Next Article in Journal
Empirical Evaluation of the Environmental Emergency Management Capability of Local Governments in China
Next Article in Special Issue
Determination of Fractured Water-Conducting Zone Height Based on Microseismic Monitoring: A Case Study in Weiqiang Coalmine, Shaanxi, China
Previous Article in Journal
Formulation of Radiometric Calibration for Azimuthal Multi-Angle Observation Space-Borne SAR
Previous Article in Special Issue
Research on Mechanical Behavior and Energy Evolution of Coal and Rocks with Different Thin Spray-On Liners Thickness under Uniaxial Compressive Loading
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Quantitative Study on the Law of Surface Subsidence Zoning in Steeply Inclined Extra-Thick Coal Seam Mining

Sustainability 2022, 14(11), 6758; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116758
by Yueguan Yan, Yanjun Zhang *, Yuanhao Zhu, Jinchi Cai and Junyao Wang
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Sustainability 2022, 14(11), 6758; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116758
Submission received: 4 May 2022 / Revised: 21 May 2022 / Accepted: 24 May 2022 / Published: 31 May 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This paper discusses inclined steeply dipping thick coal seam mining. The deformation and damage of rock strata and the characteristics and laws of the surface subsidence zone are assessed and analyzed quantitatively. The paper needs to be improved before it can be forwarded to the concerned quarters for processing. Consider my comments in the attached file for improvement.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript is generally well done. This manuscript is suggested to be accepted after minor revision, some comments listed in below:
1. Keywords do not reflect the purpose of the manuscript.Therefore,it is suggested to add keywords “influence range, zoning angle”.
2. The font in Figure 2 needs to be larger.
3. Check this sentence “The monitoring points are D1, D2, D3, Q1, Q2 ... Q22, Q40” in section 2.1, the monitoring point Q40 cannot be found in Figure 3.
4. The units in Table 1should be in parenthesis.
5. There are many introductions about 3DEC numerical simulation software. In this paper, it is only a simulation method and is suggested to be simplified.
6. In the field of geotechnical engineering, there are many numerical simulation software, such as FLAC and PFC. Please briefly explain why they are not selected for this study.
7. In Figure 5, it is suggested to add thickness to each rock strata, so that readers can better understand the simulation scheme.
8.The description of Figure 14 (a) and (c) is consistent, please recheck.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop