Systematic Mapping of Research on Farm-Level Sustainability in Egg and Chicken Meat Production
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Definition of Fundamental Concepts
2.1.1. Environmental Sustainability
2.1.2. Economic Sustainability
2.1.3. Social Sustainability
2.2. Systematic Mapping Approach
2.3. Search of Literature
- Scopus;
- Web of Science Core Collection;
- CABI: Cab Abstracts.
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
- Arrebola, J.P.; Castano, A.; Esteban, M.; Bartolome, M.; Perez-Gomez, B.; Ramos, J.J. Differential contribution of animal and vegetable food items on persistent organic pollutant serum concentrations in Spanish adults. Data from BIOAMBIENT.ES project. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 634, 235–242.
- Boggia, A.; Paolotti, L.; Antegiovanni, P.; Fagioli, F.F.; Rocchi, L. Managing ammonia emissions using no-litter flooring system for broilers: Environmental and economic analysis. Environ. Sci. Policy 2019, 101, 331–340.
- Bródka, K.; Kozajda, A.; Buczynska, A.; Szadkowska-Stanczyk, I. The variability of bacterial aerosol in poultry houses depending on selected factors. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health 2012, 3, 281–293.
- Camara, E.E.G.d.; Duarte, E.A.; Ferreira, L. Overall assessment of environmental impacts of animal production in Portugal. Anais Inst. Super. Agron. 2000, 48, 9–40.
- Castellini, C.; Boggia, A.; Cortina, C.; Bosco, A.d.; Paolotti, L.; Novelli, E.; Mugnai, C. A multicriteria approach for measuring the sustainability of different poultry production systems. J. Clean. Prod. 2012, 37, 192–201.
- Dios, M.; Souto, J.A.; Casares, J.J. Emissions inventory analysis for an urban (industrial)-rural (agricultural) environment. WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ. 2010, 129, 383–392.
- Janczak, D.; Mazurkiewicz, J.; Czekała, W.; Myszura, M.; Kozłowski, K.; Jeżowska, A. A Possibility of Functioning Biogas Plant at a Poultry Farm. J. Ecol. Eng. 2019, 20, 225–231.
- Kiley-Worthington, M. Ecological agriculture. Integrating low input, high productive farming with wildlife conservation. Results from the Experimental Farm La Combe, Drome France. Open J. Ecol. 2014, 4, 744–763.
- Lima, I.M.; McAloon, A.; Boateng, A.A. Activated carbon from broiler litter: Process description and cost of production. Biomass Bioenergy 2008, 32, 568–572.
- Meng, S. Is the agricultural industry spared from the influence of the Australian carbon tax? Agric. Econ. 2015, 46, 125–137.
- Ochs, D.S.; Wolf, C.A.; Widmar, N.J.O.; Bir, C. Consumer perceptions of egg-laying hen housing systems. Poult. Sci. 2018, 97, 3390–3396.
- Osei-Owusu, A.K.; Kastner, T.; de Ruiter, H.; Marianne Thomsen, M.; Caro, D. The global cropland footprint of Denmark’s food supply 2000–2013. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2019, 58, 101978.
- Pelletier, N. Social sustainability assessment of Canadian egg production facilities: Methods, analysis, and recommendations. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1601.
- Piskorska-Pliszczynska, J.; Strucinski, P.; Mikolajczyk, S.; Maszewski, S.; Rachubik, J.; Pajurek, M. Pentachlorophenol from an old henhouse as a dioxin source in eggs and related human exposure. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 208, 404–412.
- Prosekov, A.; Petrov, A.; Lisitsyn, A.; Ulrich, E.; Dyshlyuk, L.; Dolganuk, V.A. Selection of conditions for the biodegradation of poultry wastes industry. Res. J. Pharm. Biol. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 2659–2664.
- Rojano, F.; Bournet, P.E.; Hassouna, M.; Robin, P.; Kacira, M.; Choi, C.Y. Modelling heat and mass transfer of a broiler house using computational fluid dynamics. Biosyst. Eng. 2015, 136, 25–38.
- Röös, E.; Patel, M.; Spångberg, J.; Carlsson, G.; Rydhmer, L. Limiting livestock production to pasture and by-products in a search for sustainable diets. Food Policy 2016, 58, 1–13.
- Röös, E.; Patel, M.; Spångberg, J. Producing oat drink or cow’s milk on a Swedish farm—Environmental impacts considering the service of grazing, the opportunity cost of land and the demand for beef and protein. Agric. Syst. 2016, 142, 23–32.
- Röös, E.; Sundberg, C.; Tidaker, P.; Strid, I.; Hansson, P.A. Can carbon footprint serve as an indicator of the environmental impact of meat production? Ecol. Indic. 2013, 24, 573–581.
- Szwedziak, K.; Grzywacz, Z.; Wrotkowski, K. The Application of Microbial Additive in Poultry Production as a Way to Reduce Emission of Harmful Gases into the Environment. Rocz. Ochr. Srodowiska 2018, 20, 417–429.
- Tudorache, M.; Custura, I.; Van, I.; Miclosanu, E.P.; Vidu, L. Influence of applying broiler welfare laws on unit cost. Sci. Pap. Series D Anim. Sci. 2014, 57, 212–215.
- van Overmeire, I.; Pussemier, L.; Waegeneers, N.; Hanot, V.; Windal, I.; Boxus, L.; Covaci, A.; Eppe, G.; Scippo, M.L.; Sioen, I.; et al. Assessment of the chemical contamination in home-produced eggs in Belgium: General overview of the CONTEGG study. Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 407, 4403–4410.
- Vander Naald, B.; Cameron, T.A. Willingness to pay for other species’ well-being. Ecol. Econ. 2011, 70, 1325–1335.
- Viegas, S.; Faisca, V.M.; Dias, H.; Clerigo, A.; Carolino, E.; Viegas, C. Occupational exposure to poultry dust and effects on the respiratory system in workers. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health. Part A 2013, 76, 230–239.
- Winkel, A.; Riel, J.W.v.; Emous, R.A.v.; Aarnink, A.J.A.; Koerkamp, P.W.G.G.; Ogink, N.W.M. Abatement of particulate matter emission from experimental aviary housings for laying hens by spraying rapeseed oil. Poult. Sci. 2016, 95, 2836–2848.
- Zhao, Y.; Zhao, D.; Ma, H.; Liu, K.; Atilgan, A.; Xin, H. Environmental assessment of three egg production systems—Part III: Airborne bacteria concentrations and emissions. Poult. Sci. 2016, 95, 1473–1481.
References
- Hughes, B.O.; Mench, J.A.; Appleby, M.C. Poultry Behaviour and Welfare; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Sawai, H.; Kim, H.L.; Kuno, K.; Suzuki, S.; Gotoh, H.; Takada, M.; Takahata, N.; Satta, Y.; Akishinonomiya, F. The Origin and Genetic Variation of Domestic Chickens with Special Reference to Junglefowls Gallus g. gallus and G. varius. PLoS ONE 2010, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gunnarsson, S. Technologies for Increasing the Productivity of Poultry: Welfare Implications. In Are We Pushing Animals to Their Biological Limits? Welfare and Ethical Implications; Grandin, T., Whiting, M., Eds.; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 2018; pp. 63–75. [Google Scholar]
- FAO. FAOSTAT Database. Available online: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home (accessed on 22 February 2019).
- Anonymous. Invasive Species Compendium. Available online: http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/66441 (accessed on 22 February 2019).
- Bennett, C.E.; Thomas, R.; Williams, M.; Zalasiewicz, J.; Edgeworth, M.; Miller, H.; Coles, B.; Foster, A.; Burton, E.J.; Marume, U. The broiler chicken as a signal of a human reconfigured biosphere. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2018, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- UN. Probabilistic Population Projections based on the World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision. Available online: https://www.un.org/development/desa/publications/world-population-prospects-the-2017-revision.html (accessed on 22 February 2019).
- UN. Sustainable Development Goals. Available online: https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/sustainable/sustainable-development-goals.html (accessed on 22 February 2019).
- Vaarst, M.; Steenfeldt, S.; Horsted, K. Sustainable development perspectives of poultry production. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 2015, 71, 609–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tilman, D.; Cassman, K.G.; Matson, P.A.; Naylor, R.; Polasky, S. Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 2002, 418, 671–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stern, S.; Sonesson, U.; Gunnarsson, S.; Öborn, I.; Kumm, K.I.; Nybrant, T. Sustainable development of food production: A case study on scenarios for pig production. Ambio 2005, 34, 402–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Scherer, L.; Tomasik, B.; Rueda, O.; Pfister, S. Framework for integrating animal welfare into life cycle sustainability assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2018, 23, 1476–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chávez-Fuentes, J.J.; Capobianco, A.; Barbušová, J.; Hutňan, M. Manure from our agricultural animals: A quantitative and qualitative analysis focused on biogas production. Waste Biomass Valorization 2017, 8, 1749–1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xin, H.; Gates, R.S.; Green, A.R.; Mitloehner, F.M.; Moore, P.A.; Wathes, C.M. Environmental impacts and sustainability of egg production systems. Poult. Sci. 2011, 90, 263–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarikaya, E.; Demirer, G.N. Biogas production from broiler manure, wastewater treatment plant sludge, and greenhouse waste by anaerobic co-digestion. J. Renew. Sustain. Ener. 2013, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gomiero, T.; Paoletti, M.G.; Pimentel, D. Energy and Environmental Issues in Organic and Conventional Agriculture. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2008, 27, 239–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mottet, A.; Tempio, G. Global poultry production: Current state and future outlook and challenges. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 2017, 73, 245–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferreira, A.J.P.; Revolledo, L. Current perspectives in avian salmonellosis: Vaccines and immune mechanisms of protection. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2012, 21, 418–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maslić-Strižak, D.; Spalević, L.; Rašeta, M.; Branković, L.I. Breeding broiler chickens in the industrial poultry production. Tehnol. Mesa 2012, 53, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Yue, H.; Wu, S.; Zhang, H.; Qi, G. Nutritional modulation of health, egg quality and environmental pollution of the layers. Anim. Nutr. 2017, 3, 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tudorache, M.; Custura, I.; Van, I.; Miclosanu, E.P.; Vidu, L. Influence of applying broiler welfare laws on unit cost. Sci. Pap. Series D Anim. Sci. 2014, 57, 212–215. [Google Scholar]
- Vallance, S.; Perkins, H.C.; Dixon, J.E. What is social sustainability? A clarification of concepts. Geoforum 2011, 42, 342–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silbergeld, E.K.; Graham, J.; Price, L.B. Industrial Food Animal Production, Antimicrobial Resistance, and Human Health. Annu. Rev. Public Health 2008, 29, 151–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amador, P.; Duarte, I.M.; da Costa, R.P.R.; Fernandes, R.; Prudencio, C. Characterization of Antibiotic Resistance in Enterobacteriaceae From Agricultural Manure and Soil in Portugal. Soil Sci. 2017, 182, 292–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Just, N.; Kirychuk, S.; Gilbert, Y.; Letourneau, V.; Veillette, M.; Baljit, S.; Duchaine, C.; Singh, B. Bacterial diversity characterization of bioaerosols from cage-housed and floor-housed poultry operations. Environ. Res. 2011, 111, 492–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Viegas, S.; Faísca, V.M.; Dias, H.; Clérigo, A.; Carolino, E.; Viegas, C. Occupational Exposure to Poultry Dust and Effects on the Respiratory System in Workers. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part A 2013, 76, 230–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fournel, S.; Pelletier, F.; Godbout, S.; Lagacé, R.; Feddes, J.J.R. Odour emissions, hedonic tones and ammonia emissions from three cage layer housing systems. Biosyst. Eng. 2012, 112, 181–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sokolowicz, X.; Herbut, E.; Krawczyk, J. Poultry production and strategy for sustainable development of rural areas. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2009, 9, 107–117. [Google Scholar]
- Hodges, J. Conservation of Genes and Culture: Historical and Contemporary Issues 1. Poult. Sci. 2006, 85, 200–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Notarnicola, B.; Sala, S.; Anton, A.; McLaren, S.J.; Saouter, E.; Sonesson, U. The role of life cycle assessment in supporting sustainable agri-food systems: A review of the challenges. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 140, 399–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayres, R.U.; van den Bergh, J.C.J.M.; Gowdy, J.M. Strong versus weak sustainability: Economics, natural sciences and consilience. Environ. Ethics 2001, 23, 155–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. Externality or sustainability economics? Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69, 2047–2052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Montiel, I.; Delgado-Ceballos, J. Defining and Measuring Corporate Sustainability: Are We There Yet? Organ. Environ. 2014, 27, 113–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alliances, G.S. Global Reporting Initiative. Available online: https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ (accessed on 8 April 2020).
- Snilstveit, B.; Vojtkova, M.; Bhavsar, A.; Stevenson, J.; Gaarder, M. Evidence & Gap Maps: A tool for promoting evidence informed policy and strategic research agendas. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2016, 79, 120–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petersen, K.; Vakkalanka, S.; Kuzniarz, L. Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update. Inf. Softw. Technol. 2015, 64, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- James, K.L.; Randall, N.P.; Haddaway, N.R. A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environ. Evid. 2016, 5, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brundtland, G.H. Our Common Future—Call for Action. Environ. Conserv. 1987, 14, 291–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mie, A.; Andersen, H.R.; Gunnarsson, S.; Kahl, J.; Kesse-Guyot, E.; Rembialkowska, E.; Quaglio, G.; Grandjean, P. Human health implications of organic food and organic agriculture: A comprehensive review. Environ. Health 2017, 16, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- O’Connor, A.M.; Sargeant, J.M. An introduction to systematic reviews in animal health, animal welfare, and food safety. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 2014, 15, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gough, D.; Oliver, S.; Thomas, J. An Introduction to Systematic Reviews, 2nd ed.; SAGE Publications Ltd.: London, UK, 2017; p. 352. [Google Scholar]
Sustainability Dimensions | Search Terms 1 |
---|---|
Environment | (“environmental impact assessment” OR (environment* W/2 assessment) OR (environment* W/2 impact) OR (environment* W/2 protection) OR (climate W/1 change*) OR biodiversity OR ecosystem* OR pollution OR deforestation OR eutrophication OR (habitat W/2 destruction) OR (land W/2 degradation) OR (ozone W/2 depletion) OR “acid deposition” OR (odour W/2 emission) OR “air quality” OR “biochemical oxygen demand*” OR “chemical oxygen demand*” OR (nitrogen W/2 balance) OR (nitrogen W/2 cycle) OR (carbon W/2 cycle) OR eco-toxicity OR “carbon footprint” OR LCA OR “life cycle assessment”) |
Economic | ((agricultur* W/2 development) OR (agricultur* W/2 production) OR (farm* W/2 comparison*) OR (farm W/2 entrant*) OR (farm W/2 result*) OR (farm W/2 development) OR production OR diversification OR intensification OR “technical efficiency” OR “economic efficiency” OR “eco-efficiency” OR profit OR econom* OR return OR ”economic viability” OR ”economic performance”) |
Social | ((attitude* W/2 work) OR labour OR labor OR (quality W/2 life) OR “living condition*” OR “rural welfare” OR (work* W/2 condition*) OR “rural development” OR “social welfare” OR “social security” OR “social service*” OR “social equity” OR (health W/2 service*) OR “social status” OR (women W/2 status) OR “equal right*” OR equality OR (rural W/2 employment) OR livability OR “health equity” OR “labour rights” OR “labor rights” OR “social justice” OR “social capital” OR (community W/2 development) OR (community W/2 resilience)) |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Gunnarsson, S.; Arvidsson Segerkvist, K.; Göransson, L.; Hansson, H.; Sonesson, U. Systematic Mapping of Research on Farm-Level Sustainability in Egg and Chicken Meat Production. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3033. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12073033
Gunnarsson S, Arvidsson Segerkvist K, Göransson L, Hansson H, Sonesson U. Systematic Mapping of Research on Farm-Level Sustainability in Egg and Chicken Meat Production. Sustainability. 2020; 12(7):3033. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12073033
Chicago/Turabian StyleGunnarsson, Stefan, Katarina Arvidsson Segerkvist, Lina Göransson, Helena Hansson, and Ulf Sonesson. 2020. "Systematic Mapping of Research on Farm-Level Sustainability in Egg and Chicken Meat Production" Sustainability 12, no. 7: 3033. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12073033
APA StyleGunnarsson, S., Arvidsson Segerkvist, K., Göransson, L., Hansson, H., & Sonesson, U. (2020). Systematic Mapping of Research on Farm-Level Sustainability in Egg and Chicken Meat Production. Sustainability, 12(7), 3033. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12073033