Next Article in Journal
Impact of Secondary Succession in the Xerothermic Grassland on the Population of the Eastern Pasque Flower (Pulsatilla patens)—Preliminary Studies
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of COVID-19 on Airline Transportation Services: A Study on Service Robot Usage Intention
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Applicability of Membranes in Protective Face Masks and Comparison of Reusable and Disposable Face Masks with Life Cycle Assessment

by
Huyen Trang Do Thi
1,
Peter Mizsey
2 and
Andras Jozsef Toth
1,*
1
Environmental and Process Engineering Research Group, Department of Chemical and Environmental Process Engineering, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Műegyetem rkp. 3., H-1111 Budapest, Hungary
2
Institute of Chemistry, University of Miskolc, Egyetemváros C/1 108, H-3515 Miskolc, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(22), 12574; https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212574
Submission received: 13 October 2021 / Revised: 7 November 2021 / Accepted: 9 November 2021 / Published: 14 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Topic Solid Waste Management)

Abstract

In the COVID-19 pandemic period, the role of face masks is critical as a protective physical barrier to prevent droplets and filtrate exhalations coming from infected subjects or against various environmental threats, including the SARS-Cov-2 virus. However, the plastic and microplastic waste from the used face masks pollute the environment, cause a negative impact on human health and the natural ecosystem, as well as increase landfill and medical waste. The presented paper focuses on providing an overview of the application of membrane technology in face mask products as well as the development of protection mechanisms in the future. The authors performed an environmental analysis of reusable (cloth) masks and disposable masks (surgical masks and filtering facepiece respirators) using the Life Cycle Assessment methodology to assess the impacts on the environment, human health, and ecosystem. IMPACT 2002+ V2.14, ReCiPe 2016 Endpoint (H) V1.02, IPCC 2013 GWP 100a V1.03 methods were applied using specialized software (SimaPro V9.1). The disposable masks consistently provide higher protection, though they also carry several multiple environmental burdens. Conversely, reusable masks improve environmental performance, reduce 85% of waste, have a 3.39 times lower impact on climate change, and are 3.7 times cheaper than disposable masks.
Keywords: face masks; cloth masks; surgical masks; filtering facepiece respirators; Life Cycle Assessment; COVID-19 face masks; cloth masks; surgical masks; filtering facepiece respirators; Life Cycle Assessment; COVID-19

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Do Thi, H.T.; Mizsey, P.; Toth, A.J. Applicability of Membranes in Protective Face Masks and Comparison of Reusable and Disposable Face Masks with Life Cycle Assessment. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12574. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212574

AMA Style

Do Thi HT, Mizsey P, Toth AJ. Applicability of Membranes in Protective Face Masks and Comparison of Reusable and Disposable Face Masks with Life Cycle Assessment. Sustainability. 2021; 13(22):12574. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212574

Chicago/Turabian Style

Do Thi, Huyen Trang, Peter Mizsey, and Andras Jozsef Toth. 2021. "Applicability of Membranes in Protective Face Masks and Comparison of Reusable and Disposable Face Masks with Life Cycle Assessment" Sustainability 13, no. 22: 12574. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212574

APA Style

Do Thi, H. T., Mizsey, P., & Toth, A. J. (2021). Applicability of Membranes in Protective Face Masks and Comparison of Reusable and Disposable Face Masks with Life Cycle Assessment. Sustainability, 13(22), 12574. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212574

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop