Next Article in Journal
Sustainable Recycling of High-Strength Concrete as an Alternative to Natural Aggregates in Building Structures
Next Article in Special Issue
Analyzing Continuance of Cloud Computing in Higher Education Institutions: Should We Stay, or Should We Go?
Previous Article in Journal
Educational Impact Evaluation of Professional Development of In-Service Teachers: The Case of the Dialogic Pedagogical Gatherings at Valencia “On Giants’ Shoulders”
Previous Article in Special Issue
Conceptual Framework for Programming Skills Development Based on Microlearning and Automated Source Code Evaluation in Virtual Learning Environment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bayesian Approach to Analyze Reading Comprehension: A Case Study in Elementary School Children in Mexico

by
Ernesto U. Rodriguez-Barrios
1,
Roberto Angel Melendez-Armenta
1,*,
Sandra G. Garcia-Aburto
2,
Marieli Lavoignet-Ruiz
2,
Luis Carlos Sandoval-Herazo
1,
Antonio Molina-Navarro
3 and
Luis Alberto Morales-Rosales
4
1
División de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigacion, Tecnologico Nacional de Mexico/Instituto Tecnologico Superior de Misantla, Misantla 93821, Veracruz, Mexico
2
Departamento de Ingenieria Industrial, Tecnologico Nacional de Mexico/Instituto Tecnologico Superior de Misantla, Misantla 93821, Veracruz, Mexico
3
Engineering School, Construction and Housing, Universidad Veracruzana, Costa Verde, Boca del Rio 94294, Veracruz, Mexico
4
Faculty of Civil Engineering, Conacyt-Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Morelia 58030, Michoacán, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(8), 4285; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084285
Submission received: 30 January 2021 / Revised: 30 March 2021 / Accepted: 8 April 2021 / Published: 12 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Technology and Innovation Management in Education)

Abstract

:
In the educational field, reading comprehension is connected to learning achievement, and through it, one can interpret, retain, organize and value what has been read. It is an essential ability for the understanding and processing of information in learning. Furthermore, it is an essential skill to developing sustainable education. In this sense, sustainable development needs an advanced reading comprehension ability at elementary school in order to teach and learn future knowledge areas such as climate change, disaster risk reduction, biodiversity, poverty reduction, and sustainable consumption. Nevertheless, there have been few works focused on analyzing reading comprehension, particularly in Mexico, where the reference is the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) test on how well the Mexican students have developed this skill. Hence, this article shows the usefulness of employing Bayesian techniques in the analysis of reading comprehension at elementary school. The Bayesian network model allows for the determination of the language and communication level of achievement based on parameters such as learning style, learning pace, speed, and reading comprehension, obtaining an 85.36% precision. Moreover, the results confirm that teachers could determine changes in lesson planning and implement new pedagogical mechanisms to improve the level of learning and understanding contents.

1. Introduction

Reading comprehension is the process through which the reader builds, based on their prior knowledge, new meanings through written texts, with the aim of reaching personal goals, developing new knowledges and applying it; in addition to participating effectively in society as a progressive set of knowledge, abilities, and strategies that individuals develop throughout their lives in different contexts and interacting with their peers. Having total control over reading comprehension allows the student to use in a much more flexible way different comprehension strategies that they will apply to other particular areas and life in general. Therefore, if the student has a low level of reading comprehension, they will not be critical, reflexive, act independently, develop they creativity, be responsible, and obtain new knowledge for their everyday life [1].
In Mexico, many children and youngsters have reading problems because of their lack of skill when reading texts and low comprehension, which affects their learning and school performance in general. The Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) has confirmed several Mexican education problems. PISA is a test carried out the countries that are part of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and whose objective is to coordinate the states’ economic and social politics that integrate it [2,3]. The PISA test aims to evaluate to what extent students have acquired the knowledge and abilities in Reading, Sciences, and Mathematics. The test results obtained in 2018 place Mexico below the average among the countries that are part of the OECD. Mexico obtained 419 points in sciences, 420 points in reading, and 409 points in mathematics. The evaluation average in each of these areas was 489, 487, and 489 points, respectively. This information shows that less than 23% of the students reached excellence levels in reading competence. This is why more and more strategies are implemented in the educational system to improve the results obtained in the international tests, for example, the incorporation of technology in education.
Furthermore, reading comprehension is an essential skill to develop sustainable education. In this sense, sustainable development needs an advanced reading comprehension ability at the elementary school to teach and learn in areas such as climate change, disaster risk reduction, biodiversity, poverty reduction, and sustainable consumption [4].
Educational technology is the incorporation of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in the field of education to give support to teaching and learning processes in different contexts of formal and informal education. ICT pursuits improve teaching and learning processes through reaching the educational objectives, searching for the effectiveness and meaning of learning. The inclusion of technology in educational processes requires constant innovation and substantial resource investment to offer quality academic services. This is carried out by using international standards, methodologies, study plans, and last-generation laboratories, all in the process of continuous improvement for the students’ benefit, and thanks to the advances of Artificial Intelligence (AI). The field of education is starting to change slowly, but steadily [5].
Bayesian networks are probabilistic graphical models that consist of an acyclic directed graph that codifies the probabilistic relationships of dependent and independent samples through the Bayes theorem. These are tools destined to represent a set of related uncertainties, and are appropriate to model multivariate systems oriented to classification, diagnosis, and decision making [6]. As remarked, there are two procedures for generating Bayesian networks: 1) automatic routines where a certain number of algorithms can identify the underlying structure in a dataset, and 2) expert judgment, where the knowledge of a group of experts in a particular domain is used to generate the network’s architecture [7]. We followed the second one by using the knowledge of a group of experts in a particular domain to generate the network architecture (connections between nodes).
Therefore, in this paper, we show the usefulness of employing Bayesian techniques in the analysis of reading comprehension in elementary school children in Mexico to improve the teaching–learning process through educational technology. The contributions of this document are as follows:
  • We identified and used parameters such as learning style, learning pace, speed, and reading comprehension that promote appropriate reading comprehension following the Mexican educational system’s standards [8,9,10]. The levels allow us to determine and evaluate the reading comprehension of the students.
  • We also developed a Bayesian network model to evaluate reading comprehension in elementary school children in Mexico.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows: Section 2 shows the works related to our research. The applied methodology in the development of the study is shown in Section 3. The evaluation of the reading comprehension of the participants is shown in Section 4. Section 5 presents the obtained results in the Bayesian network model to evaluate the participants in their reading comprehension. Finally, the conclusions of this research are presented.

2. Literature Review

In the educational field, reading comprehension is connected to learning achievement, and through it, the students can interpret, retain, organize, and value what has been read. Reading is an essential process for understanding and processing information during learning activities. In the student, reading comprehension is critical as it stimulates their cognitive-linguistic development, strengthens their self-concept, and provides self-confidence. This will only be obtained if one motivation toward learning exists. Acquiring student motivation is a difficult task that entails preparing the reading process consciously [11]. Motivation is one of the obstacles that impede teaching the importance of reading comprehension in primary schools of Mexico. This cause implies that students show little interest and performance in reading exercises due to not being adequately motivated [11]. Nevertheless, the inclusion of technology in education positively affects the students’ attitudes [12].
In addition to this, the use of technologies has increased more and more in educational institutions. The need to introduce technological tools in education is favorable due to the many resources they offer. Furthermore, Refs. [13,14,15] affirm that the use of technology allows the development of autonomous skills in students, which allows demonstrating differences regarding the effectiveness of using (or not) technology tools in text comprehension [16]. The application of technologies in education, or educational technology, implies using ICT with a pedagogical purpose, integrating them as resources within the learning process’s planning. Technologies will not replace the teachers. Instead, technology is a tool with which the educational process can operate. The tasks of designing, planning, and determining the educational strategy used are in charge of the teachers’ academic expertise [17].
The number of investigations that work with a broad group of variables where there are complex relationships is increasing [18,19,20]. However, these tasks require a computer system design under artificial intelligence principles and techniques [21,22]. A Bayesian network is a type of intelligent system. It is known as a probabilistic model, a Bayesian model, or a belief network. Obtaining a Bayesian network based on data is a learning process divided into two stages: structural learning and parametric learning. The first consists of obtaining the Bayesian network structure, in other words, the dependent and independent relationships between the involved variables. The second stage aims to get probabilities a priori and conditionals required based on a given structure. Once causal relationships between each variable and its parent are established, there are established algorithms to make inferences. It is vital to observe the network structure that supplies information about the probabilistic dependencies between the variables and the conditional independencies. The insertion of independent relationships in the Bayesian network structure is an excellent tool to represent knowledge compactly based on the propagation of probabilities according to the probability theory laws.
Since Bayesian networks have appeared, researchers have integrated them in modeling in the education domain to measure the technical and cognitive performance of a student. There are different subjective perspectives in the interpretation of the context in the educational field such as the measurement of individual educational experience, emotional state, learning methods, financial background, student learning style, and specific academic abilities [23,24,25]. Although they have been widely used in the last 20 years in the artificial intelligence community, the knowledge models based on these techniques have only had limited acceptance in general psychometry. The Bayesian networks provide a convenient way of specifying complex relationships between latent cognitive variables. However, because of these models’ complexity, there are still many challenges and open research questions that have prevented achieving a more generalized use.
Bayesian networks can obtain more impulse in typical educational evaluation practice, providing enriched diagnostic information to support all students’ academic success [26]. In this way, it is possible to model the learning style, and pace, representing the way and speed students acquire and understand the dictated or read topics. Hence, it would be possible to involve students in the pedagogical process and significantly improve their academic performance [27,28,29].

3. Methodology

In this research, we designed an exploratory experiment to understand the reading comprehension in elementary school children in Mexico. This experiment describes the study units, standardized measuring instruments, and the procedure to gather the information.

3.1. Material Resources

The Secretariat of Public Education (SPE) is the institution in charge of defining regulations, plans, and study programs for education in Mexico. The SEP has defined national standards to improve reading ability in primary school students [8,9,10] including reading speed, reading comprehension, and reading fluency. Furthermore, research shows a significant relationship between learning styles and reading comprehension [30,31]. Hence, we selected the variables learning style, learning rhythm, reading speed, and reading comprehension to determine the language and communication level. In this study four standardized instruments related to reading comprehension in elementary school children were identified:
  • Learning styles test. The objective of this test is to identify the way a student learns a topic (see Appendix A).
  • Learning pace test. This test identifies the speed in which a student learns or acquires new knowledge (see Appendix B).
  • Reading speed test. This test counts the number of words a student can learn in a minute.
  • Reading comprehension test. This test determines the comprehensive ability of a student by means of readings and questions (see Appendix C).

3.2. Development Tools

Netica is a commercial program developed for the analysis of Bayesian networks. We chose Netica because it presents a friendly interface and easy comprehension for the design and analysis of the results. It has a graphic interface to model Bayesian networks and has exact and approximate reasoning algorithms for both discrete and continuous variables [32].

3.3. Participants

The sample comprised students from the elementary school General Manuel Gutiérrez Zamora in the city of Misantla, Veracruz, Mexico during the school year 2018–2019. The experimental study integrated fifth and sixth grade students (groups A, B, and C), making up a sample of a total of 107 participants, 42 female and 65 males, within the age range of 10 and 12 years old. It is important to point out that the three groups from both grades had different teachers. This reflects the diversity of participants in the experiment and different styles of teaching reading comprehension.

3.4. Procedure

The experiment was carried out in approximately six weeks, taking into account groups A, B, and C from the fifth grade and groups A, B, and C from the sixth grade. In this period, it was decided to work with one group per week during Spanish class hours with a maximum duration of 60 min per day. On the first day, the visual, auditory, and kinesthetic (VAK) learning styles test (20 min) was applied. On the second day, the test about learning pace was applied (40 min), whose objective was to analyze how a person has to learn content quickly or slowly. On the third day, the reading speed test took place, consisting of counting the number of words that a child could read during a minute. As a response to the teachers’ suggestion, the test was carried out ten times in approximately 40 min, and at the end, the number of words per student was averaged. The reading comprehension test was applied two times on the last days of the week. This test consisted of assigning a text that the students had to read (20 min) and a series of questions related to the text that they had to answer (40 min) to analyze the comprehension of the assigned text. Figure 1 shows the complete scheme of the methodology proposed in this research, which allows for the evaluation of reading comprehension in primary education in children from the application of tests of learning styles, learning pace, reading speed and reading comprehension. These variables are used as nodes in the design of a Bayesian network that classifies the language and communication level of achievement.

4. Case Description

4.1. Data Analysis

The first test evaluates that when something needs to be learned, each individual uses their own method or set of strategies. Although the concrete strategies used differ according to what needs to be learned, each individual tends to develop some tendencies more than others—these preferences or tendencies of using determined ways of learning more than others constitute our learning style [33,34]. Although the notion of learning styles is controversial, there is research that indicates the impact of learning styles on reading comprehension [35,36,37,38]. Furthermore, the results in [27,39,40] model the learning style using Bayesian networks. In this research, the participants’ learning style is divided into auditory, visual, and kinesthetic; the results are shown in Figure 2. The experts (teachers) first established the variables of interest to build the Bayesian network (tests related to reading comprehension). Second, the graph was designed with the variables and the relationships between them (causal dependencies). In this sense, eliminating some of the variables of interest, for example, learning style generates a different Bayesian network model, which possibly works in predicting the language and communication level of achievement but does not reflect the needs identified in the study sample.
In the issue of learning, the same point happens as in the other aspects of development; each student follows a personal learning pace that should be respected [41]. Each activity and learning experience must be designed, taking into account the different pace of the students to allow them to make progress and avoid labels that discriminate and cause problems in self-esteem and how they connect with themselves [42,43]. Consequently, without putting pressure by asking more than what they can do at that moment as the risk of mental block and frustration would hinder their progress. In this sense, for the second test, the results can be observed in Figure 3.
In addition, the reading speed is the number of words that a person reads per minute with the goal of understanding the context of a text. Due to that fact, practicing specific techniques and strategies to accelerate reading speed is one of the objectives of reading comprehension. An ideal reading speed is the one that suits the reader and text in each moment because not everyone reads at the same speed, nor do we read at the same pace. This test consists of a student reading 125 words in an average of a determined reading, either a fable, story, or informative text, as long as it is a reading established as the student’s corresponding grade. Once the ability to decode text in a lineal form is present, it is necessary to increase reading speed. However, the number of words read per minute is not equal to the reading comprehension per se. The number of words per minute was transformed to a discrete value under the following criteria:
  • Requires support. A student reads less than 100 words.
  • Almost standard. A student reads between 100 and 114 words.
  • Standard. A student reads between 115 and 125 words.
  • Advanced. A student reads more than 125 words.
Bayesian networks allow for a domain of knowledge to be represented with uncertainty. In many cases, the structure and the assignment of probabilities of a Bayesian network are given through the opinion of experts, manually or traditionally [44]. Therefore, in this experiment, the teachers of the elementary school General Manuel Gutiérrez Zamora decided to apply the reading speed test presented in this article based on their teaching experience. Furthermore, it was a request that they carried out this study because they are attached to their study program, and their technical teacher’s board validated the test. Figure 4 shows the results obtained in the reading speed test of the participants in this experiment.
In the reading comprehension test, we presented a text to the students that had to be read. After reading, questions related to the text were asked to identify the students’ comprehension ability in reading. Figure 5 shows the results of the reading comprehension test.

4.2. Pedagogical Evaluations

The data analysis was centered on the test results (learning style, learning pace, reading comprehension, and speed) applied to the participants in the experiments. These four tests were the main variables of the research and, based on them, the language and communication level of achievement. The professors assigned a language and communication level of achievement based on their experience and the four applied test results. Table 1 summarizes the research’s main variables, which are useful for the evaluation of reading comprehension in elementary school children in Mexico.
The aim of this research was to determine the language and communication level of achievement based on the tests applied to participants. These levels established by the Secretariat of Public Education [8,9,10] in Mexico and are described below:
  • Level I. Students can identify, select and extract accurate and explicit information of a related text fragment, literally, the question with the content of brief literary narrative texts (story or journal).
  • Level II. Students can identify, select and extract explicit information of a related text fragment through synonyms, the question with the content of narrative texts (literary and informative), and expository, both continuous and discontinuous.
  • Level III. Students can identify, select, extract and relate explicit and implicit information in several related text fragments through paraphrase, the question with content in narrative texts (literary and informative, both continuous and discontinuous). Furthermore, they can understand global and specific content based on the integration of information present in several major semantic units in the sentence.
  • Level IV. Students can identify, select, extract and relate explicit and implicit information in several related text fragments through paraphrase and inferences, question the content in narrative texts (literary and informative, expository, argumentative, and dialogic, both continuous and discontinuous). Additionally, they demonstrate through graphic representations (concept map) the understanding of global and specific content as well as the textual purpose through hierarchy and integration of information.

4.3. Data Integration

The test results were applied to 107 participants and used to integrate data in a knowledge database, considering: (1) learning style, (2) learning pace, (3) reading speed, and (4) reading comprehension. Additionally, experts (teachers) gave each of the students an assigned language and communication level of achievement based on the test results and their pedagogical experience. Figure 6 shows the knowledge base generated in .cvs format.

5. Proposed Bayesian Network Model

5.1. Variables, Parameters and Relationships

The Bayesian network allows for assigning the language and communication level of achievement in elementary school students based on their style and learning pace, speed, and reading comprehension. A Bayesian network is defined as a structure and the corresponding probability model. Bayesian networks use a probability distribution in each variable that comprises it, described in Equation (1).
P ( x 1 , , x n ) = i = 1 n p ( x i   |   p a r e n t s ( x i ) )
The probability tables’ initial data were based on the analysis of data collected from the tests applied to the students. These data are essential because the empirical construction of each probability table can be a difficult task. There are two procedures for generating Bayesian networks. The first one is based on automatic routines where a certain number of algorithms can identify the underlying structure in a dataset. The second one focuses on expert judgment, where the knowledge of a group of experts in a particular domain is used to generate the network architecture [7]. Accordingly, we defined the network crucial elements, which include the variables (nodes), links between variables, and parameters.
One way to generate a Bayesian network is to use the knowledge of a group of experts in a particular domain to generate the network architecture (connections between nodes). In this way, the relationships between nodes were established by the elementary school teachers of Escuela Primaria General Manuel Gutiérrez Zamora located in Misantla, Veracruz, Mexico. The Bayesian network proposed to evaluate and assign the language and communication level of achievement based on the test results and the experience of the pedagogical teachers is shown in Figure 7.
The proposed model represents the tests applied to the students and the language and communication level of achievement. Specifically, Figure 7 shows the final node representing the language and communication levels of reading that a student can achieve from some parent nodes such as learning style, learning pace, reading speed, and reading comprehension, influencing this end node. The data matrix represents the probabilities associated with each of the values in the nodes. In this study, we obtained complete and sufficient data for all the model variables. The probabilities were estimated based on the data frequency (maximum likelihood estimator [7]). Furthermore, 31.5% of the students were classified as level I, 23.4% as level II, 23.9% as level III, and 21.2% as level IV. The proposed model can learn from past estimates and achieve increasingly precise results, making it useful in changing learning environments such as basic education.
In Bayesian networks, a node pointed by an arrow (bow) is a dependent variable on the one at the origin of the arrow. In the proposed model (Figure 7), the dependent variables were reading_comprehension_1, reading_comprehension_2, and LC_level; the independent variables present in the model were learning_style, learning_pace, and reading_speed. Furthermore, the level of reading comprehension (node labeled LC_level) was a latent variable present in the students, and in the proposed model, we inferred this variable from the Bayesian mathematical model. As a remark, latent variables were unobserved random entities that do not have a specific unit of measurement and, therefore, any estimate is subject to an associated error. Hence, in the case of having a valid instrument for measuring a variable, any value assignment would have an associated margin of error. Furthermore, its measurement unit could vary between studies because there is no consensus on its comparison parameter [45].
In this research, we inferred the value of the language and communication level of achievement node according to the results obtained in the first and second reading comprehension tests (both with a weight of 50%). Simultaneously, the reading comprehension test results depend on the tests learning style, learning pace, and reading speed (each weighing ⅓ on the incidence of reading comprehension).
Finally, the proposed Bayesian network simulates situations during a student’s reading activity in a school. A teacher inserts the learning test results into the network and analyzes the values of the conditional probabilities. In the last step, the probability of classification by levels is observed at the final node. The result gives the teacher the percentage that a student has to understand the reading, which will allow the development of communication and language skills. In relation to this, understanding the impact of reading comprehension could lead to the development and implementation of pedagogical strategies, educational policies in the management of teaching, and will even provide crucial information to teachers on how to act so that the deficiencies in this ability do not affect school performance.

5.2. Validation of the Proposed Model

We established a group control of 41 students, formed by the test results belonging to 5th C and 6th C. The analysis was carried out in Netica, and the command test with cases was executed, considering the evaluation of the behavior concerning the previously carried out training. Table 2 shows the validation results of the confusion matrix. The model obtained an 85.36% of precision; this means that those students with level I were classified as level I (8) as well as level II–level II (9), level III–level III (4), and level IV–level IV (14).

6. Discussion

The main contribution of this work is developing a Bayesian network that evaluates the reading comprehension in fifth and sixth-grade students at an elementary school level in Mexico based on the factors learning style, learning pace, and reading speed. Furthermore, the Bayesian network will make it possible to identify students at the lowest level of reading comprehension. From this, teachers will have the necessary educational tools to plan specialized and individualized lessons within the classroom. We tested the model in an elementary school and detected that most of the fifth and sixth-grade students had a low reading comprehension level. The students were only able to identify simple information that was found explicitly in descriptive texts. Furthermore, they obtained support from graphs such as drawings or images, distinguishing only basic elements of grammar. However, there was a better performance in the reading speed test because the development of this ability was distributed in several classes, which motivated students to start their like of reading earlier and, hence, achieved better reading comprehension.
These results allow teachers to determine lesson planning changes and implement new pedagogical mechanisms to improve learning and understanding of the lessons. On the other hand, based on the generated information, the model will be able to predict if a student is at the highest levels of reading comprehension (levels III and IV). The model also generates pertinent information for the teacher about each student’s situation, allowing for feedback through activities inside and outside the classroom.

7. Conclusions

Educational technology carries out a fundamental role in decision making, planning time, activity management and, therefore, will increase student motivation during their learning experience, which is supported by the teachers’ experience. The Bayesian network model obtained an 85.36% precision when determining the language and communication level of achievement based on their learning style, learning pace, speed, and reading comprehension. Therefore, the results showed that Bayesian network implementation allows for the language and communication level of achievement to be determined with great precision. In this sense, teachers can carry out changes in class planning. For example, encouraging students to read aloud even if they have reading difficulties enhances literary text analysis from the students’ perspective through forums, debates, and round tables [46,47,48,49,50]. Furthermore, the implementation of new pedagogical mechanisms will improve the level of learning and understanding of contents.
As future work, we will extend the study including other variables that can influence the interest values to have a clearer idea about why the evaluation of reading comprehension has a deficit in Mexico. For example, we will contemplate related variables to the socioeconomic and psychological field and even analyze the differences of comprehension and learning by gender.
On the other hand, we could integrate the Bayesian network model into a decision-making system to automate the process and let the student interact with technology. Generally, they seem to be more receptive to it, obtaining trustworthy results and avoiding boredom distractions that conventional methods can generate. This intelligent system could be easily implemented in different elementary school institutions of the 32 states in the Republic of Mexico and provide a tool that can help identify the reading comprehension capacity in fifth and sixth-grade students.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.A.M.-A.; Methodology, E.U.R.-B. and R.A.M.-A.; Software, E.U.R.-B.; Validation, L.A.M.-R. and S.G.G.-A.; Writing—original draft preparation, R.A.M.-A. and M.L.-R.; Writing—review and editing, L.C.S.-H. and A.M.-N.; Supervision and project administration, R.A.M.-A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

All data are available on the request to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The first author acknowledges the scholarship to postgraduate studies from the Mexican Council of Science and Technology (CONACYT).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Learning styles test
Grado: __________ Grupo: __________ Fecha: ______/______/______
Instrucciones: Marca con una gran X tu respuesta
CuestionamientoVisualAuditivoKinestésico
¿Qué te gusta mas?Ver televisiónOír músicaJugar con tus amigos
¿En tu cumpleaños que disfrutas más?Los adornosLas mañanitasLa piñata
¿Qué te gusta hacer en la escuela?LeerEscuchar historiasExperimentar
¿Qué regalos prefieres?Cuentos e historietasCD y MP3Juegos didácticos
¿Si tuvieras dinero que comprarías?Una cámara fotográficaUn reproductorPlastilinas
¿Cuándo estás con tus amigos te gusta …?DibujarCantarJugar en el patio
¿Cuándo tus papás no te consienten tu …?Te enojasLlorasHaces berrinche
¿Cuándo sales de paseo tu prefieres?Ir al cineAsistir a un conciertoIr a la feria
Total: A.__________ B.__________ K.__________. Canal Dominante: _____________
Modelo: Visual, Auditivo y Kinestésico.

Appendix B

Learning pace test
No marque este folleto
Marque sus respuestas en la hoja especial para respuestas
OTIS sencillo
Esta es una prueba para ver como piensa. Contiene preguntas de diferentes clases. Después de cada pregunta hay de tres a cinco respuestas posibles. Usted debe decidir cual de las respuestas que le siguen es la correcta. Como es una prueba donde se mide el tiempo, no le conviene. Emplear mucho tiempo en una solo pregunta. Como ejemplo a continuación se le presentan algunas preguntas:
Ejemplo a: ¿Cuál de las cinco cosas de abajo es dura?
  a) tela  b) piedra  c) algodón  d) gelatina  e) espuma
La respuesta correcta es piedra. La palabra piedra corresponde a la letra b. Ahora, en la hoja especial para respuestas, vea los espacios para marcar las respuestas del ejemplo “a”, donde se ha marcado ya la letra b. Esta es la forma de contestar las siguientes preguntas.
Pruebe usted el siguiente ejemplo. Recuerde escribir su respuesta en el espacio especial para los ejemplos y no en este folleto.
Ejemplo b: Un pino es una especia de:
  a) pájaro  b) gusano  c) planta  d) árbol  e) flor
La respuesta correcta es árbol, la cual corresponde a la letra d, así es que en su hoja de respuestas debe marcar esa letra, en el espacio del ejemplo b.
Ejemplo c: ¿Cuál de los cinco números de abajo es menor que 25?
  a) 35 b) 58 c) 26 d) 35 e) 19
La respuesta correcta para el ejemplo “c” es 19 que corresponde a la letra e, así que esa debe ser su respuesta para el ejemplo c.
Lea cuidadosamente cada pregunta y decida cual de las respuestas es la mejor. Al marcar sus respuestas, asegúrese siempre de que el número de pregunta sea el mismo para la hoja de respuestas. Borre completamente cualquier respuesta que desee cambiar.
La prueba contiene 75 preguntas. No se espera que pueda responder todas, pero trate de contestar bien el mayor número posible. Tenga cuidado de no ir tan rápido que cometa equivocaciones. No pase mucho tiempo en una sola pregunta. Se le concederán 30 min., a partir del momento en que el examinador le indique que empiece. Ninguna pregunta será contestada por el examinador, después de empezar la prueba.
No de vuelta a esta página hasta que se le indique

Appendix C

Learning comprehension test.
Texto informativo de quinto grado
Leer atentamente el siguiente texto
Un almuerzo prehistórico
 ¡Qué dura debía ser la vida hace miles de años! En esos tiempos, los seres humanos vivían especialmente de la caza y de la recolección de frutos y raíces. Las tribus se desplazaban continuamente siguiendo a las presas que les servían de alimento. Los hombres eran los encargados de cazar y las mujeres de juntar frutas y raíces y, a veces, se ocupaban de la pesca. El alimento dependía de lo que podrían encontrar en las diferentes regiones, pero el hambre era un fantasma pertinente.
 ¿Cuál podía ser un almuerzo común para la familia de la prehistoria? Si tenían suerte, podían contar con osos, monos, elefantes, ciervos, jabalíes, renos o mamuts. Cuando la caza mayor escaseaba, atrapaban animales más pequeños, como ratas y murciélagos y complementaban la dieta con escarabajos, larvas, gusanos y otros insectos.
 Para poder frente a animales mucho más grandes que ellos, los cazadores fabricaron armas cada vez más perfectas. Así, surgieron el hacha y la lanza, que podían arrojarse a cierta distancia, con más seguridad. Estas les dieron ventajas a los hombres en la lucha con los animales.
 Nadie sabe cuándo fue el momento exacto en el que los seres humanos descubrieron cómo utilizar el fuego, pero desde ese descubrimiento todo cambió. Se empezaron a cocinar los alimentos y esto fue un avance espectacular, el fuego acababa con los parásitos de la carne y la comida se volvió más saludable. También se pudieron aprovechar muchos vegetales como el arroz, que crudo no resultaba nada atractivo.
Responder las siguientes preguntas. Responder la respuesta correcta.
  • ¿Por qué se dice que la vida debía ser dura?
  • Porque debían desplazarse continuamente para sobrevivir.
  • Porque no tenían televisores ni videojuegos.
  • Porque los chicos tenían que salir a cazar desde muy pequeños.
  • Porque solo podrían comer frutas.
2.
¿A qué se llamaba caza mayor?
  • A la caza de ratas, murciélagos e insectos.
  • A la caza que realizaba la gente mayor de la tribu.
  • A la casa más grande que había en la tribu.
  • A la caza de osos, monos, elefantes, ciervos, jabalíes y mamuts.
3.
¿Por qué las tribus debían desplazarse continuamente?
  • Porque necesitaban ir en busca de alimento.
  • Porque debían huir de otras tribus salvajes.
  • Porque de esa manera rendían culto a los dioses.
  • Porque se aburrían de vivir en el mismo lugar.
4.
Según el texto, ¿Cuáles fueron las ventajas del hacha y de la lanza?
  • Permitió mejorar las artesanías que construían.
  • Dios ventajas al hombre para luchar contra los animales.
  • Permitió que las tribus intercambiaran objetos.
  • Dios la posibilidad de armar ejércitos.
5.
¿Por qué se dice que cuando apareció el fuego, la comida fue más saludable?
  • Porque espantaba a los insectos que se acercaban a la comida.
  • Porque como cocinaban la carne, era más sabrosa y ya no tenía parásitos.
  • Porque el fuego les permitía abrigarse cuando hacía mucho frío.
  • Porque como ya no estaban a oscuras, podían cocinar mejor.
6.
¿Por qué eran los hombres los encargados de cazar?
  • Porque no les gustaba pescar.
  • Porque no querían que las mujeres trabajaran.
  • Porque solo había hombres en las tribus.
  • Porque eran más fuertes para enfrentar a los animales.

References

  1. Flórez, A.M.H.; Gallego, T.M. Desarrollo de habilidades de comprensión lectora en niños y niñas de la básica primaria. Rev. Virtual Univ. Católica Norte 2017, 51, 23–45. [Google Scholar]
  2. Tedesco, J.C. Los cambios en la educación secundaria y el papel de los planificadores. In La educación Secundaria.¿Cambio o Inmutabilidad? Santillana: Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2001; pp. 11–19. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zorrilla, M. La educación secundaria en México: Al filo de su reforma. REICE Rev. Iberoam. Sobre Calid. Efic. Cambio Educ. 2004, 2. [Google Scholar]
  4. Dale, A.; Newman, L. Sustainable development, education and literacy. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2005, 6, 351–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Oliveros, M.O.C.; de Castro, A.E.; Truyó, V.I.C.; Flórez, D.G.; Robles, H.S.; Plaza, D.D.; Fuentes, R.A.R. Comprensión lectora y TIC en la universidad. Apertura 2014, 6, 46–59. [Google Scholar]
  6. Milenkovic, K.; Draskovic, D.; Nikolic, B. Educational software system for reasoning and decision making using Bayesian networks. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Istanbul, Turkey, 3–5 April 2014; pp. 1189–1194. [Google Scholar]
  7. Sucar, L.E.; Tonantzintla, M. Redes bayesianas. Aprendizaje Automático: Conceptos básicos y avanzados. INAOE 2006, 77, 100. [Google Scholar]
  8. Sánchez, A.; Andrade, E. El aprendizaje en tercero de secundaria en México. Inf. Sobre Result. Excale 2009, 9. [Google Scholar]
  9. Lara, M.M.G. Los Estándares Nacionales de Competencia Lectora en Una Escuela de Nivel Primaria. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad Pedagógica Nacional-095, Azcapotzalco, Mexico, October 2013. [Google Scholar]
  10. Caracas, S.B.P.; Ornelas, H.M. La evaluación de la comprensión lectora en México. El caso de las pruebas EXCALE, PLANEA y PISA. Perf. Educ. 2019, 41, 8–27. [Google Scholar]
  11. Avena, E.Y.H. La Evaluación de los Ritmos de Aprendizaje en la Comprensión Lectora. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad Pedagógica Nacional-25B, Mazatlán, Sinaloa, Mexico, May 2007. [Google Scholar]
  12. Christensen, R. Effects of technology integration education on the attitudes of teachers and students. J. Res. Technol. Educ. 2002, 34, 411–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Levratto, V. ARQUILECTUR@: Modalidades de lectura digital en niños y niñas de Educación Primaria. Tend. Pedagógicas 2017, 29, 101–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Raso, F.; Hinojo, M.A.; Solá, J.M. Integración y uso docente de las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación (TIC) en la escuela rural de la provincia de Granada: Estudio descriptivo. REICE Rev. Iberoam. Sobre Calid. Efic. Cambio Educ. 2015, 13, 139–159. [Google Scholar]
  15. Carranza, A.M.R.; Caldera, M.J.F. Percepción de los Estudiantes sobre el Aprendizaje Significativo y Estrategias de Enseñanza en el Blended Learning. REICE Rev. Iberoam. Sobre Calid. Efic. Cambio Educ. 2018, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pedraza, R.M.; Gordillo, J.J.T. Las tecnologías y el desarrollo de la comprensión de textos. Propuesta de un instrumento diagnóstico. Atenas 2019, 2, 126–141. [Google Scholar]
  17. Cruz, J.C.; Carrillo, A.T.M.; Cuentas, M.S. Potenciar la comprensión lectora desde la tecnología de la información. Escenarios 2011, 9, 26–36. [Google Scholar]
  18. Nouh, Y.; Karthikeyani, P.; Nadarajan, R. Updating Student Model using Bayesian Network and Item Response Theory. In Proceedings of the 2006 Fourth International Conference on Intelligent Sensing and Information Processing, Bangalore, India, 15 October–18 December 2006; pp. 161–164. [Google Scholar]
  19. Yang, Q.; Wang, X.; Huang, Z.; Zheng, S. Research of student model based on bayesian network. In Proceedings of the 2007 First IEEE International Symposium on Information Technologies and Applications in Education, Kunming, China, 23–25 November 2007; pp. 514–519. [Google Scholar]
  20. Na, W.; Ping, W. Quality of learning analysis based on bayesian network. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Computer Design and Applications, Qinhuangdao, China, 25–27 June 2010. [Google Scholar]
  21. Hibou, M.; Labat, J.M. Embedded Bayesian network student models. In Proceedings of the Information Technology Based Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Higher Education and Training, Istanbul, Turkey, 31 May–2 June 2004; pp. 468–472. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ramírez-Noriega, A.; Juárez-Ramírez, R.; Martínez-Ramírez, Y. Evaluation module based on Bayesian networks to Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2017, 37, 1488–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Colace, F.; De Santo, M.; Pietrosanto, A.; Troiano, A. Work in progress: Bayesian networks for edutainment. In Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education 36th Annual Conference, San Diego, CA, USA, 27–31 October 2006; pp. 13–14. [Google Scholar]
  24. Hua, L.J.; Sen, W.W. The Research of Emotional Cognition Model which Based On Bayesian Network within Intelligent Tutoring System. In Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Natural Computing, Wuhan, China, 6–7 June 2009; pp. 324–327. [Google Scholar]
  25. Raigoza, J.; Wankhede, D. Publishing Student Grades while Preserving Individual Information Using Bayesian Networks. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 15–17 December 2016; pp. 1399–1400. [Google Scholar]
  26. López-Faican, L.G.; Chamba-Eras, L.A. Redes bayesianas para predecir el estilo de aprendizaje de estudiantes en entornos virtuales. AtoZ Novas Práticas Inf. Conhecimento 2014, 3, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. García, P.; Amandi, A.; Schiaffino, S.; Campo, M. Evaluating Bayesian networks’ precision for detecting students’ learning styles. Comput. Educ. 2007, 49, 794–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pytel, P.; Vegega, C.; Deroche, A.; Acosta, M.P.; Pollo Cattaneo, M.F. Modelo bayesiano para el diagnóstico del aprendizaje en alumnos de inteligencia artificial. In Proceedings of the XXI Congreso Argentino de Ciencias de la Computación, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 5–9 October 2015. [Google Scholar]
  29. Millán, E.; Loboda, T.; Pérez-De-La-Cruz, J.L. Bayesian networks for student model engineering. Comput. Educ. 2010, 55, 1663–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tangoa, V.N.; Hidalgo, M.G. Estilos de Aprendizaje y Comprensión Lectora de los Estudiantes del Quinto Grado de Educación Primaria de la Institución Educativa n° 62313 de Palmichi del Pueblo Shawi Cahuapanas-Loreto 2015; Universidad Nacional Intercultural de la Amazonia: Pucallpa, Peru, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  31. Rodríguez, H.A.R.; Mercado, R.D.C.; García, M.J.; Montes, C.O.L. Estilos de Aprendizaje que Favorecen la Lectura y Escritura en Niños de Grado Transición. Master’s Thesis, Escuela de Educación y Pedagogía, Córdoba, Colombia, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  32. Puga, J.L. Cómo construir y validar Redes bayesianas con netica. REMA 2012, 17, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  33. Polloyqueri, M.N.D. Estilos VAK y Logros de Aprendizaje del área de Matemática en Estudiantes de IV, V Ciclos de Primaria-Institución Educativa N° 70 150 Puno. 2018. Available online: https://repositorio.ucv.edu.pe/handle/20.500.12692/36258 (accessed on 1 April 2021).
  34. Del Aguila, A.A.M.; García, R.S.Y. Estilos de Aprendizaje VAK y Resolución de Problemas Matemáticos de los Estudiantes del Sexto Grado de Primaria en la Institución Educativa N° 5088 “Héroes del Pacífico”. Ventanilla. 2013. Available online: https://repositorio.ucv.edu.pe/handle/20.500.12692/9779 (accessed on 1 April 2021).
  35. Alharbi, M.A. Reading strategies, learning styles and reading comprehension: A correlation study. J. Lang. Teach. Res. 2015, 6, 1257–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Gürses, M.Ö.; Bouvet, E. Investigating Reading Comprehension and Learning Styles in Relation to Reading Strategies in L2. Read. Foreign Lang. 2016, 28, 20–42. [Google Scholar]
  37. Cornejo, C.O.; San Martín, N.L. Estilos de aprendizaje y rendimiento académico en estudiantes de pedagogía de educación general básica (primaria) de una universidad pública de Chile. Rev. Estilos Aprendiz. 2013, 6. [Google Scholar]
  38. Briceño, L.A.; Velásquez, F.R.; Peinado, S. Influencia de los mapas conceptuales y los estilos de aprendizaje en la comprensión de la lectura. Rev. Estilos Aprendiz. 2011, 4. [Google Scholar]
  39. Tadlaoui, M.A.; Carvalho, R.N.; Khaldi, M. Combining the Overlay Model and Bayesian Networks to Determine Learning Styles in AHES. In Handbook of Research on E-Assessment in Higher Education; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2019; pp. 195–218. [Google Scholar]
  40. García, P.; Amandi, A.; Schiaffino, S.; Campo, M. Using Bayesian networks to detect students’ learning styles in a web-based education system. Proc. ASAI Rosario 2005, 115-–126. [Google Scholar]
  41. Watson, J. Keeping Pace with k-12 Online Learning: A Review of State-Level Policy and Practice; Learning Point Associates/North Central Regional Educational Laboratory (NCREL): Naperville, IL, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  42. Schmid, E.C. Enhancing performance knowledge and self-esteem in classroom language learning: The potential of the ACTIVote component of interactive whiteboard technology. System 2007, 35, 119–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wachelka, D.; Katz, R.C. Reducing test anxiety and improving academic self-esteem in high school and college students with learning disabilities. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 1999, 30, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sánchez, P.L.A. Redes bayesianas para inferir integridad ecológica en los ecosistemas mexicanos. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Mexico, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  45. Pedrero, V.; Cabieses, B.; Bernales, M. El potencial de las variables latentes en investigación en Salud. Rev. Médica Chile 2015, 143, 814–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Trainin, G.; Hiebert, E.H.; Wilson, K.M. A comparison of reading rates, comprehension, and stamina in oral and silent reading of fourth-grade students. Read. Psychol. 2015, 36, 595–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Dickens, R.H.; Meisinger, E.B. Examining the effects of skill level and reading modality on reading comprehension. Read. Psychol. 2016, 37, 318–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Price, K.W.; Meisinger, E.B.; Louwerse, M.M.; D’Mello, S. The contributions of oral and silent reading fluency to reading comprehension. Read. Psychol. 2016, 37, 167–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Johnston, V. Successful read-alouds in today’s classroom. Kappa Delta Rec. 2016, 52, 39–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ninsuwan, P. The effectiveness of teaching english by using reading aloud technique towards efl beginners. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015, 197, 1835–1840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Proposed methodology for the development of the research.
Figure 1. Proposed methodology for the development of the research.
Sustainability 13 04285 g001
Figure 2. Number of students who took the learning styles test.
Figure 2. Number of students who took the learning styles test.
Sustainability 13 04285 g002
Figure 3. Number of students who took the learning pace test.
Figure 3. Number of students who took the learning pace test.
Sustainability 13 04285 g003
Figure 4. Number of students who took the reading speed test.
Figure 4. Number of students who took the reading speed test.
Sustainability 13 04285 g004
Figure 5. Number of students who took the reading comprehension test.
Figure 5. Number of students who took the reading comprehension test.
Sustainability 13 04285 g005
Figure 6. Part of knowledge base of the main variables of the research.
Figure 6. Part of knowledge base of the main variables of the research.
Sustainability 13 04285 g006
Figure 7. Bayesian network to support the teacher in the process of the decision-making of reading comprehension.
Figure 7. Bayesian network to support the teacher in the process of the decision-making of reading comprehension.
Sustainability 13 04285 g007
Table 1. Pedagogical evaluation descriptions.
Table 1. Pedagogical evaluation descriptions.
EvaluationValues
Learning style{auditory, visual, kinesthetic}
Learning pace{low, almost low, medium, almost superior, superior}
Reading speed{requires support, almost standard, standard, advanced}
Reading comprehension{very weak, weak, enough, ideal}
Language and communication level of achievement{I, II, III, IV}
Table 2. Confusion matrix results.
Table 2. Confusion matrix results.
RealPredicted
Level ILevel IILevel IIILevel IV
Level I8000
Level II1901
Level III0143
Level IV00014
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rodriguez-Barrios, E.U.; Melendez-Armenta, R.A.; Garcia-Aburto, S.G.; Lavoignet-Ruiz, M.; Sandoval-Herazo, L.C.; Molina-Navarro, A.; Morales-Rosales, L.A. Bayesian Approach to Analyze Reading Comprehension: A Case Study in Elementary School Children in Mexico. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4285. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084285

AMA Style

Rodriguez-Barrios EU, Melendez-Armenta RA, Garcia-Aburto SG, Lavoignet-Ruiz M, Sandoval-Herazo LC, Molina-Navarro A, Morales-Rosales LA. Bayesian Approach to Analyze Reading Comprehension: A Case Study in Elementary School Children in Mexico. Sustainability. 2021; 13(8):4285. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084285

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rodriguez-Barrios, Ernesto U., Roberto Angel Melendez-Armenta, Sandra G. Garcia-Aburto, Marieli Lavoignet-Ruiz, Luis Carlos Sandoval-Herazo, Antonio Molina-Navarro, and Luis Alberto Morales-Rosales. 2021. "Bayesian Approach to Analyze Reading Comprehension: A Case Study in Elementary School Children in Mexico" Sustainability 13, no. 8: 4285. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084285

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop