalysts Utilizing Rotating Disk Electrode Technique. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2015, 162, F1144–F1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sasank, B.V.; Rajalakshmi, N.; Dhathathreyan, K.S. Performance analysis of polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) fuel cell stack operated under marine environmental conditions. J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 2016, 21, 471–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Pipe and instrument drawing of the fuel cell test set-up.
Figure 1. Pipe and instrument drawing of the fuel cell test set-up.
Sustainability 14 16242 g001
Figure 2. Electrochemical characteristics of PEMFCs. (a) Polarization curves of fuel cells. (b) Nyquist plots of fuel cells at 0.5 V.
Figure 2. Electrochemical characteristics of PEMFCs. (a) Polarization curves of fuel cells. (b) Nyquist plots of fuel cells at 0.5 V.
Sustainability 14 16242 g002
Figure 3. Results of chronoamperometry for 20 h.
Figure 3. Results of chronoamperometry for 20 h.
Sustainability 14 16242 g003
Figure 4. Electrochemical characteristics of PEMFCs after long-term experiments. (a) Polarization curves of fuel cells. (b) Nyquist plots of fuel cells at 0.5 V.
Figure 4. Electrochemical characteristics of PEMFCs after long-term experiments. (a) Polarization curves of fuel cells. (b) Nyquist plots of fuel cells at 0.5 V.
Sustainability 14 16242 g004
Figure 5. Electrochemical characteristics of PEMFCs after regeneration. (a) Polarization curves of fuel cells before regeneration. (b) Polarization curves of fuel cells after regeneration. (c) Nyquist plots of fuel cells at 0.5 V before regeneration. (d) Nyquist plots of fuel cells at 0.5 V after regeneration.
Figure 5. Electrochemical characteristics of PEMFCs after regeneration. (a) Polarization curves of fuel cells before regeneration. (b) Polarization curves of fuel cells after regeneration. (c) Nyquist plots of fuel cells at 0.5 V before regeneration. (d) Nyquist plots of fuel cells at 0.5 V after regeneration.
Sustainability 14 16242 g005
Figure 6. Summary of the experiments. (a) Maximum power densities of fuel cells. (b) Resistances of fuel cells.
Figure 6. Summary of the experiments. (a) Maximum power densities of fuel cells. (b) Resistances of fuel cells.
Sustainability 14 16242 g006
Table 1. Summary of experimental conditions.
Table 1. Summary of experimental conditions.
Case 1Case 2Case 3
HumidificationDI waterNaCl solution (3.5 wt%)
Ultrasonic vibrator + Bubbler (Module 1)
Chronoamperometry0.7 V–0.3 V
20 h
Regeneration-DI water
Bubbler (Module 2)
OCV, 3 h0.4 V, 3 h
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yoo, H.J.; Cho, G.Y. Effects of Humidification with NaCl Solution Mist on Electrochemical Characteristics of Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells. Sustainability 2022, 14, 16242. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316242

AMA Style

Yoo HJ, Cho GY. Effects of Humidification with NaCl Solution Mist on Electrochemical Characteristics of Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells. Sustainability. 2022; 14(23):16242. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316242

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yoo, Ho Jun, and Gu Young Cho. 2022. "Effects of Humidification with NaCl Solution Mist on Electrochemical Characteristics of Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells" Sustainability 14, no. 23: 16242. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316242

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop