Next Article in Journal
Factors of Project-Based Teaching That Enhance Learning Interest: Evidence from Construction Contract Management Course
Next Article in Special Issue
Development of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials with Ultra-High Content of Waste Concrete Powder: Properties and Improvement
Previous Article in Journal
Blockchain-Based Solutions Supporting Reliable Healthcare for Fog Computing and Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) Integration
Previous Article in Special Issue
Flexural Behavior of Portland Cement Mortars Reinforced with Hybrid Blends of Recycled Waste Fibers
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Sustainable Lightweight Concrete Made of Cement Kiln Dust and Liquefied Polystyrene Foam Improved with Other Waste Additives

Sustainability 2022, 14(22), 15313; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215313
by Abeer M. El-Sayed 1, Abeer A. Faheim 1, Aida A. Salman 1 and Hosam M. Saleh 2,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3:
Sustainability 2022, 14(22), 15313; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215313
Submission received: 2 November 2022 / Revised: 12 November 2022 / Accepted: 15 November 2022 / Published: 18 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recycling of Concrete Wastes toward Sustainable Building Materials)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please find my comments in the file

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

Thank you for your time and your useful comments that certainly will improve my submission.

All suggested modifications were presented in the attached file and reflected in the revised submission.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Lines 77-84: Indicative references should be added.

Lines 89-95: This section should be further enhanced with more references. Also, what is the research gap the proposed research attempts to fill? What is its connection to previous literature in terms of research objectives?

Lines 106-107: This sentence needs rephrasing.

Lines 123-125: This sentence needs rephrasing.

Line 127: Please capitalize the first letter of the first word.

Lines 170, 291: There are too many spacings.

Lines 214-237: Why is this text bold and aligned to the left?

Line 246: "wastes"

Line 355: "additive materials"

 

 

 

 

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

Thank you for your time and your useful comments that certainly will improve my submission.

All suggested modifications were considered.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

The authors conducted  experimental study using waste materials for lightweight concrete however there are major issue must be solved before publication.

Abstract should contain important results not general ones.

Novelty is not clear in the introduction. It is stated there are limited studies. What is the difference between this and other studies.

What are the size of samples

What is workability and slump test?

Add actual photo for test setup

Add actaul photo of samples

Add damaged photos of samples

The reason for selectting Mix design should be added in detail. Ratio of cement, aggerate water and etc.

The importance of recycling materials to overcome enviermental prbolem should be added to introduction using:  influence of replacing cement with waste glass on mechanical properties of concrete; use of recycled coal bottom ash in reinforced concrete beams as replacement for aggregate; improvement in bending performance of reinforced concrete beams produced with waste lathe scraps; performance assessment of fiber-reinforced concrete produced with waste lathe fibers; performance evaluation of fiber-reinforced concretes produced with steel fibers extracted from waste tire; performance evaluation of fiber-reinforced concretes produced with steel fibers extracted from waste tire

Add recent studies on this subject to introduction. There are many studies on the introduction for this topic.

Conclusion should be improved. The recommendation consdiering all test should be given for engineers.

 

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

Thank you for your time and your useful comments that certainly will improve my submission.

All suggested modifications were presented in the attached file and reflected in the revised submission.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

The paper can be accepted in this current form.

Back to TopTop