Systematic Mapping of Research on Farm-Level Sustainability in Egg and Chicken Meat Production
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Definition of Fundamental Concepts
2.1.1. Environmental Sustainability
2.1.2. Economic Sustainability
2.1.3. Social Sustainability
2.2. Systematic Mapping Approach
2.3. Search of Literature
- Scopus;
- Web of Science Core Collection;
- CABI: Cab Abstracts.
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
- Arrebola, J.P.; Castano, A.; Esteban, M.; Bartolome, M.; Perez-Gomez, B.; Ramos, J.J. Differential contribution of animal and vegetable food items on persistent organic pollutant serum concentrations in Spanish adults. Data from BIOAMBIENT.ES project. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 634, 235–242.
- Boggia, A.; Paolotti, L.; Antegiovanni, P.; Fagioli, F.F.; Rocchi, L. Managing ammonia emissions using no-litter flooring system for broilers: Environmental and economic analysis. Environ. Sci. Policy 2019, 101, 331–340.
- Bródka, K.; Kozajda, A.; Buczynska, A.; Szadkowska-Stanczyk, I. The variability of bacterial aerosol in poultry houses depending on selected factors. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health 2012, 3, 281–293.
- Camara, E.E.G.d.; Duarte, E.A.; Ferreira, L. Overall assessment of environmental impacts of animal production in Portugal. Anais Inst. Super. Agron. 2000, 48, 9–40.
- Castellini, C.; Boggia, A.; Cortina, C.; Bosco, A.d.; Paolotti, L.; Novelli, E.; Mugnai, C. A multicriteria approach for measuring the sustainability of different poultry production systems. J. Clean. Prod. 2012, 37, 192–201.
- Dios, M.; Souto, J.A.; Casares, J.J. Emissions inventory analysis for an urban (industrial)-rural (agricultural) environment. WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ. 2010, 129, 383–392.
- Janczak, D.; Mazurkiewicz, J.; Czekała, W.; Myszura, M.; Kozłowski, K.; Jeżowska, A. A Possibility of Functioning Biogas Plant at a Poultry Farm. J. Ecol. Eng. 2019, 20, 225–231.
- Kiley-Worthington, M. Ecological agriculture. Integrating low input, high productive farming with wildlife conservation. Results from the Experimental Farm La Combe, Drome France. Open J. Ecol. 2014, 4, 744–763.
- Lima, I.M.; McAloon, A.; Boateng, A.A. Activated carbon from broiler litter: Process description and cost of production. Biomass Bioenergy 2008, 32, 568–572.
- Meng, S. Is the agricultural industry spared from the influence of the Australian carbon tax? Agric. Econ. 2015, 46, 125–137.
- Ochs, D.S.; Wolf, C.A.; Widmar, N.J.O.; Bir, C. Consumer perceptions of egg-laying hen housing systems. Poult. Sci. 2018, 97, 3390–3396.
- Osei-Owusu, A.K.; Kastner, T.; de Ruiter, H.; Marianne Thomsen, M.; Caro, D. The global cropland footprint of Denmark’s food supply 2000–2013. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2019, 58, 101978.
- Pelletier, N. Social sustainability assessment of Canadian egg production facilities: Methods, analysis, and recommendations. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1601.
- Piskorska-Pliszczynska, J.; Strucinski, P.; Mikolajczyk, S.; Maszewski, S.; Rachubik, J.; Pajurek, M. Pentachlorophenol from an old henhouse as a dioxin source in eggs and related human exposure. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 208, 404–412.
- Prosekov, A.; Petrov, A.; Lisitsyn, A.; Ulrich, E.; Dyshlyuk, L.; Dolganuk, V.A. Selection of conditions for the biodegradation of poultry wastes industry. Res. J. Pharm. Biol. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 2659–2664.
- Rojano, F.; Bournet, P.E.; Hassouna, M.; Robin, P.; Kacira, M.; Choi, C.Y. Modelling heat and mass transfer of a broiler house using computational fluid dynamics. Biosyst. Eng. 2015, 136, 25–38.
- Röös, E.; Patel, M.; Spångberg, J.; Carlsson, G.; Rydhmer, L. Limiting livestock production to pasture and by-products in a search for sustainable diets. Food Policy 2016, 58, 1–13.
- Röös, E.; Patel, M.; Spångberg, J. Producing oat drink or cow’s milk on a Swedish farm—Environmental impacts considering the service of grazing, the opportunity cost of land and the demand for beef and protein. Agric. Syst. 2016, 142, 23–32.
- Röös, E.; Sundberg, C.; Tidaker, P.; Strid, I.; Hansson, P.A. Can carbon footprint serve as an indicator of the environmental impact of meat production? Ecol. Indic. 2013, 24, 573–581.
- Szwedziak, K.; Grzywacz, Z.; Wrotkowski, K. The Application of Microbial Additive in Poultry Production as a Way to Reduce Emission of Harmful Gases into the Environment. Rocz. Ochr. Srodowiska 2018, 20, 417–429.
- Tudorache, M.; Custura, I.; Van, I.; Miclosanu, E.P.; Vidu, L. Influence of applying broiler welfare laws on unit cost. Sci. Pap. Series D Anim. Sci. 2014, 57, 212–215.
- van Overmeire, I.; Pussemier, L.; Waegeneers, N.; Hanot, V.; Windal, I.; Boxus, L.; Covaci, A.; Eppe, G.; Scippo, M.L.; Sioen, I.; et al. Assessment of the chemical contamination in home-produced eggs in Belgium: General overview of the CONTEGG study. Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 407, 4403–4410.
- Vander Naald, B.; Cameron, T.A. Willingness to pay for other species’ well-being. Ecol. Econ. 2011, 70, 1325–1335.
- Viegas, S.; Faisca, V.M.; Dias, H.; Clerigo, A.; Carolino, E.; Viegas, C. Occupational exposure to poultry dust and effects on the respiratory system in workers. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health. Part A 2013, 76, 230–239.
- Winkel, A.; Riel, J.W.v.; Emous, R.A.v.; Aarnink, A.J.A.; Koerkamp, P.W.G.G.; Ogink, N.W.M. Abatement of particulate matter emission from experimental aviary housings for laying hens by spraying rapeseed oil. Poult. Sci. 2016, 95, 2836–2848.
- Zhao, Y.; Zhao, D.; Ma, H.; Liu, K.; Atilgan, A.; Xin, H. Environmental assessment of three egg production systems—Part III: Airborne bacteria concentrations and emissions. Poult. Sci. 2016, 95, 1473–1481.
References
- Hughes, B.O.; Mench, J.A.; Appleby, M.C. Poultry Behaviour and Welfare; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Sawai, H.; Kim, H.L.; Kuno, K.; Suzuki, S.; Gotoh, H.; Takada, M.; Takahata, N.; Satta, Y.; Akishinonomiya, F. The Origin and Genetic Variation of Domestic Chickens with Special Reference to Junglefowls Gallus g. gallus and G. varius. PLoS ONE 2010, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Gunnarsson, S. Technologies for Increasing the Productivity of Poultry: Welfare Implications. In Are We Pushing Animals to Their Biological Limits? Welfare and Ethical Implications; Grandin, T., Whiting, M., Eds.; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 2018; pp. 63–75. [Google Scholar]
- FAO. FAOSTAT Database. Available online: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home (accessed on 22 February 2019).
- Anonymous. Invasive Species Compendium. Available online: http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/66441 (accessed on 22 February 2019).
- Bennett, C.E.; Thomas, R.; Williams, M.; Zalasiewicz, J.; Edgeworth, M.; Miller, H.; Coles, B.; Foster, A.; Burton, E.J.; Marume, U. The broiler chicken as a signal of a human reconfigured biosphere. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2018, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- UN. Probabilistic Population Projections based on the World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision. Available online: https://www.un.org/development/desa/publications/world-population-prospects-the-2017-revision.html (accessed on 22 February 2019).
- UN. Sustainable Development Goals. Available online: https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/sustainable/sustainable-development-goals.html (accessed on 22 February 2019).
- Vaarst, M.; Steenfeldt, S.; Horsted, K. Sustainable development perspectives of poultry production. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 2015, 71, 609–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tilman, D.; Cassman, K.G.; Matson, P.A.; Naylor, R.; Polasky, S. Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 2002, 418, 671–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stern, S.; Sonesson, U.; Gunnarsson, S.; Öborn, I.; Kumm, K.I.; Nybrant, T. Sustainable development of food production: A case study on scenarios for pig production. Ambio 2005, 34, 402–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Scherer, L.; Tomasik, B.; Rueda, O.; Pfister, S. Framework for integrating animal welfare into life cycle sustainability assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2018, 23, 1476–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chávez-Fuentes, J.J.; Capobianco, A.; Barbušová, J.; Hutňan, M. Manure from our agricultural animals: A quantitative and qualitative analysis focused on biogas production. Waste Biomass Valorization 2017, 8, 1749–1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xin, H.; Gates, R.S.; Green, A.R.; Mitloehner, F.M.; Moore, P.A.; Wathes, C.M. Environmental impacts and sustainability of egg production systems. Poult. Sci. 2011, 90, 263–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarikaya, E.; Demirer, G.N. Biogas production from broiler manure, wastewater treatment plant sludge, and greenhouse waste by anaerobic co-digestion. J. Renew. Sustain. Ener. 2013, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gomiero, T.; Paoletti, M.G.; Pimentel, D. Energy and Environmental Issues in Organic and Conventional Agriculture. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2008, 27, 239–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mottet, A.; Tempio, G. Global poultry production: Current state and future outlook and challenges. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 2017, 73, 245–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ferreira, A.J.P.; Revolledo, L. Current perspectives in avian salmonellosis: Vaccines and immune mechanisms of protection. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2012, 21, 418–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maslić-Strižak, D.; Spalević, L.; Rašeta, M.; Branković, L.I. Breeding broiler chickens in the industrial poultry production. Tehnol. Mesa 2012, 53, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, J.; Yue, H.; Wu, S.; Zhang, H.; Qi, G. Nutritional modulation of health, egg quality and environmental pollution of the layers. Anim. Nutr. 2017, 3, 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tudorache, M.; Custura, I.; Van, I.; Miclosanu, E.P.; Vidu, L. Influence of applying broiler welfare laws on unit cost. Sci. Pap. Series D Anim. Sci. 2014, 57, 212–215. [Google Scholar]
- Vallance, S.; Perkins, H.C.; Dixon, J.E. What is social sustainability? A clarification of concepts. Geoforum 2011, 42, 342–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silbergeld, E.K.; Graham, J.; Price, L.B. Industrial Food Animal Production, Antimicrobial Resistance, and Human Health. Annu. Rev. Public Health 2008, 29, 151–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amador, P.; Duarte, I.M.; da Costa, R.P.R.; Fernandes, R.; Prudencio, C. Characterization of Antibiotic Resistance in Enterobacteriaceae From Agricultural Manure and Soil in Portugal. Soil Sci. 2017, 182, 292–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Just, N.; Kirychuk, S.; Gilbert, Y.; Letourneau, V.; Veillette, M.; Baljit, S.; Duchaine, C.; Singh, B. Bacterial diversity characterization of bioaerosols from cage-housed and floor-housed poultry operations. Environ. Res. 2011, 111, 492–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Viegas, S.; Faísca, V.M.; Dias, H.; Clérigo, A.; Carolino, E.; Viegas, C. Occupational Exposure to Poultry Dust and Effects on the Respiratory System in Workers. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part A 2013, 76, 230–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fournel, S.; Pelletier, F.; Godbout, S.; Lagacé, R.; Feddes, J.J.R. Odour emissions, hedonic tones and ammonia emissions from three cage layer housing systems. Biosyst. Eng. 2012, 112, 181–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sokolowicz, X.; Herbut, E.; Krawczyk, J. Poultry production and strategy for sustainable development of rural areas. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2009, 9, 107–117. [Google Scholar]
- Hodges, J. Conservation of Genes and Culture: Historical and Contemporary Issues 1. Poult. Sci. 2006, 85, 200–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Notarnicola, B.; Sala, S.; Anton, A.; McLaren, S.J.; Saouter, E.; Sonesson, U. The role of life cycle assessment in supporting sustainable agri-food systems: A review of the challenges. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 140, 399–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayres, R.U.; van den Bergh, J.C.J.M.; Gowdy, J.M. Strong versus weak sustainability: Economics, natural sciences and consilience. Environ. Ethics 2001, 23, 155–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. Externality or sustainability economics? Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69, 2047–2052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Montiel, I.; Delgado-Ceballos, J. Defining and Measuring Corporate Sustainability: Are We There Yet? Organ. Environ. 2014, 27, 113–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alliances, G.S. Global Reporting Initiative. Available online: https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ (accessed on 8 April 2020).
- Snilstveit, B.; Vojtkova, M.; Bhavsar, A.; Stevenson, J.; Gaarder, M. Evidence & Gap Maps: A tool for promoting evidence informed policy and strategic research agendas. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2016, 79, 120–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petersen, K.; Vakkalanka, S.; Kuzniarz, L. Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update. Inf. Softw. Technol. 2015, 64, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- James, K.L.; Randall, N.P.; Haddaway, N.R. A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environ. Evid. 2016, 5, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Brundtland, G.H. Our Common Future—Call for Action. Environ. Conserv. 1987, 14, 291–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mie, A.; Andersen, H.R.; Gunnarsson, S.; Kahl, J.; Kesse-Guyot, E.; Rembialkowska, E.; Quaglio, G.; Grandjean, P. Human health implications of organic food and organic agriculture: A comprehensive review. Environ. Health 2017, 16, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- O’Connor, A.M.; Sargeant, J.M. An introduction to systematic reviews in animal health, animal welfare, and food safety. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 2014, 15, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gough, D.; Oliver, S.; Thomas, J. An Introduction to Systematic Reviews, 2nd ed.; SAGE Publications Ltd.: London, UK, 2017; p. 352. [Google Scholar]
Sustainability Dimensions | Search Terms 1 |
---|---|
Environment | (“environmental impact assessment” OR (environment* W/2 assessment) OR (environment* W/2 impact) OR (environment* W/2 protection) OR (climate W/1 change*) OR biodiversity OR ecosystem* OR pollution OR deforestation OR eutrophication OR (habitat W/2 destruction) OR (land W/2 degradation) OR (ozone W/2 depletion) OR “acid deposition” OR (odour W/2 emission) OR “air quality” OR “biochemical oxygen demand*” OR “chemical oxygen demand*” OR (nitrogen W/2 balance) OR (nitrogen W/2 cycle) OR (carbon W/2 cycle) OR eco-toxicity OR “carbon footprint” OR LCA OR “life cycle assessment”) |
Economic | ((agricultur* W/2 development) OR (agricultur* W/2 production) OR (farm* W/2 comparison*) OR (farm W/2 entrant*) OR (farm W/2 result*) OR (farm W/2 development) OR production OR diversification OR intensification OR “technical efficiency” OR “economic efficiency” OR “eco-efficiency” OR profit OR econom* OR return OR ”economic viability” OR ”economic performance”) |
Social | ((attitude* W/2 work) OR labour OR labor OR (quality W/2 life) OR “living condition*” OR “rural welfare” OR (work* W/2 condition*) OR “rural development” OR “social welfare” OR “social security” OR “social service*” OR “social equity” OR (health W/2 service*) OR “social status” OR (women W/2 status) OR “equal right*” OR equality OR (rural W/2 employment) OR livability OR “health equity” OR “labour rights” OR “labor rights” OR “social justice” OR “social capital” OR (community W/2 development) OR (community W/2 resilience)) |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Gunnarsson, S.; Arvidsson Segerkvist, K.; Göransson, L.; Hansson, H.; Sonesson, U. Systematic Mapping of Research on Farm-Level Sustainability in Egg and Chicken Meat Production. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3033. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12073033
Gunnarsson S, Arvidsson Segerkvist K, Göransson L, Hansson H, Sonesson U. Systematic Mapping of Research on Farm-Level Sustainability in Egg and Chicken Meat Production. Sustainability. 2020; 12(7):3033. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12073033
Chicago/Turabian StyleGunnarsson, Stefan, Katarina Arvidsson Segerkvist, Lina Göransson, Helena Hansson, and Ulf Sonesson. 2020. "Systematic Mapping of Research on Farm-Level Sustainability in Egg and Chicken Meat Production" Sustainability 12, no. 7: 3033. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12073033